Brief Case
Pension Resource

Search the Pension Law Library

Limit to:Advanced options
Searches the code/regs in effect on that date.
Words mode supports "quoted phrases", +required and -excluded terms.
Document types:
Go to T.C. Memo. 2012-170 (not yet in the library — opens the official source)
77 documents · 0.23sAllIRCERISAPBGCJoint Board
  1. T.C. Memo. 2005-173 — Transport Labor Contract/Leasing, Inc. & Subsidiaries v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJul 14, 2005related by meaning
    ll other agreements between the parties. The parties stipulate that neither of them has made any representations with respect to the subiect matter of this Agreement or any representations * * * except such representations as are specifically set forth herein and each of the parties hereto acknowledges that he or they …
  2. T.C. Memo. 2024-71 — Kenneth Steven Tuma, Sr. & Deborah Ann Tuma v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJul 11, 2024related by meaning
    …ation software is only as good as the information one puts into it.”). 21 [* 21] Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1996-140 , 71 T.C.M. (CCH) 2526 , 2526 (“ [The tax p ayers] argue that benefits received from the [RRB] are not taxable. This , however , is simply not the case.”). VIII. Conclusion Petitioners received railroad re…
  3. Notice 2012-76 — This notice contains the 2012 Cumulative List of Changes in Plan Qualification Requirements (2012 Cumulative List) described in section 4 of Rev. Proc. 2007-44…
    IRCNoticesDec 27, 2012
    Notice 2012-76 2012 Cumulative List of Changes in Plan Qualification Requirements I. PURPOSE This notice contains the 2012 Cumulative List of Changes in Plan Qualification Requirements (2012 Cumulative List) described in section 4 of Rev. Proc. 2007-44, 2007-2 C.B. 54. The 2012 Cumulative List is to be used by plan spo…
  4. Treas. Reg. § 1.430(f)-1(g) — Effect of prefunding balance and funding standard carryover balance.
    IRCRegulationsSep 9, 2016
    2012, Sponsor S is deemed to elect to reduce the January 1, 2012, prefunding balance by $15,000 under section 436(f)(3). (ii) In accordance with paragraph (d)(1)(ii)(B) of this section, the deemed election to reduce the prefunding balance is deemed to occur on the first day of the plan year, and before the date of any …
  5. 162 T.C. No. 7 — Mohamed K. Abdo & Fardowsa J. Farah v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsApr 2, 2024related by meaning
    is extended. See Stromme v. Commissioner, 138 T.C. 213, 218 n.8 (2012). We note, however, that effective with respect to federal ly declared disasters declared after November 15, 2021, the extension period has been redefined to end “on the date which is 60 days after the later of . . . [the] earliest incident date . . …
  6. Treas. Reg. § 1.436-1(h)(5) — Limits on benefits and benefit accruals under single employer defined benefit plans.
    IRCRegulationsSep 9, 2016
    he AFTAP for 2012 or until paragraph (h)(3) of this section applies on the first day of the 10th month of the plan year. Because the presumed AFTAP is 72%, Plan T is no longer subject to the restrictions on prohibited payments under paragraph (d)(1) of this section, and Plan T must provide benefits for any unpredictabl…
  7. Notice 2012-61 — This notice provides guidance on the special rules relating to pension funding stabilization for single employer defined benefit pension plans under amendments…
    IRCNoticesOct 15, 2012
    … Schedule SB reflect (1) any elections to redesignate contributions made on or before September 30, 2012, to the 2012 plan year which were originally designated as applying to the 2011 plan year in accordance with Q&A T-2(c)(2) of this notice or (2) any section 436 contributions that were made on or before September 30…
  8. T.C. Memo. 2017-3 — Candace Elaine v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJan 3, 2017related by meaning
    …le cause and good faith. Higbee v. Commissioner, 116 T.C. at 449 (citing Remy v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1997-72). The many section 72(t) cases, just some of which have been cited supra pp. 7-8, strongly indicate a common misunderstanding among taxpayers that financial hardship is an exception to the section 72(t) add…
  9. Rev. Rul. 2012-5 — 2012 covered compensation tables; permitted disparity. The covered compensation tables under section 401 of the Code for the year 2012 are provided for use in …
    IRCRevenue RulingsJan 30, 2012
    …with respect to organizational actions that affect the basis of the stock. EMPLOYEE PLANS Rev. Rul. 2012-5 Rev. Rul. 2012-5 2012 covered compensation tables; permitted disparity. The covered compensation tables under section 401 of the Code for the year 2012 are provided for use in determining contributions to defined …
  10. Notice 2012-56 — Weighted average interest rate update; corporate bond indices; 30-year Treasury securities; segment rates. This notice contains updates for the corporate bond …
    IRCNoticesSep 24, 2012
