Brief Case

Search the Pension Law Library

Limit to:Advanced options
Searches the code/regs in effect on that date.
Words mode supports "quoted phrases", +required and -excluded terms.
Document types:
Go to 79 T.C. 322 (not yet in the library — opens the official source)
44 documents · 0.06sAllIRCERISAPBGCJoint Board
  1. 89 FR 32302 — Amendment to Prohibited Transaction Exemption 84-24
    ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Apr 25, 2024★ strong match
    … hours Equivalent burden cost Burden hours Equivalent burden cost Insurance Sales Agent 250,000 $41,322,500 250,000 $41,322,500 Total 250,000 41,322,500 250,000 41,322,500 1.3.1.5 Mailing Cost for Disclosures Sent From Independent Producers to Retirement Investors As discussed at the beginning of the cost section, the …
  2. 81 FR 21147 — Amendment to and Partial Revocation of Prohibited Transaction Exemption (PTE) 84-24 for Certain Transactions Involving Insurance Agents and Brokers, Pension Co…
    ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Apr 8, 2016related by meaning
    tion 45.  15 U.S.C. 80b-11(g)(1). Back to Citation 46.   See e.g., Fish v. GreatBanc Trust Company, 749 F.3d 671 (7th Cir. 2014). Back to Citation 47.  As a practical matter, one way for financial institutions to ensure that they can meet this burden is by implementing strong anti-conflict policies and procedures, and …
  3. 89 FR 32122 — Retirement Security Rule: Definition of an Investment Advice Fiduciary
    ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Apr 25, 2024
    … Owed + $43,244,858 for the statement in the Relationship and Conflict of Interest disclosure + $41,322,500 for the rollover disclosure) + ($776,863 to prepare and send disclosures + $145,230 for material and postage costs) + ($1,455,103 for additional compensation disclosure preparation + $10,998 for materials and pos…
  4. 81 FR 21208 — Amendments to Class Exemptions 75-1, 77-4, 80-83 and 83-1
    ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Apr 8, 2016related by meaning
    under section 4975 of the Code] is hereby transferred to the Secretary of Labor”) Back to Citation 9.  29 CFR 2550.408b-2(e); 26 CFR 54.4975-6(a)(5). Back to Citation 10.  Exemptions from Prohibitions Respecting Certain Classes of Transactions Involving Employee Benefit Plans and Certain Broker-Dealers, Reporting Deal…
  5. 88 FR 75890 — Retirement Security Rule: Definition of an Investment Advice Fiduciary
    ERISAProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Nov 3, 2023
    …15,987 state-registered investment advisers, of which 283 are dually registered as a broker-dealer.[322] In 2018, 125 state-registered investment advisers were also registered with the SEC.[323] To avoid double counting, the Department counted dually registered firms as broker-dealers and excluded them from the count o…
  6. 89 FR 32346 — Amendment to Prohibited Transaction Exemptions 75-1, 77-4, 80-83, 83-1, and 86-128
    ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Apr 25, 2024related by meaning
    t. Life Ins. Co. v. Harris Trust & Sav. Bank, 510 U.S. 86, 98 (1993). Back to Citation 40.   See BancOklahoma Mortg. Corp. v. Capital Title Co., Inc., 194 F.3d 1089 (10th Cir. 1999) (stating that McCarran-Ferguson Act bars the application of a Federal statute only if (1) the Federal statute does not specifically relate…
  7. 81 FR 21181 — Amendment to and Partial Revocation of Prohibited Transaction Exemption (PTE) 86-128 for Securities Transactions Involving Employee Benefit Plans and Broker-De…
    ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Apr 8, 2016related by meaning
    tion. Back to Citation 14.  67 FR 64137 (October 17, 2002). Back to Citation 15.   See Advisory Opinion 2011-08A (June 21, 2011). Back to Citation 16.  As noted above, for purposes of this amendment, the terms “Individual Retirement Account” or “IRA” mean any account or annuity described in Code section 4975(e)(1)(B) t…
  8. 80 FR 22021 — Proposed Amendment to and Proposed Partial Revocation of Prohibited Transaction Exemption (PTE) 86-128 for Securities Transactions Involving Employee Benefit P…
    ERISAProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Apr 20, 2015related by meaning
    atio = 1.47 × (1,400,000/10,509,091) = 0.196 = 19.6 percent. Proposed Revocation of Parts I(b), I(c) and II(2) of PTE 75-1 and Restatement of PTE 75-1 The Department is proposing to revoke Parts I(b), I(c) and II(2) of PTE 75-1. In connection with the proposed revocation of Part II(2), the Department is republishing Pa…
  9. 89 FR 32260 — Amendment to Prohibited Transaction Exemption 2020-02
    ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Apr 25, 2024related by meaning
