IRCCourt RulingsAug 6, 1991related by meaning
f the matter is that the payment in question should be taxable to petitioner under section 72(e). Accordingly, we sustain respondent’s determination.6 In order to take into account what appear to be mechanical errors in respondent’s calculations and to afford the parties a further opportunity to resolve the question of…
IRCCourt RulingsJul 24, 1991related by meaning
tever source derived, including (but not limited to) the following items: *******
(11) Pensions;
SEC. 451. GENERAL RULE FOR TAXABLE YEAR OF INCLUSION. (a) General Rule. — The amount of any item of gross income shall be included in the gross income for the taxable year in which received by the taxpayer, unless, under th…
IRCCourt RulingsFeb 18, 1997related by meaning
ioner's retirement distribution's
being taxed twice. We think petitioners' contention is
meritorious. Here we take note of the long-standing principle that double taxation is to be avoided unless expressly intended
by Congress. E.g., Maass v. Higgins
, 312 U.S. 443, 449 (1941);
United States v. Supplee-Biddle Hardware …
IRCCourt RulingsMay 29, 2002related by meaning
is Court.
Section 72(t) provides that:
(1) * * * If any taxpayer receives any amount from a
qualified retirement plan (as defined in section 4974(c)), the taxpayer's tax * * * shall be increased by an amount
equal to 10 percent of the portion of such amount which is
includible in gross income.
Section 72(t)(2) provides…
IRCCourt RulingsMar 31, 1961related by meaning
ntract” as meaning the entire contract, especially since Congress, when it wished to delineate the annuity feature of the contract, did so explicitly. Although admitting that the interpretation proposed by petitioner is not without merit, we hold that section 72(d) applies only when the entire consideration furnished b…
IRCCourt RulingsJun 12, 1996related by meaning
tioner's
distribution.
Section 72(t) provides:
(1) Imposition of additional tax.--If any taxpayer
receives any amount from a qualified retirement plan * * *, the taxpayer's tax * * * for the taxable year in
which such amount is received shall be increased by an
amount equal to 10 percent of the portion of such
amount w…
IRCCourt RulingsJul 5, 1983related by meaning
so determined that petitioners were liable for an addition to tax under sec. 6651(a) in the amount of $28.76. Respondent conceded that issue on brief. The procedures set forth in sec. 7463 apply to cases involving taxes imposed by subtitle A and Chs. 11 and 12 of the Code, subject to monetary limits. As to petitions fi…
IRCCourt RulingsMar 10, 2020related by meaning
sis test.
FIe] , further, as applied to P, I.R.C. sec. 72(t) is valid because
the age and disability classifications established by the statute bear a reasonable relationship to a legitimate Government purpose.
Sandra M. Conard, pro se.
Scott W. Forbord and Mark J. Miller, for respondent.
OPINION
TORO, Judge: A taxpaye…
IRCCourt RulingsJun 24, 2003related by meaning
tract unless such amounts are
specifically excluded from gross income under other provisions of
chapter 1 of the Code. The burden is on petitioners to demonstrate that the payments in question fall into a specific
statutory exclusion. See Commissioner v. Glenshaw Glass Co.
, 348
U.S. at 429-431.
Under section 72(t), a …
IRCCourt RulingsJan 2, 2020related by meaning
n 72(t) imposes an additional 10% tax on early distributions from a
qualified retirement plan, including an IRA, made to a taxpayer before she attains the age of 59½. See secs. 72(t)(1), (2)(A)(i), 4974(c)(4). Mrs. Gebman had not
attained the age of 59½ when she received the distributions at issue. The IRA
distribution…
Notice 2024-55 — Certain Exceptions to the 10 Percent Additional Tax Under Code Section 72(t) IRCNoticesJul 8, 2024related by meaning
nal revenue law. Generally, tax returns and tax return information are confidential, as required by section 6103 of the Code.
VI. DRAFTING INFORMATION The principal authors of this notice are Naomi Lehr, Vernon Carter, and Pamela R. Kinard of the Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Employee Benefits, Exempt Organization…
IRCCourt RulingsAug 16, 2017related by meaning
en of proving that
those determinations are erroneous.4 See Rule 142(a); Welch v. Helvering, 290
U.S. I11, 115 (1933).
I. Section 72(t) Additional Tax Section 72(t)(1) imposes an additional tax on an early distribution from a
qualified retirement plan equal to 10% of the portion of the amount that is
includable in gros…
IRCCourt RulingsOct 3, 1989related by meaning
e enjoyment of the recreational activities to petitioner’s permanent staff without running afoul of the restrictions in section 274(e)(5). We so hold. A final note. We hasten to point out that, although we decide as a matter of law that a proper interpretation of section 274(e)(5) does not require in absolute terms tha…
IRCCourt RulingsOct 12, 1978related by meaning
Section 7476(b) expressly places five limitations or conditions on the exercise of the jurisdiction generally conferred by section 7476(a). See Prince Corp. v. Commissioner, 67 T.C. 318, 322-324 (1976); see generally H. Rept. 93-807 (1974), 1974-3 C.B. (Supp.) *35 236, 241, 340-345; S. Rept. 93-383 (1973), 1974-3 C.B. …
IRCCourt RulingsFeb 22, 2010related by meaning
Print 1982) .
Sec . 7702 was enacted in 1984 as part of the Deficit Reduction
.
Act of 1984, Pub . L . 98-369, sec . 221(a), 98 Stat . 767 . Although these statutory amendments
. postdate the promulgation of the
applicable regulations in 1956, for the reasons . discussed supra
we believe that the cross-reference to se…
IRCCourt RulingsApr 20, 2017related by meaning
See Parker v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2012-66, 103
T.C.M. (CCH) 1321, 1323 (finding section 6201(d) inapplicable where the tax-
(continued...)
- 10 - [*10] Petitioner has not satisfied his burden of proof. He failed in his petition to
assign error to any of respondent's determinations, asserting instead that he had no…
IRCCourt RulingsDec 2, 2010related by meaning
wers v. Commissioner,
24 T.C. 199, 239 (1955), affd. 247 F.2d 233 (2d Cir. 1957), affd.
sub nom. Bonney v. Commissioner, 247 F.2d 237 (2d Cir. 1957)); see also sec. 1 165-1(d) (2) (i), Income Tax Regs.
This is especially true in a case involving insurance.
Section 165(a) prohibits a taxpayer from deducting any amount
c…
IRCCourt RulingsMar 11, 2020related by meaning
little more than guesswork and failed to satisfy the strict substantiation
requirements for vehicle expenses prescribed in section 274(d) and related regulations. As noted above the Court may not use the rule established in Cohan
v. Commissioner, 39 F.2d at 543-544, to estimate expenses covered by section
274(d). Cons…
PBGCRegulationsJul 1, 2019related by meaning
[Reserved]
IRCCourt RulingsDec 2, 1981related by meaning
n the deficiency actions and, thus, we must follow the legislature’s mandate and dismiss this case.
An appropriate order of dismissal will be entered. ^ince this is a preliminary jurisdictional motion, the Court has concluded that the post-trial procedures of Rule 182, Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure, are not…