Brief Case

Search the Pension Law Library

Limit to:Advanced options
Searches the code/regs in effect on that date.
Words mode supports "quoted phrases", +required and -excluded terms.
Document types:
Go to 54 T.C. 327 (not yet in the library — opens the official source)
47 documents · 0.06sAllIRCERISAPBGCJoint Board
  1. 81 FR 21147 — Amendment to and Partial Revocation of Prohibited Transaction Exemption (PTE) 84-24 for Certain Transactions Involving Insurance Agents and Brokers, Pension Co…
    ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Apr 8, 2016related by meaning
    tion 45.  15 U.S.C. 80b-11(g)(1). Back to Citation 46.   See e.g., Fish v. GreatBanc Trust Company, 749 F.3d 671 (7th Cir. 2014). Back to Citation 47.  As a practical matter, one way for financial institutions to ensure that they can meet this burden is by implementing strong anti-conflict policies and procedures, and …
  2. 88 FR 75890 — Retirement Security Rule: Definition of an Investment Advice Fiduciary
    ERISAProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Nov 3, 2023
    …t advisers who do not provide pure robo-advice are currently eligible for relief under PTE 2020-02.[327]
  3. 89 FR 32122 — Retirement Security Rule: Definition of an Investment Advice Fiduciary
    ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Apr 25, 2024★ strong match
    …t the nature of their relationship with the firm and its financial professionals in plain language.[327] Although it does not apply to all of the products that a Retirement Investor might purchase, one of the purposes of the Form CRS is to help retail investors better understand and compare the services and relationshi…
  4. 89 FR 32302 — Amendment to Prohibited Transaction Exemption 84-24
    ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Apr 25, 2024related by meaning
    mmitment to regulatory compliance, as is critical to ensuring adherence to the conditions of this exemption including the Impartial Conduct Standards. By including this provision in the Final Amendment, the Department does not claim authority to impose taxes under the Code, and leaves responsibility for collecting the …
  5. 81 FR 21181 — Amendment to and Partial Revocation of Prohibited Transaction Exemption (PTE) 86-128 for Securities Transactions Involving Employee Benefit Plans and Broker-De…
    ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Apr 8, 2016related by meaning
    of the Code and a health savings account described in section 223(d) of the Code. Back to Citation 19.  Code section 4975(c)(2). Back to Citation 20.  Angela A. Hung, Noreen Clancy, Jeff Dominitz, Eric Talley, Claude Berrebi, Farrukh Suvankulov, Investor and Industry Perspectives on Investment Advisers and Broker-Deal…
  6. 91 FR 4348 — Improving Transparency Into Pharmacy Benefit Manager Fee Disclosure
    ERISAProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Jan 30, 2026
    …lth plan.[326] The Department further assumes a wage rate of $181.06 per hour for the legal review [327] and that this burden would only be incurred in the first year. The Department requests comments on these assumptions.
  7. 89 FR 32260 — Amendment to Prohibited Transaction Exemption 2020-02
    ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Apr 25, 2024related by meaning
    ns were made negligently or intentionally.”) (emphasis added); see Mathews v. Chevron Corp., 362 F.3d 1172, 1183 (9th Cir. 2004). Back to Citation 37.  84 FR 33348, note 303. The Department observes that this requirement is also consistent with, for example, the requirement under section 206 of the Advisers Act, which …
  8. 91 FR 46602 — Electronic Disclosure by Group Health Plans Under ERISA
    ERISAProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Jul 23, 2026
    …und Difference with lower bound First-year cost $45,261,525 $16,436,876 $4,109,219 $28,824,649 −$12,327,657 Note: Subsequent year costs are distribution costs only and constant across scenarios. 5. Disclosure Cost Savings
  9. 88 FR 76004 — Proposed Amendment to Prohibited Transaction Exemption 84-24
    ERISAProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Nov 3, 2023related by meaning
    cretionary Trust Services to the plan; or (3) both (1) and (2). The Department also is proposing the following amendments. Excluding Investment Advice The Department is proposing to exclude investment advice fiduciaries from relief for the transactions described in Section III(a) through (f) of current PTE 84-24. Inves…
