Brief Case
Pension Resource

Search the Pension Law Library

Limit to:Advanced options
Searches the code/regs in effect on that date.
Words mode supports "quoted phrases", +required and -excluded terms.
Document types:
Go to T.C. Memo. 1986-57 (not yet in the library — opens the official source)
68 documents · 0.09sAllIRCERISAPBGCJoint Board
  1. 90 FR 3667 — Prohibited Transaction Exemption (PTE) 2002-51 To Permit Certain Transactions Identified in the Voluntary Fiduciary Correction Program
    ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Jan 15, 2025related by meaning
    e use of the SCC and suggested that the Department should allow self-correctors to choose whether (a) to provide notice to interested persons (but not to EBSA) or (b) make the plan contribution. After considering these comments, the Department has not made this change. Self-correctors have a streamlined procedure for s…
  2. 81 FR 21181 — Amendment to and Partial Revocation of Prohibited Transaction Exemption (PTE) 86-128 for Securities Transactions Involving Employee Benefit Plans and Broker-De…
    ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Apr 8, 2016related by meaning
    …2550.408b-2(e); 26 CFR 54.4975-6(a)(5). Back to Citation 12.  PTE 86-128, 51 FR 41686 (November 18, 1986), replaced PTE 79-1, 44 FR 5963 (January 30, 1979) and PTE 84-46, 49 FR 22157 (May 25, 1984). Back to Citation 13.  Plan trustees, plan administrators and employers were permitted to rely on the exemption if they re…
  3. 81 FR 21139 — Amendment to Prohibited Transaction Exemption (PTE) 75-1, Part V, Exemptions From Prohibitions Respecting Certain Classes of Transactions Involving Employee Be…
    ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Apr 8, 2016★ strong match
    …urities Transactions Involving Employee Benefit Plans and Broker-Dealers, 51 FR 41686 (November 18, 1986), as amended, 67 FR 64137 (October 17, 2002), as further amended elsewhere in this issue of the Federal Register . Back to Citation 11.  40 FR 50845 (October 31, 1975), as amended, 71 FR 5883 (February 3, 2006). Bac…
  4. DOL Office of Administrative Law Judges — USDOL, EMPLOYEE BENEFITS SECURITY ADMINISTRATION v. PLAN ADMINISTRATOR, WHITE MOUNTAIN APACHE TRIBE RETIREMENT SAVINGS AND 401(K) PROFIT SHARING PLAN ANNUAL RE…
    ERISACourt RulingsNov 30, 2016
    …erted by the parties. Matsushita Elec. Indus. Co., Lt d. v. Zenith Radio Corp. , 475 U.S. 574, 587 (1986). In determining whether there is a genuine issue for trial, the court must view all the evidence and factual inferences in the light most favorable to the non-moving party. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc ., 477 U.S…
  5. 75 FR 53172 — Prohibited Transaction Exemption Procedures; Employee Benefit Plans
    ERISAProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Aug 30, 2010★ strong match
    …isions of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the Code), and the Federal Employees' Retirement System Act of 1986 (FERSA). The Secretary of Labor is authorized to grant exemptions from the prohibited transaction provisions of ERISA, the Code, and FERSA and to …
  6. 88 FR 76032 — Proposed Amendment to Prohibited Transaction Exemptions 75-1, 77-4, 80-83, 83-1, and 86-128
    ERISAProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Nov 3, 2023★ strong match
    …ons of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) and the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the Code). The amendments would affect participants and beneficiaries of plans, IRA owners, and certain fiduciaries of plans and IRAs. DATES: Public Comments. Comments are due on or before January 2, 2024.
  7. 80 FR 22004 — Proposed Amendment to Prohibited Transaction Exemption (PTE) 75-1, Part V, Exemptions From Prohibitions Respecting Certain Classes of Transactions Involving Em…
    ERISAProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Apr 20, 2015★ strong match
    …urities Transactions Involving Employee Benefit Plans and Broker-Dealers, 51 FR 41686 (November 18, 1986), as amended, 67 FR 64137 (October 17, 2002). Back to Citation 10.  40 FR 50845 (October 31, 1975), as amended, 71 FR 5883 (February 3, 2006). Back to Citation 11.   See Preamble to PTE 75-1, Part V, 40 FR 50845 (Oc…
  8. DOL Office of Administrative Law Judges — USDOL, EMPLOYEE BENEFITS SECURITY ADMINISTRATION v. PLAN ADMINISTRATOR, CAVALLO POINT LODGE 401(K) PLAN
    ERISACourt RulingsNov 10, 2015
    … of this matter” by failing to comply with the regulations at 29 C.F.R. § 2560.502(c)(2)(e) - (f). (Memo in Support at 2 Respondent appears to be arguing that the May 20, 2015 letter s hould be considered the applicable Notice of Intent to Assess a Penalty . 3 On September 11, 2015, this Office faxed counsel for Respon…
  9. 81 FR 21147 — Amendment to and Partial Revocation of Prohibited Transaction Exemption (PTE) 84-24 for Certain Transactions Involving Insurance Agents and Brokers, Pension Co…
    ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Apr 8, 2016related by meaning
    Document Headings Document headings vary by document type but may contain the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document the number of the CFR title and the number of each part the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly related to the agency docket number / agency internal file numb…
  10. 89 FR 4662 — Procedures Governing the Filing and Processing of Prohibited Transaction Exemption Applications
    ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Jan 24, 2024
