89 FR 32122 — Retirement Security Rule: Definition of an Investment Advice Fiduciary ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Apr 25, 2024★ strong match
two regimes cannot be harmonized or accommodated”).
Back to Citation
276.
John Hancock,
510 U.S. at 98.
Back to Citation
277.
Id.
Back to Citation 278.
See BancOklahoma Mortg. Corp.
v.
Capital Title Co., Inc.,
194 F.3d 1089 (10th Cir. 1999) (stating that McCarran-Ferguson Act bars the application of a Federal sta…
81 FR 47534 — Proposed Revision of Annual Information Return/Reports ERISAProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Jul 21, 2016
…bility for Immediate Gain Methods.
Complete this line only if you use an immediate gain method (see Rev. Rul. 81-213, 1981-2 C.B. 101, for a definition of immediate gain method).
Lines 1c(2)(a), (b), and (c). Information for Plans Using Spread Gain Methods.
Complete these lines only if you use a spread gain method (see…
90 FR 28004 — Removal of Interpretive Bulletins Relating to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Jul 1, 2025related by meaning
977) (“The attention of interested parties is directed to the fact that regulation 2550.408c-2 replaces Interpretive Bulletin 75-6”).
Back to Citation 7.
41 FR 3289 (Jan. 22, 1976).
Back to Citation
8.
43 FR 47713 (Oct. 17, 1978). Congress subsequently ratified Reorganization Plan No. 4 in 1984. See Sec. 1, Public La…
81 FR 21181 — Amendment to and Partial Revocation of Prohibited Transaction Exemption (PTE) 86-128 for Securities Transactions Involving Employee Benefit Plans and Broker-De… ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Apr 8, 2016related by meaning
36.
FINRA Regulatory Notice 12-25, p. 3 (2012).
Back to Citation
37.
Donovan
v.
Mazzola,
716 F.2d 1226, 1232 (9th Cir. 1983).
Back to Citation
38. One commenter requested an adjustment to the “prudence” component of the Best Interest Standard, under which the standard would be that of a “prudent person serving cli…
90 FR 4192 — Voluntary Fiduciary Correction Program ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Jan 15, 2025
… Notice 2023-43, once a plan or plan sponsor comes under examination (as defined in section 5.08 of Rev. Proc. 2021-30), an Eligible Inadvertent Participant Loan Failure is no longer eligible for self-correction under the IRS's EPCRS unless the plan sponsor has, before the plan or plan sponsor comes under examination, …
ERISAProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Nov 21, 2022
… for VFC Program correction under Title I of ERISA. Further, the latest updated version of EPCRS in Rev.
( printed page 71171)
85 FR 40589 — Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice: Notice of Court Vacatur ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Jul 7, 2020related by meaning
…e issued by the Fifth Circuit.
In addition, the Department finds that it has good cause to make the revisions immediately effective under section 553(d) of the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 553(d). Section 553(d) provides that final rules shall not become effective until 30 days after publication in the
Federa…
91 FR 4348 — Improving Transparency Into Pharmacy Benefit Manager Fee Disclosure ERISAProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Jan 30, 2026
….ct.gov/-/media/ohs/reports/ohs-report-of-pharmacy-benefit-manager-practices-pa-23-171-s7.pdf?rev=01a4809a4795421e890970d8cd5f2fc1.
Back to Citation
46.
Bob Herman, `It's beyond unethical': Opaque conflicts of interest permeate prescription drug benefits (June 2023),
https://www.statnews.com/2023/06/20/pbms…
ERISAFinal Rules (FR)May 17, 2024
…CA would be tax-deferred, similar to the treatment of fully paid individual annuity contracts under Rev. Rul. 2011-7, until amounts are actually paid to the participant or beneficiary. Contemporaneous with the publication of Rev. Rul. 2020-23, the IRS published Notice 2020-80, 2020-47 IRB 1060
requesting comments on th…
91 FR 16088 — Fiduciary Duties in Selecting Designated Investment Alternatives ERISAProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Mar 31, 2026★ strong match
d in a case such as this not involving a typical review of denial of benefits,” but rather interpretation of a plan term regarding lump sum payments). To further assist plan fiduciaries, the Department is proposing this regulation with safe harbors. The Department has clear statutory authority under ERISA section 505 t…
81 FR 21208 — Amendments to Class Exemptions 75-1, 77-4, 80-83 and 83-1 ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Apr 8, 2016related by meaning
… ERISA section 408(b)(2) and Code section 4975(d)(2) provide relief from the prohibited transaction rules for service contracts or arrangements if the contract or arrangement is reasonable, the services are necessary for the establishment or operation of the plan or IRA, and no more than reasonable compensation is paid…
81 FR 21147 — Amendment to and Partial Revocation of Prohibited Transaction Exemption (PTE) 84-24 for Certain Transactions Involving Insurance Agents and Brokers, Pension Co… ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Apr 8, 2016related by meaning
53.
