IRCCourt RulingsOct 25, 1961related by meaning
Order 15, sec. 6. supra.
See N. A. Woodworth Co. v. Kavanagh, 102 F. Supp. 9, 13 (E.D. Mich. 1952), affirmed per curiam 202 US 2d 154 (C.A. 6, 1953): “A reading of Section 5(a) of the Act [Wage Stabilization Act of 1942] discloses that the power to prescribe the extent to which an unlawful payment of wages or salaries…
IRCCourt RulingsJul 14, 2005related by meaning
number of TLC's customers applied the sec. 274(n)(1) limitation
to any amounts that they paid to TLC.
"Even if we were to allow petitioner to advance petitioner's tax duplication argument, petitioner would not be
entitled to the remedy it seeks. If, as petitioner asserts,
certain trucking company clients applied the s…
IRCCourt RulingsAug 6, 1991related by meaning
f the matter is that the payment in question should be taxable to petitioner under section 72(e). Accordingly, we sustain respondent’s determination.6 In order to take into account what appear to be mechanical errors in respondent’s calculations and to afford the parties a further opportunity to resolve the question of…
IRCCourt RulingsDec 2, 1981related by meaning
n the deficiency actions and, thus, we must follow the legislature’s mandate and dismiss this case.
An appropriate order of dismissal will be entered. ^ince this is a preliminary jurisdictional motion, the Court has concluded that the post-trial procedures of Rule 182, Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure, are not…
IRCCourt RulingsJan 9, 1985related by meaning
section 4975 as follows:
(c) Effective Date and Savings Provisions.—
(1)(A) The amendments made by this section shall take effect on January 1, 1975. (B) If, before the amendments made by this section take effect, an organization described in section 401(a) of the internal Revenue Code of 1954 is denied exemption unde…
IRCCourt RulingsJun 14, 1982related by meaning
nder the Sixth and Ninth Amendments of the Constitution were not violated by our actions in the instant case.
Decision will be entered under Rule 155. By stipulation, respondent concedes that the $1,562 figure is the product of an erroneous computation in the statutory notice of deficiency and that should respondent pr…
IRCCourt RulingsFeb 9, 2023related by meaning
s at issue in First Security Bank . Such a
determination would not inform our understanding of the holding or
reasoning of First Security Bank .
GG. T he Tax Reform Act of 1976
In 1976, Congress amended section 482 of the Internal Revenue
Code of 1954 to replace “the Secretary or his delegate” with “the
Secretary”. 26 …
IRCCourt RulingsDec 2, 2010related by meaning
wers v. Commissioner,
24 T.C. 199, 239 (1955), affd. 247 F.2d 233 (2d Cir. 1957), affd.
sub nom. Bonney v. Commissioner, 247 F.2d 237 (2d Cir. 1957)); see also sec. 1 165-1(d) (2) (i), Income Tax Regs.
This is especially true in a case involving insurance.
Section 165(a) prohibits a taxpayer from deducting any amount
c…
IRCCourt RulingsJun 12, 1996related by meaning
tioner's
distribution.
Section 72(t) provides:
(1) Imposition of additional tax.--If any taxpayer
receives any amount from a qualified retirement plan * * *, the taxpayer's tax * * * for the taxable year in
which such amount is received shall be increased by an
amount equal to 10 percent of the portion of such
amount w…
IRCCourt RulingsMar 31, 1997related by meaning
ble. Zmuda v. Commissioner
, 79
T.C. 714, 727 (1982), affd. 731 F.2d 1417 (9th Cir. 1984).
In this instance, petitioner readily admits that A Atlantic is presently holding his property, and that there is a
- 9 -
7
For the purposes of sec. 72(t), the term "employee" also
refers to participants in individual retirement a…
IRCCourt RulingsOct 3, 1995related by meaning
distribution qualified for tax-free
rollover treatment under section 402(a)(5); Brown v.
Commissioner
, T.C. Memo. 1995-93 (same); cf. supra
with T.C. Memo. 1993-561.
- 13 -
10
It would appear that such stipulation would also affect
the amount of the excise tax under sec. 4980A. We leave this
matter to the parties as p…
IRCCourt RulingsDec 16, 1998related by meaning
rty within the
10-year period ending on the date of the transfer.
(4) Amount involved.--The term "amount
involved" means, with respect to a prohibited transaction, the greater of the amount of money and
the fair market value of the other property given or
the amount of money and the fair market value of the
other prope…
IRCCourt RulingsJun 4, 1997related by meaning
amount is erroneously treated
as self-employment income, or if an amount is
erroneously treated as wages, and
(2) If the correction of the error would require an assessment of one such tax and the
refund or credit of the other tax, and
- 23 -
(3) If at any time the correction of the
error is authorized as to one such t…
IRCCourt RulingsAug 12, 1998related by meaning
titioner, WE 7, and
- 18 -
4
The complaint filed in the Superior Court indicates that
the subject matter of the case involved a contract to purchase a portion of a shopping center entered into on Aug. 3, 1987.
the Guardian Construction Co., Inc., as corporate partners of
Estes Co. Petitioner was identified as a partner…
89 FR 32346 — Amendment to Prohibited Transaction Exemptions 75-1, 77-4, 80-83, 83-1, and 86-128 ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Apr 25, 2024related by meaning
nd in its text, PTE 2020-02 has been broadly amended to encompass compensation for advice irrespective of the product recommended.
Back to Citation
6. ERISA section 408(a) and Code section 4975(c)(2), expressly permit the Department (through the Reorganization Plan No. 4 of 1978) to grant “a conditional or uncondition…
81 FR 21139 — Amendment to Prohibited Transaction Exemption (PTE) 75-1, Part V, Exemptions From Prohibitions Respecting Certain Classes of Transactions Involving Employee Be… ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Apr 8, 2016related by meaning
75(e)(1) of the Code are included within the scope of relief provided by PTE 75-1 because it was issued jointly by the Department and the Service.
See PTE 2002-13, 67 FR 9483 (March 1, 2002) (preamble discussion). For simplicity and consistency with the other new exemptions and amendments to other existing exemptions p…
IRCCourt RulingsJan 26, 1984related by meaning
shall not apply to amounts described in clause (ii) of subparagraph (A) of section 72(mX5) to the extent that section 72(mX5) applies to such amounts. (J) Unrealized appreciation op employer securities. — In the case of any distribution including securities of the employer corporation which, without regard to the requi…
IRCCourt RulingsMay 14, 2001related by meaning
December 19, 1989,
- 6 -
for tax years ending after the date of enactment. See OBRA sec.
7841(a)(3), 103 Stat. 2428. The court order in this case was issued in 1985; it precedes the effective date of section
414(p)(11) and cannot qualify as a QDRO.
The decree provided that petitioner is to receive a "sum of
money equa…
IRCCourt RulingsJul 25, 1984related by meaning
cated, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure.
See Tipton & Kalmbach, Inc. v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1982-260. We note, however, that Congress in enacting ERISA appears to have adopted the facts and circumstances test of sec. 1.401-6(b)(2), Income Tax Regs., for determining wheth…
IRCCourt RulingsMay 19, 1986related by meaning
4); Estate of English v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1985-549, 50 T.C.M. 1362, 54 P-H Memo T.C. par. 85,549.
Decision will he entered for the respondent. While the constitutional issue was the only argument raised in the petition with respect to the dispute over inclusion of the lump-sum payment, we deal also with the two…