Brief Case

Search the Pension Law Library

Limit to:Advanced options
Searches the code/regs in effect on that date.
Words mode supports "quoted phrases", +required and -excluded terms.
Document types:
Go to 9 T.C. 600 (not yet in the library — opens the official source)
85 documents · 0.26sAllIRCERISAPBGCJoint Board
  1. 89 FR 37706 — Clean Vehicle Credits Under Sections 25E and 30D; Transfer of Credits; Critical Minerals and Battery Components; Foreign Entities of Concern
    IRCFinal Rules (FR)May 6, 2024
    …determined consistent with the EPA's fuel economy labeling rules and definitions provided in 40 CFR 600.315-08 for vans, sport utility vehicles, pickup trucks, and other vehicles. Specifically, “van” means a vehicle classified as a van or minivan under 40 CFR 600.315-08(a)(2)(iii) and (iv), or otherwise so classified b…
  2. Treas. Reg. § 1.414(v)-1(h) — Catch-up contributions.
    IRCRegulationsNov 17, 2025
    …s, Participant B earns $80,000. Thus, Participant B's total elective deferrals for the year are $14,600 ($4,000 for the first 3 months of the year plus $5,600 for the last 9 months of the year plus an additional $5,000 throughout the year). (ii) The employer-provided limit for Participant B for the plan year is $9,600 …
  3. 77 T.C. 1197; 2 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2188 — Shut Out Dee-Fence, Inc. v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsDec 2, 1981related by meaning
    n the deficiency actions and, thus, we must follow the legislature’s mandate and dismiss this case. An appropriate order of dismissal will be entered. ^ince this is a preliminary jurisdictional motion, the Court has concluded that the post-trial procedures of Rule 182, Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure, are not…
  4. REG-108639-99 — Proposed regulations under sections 401(k) and 401(m) of the Code provide guidance on the requirements for certain retirement plans containing cash or deferred…
    IRCProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Sep 2, 2003
    …ired to correct the excess aggregate contributions (after forfeiting the matching contribution) is $600 ($1,600 in excess aggregate contributions minus $1,000 in forfeited matching contributions). If Employee F had corrected the excess deferrals of $1,000 by withdrawing $1,000 from Plan N, Plan M would have had to corr…
  5. T.C. Memo. 1997-70 — Lucky Stores, Inc., and Subsidiaries v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsFeb 10, 1997related by meaning
    e within the parameters spelled out in section 404(a)(6), may be deducted in the prior year, but only if they fall within the deduction limitations of section 404(a) and related subsections. Since petitioner's Motion and the Judicial Notice Motions never address this allimportant proviso, petitioner's claim, even if co…
  6. 162 T.C. No. 7 — Mohamed K. Abdo & Fardowsa J. Farah v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsApr 2, 2024related by meaning
    an incident date. To determine whether Congress has spoken to this question, we consider the “plain” and “literal” language of the statute itself, the specific context in which the language is used, and the broader context of the statute as a whole. See Robinson v. Shell Oil Co. , 519 U.S. 337, 341 (1997); Allen v. Uni…
  7. T.D. 9072 — Final regulations under section 414(v) of the Code provide guidance on the requirements for retirement plans providing for catch-up contributions to individual…
    IRCTreasury DecisionsSep 15, 2003
    r are $14,600 ($4,000 for the first 3 months of the year plus $5,600 for the last 9 months of the year plus an additional $5,000 throughout the year). (ii) The employer-provided limit for Participant B for the plan year is $9,600 ($4,000 for the first 3 months of the year, plus $5,600 for the last 9 months of the year)…
  8. 78 FR 33158 — Incentives for Nondiscriminatory Wellness Programs in Group Health Plans
    IRCFinal Rules (FR)Jun 3, 2013
    …00 × 50% = $3,000.) Example 3. (i) Facts. Same facts as Example 1, except that, in addition to the $600 reward for compliance with the health-contingent wellness program, the plan also imposes an additional $2,000 tobacco premium surcharge on employees who have used tobacco in the last 12 months and who are not enrolle…
  9. T.D. 9767 — Final regulations providing guidance under section 432(e)(9)(D)(vii) on an additional limitation on a benefit suspension with respect to certain multiemployer …
    IRCTreasury DecisionsMay 23, 2016related by meaning
    ple, Deputy Commissioner for Services and Enforcement. Approved: April 29, 2016. Mark J. Mazur, Assistant Secretary of the Treasury (Tax Policy). Note (Filed by the Office of the Federal Register on May 3, 2016, 4:15 p.m., and published in the issue of the Federal Register for May 5, 2016, 81 F.R. 27011) [1] Section 20…
  10. IRCRegulationsSep 17, 2024
    …tions are corrected by distribution. Under Plan M, Employee F is allocated excess contributions of $600 and excess aggregate contributions of $1,600. Employee F timely requests and receives a distribution of the $1,000 excess deferral from Plan M and, pursuant to the terms of Plan M, forfeits the corresponding $1,000 m…
  11. 77 FR 70620 — Incentives for Nondiscriminatory Wellness Programs in Group Health Plans
    IRCProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Nov 26, 2012
    …al of all rewards (including absence of a surcharge for participating in the tobacco program) is $2,600 ($600 + $2,000 = $2,600), which does not exceed 50 percent of the total annual cost of employee-only coverage ($3,000); and, tested separately, the $600 reward for the wellness program unrelated to tobacco use does n…
