Brief Case

Search the Pension Law Library

Limit to:Advanced options
Searches the code/regs in effect on that date.
Words mode supports "quoted phrases", +required and -excluded terms.
Document types:
Go to I.R.C. § 372 (not yet in the library — opens the official source)
72 documents · 0.21sAllIRCERISAPBGCJoint Board
  1. 88 FR 44596 — Short-Term, Limited-Duration Insurance; Independent, Noncoordinated Excepted Benefits Coverage; Level-Funded Plan Arrangements; and Tax Treatment of Certain Ac…
    IRCProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Jul 12, 2023
    …C.-Brookings Schaeffer Initiative for Health Policy, available at: https://www.brookings.edu/​blog/​usc-brookings-schaeffer-on-health-policy/​2020/​08/​04/​fixed-indemnity-health-coverage-is-a-problematic-form-of-junk-insurance.
  2. T.C. Memo. 2024-6 — Clair R. Couturier, Jr. v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJan 17, 2024related by meaning
    ies. Subchapter C, consisting solely of section 6751, sets forth “Procedural Requirements” applicable to all of the foregoing items. The fact that the exaction at issue does not appear in C hapter 68 of the Code provides evidence that it is not a “penalty” to which the “procedural requirements” of section 6751(b) apply…
  3. Notice 2024-35 — This notice provides relief with respect to certain required minimum distributions (RMDs) that are not made in 2024. This relief was provided with respect to c…
    IRCNoticesMay 6, 2024
    … and Kathleen Hannick (2020). “Fixed Indemnity Coverage is a Problematic Form of “Junk” Insurance,” USC-Brookings Schaeffer Initiative for Health Policy, available at: https://www.brookings.edu/blog/usc-brookings-schaeffer-on-health-policy/2020/08/04/fixed-indemnity-health-coverage-is-a-problematic-form-of-junk-insuran…
  4. 88 T.C. 548; 88 T.C. No. 28 — Porter v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsMar 5, 1987
    … and continues to perform judicial services as he is willing and able to do so. Pursuant to section 372(a) of the Judicial Code, an article III judge who is permanently disabled and has served at least 10 years may retire and continue to receive the salary of the office for the rest of his life, and an article III judg…
  5. 91 FR 4348 — Improving Transparency Into Pharmacy Benefit Manager Fee Disclosure
    ERISAProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Jan 30, 2026
    …& Dana P. Goldman, Overpaying for Prescription Drugs: The Copay Clawback, (2018), https://schaeffer.usc.edu/​research/​overpaying-for-prescription-drugs/​.) Back to Citation 183.  Megan Thompson (2018), W hy a Patient Paid a $285 Copay for a $40 Drug, https://www.pbs.org/​newshour/​health/​why-a-patient-paid-a-285-copa…
  6. 89 FR 23338 — Short-Term, Limited-Duration Insurance and Independent, Noncoordinated Excepted Benefits Coverage
    IRCFinal Rules (FR)Apr 3, 2024
    …hleen Hannick (2020). “Fixed Indemnity Health Coverage Is a Problematic Form of `Junk Insurance,' ” USC-Brookings Schaeffer Initiative for Health Policy, available at: https://www.brookings.edu/​blog/​usc-brookings-schaeffer-on-health-policy/​2020/​08/​04/​fixed-indemnity-health-coverage-is-a-problematic-form-of-junk-i…
  7. Notice 2026-48 — Notice of Intent to Issue Regulations with Respect to Saver’s Match Contributions
    IRCNoticesAug 24, 2026
    …rtain information addressed in this notice will be subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), 44 USC 3507. No collection of information will be required until approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the PRA.
