Brief Case

Search the Pension Law Library

Limit to:Advanced options
Searches the code/regs in effect on that date.
Words mode supports "quoted phrases", +required and -excluded terms.
Document types:
Go to 96 T.C. 858 (not yet in the library — opens the official source)
60 documents · 0.82sAllIRCERISAPBGCJoint Board
  1. 85 FR 81097 — Grandfathered Group Health Plans and Grandfathered Group Health Insurance Coverage
    IRCFinal Rules (FR)Dec 15, 2020
    …ion (as defined in paragraph (g)(4)(i) of this section) from March 2010 is 0.2269 (475−387.142 = 87.858; 87.858 ÷ 387.142 = 0.2269). The maximum percentage increase permitted is 37.69% (0.2269 = 22.69%; 22.69% + 15% = 37.69%). Because 33.33% does not exceed 37.69%, the change in the copayment requirement at that time d…
  2. 85 FR 42782 — Grandfathered Group Health Plans and Grandfathered Group Health Insurance Coverage
    IRCProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Jul 15, 2020
    …ion (as defined in paragraph (g)(4)(i) of this section) from March 2010 is 0.2269 (475−387.142 = 87.858; 87.858 ÷ 387.142 = 0.2269). The maximum percentage increase permitted is 37.69% (0.2269 = 22.69%; 22.69% + 15% = 37.69%). Because 33.33% does not exceed 37.69%, the change in the copayment requirement at that time d…
  3. 80 FR 72192 — Final Rules for Grandfathered Plans, Preexisting Condition Exclusions, Lifetime and Annual Limits, Rescissions, Dependent Coverage, Appeals, and Patient Protec…
    IRCFinal Rules (FR)Nov 18, 2015
    …n (as defined in paragraph (g)(3)(i) of this section) from March 2010 is 0.2269 (475 − 387.142 = 87.858; 87.858 ÷ 387.142 = 0.2269). The maximum percentage increase permitted is 37.69% (0.2269 = 22.69%; 22.69% + 15% = 37.69%). Because 33.33% does not exceed 37.69%, the change in the copayment requirement at that time d…
  4. 75 FR 34538 — Interim Final Rules for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Relating to Status as a Grandfathered Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Aff…
    IRCFinal Rules (FR)Jun 17, 2010
    …n (as defined in paragraph (g)(3)(i) of this section) from March 2010 is 0.2269 (475 − 387.142 = 87.858; 87.858 ÷ 387.142 = 0.2269). The maximum percentage increase permitted is 37.69% (0.2269 = 22.69%; 22.69% + 15% = 37.69%). Because 33.33% does not exceed 37.69%, the change in the copayment requirement at that time d…
  5. 150 T.C. No. 7 — Celia Mazzei v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsMar 5, 2018related by meaning
    1, 933 (2d Cir. 1932), rev'g 22 B.T.A. 1171 (1931)), aKg T.C. Memo. 1982-209. With that admonition in mind, we resolve these cases on their particular facts, applying the text of the relevant Code provisions. For the reasons discussed below, we reject petitioners' broadest argument--that the substance doctrines have no…
  6. Treas. Reg. § 54.9815-1251(g)(5) — Preservation of right to maintain existing coverage.
    IRCRegulationsJan 14, 2021
    …ion (as defined in paragraph (g)(4)(i) of this section) from March 2010 is 0.2269 (475−387.142 = 87.858; 87.858 ÷ 387.142 = 0.2269). The maximum percentage increase permitted is 37.69% (0.2269 = 22.69%; 22.69% + 15% = 37.69%). Because 33.33% does not exceed 37.69%, the change in the copayment requirement at that time d…
  7. 77 T.C. 1197; 2 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2188 — Shut Out Dee-Fence, Inc. v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsDec 2, 1981related by meaning
    n the deficiency actions and, thus, we must follow the legislature’s mandate and dismiss this case. An appropriate order of dismissal will be entered. ^ince this is a preliminary jurisdictional motion, the Court has concluded that the post-trial procedures of Rule 182, Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure, are not…
  8. 86 FR 55980 — Requirements Related to Surprise Billing; Part II
    IRCFinal Rules (FR)Oct 7, 2021
    …5 * $0.55). Thus, the total cost burden relating to the notice of eligibility and acceptance is $63,858. ( printed page 56088) Table 56—Annual Burden and Cost for IROs To Send Notices of Eligibility and Acceptance Starting in 2022 Year Estimated number of responses Total annual burden (hours) Total estimated labor cost…
  9. 97 T.C. 237; 97 T.C. No. 14 — Guilzon v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsAug 6, 1991related by meaning
    f the matter is that the payment in question should be taxable to petitioner under section 72(e). Accordingly, we sustain respondent’s determination.6 In order to take into account what appear to be mechanical errors in respondent’s calculations and to afford the parties a further opportunity to resolve the question of…
  10. 78 T.C. 1187; 78 T.C. No. 83 — Plastic Engineering & Mfg. Co. v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJun 30, 1982
