Brief Case

Search the Pension Law Library

Limit to:Advanced options
Searches the code/regs in effect on that date.
Words mode supports "quoted phrases", +required and -excluded terms.
Document types:
Go to T.C. Memo. 2001-270 (not yet in the library — opens the official source)
85 documents · 0.46sAllIRCERISAPBGCJoint Board
  1. T.C. Memo. 2005-173 — Transport Labor Contract/Leasing, Inc. & Subsidiaries v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJul 14, 2005related by meaning
    ll other agreements between the parties. The parties stipulate that neither of them has made any representations with respect to the subiect matter of this Agreement or any representations * * * except such representations as are specifically set forth herein and each of the parties hereto acknowledges that he or they …
  2. T.C. Memo. 2001-55 — Taylor Miller v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsMar 6, 2001★ strong match
    v. Commissioner , T.C. Memo. 1998-140; Reiher v. Commissioner , T.C. Memo. 1998-75; Easter v. Commissioner , T.C. Memo. 1998-8; Brewer v. Commissioner , T.C. Memo. 1997-542, affd. without published opinion 172 F.3d 875 (9th Cir. 1999); Gillette v. Commissioner , T.C. Memo. 1997-301; Hayes v. Commissioner , T.C. Memo. 1…
  3. T.C. Memo. 2010-149 — Harold X. O'Boyle v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJul 13, 2010
    …its sole member . Ms . O'Boyle received nonemployee compensation from Red Barn Actors studio during 2001 and 2002 . Neither petitioner was employed by any third party during 2000, 2001, or 2002 . Petitioners did not file a timely .tax return for the 2000, 2001, or 2002 tax years . Mr . O'Boyle paid $10,000 toward his p…
  4. T.C. Memo. 2005-192 — Arthur F. Millard v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsAug 8, 2005★ strong match
    T.C. Memo. 2005-192 UNITED STATES TAX COURT ARTHUR F. MILLARD, Petitioner v . COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 3713-04. Filed August 8, 2005. Arthur F. Millard, pro se. Travis T. Vance III , for respondent. MEMORANDUM OPINION WELLS, Judge : Respondent determined a deficiency of $2,764 in petition…
  5. T.C. Memo. 1996-502 — Elaine S. Bennett v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsNov 7, 1996related by meaning
    is written, and, even if petitioner's argument might accord with good policy, we are not at liberty to rewrite such section because we might deem its effects susceptible of improvement. Commissioner v. Lundy , 516 U.S. 116 S. Ct. 647, 656-657 (Jan. 17, 1996) (citing Badaracco v. Commissioner , 464 U.S. 386, 398 (1984))…
  6. T.C. Memo. 2005-298 — Isabelle Bichindaritz v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsDec 29, 2005
    ion. See 1994 U.S./French Tax Convention art. 23(4), 2 Tax Treaties (CCH) par. 2001.24. Article 18 of the 1994 U.S./French Tax Convention, rather than Article 19 in the now-superseded convention signed in 1967, - 11 - governs deductions for pension payments made in 2001. The French Foreign Ministry publication does not…
  7. T.C. Summary Opinion 2006-184 — William Edward & Patricia Marie Colombell v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsNov 30, 2006related by meaning
    ted States , 68 Fed. Cl. 177, 188 (2005) (quoting Marsh & McLennan Cos. v. United States , supra , at 1381). Rather, we must apply the language of the relevant provisions, as written. See Commissioner v. Lundy , 516 U.S. 235, 252 (1996) (courts are “bound by the language of the statute as it is written”); Badaracco v. …
  8. Rev. Proc. 2004-25 — Remedial amendment period; disqualifying provisions; December 31, 2001. This procedure extends the remedial amendment period under section 401(b) of the Code w…
    IRCRevenue ProceduresApr 19, 2004
    …] SECTION 3. EXTENSION OF REMEDIAL AMENDMENT PERIOD FOR DISQUALIFYING PROVISIONS AFTER DECEMBER 31, 2001 .01 The remedial amendment period with respect to disqualifying provisions described in § 1.401(b)-1(b)(1) that are put into effect (in the case of new plans) or adopted (in the case of existing plans) after Decembe…
  9. T.C. Summary Opinion 2005-126 — Carolyn A. Glenn v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsAug 16, 2005
    …king account where she deposited her paychecks. During the period from July 27 through December 31, 2001, Mr. Glenn wrote checks totaling $66,082.07 drawn on the Harris Trust & Savings Bank joint checking account as follows: - 6 - Date Check No. Description Amount 7/27/2001 136 Payable to: Discover $2,700.00 8/1/2001 1…
  10. Notice 2004-34 — Minimum funding standards; interest rates; section 101 of Pension Funding Equity Act. This notice describes the method for determining the permissible range of…
    IRCNoticesMay 3, 2004