  8. 86 FR 55980 — Requirements Related to Surprise Billing; Part II
    IRCFinal Rules (FR)Oct 7, 2021
    …   See Hannick, Kathleen and Loren Adler. “Provider Charges Relative to Medicare Rates, 2012-2018.” USC-Brookings Schaeffer on Health Policy. (May 2021). https://www.brookings.edu/​blog/​usc-brookings-schaeffer-on-health-policy/​2021/​05/​03/​provider-charges-relative-to-medicare-rates-2012-2018/​. Back to Citation 210…
  9. T.C. Memo. 1997-8 — Gary Benton & Karen Ruth Logsdon v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJan 6, 1997related by meaning
    a Lump-Sum Credit Section 72(e) governs the taxation of amounts received under an annuity contract but not received as an annuity. Sec. 72(e)(1)(A). 3 Section 72(e)(2)(A) provides that any amount subject to section 72(e) (i.e., an amount received under an annuity contract but not received as an annuity) shall be includ…
  10. 89 FR 32302 — Amendment to Prohibited Transaction Exemption 84-24
    ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Apr 25, 2024related by meaning
    within a foreign country that is included on the Department of Commerce's list of “foreign adversaries” that is codified in 15 CFR 7.4 as amended); or (2) Found or determined in a final judgment or court-approved settlement in a Federal or State criminal or civil court proceeding brought by the Department, the Departme…
  11. 167 T.C. No. 4 — Piton Holdings, LLC, David L. Hall, Partnership Representative, Petitioner(s) v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJul 15, 2026related by meaning
    er 1 as determined under subsection (e) by substituting — (i) in paragraph (1)(A), “200 percent” for “150 percent” . . . . 2. Section 6662: Discussion Section 6662(a) is a generally applicable provision through which all accuracy-related penalties are imposed on underpayments of tax. Section 6662(b) lists the penalizab…
  12. 89 FR 4662 — Procedures Governing the Filing and Processing of Prohibited Transaction Exemption Applications
    ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Jan 24, 2024related by meaning
    rimes is an element; or any crime identified in ERISA section 411, regardless of whether the conviction occurred in a U.S. or foreign jurisdiction; or (B) Convicted by a foreign court of competent jurisdiction or released from imprisonment, whichever is later, as a result of any crime, however denominated by the laws o…
  13. 87 FR 14722 — Procedures Governing the Filing and Processing of Prohibited Transaction Exemption Applications
    ERISAProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Mar 15, 2022related by meaning
    cy or attempt to commit any such crimes or a crime of which any of the foregoing crimes is an element; or any crime described in ERISA section 411; or (B) Convicted by a foreign court of competent jurisdiction or released from imprisonment, whichever is later, as a result of any crime, however denominated by the laws o…
  14. Notice 2024-2 — Miscellaneous Changes Under the SECURE 2.0 Act of 2022
    IRCNoticesModified Jan 8, 2024
    …dual retirement annuity described in section 408(b). 6 The definition of “State” for purposes of 42 USC 1395x(r)(1) is in 42 USC 410(h), which provides that the term “State” includes the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, and American Samoa.
  15. T.C. Memo. 2018-155 — Ruben De Los Santos & Martha De Los Santos v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsSep 18, 2018
    … which it treated as tax-deductible expenses of the medical practice: Date Contribution 11/14/2006 $372,446 12/05/2007 372,446 10/08/2008 372,486 11/19/2009 372,485 10/27/2010 372,486 Total 1,862,349 During 2007-2012 the Legacy Trust (and later the Flex Trust) paid premiums on the Policy as follows: D_ate Premium paid …
  16. T.C. Memo. 1996-354 — Brent Allan Pulliam v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsAug 1, 1996related by meaning
    event the diversion of retirement savings for nonretirement purposes and to recapture a measure of the tax benefits provided by the deferral of income tax through retirement plans. At the same time, Congress recognized that it was appropriate to provide, under limited circumstances, an exemption from the tax for certai…
  17. I.R.C. § 4975(d)(13) — Tax on prohibited transactions
    IRCCode / StatuteJan 6, 2025related by meaning
    (d)(13) (13) any transaction which is exempt from section 406 of such Act by reason of section 408(e) of such Act (or which would be so exempt if such section 406 applied to such transaction) or which is exempt from section 406 of such Act by reason of section 408(b)(12) of such Act; (d)(14) (14) any transaction requir…
  18. 88 FR 75979 — Proposed Amendment to Prohibited Transaction Exemption 2020-02
    ERISAProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Nov 3, 2023related by meaning
    utes] × $63.45 = $793. Back to Citation 65.  5 U.S.C. 601 et seq. Back to Citation 66.  5 U.S.C. 601(2), 603(a); see5 U.S.C. 551. Back to Citation 67.  Public Law 104-4, 109 Stat. 48 (Mar. 22, 1995). Back to Citation 68.  Reorganization Plan No. 4 of 1978 (5 U.S.C. App. 1 (2018)) generally transferred the authority of …
  19. T.C. Memo. 2007-19 — Bidyut K. & Diana T. Bhattacharyya v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJan 30, 2007
    …. 2005-176. The Plan 15104 Form W-2 reflects a gross distribution to petitioner from Plan 15104 of $372,850 and that petitioner made no employee contributions to Plan 15104. The parties stipulated the accuracy of the Plan 15104 Form W-2, and no evidence in the record contradicts the Plan 15104 Fórm W-2. This evidence, …
  20. 75 FR 8796 — Civil Penalties Under ERISA Section 502(c)(8)
    ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Feb 26, 2010related by meaning
    ch sets forth additional circumstances in which the Service will automatically approve a request to revoke a section 204 election. Back to Citation 4.  An excise tax under Code section 4971(g)(4) generally applies, in addition to any penalty under ERISA section 502(c)(8), in the case of a failure to adopt a rehabilitat…