Brief Case

Search the Pension Law Library

Limit to:Advanced options
Searches the code/regs in effect on that date.
Words mode supports "quoted phrases", +required and -excluded terms.
Document types:
Go to Ann. 1988-97 (not yet in the library — opens the official source)
42 documents · 0.06sAllIRCERISAPBGCJoint Board
  1. DOL Office of Administrative Law Judges — UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, PENSION AND WELFARE BENEFITS ADMINISTRATION v. CURRENT DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
    ERISACourt RulingsFeb 22, 2000related by meaning
    … 1999, [just before the hearing] they sent her the 1992 1996 participant account statements and the annual reports, which had been sent to participants in April, together with the worksheets, as well as some additional information on wages and expense information for the same years. (T 149) Joanne Palaoro: Ms. Palaoro …
  2. DOL Office of Administrative Law Judges — U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, PENSION AND WELFARE BENEFITS ADMINISTRATION v. RICHARD L. SMITH and SMITH ADMINISTRATORS
    ERISACourt RulingsJan 20, 1998★ strong match
    …11813-17420 was issued on July 20, 1987 and reached maturity on October 19, 1987; the CD paid 6.50% annual interest. Ex. C30. Once SA paid off Loan Nos. 25-20129-4 and 25-20148-4, CD Nos. 346 and 350 ceased to be collateralized. 9CD No. 11813-17493 was outstanding from August 26, 1987 to October 19, 1987 at an annual i…
  3. DOL Office of Administrative Law Judges — U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, PENSION AND WELFARE BENEFITS ADMINISTRATION v. BRANIFF, INC.
    ERISACourt RulingsSep 27, 1993★ strong match
    …tipulation of fact Paragraph 9). 6. Pursuant to ERISA § 103, 29 U.S.C. § 1023, Braniff filed timely annual reports with the IRS for each of the plans, including plan 504, for the plan year ended 1988. This information was transmitted by the IRS to the Department of Labor ("DOL") (Joint Stipulation of fact paragraph 10)…
  4. DOL Office of Administrative Law Judges — U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, PENSION AND WELFARE BENEFITS ADMINISTRATION v. GEORGE H. ROBINSON, ADMINISTRATOR ANSWERING SERVICE, INC. ESOP
    ERISACourt RulingsFeb 2, 1993
    ed nonvested accounts. Respondent's 1988 annual report for the ESOP plan showed a total of 190 participants, including 31 retired or separated persons entitled to future benefits; 103 active employees fully vested; 38 employees partially vested; and 18 employees nonvested. The Laine, Appold year-end 1988 audit stated t…
  5. 81 FR 43430 — Department of Labor Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act Catch-Up Adjustments
    ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Jul 1, 2016
    arl Levin, Chairman, Subcommittee on Oversight of Government Management, from Ann McLaughlin, Secretary of Labor, (Feb. 22, 1988). Back to Citation 5.  Although the statute and regulation refer to the amount assessed as “liquidated damages” it is appropriate to treat the amount as a civil money penalty for purposes of …
  6. 85 FR 59132 — Pension Benefit Statements-Lifetime Income Illustrations
    ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Sep 18, 2020related by meaning
    …tment's reasoning behind the IFR's assumptions for these four factors, and other matters germane to annuitization illustrations. (a) Commencement Date and Age Paragraph (c)(1) of the IFR establishes an assumed annuity commencement date and age that plan administrators must use to prepare the required illustrations. Spe…
  7. DOL Office of Administrative Law Judges — UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, PENSION AND WELFARE BENEFITS ADMINISTRATION v. MERSKIN & MERSKIN, P.C.
    ERISACourt RulingsApr 27, 1995★ strong match
    annual reports for the fiscal years 1988 through 1991 are justified. Procedural History On June 24, 1993, the Complainant, acting through its Division of Reporting Compliance and its Office of Chief Accountant, issued a Notice of Intent to Assess a Penalty in the amount of ten thousand dollars ($10,000) for reporting d…
  8. DOL Office of Administrative Law Judges — UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, PENSION AND WELFARE BENEFITS ADMINISTRATION v. T. W. TAGGART
    ERISACourt RulingsAug 25, 1995★ strong match
    …was required to pay Respondent AMCI $100,000.00 per year for five calendar years beginning with the 1988 calendar year. (Stip. Fact 23; J-Ex. 16). 36. Under the terms of the consulting agreement, MPEHA was required to reimburse Respondent AMCI for reasonable and necessary travel and other expenses. (Stip. Fact 24; J-Ex…
  9. DOL EBSA (final agency order) — U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, PENSION AND WELFARE BENEFITS ADMINISTRATION v. SPALDING AND EVENFLO COMPANIES, INC.
