Brief Case

Search the Pension Law Library

Limit to:Advanced options
Searches the code/regs in effect on that date.
Words mode supports "quoted phrases", +required and -excluded terms.
Document types:
Go to Ann. 2006-49 (not yet in the library — opens the official source)
87 documents · 0.27sAllIRCERISAPBGCJoint Board
  1. Ann. 2013-15 — This announcement contains a revised Exhibit: Sample Notice to Interested Parties, attached to Rev. Proc. 2013-6, 2013-1 I.R.B. 198. The Exhibit is revised to …
    IRCAnnouncementsMar 11, 2013related by meaning
    reserve your right to comment on a matter upon which the Department declines to comment, or by if you wish to waive that right. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 13. Detailed instructions regarding the requirements for notification of interested parties may be found in sections 17 and 18 of Rev. Proc. 2013-6. Additional informati…
  2. Notice 2006-89 — Section 906 of Pension Protection Act of 2006; transition rule. This notice provides transition relief for plans of Indian tribal governments to comply with th…
    IRCNoticesModified Oct 23, 2006
    …ms of Plan B). Accordingly, Plan B is treated as a continuation of Plan A from and after October 1, 2006. (iii) Alternative reasonable and good faith compliance. As an alternative to the action under (ii) of this Example, the ITG takes action on July 1, 2007, effective as of October 1, 2006, to spin off all (or a porti…
  3. Rev. Proc. 2021-30 — Rev. Proc. 2021-30 adds two new benefit overpayment correction methods that encourage employers to avoid seeking recoupment of benefit overpayments made to par…
    IRCRevenue ProceduresModified Aug 2, 2021
    3% of the employee’s plan compensation for each payroll period from April 1, 2006 through December 31, 2006 (resulting in elective deferrals of $960). The employee’s plan compensation for 2006 was $40,000 ($8,000 for the first three months and $32,000 for the last nine months). Employer E made matching contributions eq…
  4. Rev. Proc. 2018-52 — The revenue procedure modifies and supersedes Rev. Proc. 2016–51, 2016–42 I.R.B. 465, which sets forth the Employee Plans Compliance Resolution System (“EPCRS”…
    IRCRevenue ProceduresOct 15, 2018
    3% of the employee’s plan compensation for each payroll period from April 1, 2006 through December 31, 2006 (resulting in elective deferrals of $960). The employee’s plan compensation for 2006 was $40,000 ($8,000 for the first three months and $32,000 for the last nine months). Employer E made matching contributions eq…
  5. Rev. Proc. 2016-51 — This revenue procedure updates the comprehensive system of correction programs for sponsors of retirement plans that are intended to satisfy the requirements o…
    IRCRevenue ProceduresOct 17, 2016
    3% of the employee’s plan compensation for each payroll period from April 1, 2006 through December 31, 2006 (resulting in elective deferrals of $960). The employee’s plan compensation for 2006 was $40,000 ($8,000 for the first three months and $32,000 for the last nine months). Employer E made matching contributions eq…
  6. T.C. Summary Opinion 2004-29 — Howard T. Owens, Jr. & Ann E. Owens v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsMar 15, 2004
    …in this case, petitioners resided in Bridgeport, Connecticut. Petitioners Howard T. Owens, Jr., and Ann E. Owens, husband and wife, were born on July 20, 1934, and March 29, 1941, respectively. In 1999, petitioners owned multiple IRA accounts, including a Fidelity Investments Traditional IRA in the name of Howard T. Ow…
  7. T.C. Memo. 1996-265 — Harold E. & Anna Mae Emmons v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJun 11, 1996
    regular interest", such interest is transferred from the Accumulation Fund to the Annuity Savings Fund. Md. Ann. Code, art. 73B, sec. 14(2)(c) (1988). Benefits, are paid from the Expense Fund. Md. Ann. Code, art. 73B, sec. 14(3) (1988 and Supp. 1991). The Annuity Savings Fund holds a participant's "accumulated contribu…
  8. Rev. Rul. 2006-38 — Prohibited transactions; first tier excise tax calculations. This ruling describes how the amount involved is calculated with respect to the section 4975 prohi…
    IRCRevenue RulingsJul 17, 2006
    INCOME TAX Notice 2006-60 Notice 2006-60 This notice announces that the Treasury Department and IRS will amend regulations section 1.45D-1 to provide guidance on how an entity meets the requirements to be a qualified active low-income community business when its activities involve certain targeted populations under sec…
  9. Rev. Proc. 2007-71 — Tax-sheltered annuities; written program; public schools; model amendments. This procedure sets forth model amendments that may be adopted in order to satisfy …
    IRCRevenue ProceduresDec 17, 2007related by meaning
    as to whether the participant is a former employee, assuming that reliance on that information is not unreasonable under the facts and circumstances. 8.03. Re-exchange back into plan. If, after September 24, 2007 and before January 1, 2009, a contract is issued in an exchange permitted under Rev. Rul. 90-24 (an “inter…
  10. T.D. 9075 — Final regulations under section 457 of the Code provide guidance on eligible section 457 deferred compensation plans of state and local governmental employers …