    …14 (not a toll-free number). Table 1 Composite Corporate Bond Rates Composite Rates for: Month 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 January 7.94 7.34 6.92 6.07 5.68 February 7.84 7.21 6.86 5.90 5.63 March 7.87 7.08 7.10 5.89 5.44 April 7.84 7.28 7.03 5.91 May 8.27 7.28 6.99 5.42 June 8.05 7.17 6.76 5.24 July 7.93 7.13 6.74 5.77 Au…
  11. T.C. Memo. 2006-101 — Eugenie Denise Mitchell v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsMay 11, 2006
    …counts were made with funds which were not included in petitioner's taxable income. On February 28, 2001, petitioner's then-current employer went out of business, and petitioner was laid off. As a result of being laid off, in the spring of 2001 petitioner applied for and received unemployment benefits from the State of…
  12. T.C. Memo. 2000-384 — Robert W. & Vivian Toan v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsDec 19, 2000related by meaning
    ec. 402(a), 96 Stat. 324, 648, but had to be determined in the Toans’ individual case. Alternatively, petitioners argue, any assessment under the 1980 notice is time barred under section 6501. Petitioners assert that the addition to tax under section 6659 was an affected item - 7 - for 1982 and that the related notice …
  13. 160 T.C. No. 3 — 3M Company and Subsidiaries v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsFeb 9, 2023related by meaning
    … and June 30, 1979), aff’d , 961 F.2d 1255 (6th Cir. 1992); and Exxon Cor p. v. Commissioner , T.C. Memo. 1993-616, 66 T.C.M. (CCH) 1707 (a case involving tax years 1979, 1980, and 1981), aff’d sub nom. Texaco, Inc. v. Commissioner , 98 F.3d 825 (5th Cir. 1996) In Procter & Gamble Co. v. Commissioner , 95 T.C. 323, 324…
  14. T.C. Memo. 2011-2 — Michael C. Hollen, D.D.S., P.C. v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJan 4, 2011
    … Amendment Effective Adopted . Effective Section Date Date Date 402(c) (4) (C) Jan. 1, 1999 Jan. 1, 2001 Jan. 1, 2001 414(n) (2) (C) Nov. 1, 1997 Jan. 1, 2001 Jan. 1, 2001 414(q) Nov. 1, 1997 Jan. 1, 2001 Jan. 1, 2001 414(u) Dec. 12, 1994 Jan. 1, 2001 Jan. 1, 2001 415(c) (3) (D) Dec. 31, 1997 Jan. 1, 2001 Jan. 1, 2001 …
  15. T.C. Memo. 2009-272 — Carolyn D. Hemrick v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsNov 25, 2009related by meaning
    t affect the tax treatment - 5 under the Internal, Revenue Code . See sec . 7701(j)(5) ("No provision of law not contained in this title [the internal Revenue Code] shall apply for purposes of determining the treatment under this title of the Thrift Savings Fund or any contribution to, or distribution from, such Fund .…
  16. T.C. Memo. 1996-365 — Timothy W. & Suzanne M. Coffield v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsAug 8, 1996related by meaning
    to the Internal Revenue Code by section 302 of the Taxpayer Bill of Rights 2, Pub. L. 104-168, authorizes this Court to review the Secretary's failure to abate interest with respect to requests for abatement after July 30, 1996. Because this case does not involve a request for abatement after July 30, 1996, we lack jur…
  17. T.C. Memo. 2010-226 — Harry Eugene Mathews v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsOct 19, 2010related by meaning
    … • warnings that he was in danger of being penalized. For example, in Mathews v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2005-84, we told petitioner: "Even though the filing of the petition resulted in respondent's concession of the sec. 72(t) additional tax,
  18. PLR 200009002 — Treatment of Funded Welfare Benefit Plans
    IRCPrivate Letter RulingsMar 3, 2000related by meaning
    …C:EBEO:4 TL-N-4712-99 UILC: 419.00-00 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE NATIONAL OFFICE FIELD SERVICE ADVICE MEMORANDUM FOR FROM: Assistant Chief Counsel (Employee Benefits and Exempt Organizations) CC: EBEO SUBJECT: This Field Service Advice is in res ponse to your memorandum dated October 5, 1999. Field Service Advice is not …
  19. Treas. Reg. § 54.4980B-10(b) — Interaction of FMLA and COBRA.
    IRCRegulationsDec 30, 2016
    y of FMLA leave is 12 weeks later, on April 25, 2001, and B does not return to work with X at the end of the FMLA leave. If B does not elect COBRA continuation coverage, B will not be covered under the group health plan of X as of April 26, 2001. (ii) B experiences a qualifying event on April 25, 2001, and the maximum …
  20. 162 T.C. No. 7 — Mohamed K. Abdo & Fardowsa J. Farah v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsApr 2, 2024related by meaning
    is extended. See Stromme v. Commissioner, 138 T.C. 213, 218 n.8 (2012). We note, however, that effective with respect to federal ly declared disasters declared after November 15, 2021, the extension period has been redefined to end “on the date which is 60 days after the later of . . . [the] earliest incident date . . …