    …isions of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the Code), and the Federal Employees' Retirement System Act of 1986 (FERSA) (the Amendments). The Secretary of Labor (the Secretary) is authorized to grant exemptions from the prohibited transaction provisions of E…
  11. 87 FR 14722 — Procedures Governing the Filing and Processing of Prohibited Transaction Exemption Applications
    ERISAProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Mar 15, 2022
    …isions of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the Code), and the Federal Employees' Retirement System Act of 1986 (FERSA). The Secretary of Labor (the Secretary) is authorized to grant exemptions from the prohibited transaction provisions of ERISA, the Code, a…
  12. 87 FR 70753 — Prohibited Transaction Exemption (PTE) 2002-51 To Permit Certain Transactions Identified in the Voluntary Fiduciary Correction Program
    ERISAProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Nov 21, 2022related by meaning
    he Department no longer believes that posting the notification is reasonably calculated to ensure that interested persons actually receive the notice. The Department has reviewed several notices to interested persons submitted to the applicable Regional Offices and found that some of them do not meet the applicable req…
  13. 85 FR 40589 — Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice: Notice of Court Vacatur
    ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Jul 7, 2020related by meaning
    …9 (June 15, 1984), as amended, 71 FR 5887 (Feb. 3, 2006); and PTE 86-128, 51 FR 41686 (November 18, 1986), as amended, 67 FR 64137 (October 17, 2002). Back to Citation 3.   See 82 FR 7336 (January 19, 2017). Back to Citation 4.  Available at https://www.dol.gov/​agencies/​ebsa/​employers-and-advisers/​guidance/​exempti…
  14. DOL Office of Administrative Law Judges — U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, PENSION AND WELFARE BENEFITS ADMINISTRATION v. RICHARD L. SMITH and SMITH ADMINISTRATORS
    ERISACourt RulingsJan 20, 1998
    …t participants or beneficiaries ." 5CD No. 328 was outstanding from October 11, 1985 to October 11, 1986 at an interest rate of 7.625%. CD No. 328 was apparently issued in the name of "Smith Administrators Medical Claims Account." Ex C16. As I indicated above, there is no independent evidence documenting the existence …
  15. 90 FR 28004 — Removal of Interpretive Bulletins Relating to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
    ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Jul 1, 2025★ strong match
    977) (“The attention of interested parties is directed to the fact that regulation 2550.408c-2 replaces Interpretive Bulletin 75-6”). Back to Citation 7.  41 FR 3289 (Jan. 22, 1976). Back to Citation 8.  43 FR 47713 (Oct. 17, 1978). Congress subsequently ratified Reorganization Plan No. 4 in 1984. See Sec. 1, Public La…
  16. 89 FR 32346 — Amendment to Prohibited Transaction Exemptions 75-1, 77-4, 80-83, 83-1, and 86-128
    ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Apr 25, 2024related by meaning
    this provision undermines the careful balance of labor relations in this country and argued that it is preempted by the National Labor Relations Act. After consideration of the comments, the Department has deleted the proposed recordkeeping requirements applicable to Section VII of PTE 86-128. However, as with PTE 202…
  17. 80 FR 22021 — Proposed Amendment to and Proposed Partial Revocation of Prohibited Transaction Exemption (PTE) 86-128 for Securities Transactions Involving Employee Benefit P…
    ERISAProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Apr 20, 2015related by meaning
    s) earned in connection with the transactions covered by the exemption. Back to Citation 7.  67 FR 64137 (October 17, 2002). Back to Citation 8.   See Advisory Opinion 2011-08A (June 21, 2011). Back to Citation 9.  This proposal would move the definitions from Section I to Section VII. The other sections are re-ordered…
  18. 76 FR 66637 — Prohibited Transaction Exemption Procedures; Employee Benefit Plans
    ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Oct 27, 2011
    …isions of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the Code), and the Federal Employees' Retirement System Act of 1986 (FERSA). The Secretary of Labor is authorized to grant exemptions from the prohibited transaction provisions of ERISA, the Code, and FERSA and to …
  19. DOL Office of Administrative Law Judges — USDOL, EBSA v. PLAN ADMINISTRATOR, HOME OF ECONOMY 401(K) PLAN, HOME OF ECONOMY, INC.
    ERISACourt RulingsJun 26, 2013
    … (ARB Feb. 28, 2006) (CAA). 8 29 C.F.R. § 18.40(d); Celot ex Corp. v. Cartrett , 477 U.S. 317, 322 (1986). 9 Saporito , ARB No. 05-004, slip op. at 5 (citing Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. , 477 U.S. 242, 248 (1986)). - 8 -
  20. DOL Office of Administrative Law Judges — UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, PENSION AND WELFARE BENEFITS ADMINISTRATION v. CINPAC, INC./LIBBY LEE TOYS, INC.
    ERISACourt RulingsMar 20, 1995
    …uine issue of material fact to be determined at trial. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 322 (1986); 29 C.F.R. § 18.41; Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c). A genuine issue of material fact is present where the record, taken as a whole, could lead a rational trier-of-fact to find for the non-moving party. Matsushita Electric I…