Brief Case

Search the Pension Law Library

Limit to:Advanced options
Searches the code/regs in effect on that date.
Words mode supports "quoted phrases", +required and -excluded terms.
Document types:
Go to 112 T.C. 247 (not yet in the library — opens the official source)
64 documents · 0.08sAllIRCERISAPBGCJoint Board
  1. 89 FR 32122 — Retirement Security Rule: Definition of an Investment Advice Fiduciary
    ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Apr 25, 2024★ strong match
    two regimes cannot be harmonized or accommodated”). Back to Citation 276.   John Hancock, 510 U.S. at 98. Back to Citation 277.   Id. Back to Citation 278.   See BancOklahoma Mortg. Corp. v. Capital Title Co., Inc., 194 F.3d 1089 (10th Cir. 1999) (stating that McCarran-Ferguson Act bars the application of a Federal sta…
  2. 91 FR 4348 — Improving Transparency Into Pharmacy Benefit Manager Fee Disclosure
    ERISAProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Jan 30, 2026
    …o types of State-level PBM disclosures: inter-firm disclosures [246] and disclosures to regulators.[247]
  3. 81 FR 21147 — Amendment to and Partial Revocation of Prohibited Transaction Exemption (PTE) 84-24 for Certain Transactions Involving Insurance Agents and Brokers, Pension Co…
    ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Apr 8, 2016related by meaning
    upremacy when the two regimes cannot be harmonized or accommodated”). Back to Citation 50.   See BancOklahoma Mortg. Corp. v. Capital Title Co., Inc., 194 F.3d 1089 (10th Cir. 1999) (stating that McCarran-Ferguson Act bars the application of a federal statute only if (1) the federal statute does not specifically relate…
  4. 89 FR 32302 — Amendment to Prohibited Transaction Exemption 84-24
    ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Apr 25, 2024★ strong match
    …hn Hancock Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Harris Trust & Sav. Bank, 510 U.S. 86, 98 (1993). Back to Citation 112.   See BancOklahoma Mortg. Corp. v. Capital Title Co., Inc., 194 F.3d 1089 (10th Cir. 1999) (stating that McCarran-Ferguson Act bars the application of a Federal statute only if (1) the Federal statute does not speci…
  5. 76 FR 76235 — Ex Parte Cease and Desist and Summary Seizure Orders-Multiple Employer Welfare Arrangements
    ERISAProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Dec 6, 2011related by meaning
    ss provided all copies are clear and legible. § 2571.4 Parties For section 521 proceedings, this section shall apply in lieu of § 18.10 of this title: (a) The term “party” wherever used in these rules shall include any person that is a subject of the temporary order and is challenging the temporary order under these se…
  6. 78 FR 13797 — Ex Parte Cease and Desist and Summary Seizure Orders-Multiple Employer Welfare Arrangements
    ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Mar 1, 2013related by meaning
    s provided all copies are clear and legible. § 2571.4 Parties. For section 521 proceedings, this section shall apply in lieu of § 18.10 of this title: (a) The term “party” wherever used in these rules shall include any person that is a subject of the temporary order and is challenging the temporary order under these se…
  7. 81 FR 43430 — Department of Labor Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act Catch-Up Adjustments
    ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Jul 1, 2016★ strong match
    …he penalty conversion table. To adjust the existing minimum penalty for inflation, MSHA multiplied $112, the minimum civil penalty last established by regulation (other than under the Prior Inflation Adjustment Act) in 2007 (72 FR 13592), by the inflation adjustment factor for 2007 of 1.13833, which resulted in a penal…
  8. DOL Office of Administrative Law Judges — U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, PENSION AND WELFARE BENEFITS ADMINISTRATION v. RICHARD L. SMITH and SMITH ADMINISTRATORS
    ERISACourt RulingsJan 20, 1998★ strong match
    …erest involved therein. Complainants assessed a civil penalty against Respondents in the amount of $247,168.00 pursuant to section 502(i) of ERISA and the regulations promulgated thereunder. In its answer, Respondents challenged the assessment of the penalties on various factual and legal grounds as discussed below. II…
  9. 81 FR 21181 — Amendment to and Partial Revocation of Prohibited Transaction Exemption (PTE) 86-128 for Securities Transactions Involving Employee Benefit Plans and Broker-De…
    ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Apr 8, 2016related by meaning
    of the Code and a health savings account described in section 223(d) of the Code. Back to Citation 19.  Code section 4975(c)(2). Back to Citation 20.  Angela A. Hung, Noreen Clancy, Jeff Dominitz, Eric Talley, Claude Berrebi, Farrukh Suvankulov, Investor and Industry Perspectives on Investment Advisers and Broker-Deal…
  10. 80 FR 22021 — Proposed Amendment to and Proposed Partial Revocation of Prohibited Transaction Exemption (PTE) 86-128 for Securities Transactions Involving Employee Benefit P…
    ERISAProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Apr 20, 2015related by meaning
