80 FR 22021 — Proposed Amendment to and Proposed Partial Revocation of Prohibited Transaction Exemption (PTE) 86-128 for Securities Transactions Involving Employee Benefit P… ERISAProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Apr 20, 2015related by meaning
s) earned in connection with the transactions covered by the exemption.
Back to Citation
7.
67 FR 64137 (October 17, 2002).
Back to Citation
8.
See Advisory Opinion 2011-08A (June 21, 2011).
Back to Citation
9.
This proposal would move the definitions from Section I to Section VII. The other sections are re-ordered…
81 FR 21181 — Amendment to and Partial Revocation of Prohibited Transaction Exemption (PTE) 86-128 for Securities Transactions Involving Employee Benefit Plans and Broker-De… ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Apr 8, 2016related by meaning
s applicable solely to the proposed new covered transaction. The new Section IV incorporates conditions originally applicable to PTE 75-1, Part II(2). Specifically, the conditions applicable to the new covered transaction in Section I(b), as set forth in Section IV, are: (1) The fiduciary customarily sells securities f…
88 FR 76032 — Proposed Amendment to Prohibited Transaction Exemptions 75-1, 77-4, 80-83, 83-1, and 86-128 ERISAProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Nov 3, 2023related by meaning
ent advice, as defined under ERISA and in a proposed regulation issued by the Department that is found elsewhere in this issue of the
Federal Register , from the covered transactions in each exemption and make certain other administrative changes. The Department is proposing these amendments on its own motion, pursuant…
81 FR 21147 — Amendment to and Partial Revocation of Prohibited Transaction Exemption (PTE) 84-24 for Certain Transactions Involving Insurance Agents and Brokers, Pension Co… ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Apr 8, 2016related by meaning
ion in connection with transactions involving insurance contracts, specified annuity contracts, and investment company securities, as described below. (b) Exemptions. The restrictions of ERISA section 406(a)(1)(A) through (D) and 406(b) and the taxes imposed by Code section 4975(a) and (b) by reason of Code section 497…
89 FR 32346 — Amendment to Prohibited Transaction Exemptions 75-1, 77-4, 80-83, 83-1, and 86-128 ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Apr 25, 2024related by meaning
nd in its text, PTE 2020-02 has been broadly amended to encompass compensation for advice irrespective of the product recommended.
Back to Citation
6. ERISA section 408(a) and Code section 4975(c)(2), expressly permit the Department (through the Reorganization Plan No. 4 of 1978) to grant “a conditional or uncondition…
80 FR 22004 — Proposed Amendment to Prohibited Transaction Exemption (PTE) 75-1, Part V, Exemptions From Prohibitions Respecting Certain Classes of Transactions Involving Em… ERISAProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Apr 20, 2015related by meaning
to Citation
11.
See
Preamble to PTE 75-1, Part V, 40 FR 50845 (Oct. 31, 1975); ERISA Advisory Opinion 86-12A (March 19, 1986).
Back to Citation
12. Because of this limitation, the Department views it as unnecessary to condition this exemption on the fiduciary's adherence to the impartial conduct standards, including…
80 FR 22010 — Proposed Amendment to and Proposed Partial Revocation of Prohibited Transaction Exemption (PTE) 84-24 for Certain Transactions Involving Insurance Agents and B… ERISAProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Apr 20, 2015related by meaning
the writer's interest in the proposal. Comments received will be available for public inspection at the above address.
Proposed Amendment to PTE 84-24 Under section 408(a) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (ERISA) and section 4975(c)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (…
ERISARegulationsJan 1, 2017related by meaning
For 502(c)(6) civil penalty proceedings, this section shall apply in lieu of § 18.10 of this title.
81 FR 21139 — Amendment to Prohibited Transaction Exemption (PTE) 75-1, Part V, Exemptions From Prohibitions Respecting Certain Classes of Transactions Involving Employee Be… ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Apr 8, 2016related by meaning
75(e)(1) of the Code are included within the scope of relief provided by PTE 75-1 because it was issued jointly by the Department and the Service.
See PTE 2002-13, 67 FR 9483 (March 1, 2002) (preamble discussion). For simplicity and consistency with the other new exemptions and amendments to other existing exemptions p…
88 FR 76004 — Proposed Amendment to Prohibited Transaction Exemption 84-24 ERISAProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Nov 3, 2023related by meaning
cretionary Trust Services to the plan; or (3) both (1) and (2).
The Department also is proposing the following amendments.
