Brief Case

Search the Pension Law Library

Limit to:Advanced options
Searches the code/regs in effect on that date.
Words mode supports "quoted phrases", +required and -excluded terms.
Document types:
Go to 1 U.S.C. § 1 (not yet in the library — opens the official source)
59 documents · 0.20sAllIRCERISAPBGCJoint Board
  1. 160 T.C. No. 3 — 3M Company and Subsidiaries v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsFeb 9, 2023related by meaning
    olving a challenge to the same regulation that had been challenged in Wendland. The Tax Court in Wing v. Commissioner , 81 T.C. at 29- 30, applied the holding in Wendland, but additionally suggested that if there were a conflict between the successor to sec . 3791(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 19 39 (i.e., sec . 7…
  2. 88 FR 44596 — Short-Term, Limited-Duration Insurance; Independent, Noncoordinated Excepted Benefits Coverage; Level-Funded Plan Arrangements; and Tax Treatment of Certain Ac…
    IRCProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Jul 12, 2023
    …C.-Brookings Schaeffer Initiative for Health Policy, available at: https://www.brookings.edu/​blog/​usc-brookings-schaeffer-on-health-policy/​2020/​08/​04/​fixed-indemnity-health-coverage-is-a-problematic-form-of-junk-insurance.
  3. 86 FR 55980 — Requirements Related to Surprise Billing; Part II
    IRCFinal Rules (FR)Oct 7, 2021★ strong match
    …   See Hannick, Kathleen and Loren Adler. “Provider Charges Relative to Medicare Rates, 2012-2018.” USC-Brookings Schaeffer on Health Policy. (May 2021). https://www.brookings.edu/​blog/​usc-brookings-schaeffer-on-health-policy/​2021/​05/​03/​provider-charges-relative-to-medicare-rates-2012-2018/​. Back to Citation 210…
  4. Notice 2024-35 — This notice provides relief with respect to certain required minimum distributions (RMDs) that are not made in 2024. This relief was provided with respect to c…
    IRCNoticesMay 6, 2024
    … and Kathleen Hannick (2020). “Fixed Indemnity Coverage is a Problematic Form of “Junk” Insurance,” USC-Brookings Schaeffer Initiative for Health Policy, available at: https://www.brookings.edu/blog/usc-brookings-schaeffer-on-health-policy/2020/08/04/fixed-indemnity-health-coverage-is-a-problematic-form-of-junk-insuran…
  5. 91 FR 4348 — Improving Transparency Into Pharmacy Benefit Manager Fee Disclosure
    ERISAProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Jan 30, 2026
    …& Dana P. Goldman, Overpaying for Prescription Drugs: The Copay Clawback, (2018), https://schaeffer.usc.edu/​research/​overpaying-for-prescription-drugs/​.) Back to Citation 183.  Megan Thompson (2018), W hy a Patient Paid a $285 Copay for a $40 Drug, https://www.pbs.org/​newshour/​health/​why-a-patient-paid-a-285-copa…
  6. 89 FR 23338 — Short-Term, Limited-Duration Insurance and Independent, Noncoordinated Excepted Benefits Coverage
    IRCFinal Rules (FR)Apr 3, 2024
    …hleen Hannick (2020). “Fixed Indemnity Health Coverage Is a Problematic Form of `Junk Insurance,' ” USC-Brookings Schaeffer Initiative for Health Policy, available at: https://www.brookings.edu/​blog/​usc-brookings-schaeffer-on-health-policy/​2020/​08/​04/​fixed-indemnity-health-coverage-is-a-problematic-form-of-junk-i…
  7. Notice 2026-48 — Notice of Intent to Issue Regulations with Respect to Saver’s Match Contributions
    IRCNoticesAug 24, 2026
    …rtain information addressed in this notice will be subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), 44 USC 3507. No collection of information will be required until approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the PRA.
  8. 162 T.C. No. 7 — Mohamed K. Abdo & Fardowsa J. Farah v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsApr 2, 2024related by meaning
    ases except those appealable to the Third Circuit. Sanders, 161 T.C., slip op. at 7 – 8. 1 Today, the opinion of the Court holds that section 7508A(d) provides for an unambiguously self-executing postponement period for certain acts set forth in section 7508(a), including the filing of a petition for redetermination wi…
  9. 86 FR 51730 — Requirements Related to Air Ambulance Services, Agent and Broker Disclosures, and Provider Enforcement
    IRCProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Sep 16, 2021
    … HHS and Transportation ability to conduct these analyses. E. Regulatory Flexibility Act The RFA (5 USC 601, et seq.), requires agencies to prepare an initial regulatory flexibility analysis to describe the impact of these proposed rules on small entities, unless the head of the agency can certify that the rule will no…
  10. Notice 2024-2 — Miscellaneous Changes Under the SECURE 2.0 Act of 2022
    IRCNoticesModified Jan 8, 2024
    …dual retirement annuity described in section 408(b). 6 The definition of “State” for purposes of 42 USC 1395x(r)(1) is in 42 USC 410(h), which provides that the term “State” includes the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, and American Samoa.