    s) earned in connection with the transactions covered by the exemption. Back to Citation 7.  67 FR 64137 (October 17, 2002). Back to Citation 8.   See Advisory Opinion 2011-08A (June 21, 2011). Back to Citation 9.  This proposal would move the definitions from Section I to Section VII. The other sections are re-ordered…
  11. 88 FR 75890 — Retirement Security Rule: Definition of an Investment Advice Fiduciary
    ERISAProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Nov 3, 2023
    …ents do not require a broker-dealer's recommendations to be in the retail customer's best interest.[247] Accordingly, the SEC stated that Regulation Best Interest enhances the broker-dealer standard of conduct beyond existing “suitability” obligations [248] and aligns the standard of conduct with customers' reasonable …
  12. 89 FR 32346 — Amendment to Prohibited Transaction Exemptions 75-1, 77-4, 80-83, 83-1, and 86-128
    ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Apr 25, 2024related by meaning
    t. Life Ins. Co. v. Harris Trust & Sav. Bank, 510 U.S. 86, 98 (1993). Back to Citation 40.   See BancOklahoma Mortg. Corp. v. Capital Title Co., Inc., 194 F.3d 1089 (10th Cir. 1999) (stating that McCarran-Ferguson Act bars the application of a Federal statute only if (1) the Federal statute does not specifically relate…
  13. 89 FR 32260 — Amendment to Prohibited Transaction Exemption 2020-02
    ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Apr 25, 2024related by meaning
    ns were made negligently or intentionally.”) (emphasis added); see Mathews v. Chevron Corp., 362 F.3d 1172, 1183 (9th Cir. 2004). Back to Citation 37.  84 FR 33348, note 303. The Department observes that this requirement is also consistent with, for example, the requirement under section 206 of the Advisers Act, which …
  14. 75 FR 32846 — Final Rule Relating to Time and Order of Issuance of Domestic Relations Orders
    ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Jun 10, 2010related by meaning
    1(n). The Secretary of the Treasury and the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation were consulted in connection with the final rule. Back to Citation 2.  For purposes of the Code, the requirements of section 414(p)(2) and (3) (parallel to ERISA section 206(d)(3)(C) and (D)) do not apply to governmental plans, church plan…
  15. 89 FR 5624 — Automatic Portability Transaction Regulations
    ERISAProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Jan 29, 2024
    …191 225 261 295 1,469 −Baseline 14 28 43 57 71 85 99 113 128 142 780 = Benefits 3 10 22 38 54 72 92 112 133 153 689 Value of Abandoned Accounts Consolidated: Rule 12 16 19 21 22 23 24 25 25 25 211 −Baseline 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 101 = Benefits 2 5 9 11 12 13 14 14 15 15 110 Annual Total: Rule 29,247 27,846 26,4…
  16. 75 FR 41600 — Reasonable Contract or Arrangement Under Section 408(b)(2)-Fee Disclosure
    ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Jul 16, 2010★ strong match
    …4,000 34,808,000 2014 6,044,000 18,809,000 6,685,000 995,000 32,531,000 2015 5,648,000 17,578,000 6,247,000 929,000 30,403,000 2016 5,279,000 16,428,000 5,839,000 869,000 28,414,000 2017 4,933,000 15,354,000 5,457,000 812,000 26,555,000 2018 4,611,000 14,349,000 5,100,000 759,000 24,818,000
  17. DOL Office of Administrative Law Judges — UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, PENSION AND WELFARE BENEFITS ADMINISTRATION v. CURRENT DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
    ERISACourt RulingsFeb 22, 2000related by meaning
    he failure to deliver the Annual Report Form 5500 C/Rs by November 13, 1998, which were delivered five days late on November 18, 1998 15,000.00 Total: $53,062.00 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: 1. In the event that the Respondent pays to the Complainant the 1% of the $2,096,200.00 penalty, the previously negotiated civil…
  18. 82 FR 5373 — Department of Labor Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act Annual Adjustments for 2017
    ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Jan 18, 2017
    …ortunities under Section 701(f)(3)(B)(i)(l)—each employee a separate violation 29 CFR 2575.2(h) 110 112. EBSA Employee Retirement Income Security Act Section 502(c)(9)(B)—Per day for each failure by a plan to timely provide to any State information required to be disclosed under Section 701(f)(3)(B)(ii), as added by CH…
  19. DOL Office of Administrative Law Judges — U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, PENSION AND WELFARE BENEFITS ADMINISTRATION v. SPALDING AND EVENFLO COMPANIES, INC.
    ERISACourt RulingsFeb 1, 1993
    …f reasonable cause, DOL waived 25% of the penalty for each plan, which reduced the total amount to $112,500. Respondent requested an administrative hearing on this determination, which was held on October 20, 1992. JOINT STIPULATIONS At the hearing, the parties entered the following stipulations for the record which ar…
  20. 81 FR 20946 — Definition of the Term “Fiduciary”; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice
    ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Apr 8, 2016related by meaning
    -21(d). Back to Citation 48.  Reorganization Plan No. 4 of 1978 (5 U.S.C. App. (2000)). Back to Citation 49.  Id. at section 102. Back to Citation 50.  Reorganization Plan, Message of the President. Back to Citation 51.   See, e.g., Public Citizen v. Dep't of Health and Human Servs., 332 F.3d 654, 668 (2003) (the ratif…