Brief Case

Search the Pension Law Library

Limit to:Advanced options
Searches the code/regs in effect on that date.
Words mode supports "quoted phrases", +required and -excluded terms.
Document types:
Go to 92 T.C. 749 (not yet in the library — opens the official source)
81 documents · 0.20sAllIRCERISAPBGCJoint Board
  1. T.C. Memo. 2005-173 — Transport Labor Contract/Leasing, Inc. & Subsidiaries v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJul 14, 2005★ strong match
    ll other agreements between the parties. The parties stipulate that neither of them has made any representations with respect to the subiect matter of this Agreement or any representations * * * except such representations as are specifically set forth herein and each of the parties hereto acknowledges that he or they …
  2. T.C. Memo. 2007-19 — Bidyut K. & Diana T. Bhattacharyya v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJan 30, 2007
    …rp IRA, and the distributions from the Fidelity IRA and the US Bancorp IRA to petitioners totaling $749,930. The par ies agree that the rollovers from Plan 15105 and Plan 15106 to the Fidelity IRA and the direct rollovers of $500,000 and $62,930 from Fidelity IRA to the US Bancorp IRA are excluded from income. See sec.…
  3. 71 T.C. 1049 — Minnis v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsMar 26, 1979
    …-edgement that, in general, policy loans are debts for purposes of the interest deduction. H. Rept. 749, 88th Cong., 1st Sess. 61-62 (1963), 1964-1 C.B. (Part 2) 125, 185-186; S. Rept. 830, 88th Cong., 2d Sess. 77-79 (1964), 1964-1 C.B. (Part 2) 505, 581-583. To be sure, the policy loan herein falls within the literal …
  4. PLR 201240018 — Included vs. Not Included in Gross Income
    IRCPrivate Letter RulingsOct 5, 2012
    … U.S. 591 (1948), Helvering v. Clifford, 309 U.S. 331 (1940), and Chri stoffersen v. United States, 749 F.2d 513 (8th Cir. 1984) (variable contract under which the policyholder did not possess sufficient control over the separate account assets to be treated as owning them for tax purposes.) Rev. Rul. 2003-92,
  5. T.C. Memo. 2005-298 — Isabelle Bichindaritz v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsDec 29, 2005related by meaning
    ion. See 1994 U.S./French Tax Convention art. 23(4), 2 Tax Treaties (CCH) par. 2001.24. Article 18 of the 1994 U.S./French Tax Convention, rather than Article 19 in the now-superseded convention signed in 1967, - 11 - governs deductions for pension payments made in 2001. The French Foreign Ministry publication does not…
  6. 86 FR 55980 — Requirements Related to Surprise Billing; Part II
    IRCFinal Rules (FR)Oct 7, 2021
    tions specialist. The labor rate is applied in the following calculation: 1,749,471 claims × 0.50 hours × $101.32 = $88,628,201. Back to Citation 285.  The burden is estimated as follows: 1,749,471 uninsured individuals in need of good faith estimates with additional items and services × 0.50 hours = 874,736 hours. A l…
  7. T.C. Summary Opinion 2006-136 — Larry J. & Catherine E. France v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsAug 30, 2006related by meaning
    rough prosecution of a legal suit or action based upon tort or tort type rights, or - 14 - through a settlement agreement entered into in lieu of such prosecution.” Sec. 1.104-1(c), Income Tax Regs. Thus, the exclusion must derive from some sort of tort claim against the payor. Rickel v. Commissioner , 900 F.2d 655, 65…
  8. 91 FR 4348 — Improving Transparency Into Pharmacy Benefit Manager Fee Disclosure
    ERISAProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Jan 30, 2026
    …alculated as: 1 percent price reduction × 0.36 price elasticity × 600,768,000 prescriptions = 2,150,749 prescriptions. Back to Citation 317.  This estimate is calculated as: $181.15 average prescription cost × 2,150,749 prescriptions = $389,618,503. Back to Citation 318.  Sharon Faust, Prepared Testimony Before the Uni…
  9. 162 T.C. No. 7 — Mohamed K. Abdo & Fardowsa J. Farah v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsApr 2, 2024
    … have characterized the constraints of the AIA as jurisdictional, see Bob Jones Univ. , 416 U.S. at 749. The AIA has “almost literal effect,” thereby depriving courts of jurisdiction over any suit for the purpose of restraining the assessment or collection of any tax. Id. at 737, 749; see also Maze v. IRS , 862 F.3d 10…
  10. T.C. Memo. 1996-42 — Jerry Silver v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsFeb 6, 1996
    … income tax return. At sometime during 1989, petitioner received a distribution in the amount of $6,749 from a profit-sharing retirement plan (Plan) maintained by his former employer, Jacob Goldfinger (Goldfinger). The Plan was a qualified plan under section 401(a). Petitioner left the employ of Goldfinger in August 19…