  11. 85 T.C. 1031; 85 T.C. No. 60 — Anesthesia Service Medical Group, Inc. v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsDec 24, 1985related by meaning
    394 U.S. 741, 749-751, 89 S.Ct. 1439, 1444-1445, 22 L.Ed.2d 695 (1969). * * * [Commissioner v. Portland Cement Co. of Utah, 450 U.S. 156, 169 (1981).] As petitioners correctly note, the regulation in issue was promulgated under the Treasury’s general rule-making power in section 7805(a) and. thus is entitled to less de…
  12. T.C. Memo. 2003-156 — Michael W. Duncan v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsMay 28, 2003related by meaning
    r the Northern District of Illinois, in which petitioner pleaded guilty to one count of obstructing and impeding the due administration of the Code in violation of section 7212(a). 3 - 6 - 3 (...continued) corruptly or by force or threats of force (including any threatening letter or communication) endeavors to intimid…
  13. 87 FR 80097 — Guidance on the Foreign Government Income Exemption and the Definition of Domestically Controlled Qualified Investment Entities
    IRCProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Dec 29, 2022related by meaning
    Under paragraph (c)(3)(v)(L) of this section, USR2 and USR1 are QIEs. USR1 is not treated as a non-look-through person under paragraph (c)(3)(iii)(C) of this section because USR1 is not a public QIE as defined in paragraph (c)(3)(v)(H) of this section. Each of USR1 and PRS is a look-through person as defined in paragra…
  14. 81 FR 27011 — Additional Limitation on Suspension of Benefits Applicable to Certain Pension Plans Under the Multiemployer Pension Reform Act of 2014
    IRCFinal Rules (FR)May 5, 2016related by meaning
    in compliance with' the Copyright Act.”). There are no “roughly” similar phrases across subclauses (I) and (II). Kirtsaeng is therefore inapposite.[4] The Treasury Department and the IRS recognize that the language of section 432(e)(9)(D)(vii) bears some similarity to other statutory provisions that establish priority …
  15. 162 T.C. No. 4 — Clair R. Couturier, Jr. v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsFeb 28, 2024related by meaning
    argument that the statute of limitations should be treated as a substantive limit on their case rather than as a procedural limit on the reme dy) . 40 The Supreme Court observed in Landgraf that “the great majority of [its] decisions relying upon the antiretroactivity presumption have involved intervening statutes burd…
  16. Notice 2008-113 — This notice provides taxpayers the ability to correct certain operational failures to comply with section 409A of the Code, or to limit the amount of additiona…
    IRCNoticesModified Dec 22, 2008
    …ecurities and Exchange Commission under § 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, 15 USC 78p, without regard to whether the service recipient has any class of equity securities registered under § 12 of such Act, 15 USC 78l. See 17 CFR § 240.16a-1(a) (beneficial owner) and (f) (officer). In the case of a …
  17. 81 FR 7253 — Additional Limitation on Suspension of Benefits Applicable to Certain Pension Plans Under the Multiemployer Pension Reform Act of 2014
    IRCProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Feb 11, 2016related by meaning
    ed Treasury regulations issued under section 432 of the Code apply as well for purposes of section 305 of ERISA. Back to Citation 2.   See Loughrin v. United States, 134 S. Ct. 2384, 2390 (2014) (“We have often noted that when `Congress includes particular language in one section of a statute but omits it in another'—l…
  18. Notice 2007-100 — This notice provides transition relief and guidance on the correction of certain failures of a nonqualified deferred compensation plan to comply with section 4…
    IRCNoticesObsolete Dec 26, 2007
    …ecurities and Exchange Commission under § 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, 15 USC 78p, without regard to whether the service recipient has any class of equity securities registered under § 12 of such Act, 15 USC 78l. See 17 CFR § 240.16a-1(a) (beneficial owner) and (f) (officer). In the case of a …
  19. Ann. 2005-33 — This document contains corrections to final regulations (T.D. 9166, 2005-8 I.R.B. 558) under section 9801 of the Code governing portability requirements for gr…
    IRCAnnouncementsMay 9, 2005
    …ALTH PLANS Par. 1. The authority citation for part 2590 continues to read as follows: Authority: 29 USC 1027, 1059, 1135, 1161-1168, 1169, 1181-1183, 1181 note, 1185, 1185a, 1185b, 1191, 1191a, 1191b, and 1191c, sec. 101(g), Public Law 104-191, 101 Stat. 1936; sec. 401(b), Public Law 105-200, 112 Stat. 645 (42 USC 651 …
  20. 29 C.F.R. § 4000.21 — What are these rules for determining the filing or issuance date about?
    PBGCRegulationsJan 1, 2017
    …r than in the PBGC's own regulations (e.g., requirements under the Internal Revenue Code (Title 26, USC)). In meeting those requirements, you should follow any applicable rules under those requirements for determining the filing and issuance date. (Subpart A tells you what filing methods you may use for filings with us…