    ERISACourt RulingsNov 18, 1994
    …nt an applicable exemption from ERISA's reporting requirements, Plans AA, FF and H each required an annual report containing an opinion of an independent qualified public accountant based on an audit of the plan because each plan was funded and covered over 100 employees. The 1988 annual report for each plan was due on…
  10. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit — Ann Johnson v. Russell Investments Trust Company
    ERISACourt RulingsAug 17, 2026
    …s Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 25 -10692 ____________________ ANN JOHNSON, as the representative of a class of similarly situated persons, and on behalf of Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd Retirement Savings Plan, Plainti - Appellant, versus RUSSELL INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT, LLC, RUSSELL I…
  11. DOL Office of Administrative Law Judges — U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, PENSION AND WELFARE BENEFITS ADMINISTRATION v. NORTHWESTERN INSTITUTE OF PSYCHIATRY
    ERISACourt RulingsDec 21, 1993★ strong match
    …anuary 16, 1990, NIP through a professional service, Tycor Benefits Administrators, Inc., filed its annual report with the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). This filing was accompanied by an appropriate request for extension to file the report later than the 210 day period after the close of the plan year as required by …
  12. 29 C.F.R. § 2520.105-3(d)(2)(ii) — Lifetime income disclosure for individual account plans.
    ERISARegulationsSep 18, 2021related by meaning
    …(2)(i) of this section, the plan administrator may use the following model language: “A single life annuity is an arrangement that pays you a fixed amount of money each month for the rest of your life. Following your death, no further payments would be made to your spouse or heirs.” (d)(3) (3) (d)(3)(i) (i) An explanat…
  13. DOL Office of Administrative Law Judges — U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, PENSION AND WELFARE BENEFITS ADMINISTRATION v. SPALDING AND EVENFLO COMPANIES, INC.
    ERISACourt RulingsFeb 1, 1993
    …nded differently. For example, the medical and dental plans were paid for by Spalding until July 1, 1988, when employees began making contributions. The life insurance was a cafeteria plan in which Spalding paid for a benefit equal to the employee's salary, and the employee had an option of paying for an increase in be…
  14. TR 1988-01 — Technical Release 88-01
    ERISADOL Technical ReleasesAug 12, 1988
    Department of Labor Announces Enforcement Policy on Participant Contributions to Cafeteria Plans and Consideration of a Regulatory Exemption For Release: Friday, August 12, 1988 Contact: Mark Greenstein Office: (202) 523-7901 Printable Version The Department of Labor's Pension and Welfare Benefits Administration today …
  15. 81 FR 21147 — Amendment to and Partial Revocation of Prohibited Transaction Exemption (PTE) 84-24 for Certain Transactions Involving Insurance Agents and Brokers, Pension Co…
    ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Apr 8, 2016related by meaning
    investing in indexed annuities precisely because such products are not regulated as securities and therefore do not fall within FINRA's jurisdiction. A few commenters cited statements by the SEC staff, FINRA and the North American Securities Administrators Association, regarding indexed annuities. The statements, quot…
  16. TR 1992-01 — Technical Release 92-01
    ERISADOL Technical Releases★ strong match
    1991). Signed at Washington, DC, this 28th day of May 1992 Alan D. Lebowitz Deputy Assistant Secretary for Program Operations U.S. Department of Labor Pension and Welfare Benefits Administration
  17. ERISA § 205(c)(7) (29 U.S.C. § 1055) — Requirement of joint and survivor annuity and preretirement survivor annuity
    ERISACode / StatuteJan 14, 2019related by meaning
    … than such date. (c)(7)(A) (A) in the case of an election to waive the qualified joint and survivor annuity form of benefit, the 180-day period ending on the annuity starting date, or (c)(7)(B) (B) in the case of an election to waive the qualified preretirement survivor annuity, the period which begins on the first day…
  18. DOL Office of Administrative Law Judges — United States Department of Labor, Pension and Welfare Benefits Administration
    ERISACourt RulingsJun 9, 2000related by meaning
    on September 1, 1989, the date of transfer, which would demonstrate that the Piedmont plan no longer contained any assets. (J-23). These changes were made and submitted as a draft to the PWBA on June 22, 1993. The draft was not signed. (J-24). An executed copy was submitted on July 13, 1993. (J-25). II. Procedural His…
  19. 90 FR 38908 — Selection of Annuity Providers-Safe Harbor for Individual Account Plans; Withdrawal
    ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Aug 12, 2025related by meaning
    Document Headings Document headings vary by document type but may contain the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document the number of the CFR title and the number of each part the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly related to the agency docket number / agency internal file numb…
  20. 81 FR 21002 — Best Interest Contract Exemption
    ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Apr 8, 2016related by meaning
    …2006), as amended elsewhere in this issue of the Federal Register . Back to Citation 26.  “Variable Annuities: Beyond the Hard Sell,” available at http://www.finra.org/​sites/​default/​files/​InvestorDocument/​p125846.pdf. FINRA also has special suitability rules for certain investment products, including variable annu…