Brief Case

Search the Pension Law Library

Limit to:Advanced options
Searches the code/regs in effect on that date.
Words mode supports "quoted phrases", +required and -excluded terms.
Document types:
Go to 45 T.C. 600 (not yet in the library — opens the official source)
83 documents · 0.22sAllIRCERISAPBGCJoint Board
  1. 89 FR 37706 — Clean Vehicle Credits Under Sections 25E and 30D; Transfer of Credits; Critical Minerals and Battery Components; Foreign Entities of Concern
    IRCFinal Rules (FR)May 6, 2024
    …determined consistent with the EPA's fuel economy labeling rules and definitions provided in 40 CFR 600.315-08 for vans, sport utility vehicles, pickup trucks, and other vehicles. Specifically, “van” means a vehicle classified as a van or minivan under 40 CFR 600.315-08(a)(2)(iii) and (iv), or otherwise so classified b…
  2. 150 T.C. No. 7 — Celia Mazzei v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsMar 5, 2018related by meaning
    ximum of 46% of the combined income to the FSC (by adjusting the sale 1 transfer price). If the profit margin was between 3.98% and 7.96%, the maximum amount of taxable income assignable varied inversely from 46% to 23%, respectively. If the profit margin exceeded 7.96%, they could assign a maximum of 23% of the combin…
  3. T.C. Memo. 2005-173 — Transport Labor Contract/Leasing, Inc. & Subsidiaries v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJul 14, 2005related by meaning
    ll other agreements between the parties. The parties stipulate that neither of them has made any representations with respect to the subiect matter of this Agreement or any representations * * * except such representations as are specifically set forth herein and each of the parties hereto acknowledges that he or they …
  4. Treas. Reg. § 1.414(v)-1(h) — Catch-up contributions.
    IRCRegulationsNov 17, 2025
    …s, Participant B earns $80,000. Thus, Participant B's total elective deferrals for the year are $14,600 ($4,000 for the first 3 months of the year plus $5,600 for the last 9 months of the year plus an additional $5,000 throughout the year). (ii) The employer-provided limit for Participant B for the plan year is $9,600 …
  5. REG-108639-99 — Proposed regulations under sections 401(k) and 401(m) of the Code provide guidance on the requirements for certain retirement plans containing cash or deferred…
    IRCProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Sep 2, 2003
    …ired to correct the excess aggregate contributions (after forfeiting the matching contribution) is $600 ($1,600 in excess aggregate contributions minus $1,000 in forfeited matching contributions). If Employee F had corrected the excess deferrals of $1,000 by withdrawing $1,000 from Plan N, Plan M would have had to corr…
  6. T.D. 9072 — Final regulations under section 414(v) of the Code provide guidance on the requirements for retirement plans providing for catch-up contributions to individual…
    IRCTreasury DecisionsSep 15, 2003
    r are $14,600 ($4,000 for the first 3 months of the year plus $5,600 for the last 9 months of the year plus an additional $5,000 throughout the year). (ii) The employer-provided limit for Participant B for the plan year is $9,600 ($4,000 for the first 3 months of the year, plus $5,600 for the last 9 months of the year)…
  7. 78 FR 33158 — Incentives for Nondiscriminatory Wellness Programs in Group Health Plans
    IRCFinal Rules (FR)Jun 3, 2013
    …00 × 50% = $3,000.) Example 3. (i) Facts. Same facts as Example 1, except that, in addition to the $600 reward for compliance with the health-contingent wellness program, the plan also imposes an additional $2,000 tobacco premium surcharge on employees who have used tobacco in the last 12 months and who are not enrolle…
  8. 73 T.C. 182 — Oakton Distributors, Inc. v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsOct 30, 1979related by meaning
    will be entered for the respondent. Footnotes 1. All section references are to the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as amended, unless otherwise noted.↩ 2. The extent of integration of a plan is the ratio, expressed as a percentage, which the employer contribution rate, actual benefits, benefit rate, offset rate, or allo…
  9. IRCRegulationsSep 17, 2024
    …tions are corrected by distribution. Under Plan M, Employee F is allocated excess contributions of $600 and excess aggregate contributions of $1,600. Employee F timely requests and receives a distribution of the $1,000 excess deferral from Plan M and, pursuant to the terms of Plan M, forfeits the corresponding $1,000 m…
  10. 78 T.C. 1187; 78 T.C. No. 83 — Plastic Engineering & Mfg. Co. v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJun 30, 1982related by meaning
    ance standard of section 162(a)(1). Bianchi v. Comm issioner, 66 T.C. 324, 329-330 (1976), affd. without published opinion 553 F.2d 93 (2d Cir. 1977). Respondent contends that in order for a contribution to a pension plan to be deductible under section 404, the contribution must represent compensation for personal serv…
  11. 77 FR 70620 — Incentives for Nondiscriminatory Wellness Programs in Group Health Plans
    IRCProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Nov 26, 2012
    …al of all rewards (including absence of a surcharge for participating in the tobacco program) is $2,600 ($600 + $2,000 = $2,600), which does not exceed 50 percent of the total annual cost of employee-only coverage ($3,000); and, tested separately, the $600 reward for the wellness program unrelated to tobacco use does n…