Excluding Investment Advice The Department is proposing to exclude investment advice fiduciaries from relief for the transactions described in Section III(a) through (f) of current PTE 84-24. Inves…
81 FR 20946 — Definition of the Term “Fiduciary”; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Apr 8, 2016related by meaning
-21(d).
Back to Citation
48.
Reorganization Plan No. 4 of 1978 (5 U.S.C. App. (2000)).
Back to Citation
49.
Id. at section 102.
Back to Citation
50. Reorganization Plan, Message of the President.
Back to Citation
51.
See, e.g., Public Citizen
v.
Dep't of Health and Human Servs.,
332 F.3d 654, 668 (2003) (the ratif…
ERISARegulationsJan 1, 2017related by meaning
For prohibited transaction penalty proceedings, this section shall apply in lieu of § 18.10 of this title.
89 FR 43675 — Prohibited Transaction Exemption 2006-06 for Services Provided in Connection With the Termination of Abandoned Individual Account Plans ERISAFinal Rules (FR)May 17, 2024related by meaning
section 4975(c)(2) necessitate proposing an amendment to the exemption.
Back to Citation
26.
See 29 CFR 2578.1(d)(2)(v).
Back to Citation
27.
See Section I(a)(3) of this exemption amendment.
Back to Citation
28.
See
paragraph 29 CFR 2578.1(c)(3) of the QTA Regulation or in the case of a QTA described in Section …
81 FR 21208 — Amendments to Class Exemptions 75-1, 77-4, 80-83 and 83-1 ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Apr 8, 2016related by meaning
st that a reasonable person would conclude could affect the exercise of its best judgment as a fiduciary in rendering advice to the plan or IRA owner. For purposes of this section, a fiduciary acts in the “Best Interest” of the plan or IRA when the fiduciary acts with the care, skill, prudence, and diligence under the …
77 FR 5632 — Reasonable Contract or Arrangement Under Section 408(b)(2)-Fee Disclosure ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Feb 3, 2012related by meaning
efinitions related to plans subject to the prohibited transaction and excise tax provisions in Code section 4975.
See
Code section 4975(e)(1) and (g). Back to Citation
37.
81 FR 47534 — Proposed Revision of Annual Information Return/Reports ERISAProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Jul 21, 2016related by meaning
tnership, or
3. the beneficial interest of such trust or estate, is owned directly or indirectly, or held by persons described in A, B, C, D, or E;
H. An employee, officer, director (or an individual having powers or responsibilities similar to those of officers or directors), or a 10% or more shareholder directly or i…
79 FR 13949 — Amendment Relating to Reasonable Contract or Arrangement Under Section 408(b)(2)-Fee Disclosure ERISAProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Mar 12, 2014related by meaning
e of more than $100 million, adjusted for inflation, or increase expenditures by the private sector of more than $100 million, adjusted for inflation. 13. Federalism Statement
88 FR 75979 — Proposed Amendment to Prohibited Transaction Exemption 2020-02 ERISAProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Nov 3, 2023related by meaning
utes] × $63.45 = $793.
Back to Citation
65.
5 U.S.C. 601
et seq.
Back to Citation
66.
5 U.S.C. 601(2), 603(a);
see5 U.S.C. 551.
Back to Citation
67. Public Law 104-4, 109 Stat. 48 (Mar. 22, 1995).
Back to Citation
68.
Reorganization Plan No. 4 of 1978 (5 U.S.C. App. 1 (2018)) generally transferred the authority of …
89 FR 32260 — Amendment to Prohibited Transaction Exemption 2020-02 ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Apr 25, 2024related by meaning
ns
were made negligently or intentionally.”) (emphasis added);
see Mathews
v.
Chevron Corp.,
362 F.3d 1172, 1183 (9th Cir. 2004).
Back to Citation
37. 84 FR 33348, note 303. The Department observes that this requirement is also consistent with, for example, the requirement under section 206 of the Advisers Act, which …
81 FR 21089 — Class Exemption for Principal Transactions in Certain Assets Between Investment Advice Fiduciaries and Employee Benefit Plans and IRAs ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Apr 8, 2016related by meaning
ption.
Back to Citation
60.
See, e.g.,
PTE 75-1, Part II, 40 FR 50845 (Oct. 31, 1975), as amended at 71 FR 5883 (Feb. 3, 2006).
Back to Citation
61. 29 CFR 2570.31(j).
Back to Citation
62.
The same commenter also requested clarification that an IRA owner will not be deemed to fail the Independence requirement simpl…