  12. Treas. Reg. § 1.408-11(d) — Net income calculation for returned or recharacterized IRA contributions.
    IRCRegulationsMay 18, 2016
    …and this section: Example 1.(i) On May 1, 2004, when her IRA is worth $4,800, Taxpayer A makes a $1,600 regular contribution to her IRA. Taxpayer A requests that $400 of the May 1, 2004, contribution be returned to her pursuant to section 408(d)(4). Pursuant to this request, on February 1, 2005, when the IRA is worth $…
  13. Rev. Rul. 2009-40 — 2010 covered compensation tables; permitted disparity. The covered compensation tables under section 401 of the Code for the year 2010 are provided for use in …
    IRCRevenue RulingsDec 28, 2009related by meaning
    ment 2009-88 Announcement 2009-88 A list is provided of organizations now classified as private foundations. Announcement 2009-90 Announcement 2009-90 The IRS has revoked its determination that Twenty First Century World — TEMENOS of San Rafael, CA, qualifies as an organization described in sections 501(c)(3) and 170(c…
  14. Rev. Proc. 2021-30 — Rev. Proc. 2021-30 adds two new benefit overpayment correction methods that encourage employers to avoid seeking recoupment of benefit overpayments made to par…
    IRCRevenue ProceduresModified Aug 2, 2021
    …(k) plan is 3% of compensation. Thus, the missed deferral is equal to 3% multiplied by $20,000, or $600. Accordingly, the required QNEC for Employee M’s missed deferral opportunity in 2006 is $300, that is, 50% of $600. The missed matching contribution, based on the missed deferral of $600, is $600. The required correc…
  15. Rev. Proc. 2018-52 — The revenue procedure modifies and supersedes Rev. Proc. 2016–51, 2016–42 I.R.B. 465, which sets forth the Employee Plans Compliance Resolution System (“EPCRS”…
    IRCRevenue ProceduresOct 15, 2018
    …(k) plan is 3% of compensation. Thus, the missed deferral is equal to 3% multiplied by $20,000, or $600. Accordingly, the required QNEC for Employee M’s missed deferral opportunity in 2006 is $300, that is, 50% of $600. The missed matching contribution, based on the missed deferral of $600, is $600. The required correc…
  16. T.D. 9275 — Final regulations under section 410 of the Code implement a statutory directive of the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001 (EGTRRA) to am…
    IRCTreasury DecisionsAug 28, 2006related by meaning
    INCOME TAX Rev. Rul. 2006-41 Rev. Rul. 2006-41 LIFO; price indexes; department stores. The June 2006 Bureau of Labor Statistics price indexes are accepted for use by department stores employing the retail inventory and last-in, first-out inventory methods for valuing inventories for tax years ended on, or with referenc…
  17. Rev. Proc. 2016-51 — This revenue procedure updates the comprehensive system of correction programs for sponsors of retirement plans that are intended to satisfy the requirements o…
    IRCRevenue ProceduresOct 17, 2016
    …(k) plan is 3% of compensation. Thus, the missed deferral is equal to 3% multiplied by $20,000, or $600. Accordingly, the required QNEC for Employee M’s missed deferral opportunity in 2006 is $300, that is, 50% of $600. The missed matching contribution, based on the missed deferral of $600, is $600. The required correc…
  18. 81 T.C. 735; 81 T.C. No. 44 — Bricklayers Ben. Plans, Inc. v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsOct 13, 1983related by meaning
    s payable at the time of mandatory or voluntary retirement. Sec. 1.501(c)(9) — 3(f), Income Tax Regs. See also sec. 1.501(c)(9)-3(b), Income Tax Regs. The parties agree that petitioner provides for the payment of pension benefits since three of its six members are pension funds. They also agree that the regulations pro…
  19. Rev. Proc. 2008-50 — This procedure updates the comprehensive system of correction programs for sponsors of retirement plans that are intended to satisfy the requirements of sectio…
    IRCRevenue ProceduresSep 2, 2008
    …(k) plan is 3% of compensation. Thus, the missed deferral is equal to 3% multiplied by $20,000, or $600. Accordingly, the required QNEC for Employee M’s missed deferral opportunity in 2006 is $300, i.e., 50% of $600. The required matching contribution, based on the missed deferral of $600, is $600. The required correct…
  20. Rev. Proc. 2006-27 — Administrative programs; correction programs. This procedure updates and expands upon the Service’s comprehensive Employee Plans Compliance Resolution System (…
    IRCRevenue ProceduresSuperseded May 30, 2006
    …(k) plan is 3% of compensation. Thus, the missed deferral is equal to 3% multiplied by $20,000, or $600. Accordingly, the required corrective contribution for Employee M’s missed deferral opportunity in 2003 is $300, i.e., 50% of $600. The required matching contribution, based on the missed deferral of $600, is $600. T…