    …from Plastic totaling $94,740. Petitioner made contributions to the plan in the total amount of $25,858.46 for the period September 30, 1974, through September 30, 1975, all payments actually having been made by December 1, 1974. The $25,858.46 represents the normal cost of funding the 12-month plan year beginning on S…
  11. 89 FR 32302 — Amendment to Prohibited Transaction Exemption 84-24
    ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Apr 25, 2024
    …s, respectively. This results in an hour burden of 260,967 hours with an equivalent cost of $43,244,858 in the first year.[86] Table 6—Hour Burden and Equivalent Cost Associated With the All Material Facts Activity Year 1 Subsequent years Burden hours Equivalent burden cost Burden hours Equivalent burden cost Legal 260…
  12. T.C. Memo. 2024-6 — Clair R. Couturier, Jr. v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJan 17, 2024related by meaning
    Title 26 U.S.C. (Code) , in effect at all relevant times, and Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure . Served 01/17/24 2 [* 2 ] deficiencies under section 4973 in th e aggregate amount of $8,476,705 . The notices also determined additions to tax under section 6651(a)(1) and (2) and accurac…
  13. 78 T.C. 979; 78 T.C. No. 69 — Ruggere v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJun 14, 1982related by meaning
    nder the Sixth and Ninth Amendments of the Constitution were not violated by our actions in the instant case. Decision will be entered under Rule 155. By stipulation, respondent concedes that the $1,562 figure is the product of an erroneous computation in the statutory notice of deficiency and that should respondent pr…
  14. T.C. Summary Opinion 2002-66 — Milagros Z. Gueco v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJun 10, 2002related by meaning
    T.C. Summary Opinion 2002-66 UNITED STATES TAX COURT MILAGROS Z. GUECO, Petitioner v . COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 545-01S. Filed June 10, 2002. Milagros Z. Gueco, pro se. James N. Beyer , for respondent. DINAN, Special Trial Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section …
  15. T.C. Memo. 1996-365 — Timothy W. & Suzanne M. Coffield v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsAug 8, 1996related by meaning
    to the Internal Revenue Code by section 302 of the Taxpayer Bill of Rights 2, Pub. L. 104-168, authorizes this Court to review the Secretary's failure to abate interest with respect to requests for abatement after July 30, 1996. Because this case does not involve a request for abatement after July 30, 1996, we lack jur…
  16. T.C. Memo. 2020-48 — Henry C. Williams & Sonja L. Johnson v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsApr 16, 2020
    …nd 2014. Withdrawals From Retirement Accounts In 2010 and 2011 petitioners withdrew $71,625 and $42,858, respectively, from their retirement accounts. On their 2010 return petitioners reported that they - 10 - [*10] received $50,275 in pension and annuity distributions but asserted the distributions were nontaxable bec…
  17. T.C. Memo. 1998-295 — Shedco, Inc. v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsAug 12, 1998related by meaning
    titioner, WE 7, and - 18 - 4 The complaint filed in the Superior Court indicates that the subject matter of the case involved a contract to purchase a portion of a shopping center entered into on Aug. 3, 1987. the Guardian Construction Co., Inc., as corporate partners of Estes Co. Petitioner was identified as a partner…
  18. 86 T.C. 980; 86 T.C. No. 60 — Estate of Rosenberg v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsMay 19, 1986related by meaning
    4); Estate of English v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1985-549, 50 T.C.M. 1362, 54 P-H Memo T.C. par. 85,549. Decision will he entered for the respondent. While the constitutional issue was the only argument raised in the petition with respect to the dispute over inclusion of the lump-sum payment, we deal also with the two…
  19. T.C. Memo. 2005-173 — Transport Labor Contract/Leasing, Inc. & Subsidiaries v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJul 14, 2005related by meaning
    48 F.2d 306, 310 (9th Cir. 1945), affg. a Memorandum Opinion of this Court dated Jan. 5, 1943; Standard Knitting Mills, Inc. v. Commissioner, 141 F.2d 195, 198-199 (6th Cir. 1944), affg. 47 B.T.A. 295 (1942). Generally, new issues may not be raised in a Rule 155 computation. Harris v. Commissioner, 99 T.C. 121, 123 (19…
  20. T.D. 9744 — This document contains final regulations concerning Public Health Services Act sections which are incorporated into section 9815 of the Internal Revenue Code b…
    IRCTreasury DecisionsDec 7, 2015
    …n (as defined in paragraph (g)(3)(i) of this section) from March 2010 is 0.2269 (475 – 387.142 = 87.858; 87.858 ÷ 387.142 = 0.2269). The maximum percentage increase permitted is 37.69% (0.2269 = 22.69%; 22.69% + 15% = 37.69%). Because 33.33% does not exceed 37.69%, the change in the copayment requirement at that time d…