IRCCourt RulingsJan 17, 2024related by meaning
Title 26 U.S.C. (Code) , in effect at all relevant times, and Rule references are to
the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .
Served 01/17/24
2 [* 2 ] deficiencies under section 4973 in th e aggregate amount of
$8,476,705 . The notices also determined additions to tax under section
6651(a)(1) and (2) and accurac…
IRCCourt RulingsAug 6, 1991related by meaning
f the matter is that the payment in question should be taxable to petitioner under section 72(e). Accordingly, we sustain respondent’s determination.6 In order to take into account what appear to be mechanical errors in respondent’s calculations and to afford the parties a further opportunity to resolve the question of…
IRCCourt RulingsDec 11, 2003related by meaning
ining whether petitioner satisfies the return-filed safe
harbor of section 6654(d)(1)(B)(i).
Because petitioner made no estimated tax payments for the audit year, he necessarily failed the alternative safe harbor of
section 6654(d)(1)(B)(i) to make estimated tax payments equal to
“90 percent of the tax” (i.e., his ulti…
IRCCourt RulingsDec 2, 1981related by meaning
n the deficiency actions and, thus, we must follow the legislature’s mandate and dismiss this case.
An appropriate order of dismissal will be entered. ^ince this is a preliminary jurisdictional motion, the Court has concluded that the post-trial procedures of Rule 182, Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure, are not…
IRCCourt RulingsFeb 6, 1992related by meaning
and the temporary regulations rather than the general deduction-timing rules (i.e., normal rules of accrual accounting) of the Internal Revenue Code. In summary, we hold that section 1.404(b)-lT, Temporary Income Tax Regs., is a valid temporary regulation, that petitioner has not brought itself within any exception th…
81 FR 21139 — Amendment to Prohibited Transaction Exemption (PTE) 75-1, Part V, Exemptions From Prohibitions Respecting Certain Classes of Transactions Involving Employee Be… ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Apr 8, 2016related by meaning
under section 4975 of the Code] is hereby transferred to the Secretary of Labor”).
Back to Citation
9.
29 CFR 2550.408b-2(e); 26 CFR 54.4975-6(a)(5). Back to Citation
10.
See
PTE 86-128, Exemption for Securities Transactions Involving Employee Benefit Plans and Broker-Dealers, 51 FR 41686 (November 18, 1986), as ame…
IRCCourt RulingsJun 14, 1982related by meaning
nder the Sixth and Ninth Amendments of the Constitution were not violated by our actions in the instant case.
Decision will be entered under Rule 155. By stipulation, respondent concedes that the $1,562 figure is the product of an erroneous computation in the statutory notice of deficiency and that should respondent pr…
IRCCourt RulingsJan 13, 1997related by meaning
7,676 represents the imposition of
additional tax under section 72(t) on petitioner's premature
retirement benefits distribution of $176,754.88. Since respondent asserts an increased deficiency, she has the burden of
proof on this issue. Rule 142(a). However, the parties
stipulated that $20,655.42 of that distribution …
89 FR 32346 — Amendment to Prohibited Transaction Exemptions 75-1, 77-4, 80-83, 83-1, and 86-128 ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Apr 25, 2024related by meaning
nd in its text, PTE 2020-02 has been broadly amended to encompass compensation for advice irrespective of the product recommended.
Back to Citation
6. ERISA section 408(a) and Code section 4975(c)(2), expressly permit the Department (through the Reorganization Plan No. 4 of 1978) to grant “a conditional or uncondition…
IRCCourt RulingsMay 30, 1984related by meaning
was that it was "clarifying” the "existing” law by rejecting respondent’s position regarding the applicability of sec. 403 to public school employees. Neither party has advanced any argument herein based upon the legislative history of sec. 403(b) and of sec. 2039(c). Nor was this legislative history considered in Esta…
IRCCourt RulingsJul 14, 2005related by meaning
48 F.2d 306, 310 (9th Cir.
1945), affg. a Memorandum Opinion of this Court dated Jan. 5,
1943; Standard Knitting Mills, Inc. v. Commissioner, 141 F.2d 195, 198-199 (6th Cir. 1944), affg. 47 B.T.A. 295 (1942).
Generally, new issues may not be raised in a Rule 155
computation. Harris v. Commissioner, 99 T.C. 121, 123 (19…
IRCCourt RulingsNov 1, 2005related by meaning
ficiency for the years in
issue. Respondent determined that petitioner was liable for
additional taxes of $499 and $5,215 for early distributions from her IRAs for 1999 and 2000, respectively. Respondent also
determined that petitioner was liable for additions to tax under
sections 6651(a)(1) and 6654(a), as set out ab…
IRCCourt RulingsJul 8, 1980related by meaning
2,300.
All statutory references are to the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 as in effect during the year in issue.
Sec. 6652(c) states in pertinent part: (c) Failure To Report Tips. — In the case of failure by an employee to report to his employer on the date and in the manner prescribed therefor any amount of tips requir…
T.C. Memo. 2014-109 — Leslie J. Molinet Petitioner, and Michael F. Molinet, Intervenor v. Commissioner IRCCourt RulingsJun 9, 2014related by meaning
t available to the
spouse under section 6015(b) or (c). Sec. 6015(f)(1) and (2).
Subsections (b) and (c) of section 6015 apply only in the case of "an understatement of tax" or "any deficiency" in tax, and do not apply in the case of
underpayments of tax reported on joint tax returns. Sec. 6015(b)(1)(B), (c)(1);
Hopkin…
IRCCourt RulingsFeb 26, 1964related by meaning
It follows, therefore, that the amounts received by petitioners from the special fund are not excludable from gross income under either section 104 or section 105 unless they are covered by subsection 105(b), subsection 105(c), or subsection 105(d). Only the last subsection (105(d)), to which petitioners make no refere…
IRCCourt RulingsApr 20, 2017related by meaning
See Parker v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2012-66, 103
T.C.M. (CCH) 1321, 1323 (finding section 6201(d) inapplicable where the tax-
(continued...)
- 10 - [*10] Petitioner has not satisfied his burden of proof. He failed in his petition to
assign error to any of respondent's determinations, asserting instead that he had no…
IRCCourt RulingsAug 16, 2017related by meaning
en of proving that
those determinations are erroneous.4 See Rule 142(a); Welch v. Helvering, 290
U.S. I11, 115 (1933).
I. Section 72(t) Additional Tax Section 72(t)(1) imposes an additional tax on an early distribution from a
qualified retirement plan equal to 10% of the portion of the amount that is
includable in gros…
IRCCourt RulingsJun 11, 1996related by meaning
rary purpose has been shown here.
Because we are satisfied that our analysis of section
4980A(e)(2) leads to the conclusion that the Retirement System was a qualified employer plan under section 4980A, we sustain
respondent's determination that petitioner is liable for the 15percent excise tax under section 4980A.
- 11…
T.D. 9275 — Final regulations under section 410 of the Code implement a statutory directive of the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001 (EGTRRA) to am… IRCTreasury DecisionsAug 28, 2006related by meaning
n the information elicited on those line items, as well as the rest of the form, in their books and records.
Announcement 2006-56 Announcement 2006-56 This document contains corrections to temporary regulations (T.D. 9262, 2006-24 I.R.B. 1040) concerning the application of section 199 of the Code, which provides a dedu…
IRCCourt RulingsJun 4, 1997related by meaning
amount is erroneously treated
as self-employment income, or if an amount is
erroneously treated as wages, and
(2) If the correction of the error would require an assessment of one such tax and the
refund or credit of the other tax, and
- 23 -
(3) If at any time the correction of the
error is authorized as to one such t…