  12. Treas. Reg. § 1.408-11(d) — Net income calculation for returned or recharacterized IRA contributions.
    IRCRegulationsMay 18, 2016
    …and this section: Example 1.(i) On May 1, 2004, when her IRA is worth $4,800, Taxpayer A makes a $1,600 regular contribution to her IRA. Taxpayer A requests that $400 of the May 1, 2004, contribution be returned to her pursuant to section 408(d)(4). Pursuant to this request, on February 1, 2005, when the IRA is worth $…
  13. T.C. Memo. 2013-10 — Robert A. & Pearl Fletcher v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJan 14, 2013related by meaning
    Mr. Villasenor was injured on or about May 13, 2000. Although the file is much more extensive than that of Ms. Muriel and it appears that petitioners hired and paid attorneys through 20 3 to handle the appeal of the worker's compensation claim, Ms. Strick's name does not appear on any of the documents, and she did not…
  14. Rev. Proc. 2021-30 — Rev. Proc. 2021-30 adds two new benefit overpayment correction methods that encourage employers to avoid seeking recoupment of benefit overpayments made to par…
    IRCRevenue ProceduresModified Aug 2, 2021
    …(k) plan is 3% of compensation. Thus, the missed deferral is equal to 3% multiplied by $20,000, or $600. Accordingly, the required QNEC for Employee M’s missed deferral opportunity in 2006 is $300, that is, 50% of $600. The missed matching contribution, based on the missed deferral of $600, is $600. The required correc…
  15. Rev. Proc. 2018-52 — The revenue procedure modifies and supersedes Rev. Proc. 2016–51, 2016–42 I.R.B. 465, which sets forth the Employee Plans Compliance Resolution System (“EPCRS”…
    IRCRevenue ProceduresOct 15, 2018
    …(k) plan is 3% of compensation. Thus, the missed deferral is equal to 3% multiplied by $20,000, or $600. Accordingly, the required QNEC for Employee M’s missed deferral opportunity in 2006 is $300, that is, 50% of $600. The missed matching contribution, based on the missed deferral of $600, is $600. The required correc…
  16. 72 T.C. 377 — La Mastro v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsMay 23, 1979related by meaning
    rden of proof on the unreasonable compensation issue since he raised it in his amended answer. Rule 142(a), Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure. Turning to the merits, we note that respondent argues that the case of Bianchi v. Commissioner, 66 T.C. 324 (1976), affd. per curiam 553 F.2d 93 (2d Cir. 1977), is direc…
  17. T.C. Memo. 2024-6 — Clair R. Couturier, Jr. v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJan 17, 2024related by meaning
    Title 26 U.S.C. (Code) , in effect at all relevant times, and Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure . Served 01/17/24 2 [* 2 ] deficiencies under section 4973 in th e aggregate amount of $8,476,705 . The notices also determined additions to tax under section 6651(a)(1) and (2) and accurac…
  18. Rev. Proc. 2016-51 — This revenue procedure updates the comprehensive system of correction programs for sponsors of retirement plans that are intended to satisfy the requirements o…
    IRCRevenue ProceduresOct 17, 2016
    …(k) plan is 3% of compensation. Thus, the missed deferral is equal to 3% multiplied by $20,000, or $600. Accordingly, the required QNEC for Employee M’s missed deferral opportunity in 2006 is $300, that is, 50% of $600. The missed matching contribution, based on the missed deferral of $600, is $600. The required correc…
  19. 147 T.C. No. 14 — Pizza Pro Equipment Leasing, Inc. v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsNov 17, 2016related by meaning
    culating the required reduction in the section 415 dollar limitation. Accordingly, inasmuch as respondent applied this method to calculate the reduced benefit limitation under section 415(b)(2)(C) for the plan, his calculations of the age 45 limits for tax years 2002 through 2006 are correct. III. Petitioner's Liabilit…
  20. Rev. Proc. 2008-50 — This procedure updates the comprehensive system of correction programs for sponsors of retirement plans that are intended to satisfy the requirements of sectio…
    IRCRevenue ProceduresSep 2, 2008
    …(k) plan is 3% of compensation. Thus, the missed deferral is equal to 3% multiplied by $20,000, or $600. Accordingly, the required QNEC for Employee M’s missed deferral opportunity in 2006 is $300, i.e., 50% of $600. The required matching contribution, based on the missed deferral of $600, is $600. The required correct…