    IRCTreasury DecisionsSep 29, 2003
    of paragraph (c)(1)(i)(A) of this section is $15,000 for 2006 and the additional dollar amount permitted under the age 50 catch-up is $5,000 for 2006. (ii) Conclusion. C is eligible for the age 50 catch-up in 2006 because C is 55 in 2006. However, C is not eligible for the special section 457 catch-up under paragraph (…
  11. PLR 200939018 — Annuities: Endowment and Life Insurance (Included v. Not Included in Gross Income)
    IRCPrivate Letter RulingsSep 25, 2009related by meaning
    Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury Wa shington, DC 20224 Number: 200939018 Release Date: 9/25/2009 Index Number: 72.00-00 --------------------- -------------------------------------------- -------------------------- -------------- ------------ Third Party Communication: None Date of Communication: Not …
  12. PLR 200742010 — Annuities: Endowment and Life Insurance (Included v. Not Included in Gross Income)
    IRCPrivate Letter RulingsOct 19, 2007related by meaning
    …r and subsequent submissions by Taxpayer requesting ruling concerning the issuance of deferred gift annuities and the application of section 72 of the Internal Revenue Code. 1 FACTS Taxpayer represents that is a public charity within the meaning of section 509 of the Internal Revenue Code and is exempt from tax under s…
  13. PLR 200711014 — Annuities: Endowment and Life Insurance (Included v. Not Included in Gross Income)
    IRCPrivate Letter RulingsMar 16, 2007related by meaning
    Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury Washington, DC 20224 Number: 200711014 Release Date: 3/16/2007 Index Number: 264.00-00, 72.00-00, 1035.00-00 ------------------------------------------------------------ - ---------------------------------- -------------------------------- ----------------------------…
  14. Notice 2006-75 — Weighted average interest rate modifications; corporate bond weighted average. This notice extends the use of the corporate bond weighted average interest rate…
    IRCNoticesSep 5, 2006
    se of the corporate bond weighted average for plan years beginning in 2006 and 2007. Corresponding changes were made to the parallel ERISA provisions. This notice provides the composite corporate bond rates from December, 2005 through July, 2006, and the resulting corporate bond weighted averages for plan years beginni…
  15. PLR 200626034 — Annuity Contracts Not Held By Natural Persons
    IRCPrivate Letter RulingsJun 30, 2006related by meaning
    …----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Old Annuity = --------------------------------------------- New Annuity = -------------------------------------- Settlor = ------------------------------------------------ ----------------------------------------------------…
  16. T.C. Memo. 2010-115 — Ronald D. & Lorie A. Jelling v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsMay 27, 2010
    … from Benistar Plan, the applicable Federal rate was 3 .89 percent for a short-term loan compounded annually . Rev . Rul . 2005-66, 2005-2 C .B . 686 . Mid- and long-term rates were higher . Id . In March 2006, when Mogelefsky withdrew from Benistar Plan, the applicable Federal rate .was 4 .58 percent for a short-term …
  17. PLR 200820009 — Investment in Contract
    IRCPrivate Letter RulingsMay 16, 2008related by meaning
    Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury Washington, DC 20224 Number: 200820009 Release Date: 5/16/2008 Index Number: 72.02-00, 72.20-00, 401.0000, 401.06-00, 402.00-00, 403.00-00, 408.06-00, 4973.00-00, 4979.00-00 -------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------ ------…
  18. Rev. Proc. 2015-36 — This revenue procedure modifies Rev. Proc. 2011–49 by expanding the scope of the pre-approved program to include defined benefit plans containing cash balance …
    IRCRevenue ProceduresJul 6, 2015
    …cceptability of the form of pre-approved plans were set forth in Rev. Proc. 2011–49 (as modified by Ann. 2012–3, 2012–4 I.R.B. 335; Ann. 2013–37, 2013–34 I.R.B. 155; Ann. 2014–4, 2014–7 I.R.B. 523; Ann. 2014–41, 2014– 52 I.R.B. 979; and Rev. Proc. 2015–6, 2015–1 I.R.B. 194). Sections 6.03(4) and 16.03(4) of Rev. Proc. …
  19. Ann. 2006-70 — Minimum funding standards; alternative funding schedule election. This announcement describes how to make an election of an alternative funding schedule pursua…
    IRCAnnouncementsOct 2, 2006★ strong match
    employer. B. This election must be filed at the following address: Internal Revenue Service Commissioner, Tax Exempt and Government Entities Division Attention: SE:T:EP:RA:T Alternative Funding Schedule Election P. O. Box 27063 McPherson Station Washington, D.C. 20038
  20. 98 T.C. 283; 98 T.C. No. 23 — Aronson v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsMar 18, 1992
    …y Maryland statute to replace the former Maryland Savings Share Insurance Corp. Md. Fin. Inst. Code Ann. secs. 10-102, 10-101 (1986). Funds are appropriated to MDIF “to the extent necessary to protect holders of savings accounts in member associations”, and to enable MDIF “to meet its obligations under a hardship withd…