    …ts Security Administration 29 CFR Part 2550 [Application No. D-12057] ZRIN 1210-ZA32 ( printed page 32260) AGENCY: Employee Benefits Security Administration, U.S. Department of Labor. ACTION: Amendment to Class Exemption PTE 2020-02. SUMMARY: This document contains a notice of amendment to class prohibited transaction …
  10. 88 FR 76032 — Proposed Amendment to Prohibited Transaction Exemptions 75-1, 77-4, 80-83, 83-1, and 86-128
    ERISAProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Nov 3, 2023related by meaning
    ent advice, as defined under ERISA and in a proposed regulation issued by the Department that is found elsewhere in this issue of the Federal Register , from the covered transactions in each exemption and make certain other administrative changes. The Department is proposing these amendments on its own motion, pursuant…
  11. 91 FR 9213 — Requirement To Provide Paper Statements in Certain Cases-Amendments to Electronic Disclosure Safe Harbors
    ERISAProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Feb 25, 2026
    …ations 693,105 = 770,117 Plans × 90% Using a Service Provider 5/60 70.29 57,759 4,059,862 Total 138,322 $18,646,718 Table 8—Cost for Distribution of New Paper Benefit Statements for 2020 Safe Harbor [Year 1] Description Affected entities Pages per disclosure Material costs per page Distribution costs per disclosure Tot…
  12. 87 FR 73822 — Prudence and Loyalty in Selecting Plan Investments and Exercising Shareholder Rights
    ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Dec 1, 2022
    …f affected entities in section IV.C. Back to Citation 278.  The burden is estimated as follows: 149,322 plans × 4 hours = 597,288 hours. A labor rate of $153.21 is used for a legal professional. The cost is estimated as follows: 149,322 plans × 4 hours × $153.21 = $91,510,494. Back to Citation 279.  The per-plan burden…
  13. DOL Office of Administrative Law Judges — UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, PENSION AND WELFARE BENEFITS ADMINISTRATION v. CINPAC, INC./LIBBY LEE TOYS, INC.
    ERISACourt RulingsMar 20, 1995
    …o genuine issue of material fact to be determined at trial. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 322 (1986); 29 C.F.R. § 18.41; Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c). A genuine issue of material fact is present where the record, taken as a whole, could lead a rational trier-of-fact to find for the non-moving party. Matsushita Elect…
  14. 91 FR 46602 — Electronic Disclosure by Group Health Plans Under ERISA
    ERISAProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Jul 23, 2026
    …fit institutions. Respondents: 809,901. Responses: 178,211,549. Estimated Total Burden Hours: 1,068,322. Estimated Total Costs: $18,423,119. Descriptions:
  15. 80 FR 22035 — Proposed Amendments to Class Exemptions 75-1, 77-4, 80-83 and 83-1
    ERISAProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Apr 20, 2015related by meaning
    duciary is providing or other actions it is taking in relation to a plan's or IRA owner's investment decisions is deemed to be a misleading statement. For purposes of this section, a fiduciary acts in the “Best Interest” of the plan or IRA when the fiduciary acts with the care, skill, prudence, and diligence under the …
  16. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit — Richard Kelly v. Altria Client Services, LLC
    ERISACourt RulingsAug 10, 2026
    … for appropriate remedies, sanctions, and ready access to the Federal courts.’ ” Marks v. Watters , 322 F.3d 316, 322 (4th Cir. 2003) (quoting 29 U.S.C. § 1001(b) ). USCA4 Appeal: 25-1350 Doc: 89 Filed: 08/10/2026 Pg: 3 of 21 4 As to Kelly’s third claim, h e allege d that, despite his request, the p lan administrator r…
  17. 29 C.F.R. § 2570.4 — Parties.
    ERISARegulationsJan 1, 2017related by meaning
    For prohibited transaction penalty proceedings, this section shall apply in lieu of § 18.10 of this title.
  18. 91 FR 4348 — Improving Transparency Into Pharmacy Benefit Manager Fee Disclosure
    ERISAProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Jan 30, 2026
    … providers, as defined in the statute, must now disclose both direct and indirect fee compensation.[322] When questioned by Congress in 2023 regarding PBMs' compliance with Section 408(b)(2), PCMA responded that they believed their companies were in compliance and provided the appropriate disclosures related to direct …
  19. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit — Richard Kelly v. Altria Client Services, LLC
    ERISACourt RulingsAug 10, 2026
    … for appropriate remedies, sanctions, and ready access to the Federal courts.’ ” Marks v. Watters , 322 F.3d 316, 322 (4th Cir. 2003) (quoting 29 U.S.C. § 1001(b) ). USCA4 Appeal: 25-2080 Doc: 59 Filed: 08/10/2026 Pg: 3 of 21 4 As to Kelly’s third claim, h e allege d that, despite his request, the p lan administrator r…
  20. ERISARegulationsJan 1, 2017related by meaning
    [Reserved]