Brief Case

Search the Pension Law Library

Limit to:Advanced options
Searches the code/regs in effect on that date.
Words mode supports "quoted phrases", +required and -excluded terms.
Document types:
Go to T.C. Memo. 2010-86 (not yet in the library — opens the official source)
70 documents · 0.24sAllIRCERISAPBGCJoint Board
  1. Rev. Proc. 2014-5 — Revised procedures are provided for furnishing technical advice to area managers and appeals office by the Office of the Division Commissioner, Tax Exempt and …
    IRCRevenue ProceduresJan 2, 2014related by meaning
    , or documents to which §6104 (document open to public inspection) applies, as described in section 10.03. Taxpayer may protest deletions not made .05 After receiving the notice under § 6110(f)(1) of intention to disclose the TAM, the taxpayer may protest the disclosure of certain information in it. The taxpayer must s…
  2. Treas. Reg. § 1.430(f)-1(g) — Effect of prefunding balance and funding standard carryover balance.
    IRCRegulationsSep 9, 2016
    …arryover balance of Plan P is $25,000 and the prefunding balance is zero as of the beginning of the 2010 plan year. The sponsor of Plan P, Sponsor S, does not elect to use any portion of the balance to offset the minimum required contribution for 2010 pursuant to paragraph (d)(1) of this section, or to reduce any porti…
  3. Rev. Proc. 2013-5 — Technical advice. Revised procedures are provided for furnishing technical advice to area managers and appeals office by the Office of the Division Commissione…
    IRCRevenue ProceduresJan 2, 2013related by meaning
    ed do not apply to requests for any documents to the extent § 6104 applies. Statement identifying information to be deleted from public inspection .04 The text of a TAM subject to § 6110(a) may be open to public inspection. The Service deletes certain information from the text before it is made available for inspection…
  4. 75 FR 34538 — Interim Final Rules for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Relating to Status as a Grandfathered Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Aff…
    IRCFinal Rules (FR)Jun 17, 2010
    fore March 23, 2010; (B) Changes effective after March 23, 2010 pursuant to a filing on or before March 23, 2010 with a State insurance department; or (C) Changes effective after March 23, 2010 pursuant to written amendments to a plan that were adopted on or before March 23, 2010. (ii) Changes made after March 23, 2010…
  5. Notice 2010-80 — This notice provides additional relief for nonqualified deferred compensation plans covered under section 409A. This notice also expands the types of plans eli…
    IRCNoticesDec 20, 2010
    Notice 2010-80 Modification to the Relief and Guidance on Corrections of Certain Failures of a Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan to Comply with § 409A(a) I. PURPOSE This notice modifies certain provisions of Notice 2008-113, Relief and Guidance on Corrections of Certain Failures of a Nonqualified Deferred Compens…
  6. Notice 2010-77 — This notice further extends the deadline for amending qualified defined benefit plans to meet certain requirements of the Code that were added by the Pension P…
    IRCNoticesDec 20, 2010
    …ing plan amendments provided by this notice. Notice 2009-97 and Rev. Proc. 2007-44 modified. Notice 2010-80 Notice 2010-80 This notice provides additional relief for nonqualified deferred compensation plans covered under section 409A. This notice also expands the types of plans eligible for relief under Notice 2010-6, …
  7. T.C. Memo. 2024-71 — Kenneth Steven Tuma, Sr. & Deborah Ann Tuma v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJul 11, 2024related by meaning
    ). VIII. Conclusion Petitioners received railroad retirement and Social Security benefits from the RRB during each of the years in issue . Petitioners have failed to prove that respondent incorrectly determined the adjustments to petitioners’ income on the basis of amounts that were not reported in the information retu…
  8. Notice 2011-3 — Special rules relating to funding relief for single-employer pension plans under PRA 2010. This notice provides guidance on the special rules relating to fundi…
    IRCNoticesJan 10, 2011
    …t of 1974, as amended (ERISA), is parallel to § 430(c)(2) of the Code, and section 201(a)(1) of PRA 2010 amends section 303(c)(2) of ERISA in a manner parallel to the amendments made to § 430(c)(2) of the Code by section 201(b)(1) of PRA 2010. Section 201(a)(2) of PRA 2010 adds section 303(c)(7) of ERISA, which is para…
  9. Notice 2010-84 — Section 2112 of the Small Business Jobs Act of 2010 (“SBJA”) added section 402A(c)(4) to the Code, effective for distributions made after September 27, 2010, t…
    IRCNoticesDec 20, 2010
    …ption to the general rule regarding the year of income inclusion for in-plan Roth rollovers made in 2010? A-10. Yes. For distributions made in 2010 that are rolled over in an in-plan Roth rollover, the taxable amount is includible in gross income half in 2011 and half in 2012 unless the individual elects to include the…
  10. Notice 2010-48 — This notice provides relief to sponsors of defined contribution pre-approved plans (i.e., master and prototype (M&P) and volume submitter (VS) plans) affected …
    IRCNoticesJul 6, 2010
    …e IRS has provided relief to certain counties in the following states: Connecticut victims of March 2010 severe storms and flooding. See, News Release CT-2010-35, June 1, 2010. Tennessee victims of April-May 2010 severe storms and flooding. See, News Release AL/TN-2010-56T, May 5, 2010. Alabama victims of April 2010 se…
  11. T.C. Memo. 2011-92 — Kathleen Susan Stipe v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsApr 25, 2011related by meaning
    …not necessarily disabled within the meaning of I section 72(m) (7). See Kopty v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo; 2007-343 (taxpayer who received long-term disability benefits from the U.S. Social Security Administration nct disabled within the' meaning of section 72(m) (7)), affd. 313 Fed. Appx. 333 (D.C. Cir. 2009); see also…