  11. 97 T.C. 237; 97 T.C. No. 14 — Guilzon v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsAug 6, 1991related by meaning
    f the matter is that the payment in question should be taxable to petitioner under section 72(e). Accordingly, we sustain respondent’s determination.6 In order to take into account what appear to be mechanical errors in respondent’s calculations and to afford the parties a further opportunity to resolve the question of…
  12. T.C. Memo. 2007-292 — Hubert Joubert v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsSep 24, 2007related by meaning
    T .C . Memo . 2007-292 UNITED STATES TAX COUR T HUBERT JOUBERT, Petitioner V . COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Responden t Docket No . 8769-06 . Filed September 24, 2007 . P failed to file a Federal income tax return for 2002 . R determined a deficiency and asserted in the notic e deficiency, the answer, and the pret…
  13. 82 FR 5373 — Department of Labor Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act Annual Adjustments for 2017
    ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Jan 18, 2017
    …r August 1, 2016 after January 13, 2017. § 1903.15(d)(1) $8,908 $9,054. § 1903.15(d)(1) 124,709 126,749. § 1903.15(d)(2) 124,709 126,749. § 1903.15(d)(3) 12,471 12,675. § 1903.15(d)(4) 12,471 12,675. § 1903.15(d)(5) 12,471 12,675. § 1903.15(d)(6) 12,471 12,675. ( printed page 5383) Department of Labor Employee Benefits…
  14. 97 T.C. 51; 97 T.C. No. 4 — Darby v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJul 24, 1991related by meaning
    Yolanda) was the distributee (within the meaning of section 402(a)(1)) of the entire distribution here in dispute. II. Taxability of the Distribution Preliminarily, we note that the apparent effect of petitioner’s contention that section 72 authorizes him to exclude $75,000 from income — if we were to agree with it — …
  15. T.C. Summary Opinion 2019-26 — Pascal Nsame & Lamiaa Msalka v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsSep 23, 2019related by meaning
    or the taxing authority that imposed the levy. Petitioners have not shown that they are eligible for the exception for tax levies under section 72(t). Petitioners also contend that the remaining portion of the $17,500 was a loan which they used to purchase a home in Vermont in 2013. Petitioners provided only Form 1099-…
  16. T.C. Memo. 2024-6 — Clair R. Couturier, Jr. v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJan 17, 2024related by meaning
    Title 26 U.S.C. (Code) , in effect at all relevant times, and Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure . Served 01/17/24 2 [* 2 ] deficiencies under section 4973 in th e aggregate amount of $8,476,705 . The notices also determined additions to tax under section 6651(a)(1) and (2) and accurac…
  17. 35 T.C. 1217 — Searl v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsMar 31, 1961related by meaning
    ntract” as meaning the entire contract, especially since Congress, when it wished to delineate the annuity feature of the contract, did so explicitly. Although admitting that the interpretation proposed by petitioner is not without merit, we hold that section 72(d) applies only when the entire consideration furnished b…
  18. T.C. Memo. 2002-130 — Ray C. & Bernadette B. Baas v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsMay 29, 2002related by meaning
    to the additional tax under section 72(t) and distinguished Larotonda and Murillo on the ground that "the IRA distributions [in Czepiel] were not made without any active participation by" the taxpayer. Id. That is equally true of the distribution here. - 5 - To reflect the foregoing, An appropriate order of dismissal a…
  19. T.C. Memo. 1998-336 — Robert A. & Laverne M. Hall v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsSep 22, 1998related by meaning
    ights-related activity. And since none of petitioner's compensation for the year was includable in gross income, all of petitioner's IRA contributions for the year are nondeductible. Secs. 219(b), 408(o). Contributions are deemed to have been made to an IRA on the last day of the preceding taxable year if the contribut…
  20. 50 T.C. 583 — Audrey Realty, Inc. v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJul 18, 1968
    …lvich is specifically allowable as a deduction under section 16$. [Emphasis supplied.] H. Rept. No. 749, 88th Cong., 1st Sess. p. 82 (1968). See also H. Rept. No. 749, p. A92 (1963). In view of these statutory changes, McNutt-Boyce Co., supra, is no longer applicable. The Commissioner’s determination is sustained. Deci…