Brief Case

Search the Pension Law Library

Limit to:Advanced options
Searches the code/regs in effect on that date.
Words mode supports "quoted phrases", +required and -excluded terms.
Document types:
Go to I.R.C. § 280G (not yet in the library — opens the official source)
56 documents · 0.28sAllIRCERISAPBGCJoint Board
  1. Notice 2008-94 — This notice provides guidance on certain executive compensation provisions of the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (EESA). Section 302 of EESA adde…
    IRCNoticesNov 3, 2008★ strong match
    …rances occurring during the TARP authorities period. Q-11: Who is subject to the special rules in § 280G(e)? A-11: The special rules in § 280G(e) apply to any covered executive of an applicable employer who has a severance from employment during an applicable taxable year that is treated as an “applicable severance fro…
  2. 160 T.C. No. 3 — 3M Company and Subsidiaries v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsFeb 9, 2023related by meaning
    until the restriction was lifted. Id. The Tax Court held that because section 482 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 does not apply, the regulations under section 482 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 do not apply. Procter & Gamble Co. v. Commissioner , 95 T.C. at 340-341. Excerpted in full below is the Tax Court’…
  3. 93 T.C. 103; 93 T.C. No. 10 — Gord v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJul 26, 1989related by meaning
    June 19, 1986, the Court of Appeals affirmed our decision sub nom. Dillon v. United States, 792 F.2d 849 (9th Cir. 1986). The parties also stipulated: Petitioners accept the determination of tax contained in the deficiency notice as mathematically correct, except they contend that the tax should be computed by applying…
  4. 86 FR 55980 — Requirements Related to Surprise Billing; Part II
    IRCFinal Rules (FR)Oct 7, 2021
    …   See Hannick, Kathleen and Loren Adler. “Provider Charges Relative to Medicare Rates, 2012-2018.” USC-Brookings Schaeffer on Health Policy. (May 2021). https://www.brookings.edu/​blog/​usc-brookings-schaeffer-on-health-policy/​2021/​05/​03/​provider-charges-relative-to-medicare-rates-2012-2018/​. Back to Citation 210…
  5. T.C. Memo. 2020-1 — Clark J. Gebman & Rebecca Gebman v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJan 2, 2020related by meaning
    er. Mrs. Gebman did not provide any evidence that persuades us that she meets the requirements for relief. Accordingly, Mrs. Gebman is not entitled to relief under section 6015(f), and we will deny her motion for leave to file amendment to petition filed August 28, 2019. VI. Section 6662(a) Penalties Section 6662(a) an…
  6. 80 FR 57709 — Reliance Standards for Making Good Faith Determinations
    IRCFinal Rules (FR)Sep 25, 2015related by meaning
    llection of information must be retained as long as their contents might become material in the administration of any internal revenue law. Background This document contains amendments to 26 CFR part 53 under chapter 42, subtitle D of the Internal Revenue Code (Code). To avoid certain excise taxes under chapter 42, a p…
  7. PLR 201521013 — Nonqualified Deferred Compensation
    IRCPrivate Letter RulingsMay 22, 2015
    …17, 2007) ) states that the rule was intended to adopt the same standard as that set forth under §1.280G - 1, Q&A - 6(e). Section 1.280G - 1, Q&A - 6(e) provides that, for purposes of section 280G, stock is treated as readily tradable if it is regularly quoted by brokers or dealers making a market in the stock. Section…
  8. T.C. Memo. 2014-14 — Ries Enterprises, Inc. v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJan 27, 2014related by meaning
    uring which the return remains delinquent, up to a maximum addition of 25% for returns more than four months delinquent. Sec. 6651(a)(1). The addition to tax for delinquent payment is calculated as 0.5% of the amount shown as tax on -15- [*15] the return but not paid, with an additional 0.5% for each month or fraction …
  9. 88 FR 78134 — Income and Currency Gain or Loss With Respect to a Qualified Business Unit
    IRCProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Nov 14, 2023related by meaning
    26 U.S.C. 863(a), 864(e), 865(i), and 7701(f). * * * * * Section 1.861-12T also issued under 26 U.S.C. 863(a), 864(e), 865(i), and 7701(f). * * * * * Section 1.861-13T also issued under 26 U.S.C. 863(a), 864(e), 865(i), and 7701(f). * * * * * Section 1.861-14T also issued under 26 U.S.C. 863(a), 864(e), 865(i), and 77…
  10. 88 FR 76032 — Proposed Amendment to Prohibited Transaction Exemptions 75-1, 77-4, 80-83, 83-1, and 86-128
    ERISAProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Nov 3, 2023related by meaning
    rm × 5.8 percent paper) + (11,000 Annual Statement × 5.8 percent paper) + (11,000 Report of Commissions Paid × 5.8 percent paper) = 1,943 disclosures. Back to Citation 52.  5 U.S.C. 601 et seq. Back to Citation 53.  5 U.S.C. 601(2), 603(a); see also 5 U.S.C. 551. Back to Citation 54.  Public Law 104-4, 109 Stat. 48 (Ma…
