IRCCourt RulingsJan 12, 1998related by meaning
ontrol of the use of the IRA
distributions. We are not persuaded by respondent's argument
that the instant situation falls within the ambit of Aronson because, by virtue of the plea agreement, his consent to the
forfeiture, and his avoidance of a fine or potentially longer
prison sentence, petitioner should be treated …
IRCCourt RulingsAug 12, 1980related by meaning
.
Unless indicated otherwise, all section references are to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 as in effect for the taxable years in issue. SEC. 4973. TAX ON EXCESS CONTRIBUTIONS TO INDIVIDUAL RETIREMENT ACCOUNTS, CERTAIN SECTION 403(b) CONTRACTS, CERTAIN INDIVIDUAL RETIREMENT ANNUITIES, AND CERTAIN RETIREME…
IRCCourt RulingsJun 14, 1982related by meaning
nder the Sixth and Ninth Amendments of the Constitution were not violated by our actions in the instant case.
Decision will be entered under Rule 155. By stipulation, respondent concedes that the $1,562 figure is the product of an erroneous computation in the statutory notice of deficiency and that should respondent pr…
IRCCourt RulingsMar 10, 2020related by meaning
sis test.
FIe] , further, as applied to P, I.R.C. sec. 72(t) is valid because
the age and disability classifications established by the statute bear a reasonable relationship to a legitimate Government purpose.
Sandra M. Conard, pro se.
Scott W. Forbord and Mark J. Miller, for respondent.
OPINION
TORO, Judge: A taxpaye…
IRCCourt RulingsNov 10, 1998related by meaning
tstanding rollover involved in
this case. Accordingly, the amount of excludable basis in the
instant case is computed by multiplying the amount of the distribution $6,100 by a fraction the numerator of which is
$1,950 and the denominator of which is $1,374.53 plus $6,100,
resulting in an amount excludable of $1,591.40.…
IRCCourt RulingsJun 14, 2012related by meaning
ess doctrine, courts may invalidate laws if "'men of common
intelligence must necessarily guess at its meaning.'" Ick (quoting Hynes v. Mayor
- - 45 - of Oradell, 425 U.S. 610, 620 (1976)); see also United States v. Derezinski, 945
F.2d 1006, 1010 (8th Cir. 1991). It is apparent that Notice 2004-8, supra
addresses tran…
IRCCourt RulingsAug 6, 1991related by meaning
f the matter is that the payment in question should be taxable to petitioner under section 72(e). Accordingly, we sustain respondent’s determination.6 In order to take into account what appear to be mechanical errors in respondent’s calculations and to afford the parties a further opportunity to resolve the question of…
ERISARegulationsJan 1, 2017related by meaning
For prohibited transaction penalty proceedings, this section shall apply in lieu of § 18.10 of this title.
IRCCourt RulingsJan 9, 1985related by meaning
section 4975 as follows:
(c) Effective Date and Savings Provisions.—
(1)(A) The amendments made by this section shall take effect on January 1, 1975. (B) If, before the amendments made by this section take effect, an organization described in section 401(a) of the internal Revenue Code of 1954 is denied exemption unde…
IRCCourt RulingsJul 5, 1983related by meaning
so determined that petitioners were liable for an addition to tax under sec. 6651(a) in the amount of $28.76. Respondent conceded that issue on brief. The procedures set forth in sec. 7463 apply to cases involving taxes imposed by subtitle A and Chs. 11 and 12 of the Code, subject to monetary limits. As to petitions fi…
IRCCourt RulingsAug 3, 1979related by meaning
to a reasonable concern of Congress. Thus section 219(b)(2) does not create an unconstitutional presumption.
II. Liability for Section U973 Excise Tax Petitioners argue that, if we uphold the constitutionality of section 219(b)(2), then the 6-percent excise tax imposed by section 4973 cannot be imposed because there ar…
Notice 2024-55 — Certain Exceptions to the 10 Percent Additional Tax Under Code Section 72(t) IRCNoticesJul 8, 2024related by meaning
nal revenue law. Generally, tax returns and tax return information are confidential, as required by section 6103 of the Code.
VI. DRAFTING INFORMATION The principal authors of this notice are Naomi Lehr, Vernon Carter, and Pamela R. Kinard of the Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Employee Benefits, Exempt Organization…
IRCCourt RulingsJan 17, 2024related by meaning
United States Tax Court
T.C. Memo. 2024-6
CLAIR R. COUTURIER, JR. ,
Petitioner
v .
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,
Respondent
—————
Docket N o. 19714-16. Filed January 17, 2024.
—————
Michael Eddison Romero , Alvah Lavar Taylor, Daniel W. Soto , and
Jonathan T. Amitrano , for petitioner.
Hilary E. March , Laura A. Pr…
IRCCourt RulingsFeb 9, 2023related by meaning
s at issue in First Security Bank . Such a
determination would not inform our understanding of the holding or
reasoning of First Security Bank .
GG. T he Tax Reform Act of 1976
In 1976, Congress amended section 482 of the Internal Revenue
Code of 1954 to replace “the Secretary or his delegate” with “the
Secretary”. 26 …
IRCCourt RulingsAug 24, 1995related by meaning
OPINION
Tannenwald, Judge:
Respondent determined a deficiency in petitioner’s 1988 Federal income tax of $11,752 and an addition to tax of $588 under section 6653(a)(1). This case is before us on respondent’s motion for partial summary judgment under Rule 121 that collateral estoppel precludes petitioner’s claim that a…
IRCCourt RulingsDec 8, 1987related by meaning
ge of persons. See H. Rept. 93-1280 (Conf.) (1974), 1974-3 C.B. 415, 468.
Any reference to a Rule is to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure. It is undisputed that the application for exemption supplied the Commissioner with notice of the prohibited transactions. Such application was sent to both the Departmen…
IRCCourt RulingsNov 13, 1998related by meaning
s in which taxpayers have
sought to avoid the 10-percent additional tax under section
72(t). We repeatedly have ruled that we are bound by the list of statutory exceptions to section 72(t) contained in section
72(t)(2)(A). See, e.g., Clark v. Commissioner
, 101 T.C. 215,
224-225 (1993); Vorwald v. Commissioner
, T.C. M…
IRCCourt RulingsSep 11, 1972related by meaning
tation of that section. Petitioners contend that Eev. Eul. 69-544 is at variance with the plain wording of section 1.72-16 (b) (6) of the regulations. In Raymond J. Moore, 45 B.T.A. 1073 (1941), we held that the portion of the premiums paid by a qualified pension trust for the benefit of employees for an annuity contra…
IRCCourt RulingsJun 24, 2003related by meaning
tract unless such amounts are
specifically excluded from gross income under other provisions of
chapter 1 of the Code. The burden is on petitioners to demonstrate that the payments in question fall into a specific
statutory exclusion. See Commissioner v. Glenshaw Glass Co.
, 348
U.S. at 429-431.
Under section 72(t), a …
IRCCourt RulingsApr 25, 1972related by meaning
ecision will ~be entered for the petitioners.
unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as amended. This date is at variance with the date shown on the acceptance, Dec. 31, 1963. However, the parties agree by stipulation that the application was accepted on Dec. 31, 19…