  12. Treas. Reg. § 1.430(d)-1(f)(9) — Determination of target normal cost and funding target.
    IRCRegulationsSep 9, 2016
    … H has a funding target of $1,000,000 and an actuarial value of assets of $810,000 as of January 1, 2010. No annuity contracts have been purchased, and Plan H has no funding standard carryover balance or prefunding balance as of January 1, 2010. The enrolled actuary certifies that the January 1, 2010, AFTAP is 81%. Eff…
  13. T.C. Memo. 2010-142 — Ronald W. Parkinson v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJun 28, 2010related by meaning
    erized the settlement payment, implicitly conceding that it was not made with respect to certain claims (i .e ., Federal claims, punitive damages, and attorney' s fees ) nominally covered by the settlement agreement . It is unclear whether petitioner obtained professional tax advice with regard to this matter . It appe…
  14. T.C. Memo. 2009-272 — Carolyn D. Hemrick v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsNov 25, 2009related by meaning
    t affect the tax treatment - 5 under the Internal, Revenue Code . See sec . 7701(j)(5) ("No provision of law not contained in this title [the internal Revenue Code] shall apply for purposes of determining the treatment under this title of the Thrift Savings Fund or any contribution to, or distribution from, such Fund .…
  15. Notice 2010-83 — Funding relief for multiemployer defined benefit plans under PRA 2010. This notice provides guidance in the form of questions and answers for sponsors of multi…
    IRCNoticesDec 20, 2010
    …atus. In addition, the restriction on plan amendments under § 431(b)(8)(D) is effective on June 25, 2010, the date of the enactment of PRA 2010. Section 304(b)(8) of ERISA, added to ERISA by section 211(a)(1) of PRA 2010, is parallel to § 431(b)(8). Under section 101 of Reorganization Plan No. 4 of 1978 (43 FR 47713), …
  16. PLR 200610016 — Year of Deduction
    IRCPrivate Letter RulingsMar 10, 2006related by meaning
    … 86,112 sets forth a defined set of circumstances in which the Service may apply a technical advice memorandum (TAM) that retroactively revokes an earlier TAM or ruling that involves a particular taxpayer. Section 16 of Rev. Proc. 2005-2, 2005-1 I.R.B. 86, 13 provides that under § 7805(b) an Associate Chief Counsel, as…
  17. PLR 200009002 — Treatment of Funded Welfare Benefit Plans
    IRCPrivate Letter RulingsMar 3, 2000related by meaning
    …C:EBEO:4 TL-N-4712-99 UILC: 419.00-00 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE NATIONAL OFFICE FIELD SERVICE ADVICE MEMORANDUM FOR FROM: Assistant Chief Counsel (Employee Benefits and Exempt Organizations) CC: EBEO SUBJECT: This Field Service Advice is in res ponse to your memorandum dated October 5, 1999. Field Service Advice is not …
  18. Notice 2010-90 — This notice contains the 2010 Cumulative List of Changes in Plan Qualification Requirements (2010 Cumulative List) described in section 4 of Rev. Proc. 2007-44…
    IRCNoticesDec 27, 2010
    ation requirements, not just those on the 2010 Cumulative List. The 2010 Cumulative List includes the following guidance issued after October 1, 2010: Notice 2010-84, 2010-51 I.R.B. 872, (item 14 in section IV of this notice). The Service will consider Notice 2010-84 in issuing an opinion, advisory, or determination le…
  19. 80 FR 72192 — Final Rules for Grandfathered Plans, Preexisting Condition Exclusions, Lifetime and Annual Limits, Rescissions, Dependent Coverage, Appeals, and Patient Protec…
    IRCFinal Rules (FR)Nov 18, 2015
    grandfathered health plan: (A) Changes effective after March 23, 2010 pursuant to a legally binding contract entered into on or before March 23, 2010; (B) Changes effective after March 23, 2010 pursuant to a filing on or before March 23, 2010 with a State insurance department; or (C) Changes effective after March 23, 2…
  20. T.C. Memo. 2014-106 — Whistleblower 10949-13W v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJun 4, 2014related by meaning
    hey would establish that respondent proceeded against the targets using information the whistleblower provided after December 20, 2006. If these facts are established, the whistleblower is entitled to judicial review of respondent's award determination. We hold, consistent with the rationale of Dacosta, that this Court…