FINRA Regulatory Notice 12-25, p. 3 (2012).
Back to Citation
54.
Donovan
v.
Mazzola,
716 F.2d 1226, 1232 (9th Cir. 1983).
Back to Citation
55. One commenter requested an adjustment to the “prudence” component of the Best Interest standard, under which the standard would be that of a “prudent person serving cli…
90 FR 3667 — Prohibited Transaction Exemption (PTE) 2002-51 To Permit Certain Transactions Identified in the Voluntary Fiduciary Correction Program ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Jan 15, 2025★ strong match
…riations Act, 2023, Public Law 117 328, 136 Stat. 4459 (2022).
Back to Citation
7.
As described in Rev. Proc. 2021-30, or any successor guidance).
Back to Citation
8.
The term pension plans include both defined contribution plans and defined benefit plans.
See
ERISA section 3(34) and 3(35).
Back to Citation
9.
As no…
81 FR 20946 — Definition of the Term “Fiduciary”; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Apr 8, 2016related by meaning
…-1, Parts II-V; PTE 77-4; PTE 80-83; PTE 83-1: PTE 84-24; and PTE 86-128.
Back to Citation
54.
The revoked exemptions include PTE 75-1, Parts I(b) and (c); PTE 75-1, Part II(2); and parts of PTE 84-2 and PTE 86-128.
Back to Citation
55.
85 FR 82798 — Prohibited Transaction Exemption 2020-02, Improving Investment Advice for Workers & Retirees ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Dec 18, 2020related by meaning
ired notice and comment rulemaking, citing
Am. Min. Cong.
v.
Mine Safety & Health Admin.,
995 F.2d 1106, 1112 (D.C. Cir. 1993), and
Chao
v.
Rothermel, 327 F.3d 223, 227 (3d Cir. 2003). The Department disagrees that the factors cited in these cases are satisfied. In this regard, there would be an adequate legislative ba…
89 FR 4662 — Procedures Governing the Filing and Processing of Prohibited Transaction Exemption Applications ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Jan 24, 2024★ strong match
…ponse to its notice and comment solicitation in the Paperwork Reduction Act section of the Proposed Rule.
Back to Citation
10.
67 FR 44622 (July 3, 2002).
Back to Citation
11.
See, e.g.,
PTE 2020-02 (85 FR 82798, December 18, 2020); PTE 2022-02 (87 FR 23245, April 19, 2022); PTE 2022-03 (87 FR 54264, September 2, 20…
84 FR 37508 — Definition of “Employer” Under Section 3(5) of ERISA-Association Retirement Plans and Other Multiple-Employer Plans ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Jul 31, 2019
…titutions, make available for adoption by employers and that have been pre-approved by the IRS. See Rev. Proc. 2017-41, 2017-29 IRB 92. A plan that uses a Pre-Approved Plan document may either be a single-employer plan or a MEP. With respect to single-employer Pre-Approved Plans, providers often offer centralized admin…
89 FR 32302 — Amendment to Prohibited Transaction Exemption 84-24 ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Apr 25, 2024★ strong match
…eration of these comments, the Department is retaining Section III(f) in the Final Amendment with a revision that changes references to a “master or prototype plan” to a “Pre-Approved Plan,” which is consistent with a change in terminology the IRS adopted in IRS Rev. Proc. 2017-41.
The Department also received several …
ERISACourt RulingsApr 28, 1995
…d beneficiaries during the 1990 plan year. (CX-
1). (2) The effective date of the Plan was June 12, 1968. (CX-
1). (3) In essence, the Plan, pursuant to a collective
bargaining contract, collected contributions from the various
89 FR 43675 — Prohibited Transaction Exemption 2006-06 for Services Provided in Connection With the Termination of Abandoned Individual Account Plans ERISAFinal Rules (FR)May 17, 2024related by meaning
…ved the reference to “spouse” in Section III(c) because the
( printed page 43680)
exclusive benefit rule in Code section 408(a) does not separately reference a spouse.
E. Discussion of Comments