  10. 91 FR 16088 — Fiduciary Duties in Selecting Designated Investment Alternatives
    ERISAProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Mar 31, 2026
    …g discretion in interpreting and applying plan terms. For example, in Tussey v. ABB, Inc., 746 F.3d 327 (8th Cir. 2014), the Eighth Circuit found that there is “no compelling reason to limit Firestone
  11. 80 FR 22010 — Proposed Amendment to and Proposed Partial Revocation of Prohibited Transaction Exemption (PTE) 84-24 for Certain Transactions Involving Insurance Agents and B…
    ERISAProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Apr 20, 2015related by meaning
    e authority of the Secretary of the Treasury to issue administrative exemptions under Code section 4975 to the Secretary of Labor. Back to Citation 3.  For purposes of this amendment, the terms “Individual Retirement Account” or “IRA” mean any trust, account or annuity described in Code section 4975(e)(1)(B) through (F…
  12. 79 FR 13949 — Amendment Relating to Reasonable Contract or Arrangement Under Section 408(b)(2)-Fee Disclosure
    ERISAProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Mar 12, 2014
    …w-estimate), 196,600 hours with an equivalent cost of $13.4 million annually (medium-estimate), and 327,600 hours with an equivalent cost of $22.2 million annually (high-estimate). The Department's methodology for estimating the hour burden is discussed in detail in the Costs section of the Regulatory Impact Analysis, …
  13. 78 FR 13797 — Ex Parte Cease and Desist and Summary Seizure Orders-Multiple Employer Welfare Arrangements
    ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Mar 1, 2013related by meaning
    otect attorney work product prepared to assist the fiduciary in its fiduciary capacity from discovery or from use by the Secretary in the proceedings. The fiduciary exception does not apply, however, to the extent that communications were made or documents were prepared exclusively to aid the fiduciary personally or fo…
  14. 29 C.F.R. § 2570.167 — Summary decision.
    ERISARegulationsJan 1, 2017related by meaning
    For 502(c)(8) civil penalty proceedings, this section shall apply in lieu of § 18.41 of this title.
  15. 29 C.F.R. § 2570.8 — Summary decision.
    ERISARegulationsJan 1, 2017related by meaning
    For prohibited transaction penalty proceedings, this section shall apply in lieu of § 18.41 of this title.
  16. 29 C.F.R. § 2570.4 — Parties.
    ERISARegulationsJan 1, 2017related by meaning
    For prohibited transaction penalty proceedings, this section shall apply in lieu of § 18.10 of this title.
  17. 76 FR 76235 — Ex Parte Cease and Desist and Summary Seizure Orders-Multiple Employer Welfare Arrangements
    ERISAProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Dec 6, 2011related by meaning
    ive law judge shall expressly limit the scope and terms of the discovery to that for which “good cause” has been shown, as provided in this paragraph. (b) Any evidentiary privileges apply as they would apply in a civil proceeding in federal district court. For example, legal advice provided by an attorney to a client i…
  18. 89 FR 32346 — Amendment to Prohibited Transaction Exemptions 75-1, 77-4, 80-83, 83-1, and 86-128
    ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Apr 25, 2024related by meaning
    t. Life Ins. Co. v. Harris Trust & Sav. Bank, 510 U.S. 86, 98 (1993). Back to Citation 40.   See BancOklahoma Mortg. Corp. v. Capital Title Co., Inc., 194 F.3d 1089 (10th Cir. 1999) (stating that McCarran-Ferguson Act bars the application of a Federal statute only if (1) the Federal statute does not specifically relate…
  19. 29 C.F.R. § 2570.116 — Scope of discovery.
    ERISARegulationsJan 1, 2017related by meaning
    For 502(c)(6) civil penalty proceedings, this section shall apply in lieu of § 18.14 of this title.
  20. 85 FR 82798 — Prohibited Transaction Exemption 2020-02, Improving Investment Advice for Workers & Retirees
    ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Dec 18, 2020★ strong match
    … Cong. v. Mine Safety & Health Admin., 995 F.2d 1106, 1112 (D.C. Cir. 1993), and Chao v. Rothermel, 327 F.3d 223, 227 (3d Cir. 2003). The Department disagrees that the factors cited in these cases are satisfied. In this regard, there would be an adequate legislative basis for enforcement in the absence of the interpret…