    …Segment Rates First Segment Second Segment Third Segment 1.75 4.62 5.72 For plan years beginning in 2012, the 24-month average segment rates determined under § 430(h)(2)(C)(iv) must be not less than 90% nor greater than 110% of the 25-year average segment rates. Pursuant to Notice 2012-55, I.R.B. 2012-36, the first, se…
  11. Notice 2012-66 — Weighted average interest rate update; corporate bond indices; 30-year Treasury securities; segment rates. This notice contains updates for the corporate bond …
    IRCNoticesDec 3, 2012
    …Segment Rates First Segment Second Segment Third Segment 1.69 4.53 5.60 For plan years beginning in 2012, the 24-month average segment rates determined under § 430(h)(2)(C)(iv) must be not less than 90% nor greater than 110% of the 25-year average segment rates. Pursuant to Notice 2012-55, 2012-36 I.R.B. 332, the first…
  12. Notice 2012-78 — Weighted average interest rate update; corporate bond indices; 30-year Treasury securities; segment rates. This notice contains updates for the corporate bond …
    IRCNoticesDec 27, 2012
    …Segment Rates First Segment Second Segment Third Segment 1.66 4.47 5.52 For plan years beginning in 2012, the 24-month average segment rates determined under § 430(h)(2)(C)(iv) must be not less than 90% nor greater than 110% of the 25-year average segment rates. Pursuant to Notice 2012-55, 2012-36 I.R.B. 332, the first…
  13. T.C. Memo. 2012-344 — Karl E. Cross v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsDec 13, 2012related by meaning
    CLC T.C. Memo. 2012-344 UNITED STATES TAX COURT KARL E. CROSS, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 6009-09. Filed December 13, 2012. Mitchell Stuart Fuerst and Joseph A. DiRuzzo III, for petitioner. Brian E. Derdowski, Jr., and Carroll De Groff Lansdell, for respondent. MEMORANDUM OPIN…
  14. T.C. Memo. 2014-106 — Whistleblower 10949-13W v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJun 4, 2014related by meaning
    hey would establish that respondent proceeded against the targets using information the whistleblower provided after December 20, 2006. If these facts are established, the whistleblower is entitled to judicial review of respondent's award determination. We hold, consistent with the rationale of Dacosta, that this Court…
  15. Notice 2012-16 — Weighted average interest rate update; corporate bond indices; 30-year Treasury securities; segment rates. This notice contains updates for the corporate bond …
    IRCNoticesFeb 27, 2012
    ginning in 30-Year Treasury Weighted Average Permissible Range Month Year 90% to 105% February 2012 4.04 3.64 4.25 MINIMUM PRESENT VALUE SEGMENT RATES Generally for plan years beginning after December 31, 2007, the applicable interest rates under § 417(e)(3)(D) are segment rates computed without regard to a 24-month av…
  16. T.C. Memo. 2011-104 — Patricia Louise Hyde v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsMay 19, 2011related by meaning
    nd to the extent not discussed herein we conclude that they are irrelevant, moot, or without merit. To reflect the foregoing, Decision will be entered under Rule 155.
  17. Notice 2012-24 — Weighted average interest rate update; corporate bond indices; 30-year Treasury securities; segment rates. This notice contains updates for the corporate bond …
    IRCNoticesMar 26, 2012
    Beginning in 30-Year Treasury Weighted Average Permissible Range Month Year 90% to 105% March 2012 4.00 3.60 4.20 MINIMUM PRESENT VALUE SEGMENT RATES Generally for plan years beginning after December 31, 2007, the applicable interest rates under § 417(e)(3)(D) are segment rates computed without regard to a 24-month av…
  18. Notice 2012-28 — Weighted average interest rate update; corporate bond indices; 30-year Treasury securities; segment rates. This notice contains updates for the corporate bond …
    IRCNoticesApr 23, 2012
    Beginning in 30-Year Treasury Weighted Average Permissible Range Month Year 90% to 105% April 2012 3.97 3.57 4.17 MINIMUM PRESENT VALUE SEGMENT RATES Generally for plan years beginning after December 31, 2007, the applicable interest rates under § 417(e)(3)(D) are segment rates computed without regard to a 24-month av…
  19. Notice 2012-36 — Weighted average interest rate update; corporate bond indices; 30-year Treasury securities; segment rates. This notice contains updates for the corporate bond …
    IRCNoticesMay 29, 2012
    rs Beginning in 30-Year Treasury Weighted Average Permissible Range Month Year 90% to 105% May 2012 3.93 3.54 4.13 MINIMUM PRESENT VALUE SEGMENT RATES Generally for plan years beginning after December 31, 2007, the applicable interest rates under § 417(e)(3)(D) are segment rates computed without regard to a 24-month av…
  20. T.C. Memo. 2019-1 — Robert Wesley v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsMar 14, 2019related by meaning
    … we will give effect to these concessions and to respondent's agreement to abate the portion of the 2012 tax attributable to those amounts. We assume that further abatements may be required with respect to self-employment tax and for portions of the sections 6651 and 6654 additions to tax. - 17 - [*17] C. Abuse of Disc…