  11. 89 T.C. 1137; 89 T.C. No. 80 — Rutland v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsDec 8, 1987related by meaning
    tions. For such reason, the application cannot be deemed a return sufficient to start the 3-year statute of limitations running under section 6501(a). The final issue for our decision is whether section 4975 is an excise tax provision or a penalty provision. The petitioners argue that such section is intended to discou…
  12. 89 FR 23338 — Short-Term, Limited-Duration Insurance and Independent, Noncoordinated Excepted Benefits Coverage
    IRCFinal Rules (FR)Apr 3, 2024
    …hleen Hannick (2020). “Fixed Indemnity Health Coverage Is a Problematic Form of `Junk Insurance,' ” USC-Brookings Schaeffer Initiative for Health Policy, available at: https://www.brookings.edu/​blog/​usc-brookings-schaeffer-on-health-policy/​2020/​08/​04/​fixed-indemnity-health-coverage-is-a-problematic-form-of-junk-i…
  13. 164 T.C. No. 9 — Facebook, Inc. & Subsidiaries v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsMay 22, 2025related by meaning
    waived a procedural challenge to Temp. Treas. Reg. § 1.482-7T. It did not waive a substantive challenge that the regulations reach an outcome that is not permitted by statute either on their face or as applied to petitioner. See Order, September 23, 2022 (Docket Index No. 596). 118 with a brief history of the statute …
  14. 86 FR 36872 — Requirements Related to Surprise Billing; Part I
    IRCFinal Rules (FR)Jul 13, 2021related by meaning
    lve the complaint. Department of the Treasury Internal Revenue Service Accordingly, 26 CFR part 54 is amended as follows: PART 54—PENSION EXCISE TAXES Paragraph 4. The authority citation for part 54 continues to read, in part, as follows: Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805, unless otherwise noted. * * * * * Par. 5. Section 54.9…
  15. T.C. Memo. 1996-378 — Gaylord W. Greenlee v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsAug 15, 1996related by meaning
    c. Year 6651(a)(1) 1985 $ 813 1986 1,123 1987 1,403 1988 1,529 1989 1,581 1990 1,539 Then, in her reply brief, she conceded that the correct additions to tax are as stated in the text. The primary issue for decision is whether petitioner engaged in a prohibited transaction so as to be subject to the first-tier excise t…
  16. 88 FR 75744 — Federal Independent Dispute Resolution Operations
    IRCProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Nov 3, 2023related by meaning
    U.S.C. 1108), 112 Stat. 2061; 25 U.S.C. 1647b. 2. Section 890.114 is amended by revising paragraph (a) to read as follows: § 890.114 Surprise billing. (a) A carrier must comply with requirements described in 26 CFR 54.9816-3, 54.9816-3T through 54.9816-6T, 54.9816-6A, 54.9816-6, 54.9816-8T, 54.9816-8, 54.9817-1T, 54.98…
  17. T.C. Memo. 2015-176 — Ronald Craig Fish v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsSep 10, 2015related by meaning
    m nt of tax attributable to: (1) negligence or disregard of rules and regulations; or (2) a substantial understatement of income tax. Sec. 6662(a) and (b)(1) and (2). Negligence is defined to include any failure to make a reasonable attempt to comply with the Internal Revenue Code. Sec. 6662(c). The statute defines dis…
  18. T.D. 9694 — These final regulations provide guidance on the application of § 162(m)(6). Section 162(m)(6) limits the allowable deduction for remuneration for services prov…
    IRCTreasury DecisionsOct 6, 2014
    …l for a taxable year but for the deduction for the AIR or DDR being disallowed by reason of section 280G. (ii) Example. The following example illustrates the rule of this paragraph (g)(2). Example. Corporation A, a covered health insurance provider, pays $750,000 of AIR to P, an applicable individual, during A’s disqua…
  19. REG-106796-12 — These proposed regulations provide guidance on the application of section 162(m)(6). Section 162(m)(6) limits the allowable deduction for remuneration for serv…
    IRCProposed Rules (FR)Proposed May 28, 2013
    …ation of the applicable individual for a taxable year but for being disallowed by reason of section 280G. (ii) Example. The following example illustrates the rule of this paragraph (g)(2). Example. Corporation A, a covered health insurance provider, pays $750,000 of applicable individual remuneration to P, an applicabl…
  20. 82 FR 47656 — Moral Exemptions and Accommodations for Coverage of Certain Preventive Services Under the Affordable Care Act; Proposed Rulemaking
    IRCProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Oct 13, 2017related by meaning
    If a public hearing is scheduled, notice of the date, time, and place for the hearing will be published in the Federal Register . Drafting Information The principal author of these proposed regulations is Karen Levin, Office of the Division Counsel/Associate Chief Counsel (Tax Exempt and Government Entities), IRS. The …