Brief Case

Search the Pension Law Library

Limit to:Advanced options
Searches the code/regs in effect on that date.
Words mode supports "quoted phrases", +required and -excluded terms.
Document types:
Go to 12 T.C. 521 (not yet in the library — opens the official source)
66 documents · 0.18sAllIRCERISAPBGCJoint Board
  1. 76 FR 76235 — Ex Parte Cease and Desist and Summary Seizure Orders-Multiple Employer Welfare Arrangements
    ERISAProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Dec 6, 2011
    … party against whom the Secretary is seeking to impose a cease and desist order under ERISA section 521; (m) Secretary means the Secretary of Labor or his or her delegate; ( printed page 76247) (n) Section 521 proceeding means an adjudicatory proceeding relating to the issuance of a temporary order under 29 CFR 2560.52…
  2. 78 FR 13797 — Ex Parte Cease and Desist and Summary Seizure Orders-Multiple Employer Welfare Arrangements
    ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Mar 1, 2013
    … party against whom the Secretary is seeking to impose a cease and desist order under ERISA section 521; (m) Secretary means the Secretary of Labor or his or her delegate; (n) Section 521 proceeding means an adjudicatory proceeding relating to the issuance of a temporary order under 29 CFR 2560.521-1 and section 521 of…
  3. 29 C.F.R. § 2560.521-1(a) — Cease and desist and seizure orders under section 521.
    ERISARegulationsJan 1, 2017
    (a) (a) Purpose. Section 521(a) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. 1151(a), authorizes the Secretary of Labor to issue an ex parte cease and desist order if it appears to the Secretary that the alleged conduct of a multiple employer welfare arrangement (MEWA) under section 3(40) o…
  4. 136 T.C. No. 2 — G. Mason Cadwell, Jr. v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJan 3, 2011related by meaning
    s, earnings, and reasonable charges) pursuant tb Rev. Proc. 2005-25, 2005-1 C.B. 962. P may not : rŠduce the PERC value by the surrender charge, as it spould be disregarded for valuation purposes pursuant to Rev. Proc . 2005-25, lsupra. Held, further, P must include in his gross income the excess contributiorls pursuan…
  5. T.C. Memo. 2024-6 — Clair R. Couturier, Jr. v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJan 17, 2024related by meaning
    Title 26 U.S.C. (Code) , in effect at all relevant times, and Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure . Served 01/17/24 2 [* 2 ] deficiencies under section 4973 in th e aggregate amount of $8,476,705 . The notices also determined additions to tax under section 6651(a)(1) and (2) and accurac…
  6. 85 FR 71142 — Additional Policy and Regulatory Revisions in Response to the COVID-19 Public Health Emergency
    IRCFinal Rules (FR)Nov 6, 2020
    …tatus, are comparable to those same episodes in the performance period that are assigned to MS-DRGs 521 and 522, respectively. For the remainder of PY5, we will calculate quality adjusted target prices for episodes initiated by MS-DRGs 521 and 522 using baseline episodes initiated by MS-DRG 469 with fracture and MS-DRG…
  7. T.C. Memo. 1999-80 — Edward Clasby and C. T. Garrahan Insurance Agency, Inc. v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsMar 16, 1999related by meaning
    ions to tax under section 6651(a)(2) and that the addition to tax under section 6651(a)(1) for 1993 is not larger than $7,959. We sustain respondent's determination that petitioners are liable for additions to tax under section 6651(a)(1), except as conceded by respondent. Decision will be entered under Rule 155 .
  8. 97 T.C. 237; 97 T.C. No. 14 — Guilzon v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsAug 6, 1991related by meaning
    f the matter is that the payment in question should be taxable to petitioner under section 72(e). Accordingly, we sustain respondent’s determination.6 In order to take into account what appear to be mechanical errors in respondent’s calculations and to afford the parties a further opportunity to resolve the question of…
  9. T.C. Summary Opinion 2003-83 — Manuel Francisco Palomo & Jane Lyon Potter v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJun 24, 2003related by meaning
    tract unless such amounts are specifically excluded from gross income under other provisions of chapter 1 of the Code. The burden is on petitioners to demonstrate that the payments in question fall into a specific statutory exclusion. See Commissioner v. Glenshaw Glass Co. , 348 U.S. at 429-431. Under section 72(t), a …
  10. 62 T.C. 524; 62 T.C. No. 59 — Estate of Harrison v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJul 25, 1974related by meaning
    ew principal place of work. Prior to Jan. 1, 1970, self-employed persons were not entitled to the benefits of sec. 217. SEC. 6653. FAILURE TO PAY TAX. (a) Negligence ok Intentional Disregard of Roles and Regulations With Respect to Income or Gift Taxes. — If any part of any underpayment (as defined in subsection (c) (1…
  11. 59 T.C. 598; 59 T.C. No. 59 — Thriftimart, Inc. v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJan 31, 1973related by meaning
    for any payment of any specific amount to any employee until the conditions of that employee having medical services or being away from work occurred. In Simplified Tax Records, Inc., 41 T.C. 75, 79 (1963), in disallowing a deduction to the taxpayer for a reserve for the estimated future cost of preparing subscribers’ …
  12. T.C. Memo. 2012-311 — Charles L. Hartley v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsNov 6, 2012related by meaning
    oneous. Rule 142(a); Welch v. Helvering, 290 U.S. 111, 115 (1933). However, the Commissioner bears the burden of proof with respect to any increase in deficiency. See Rule 142(a)(1). Our conclusion, however, is based on a preponderance of the evidence, and thus the allocation of the burden of proof is immaterial. See E…
  13. T.C. Memo. 1996-272 — Tommy L. & Patricia A. Hobson v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJun 12, 1996related by meaning
    tioner's distribution. Section 72(t) provides: (1) Imposition of additional tax.--If any taxpayer receives any amount from a qualified retirement plan * * *, the taxpayer's tax * * * for the taxable year in which such amount is received shall be increased by an amount equal to 10 percent of the portion of such amount w…
  14. T.C. Summary Opinion 2020-5 — Tracey Rene Merrell & Christopher L. Merrell v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJan 16, 2020related by meaning
    bed in section 72(t) in respect of Mr. Merrell's IRA distribution is sustained. As a final matter, petitioners maintain that they will suffer economic hardship if the additional tax prescribed in section 72(t) is imposed in this case. We have considered similar claims in the past and have observed that there is no -8au…
  15. T.C. Memo. 2012-189 — James F. Drakes & Barbara E. Taylor v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJul 11, 2012related by meaning
    ditional tax provided by section 72(t)), penalties, and statutory interest.. See Katz v. Commissioner, 115 T.C. 329, 338-339 (2000). The record . 12 - does not establish that petitioners received a.notice of deficiency for 2007 and consequently a challenge to petitioners' 2007 tax liability is allowed in thi judicial p…
  16. T.C. Summary Opinion 2003-137 — John & Michele McGovern v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsSep 30, 2003related by meaning
    ance with its substance.” Neonatology Associates, P.A. v. Commissioner , 299 F.3d 221, 230 n.12 (3d Cir. 2002), affg. 115 T.C. 43 (2000). However, the Supreme Court “has observed repeatedly that, while a taxpayer is free to organize his affairs as he chooses, nevertheless, once having done so, he must accept the tax co…
  17. 97 T.C. 385; 97 T.C. No. 27 — Zabolotny v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsSep 30, 1991related by meaning
    o the Internal Revenue Code as amended and in effect for the years in issue. All Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure. This is the figure that appeared on the front page of both notices of deficiency. The computations attached to the notices both used the figure $81,023.94 for the additi…
  18. T.C. Memo. 2007-19 — Bidyut K. & Diana T. Bhattacharyya v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJan 30, 2007related by meaning
    s were attributable to disability, or that the distributions otherwise qualify for an exception to the 10-percent additional tax. In fact, petitioners state on brief that "Petitioners do understand that petitioners have to pay 10% penalty tax on the amount stated above * * * This is consistent with IRC section 72(t) (1…
  19. 124 T.C. No. 12 — Charles P. Stepnowski v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsApr 26, 2005related by meaning
    t, as follows: (a) General: Disposition of an action for declaratory judgment which involves the initial qualification of a retirement plan * * * will ordinarily be made on the basis of the administrative record, as defined in Rule 210(b)(12). Only with the permission of the Court, upon good cause shown, will any party…
  20. 35 T.C. 1217 — Searl v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsMar 31, 1961related by meaning
    ntract” as meaning the entire contract, especially since Congress, when it wished to delineate the annuity feature of the contract, did so explicitly. Although admitting that the interpretation proposed by petitioner is not without merit, we hold that section 72(d) applies only when the entire consideration furnished b…