Brief Case

Search the Pension Law Library

Limit to:Advanced options
Searches the code/regs in effect on that date.
Words mode supports "quoted phrases", +required and -excluded terms.
Document types:
Go to T.C. Memo. 1988-142 (not yet in the library — opens the official source)
54 documents · 0.08sAllIRCERISAPBGCJoint Board
  1. DOL Office of Administrative Law Judges — U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, PENSION AND WELFARE BENEFITS ADMINISTRATION v. RICHARD L. SMITH and SMITH ADMINISTRATORS
    ERISACourt RulingsJan 20, 1998
    …Loan No. 1310001. Ex. C23. 10CD No. 11813-17572 was outstanding from October 13, 1987 to January 1, 1988 at an annual interest rate of 7.00%. Ex. C10. 11CD No. 11813-17579 was outstanding from October 19, 1987 to January 1, 1988 at an annual interest rate of 7.00%. Ex. C26. 12CD No. 11813-17578 was outstanding from Oct…
  2. 89 FR 32346 — Amendment to Prohibited Transaction Exemptions 75-1, 77-4, 80-83, 83-1, and 86-128
    ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Apr 25, 2024related by meaning
    this provision undermines the careful balance of labor relations in this country and argued that it is preempted by the National Labor Relations Act. After consideration of the comments, the Department has deleted the proposed recordkeeping requirements applicable to Section VII of PTE 86-128. However, as with PTE 202…
  3. DOL Office of Administrative Law Judges — U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, PENSION AND WELFARE BENEFITS ADMINISTRATION v. GEORGE H. ROBINSON, ADMINISTRATOR ANSWERING SERVICE, INC. ESOP
    ERISACourt RulingsFeb 2, 1993
    ed nonvested accounts. Respondent's 1988 annual report for the ESOP plan showed a total of 190 participants, including 31 retired or separated persons entitled to future benefits; 103 active employees fully vested; 38 employees partially vested; and 18 employees nonvested. The Laine, Appold year-end 1988 audit stated t…
  4. 81 FR 21181 — Amendment to and Partial Revocation of Prohibited Transaction Exemption (PTE) 86-128 for Securities Transactions Involving Employee Benefit Plans and Broker-De…
    ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Apr 8, 2016related by meaning
    proposal and updated economic analysis. The first proposed amendment to the rule was withdrawn on April 20, 2015, see80 FR 21927. Back to Citation 10.  Subsequent to the issuance of these regulations, Reorganization Plan No. 4 of 1978, 5 U.S.C. App. (2010), divided rulemaking and interpretive authority between the Secr…
  5. DOL Office of Administrative Law Judges — U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, PENSION AND WELFARE BENEFITS ADMINISTRATION v. BRANIFF, INC.
    ERISACourt RulingsSep 27, 1993
    …mely annual reports with the IRS for each of the plans, including plan 504, for the plan year ended 1988. This information was transmitted by the IRS to the Department of Labor ("DOL") (Joint Stipulation of fact paragraph 10). 7. Based on Braniff's interpretation of the regulations at 29 C.F.R. § 2520.103-8, Braniff di…
  6. DOL EBSA (final agency order) — U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, PENSION AND WELFARE BENEFITS ADMINISTRATION v. SPALDING AND EVENFLO COMPANIES, INC.
    ERISACourt RulingsNov 18, 1994★ strong match
    oximately $2,700,000. Audits for 1988 by Deloitte & Touche which were submitted to the Department on February 25, 1992 showed that the three plans had combined total assets, including unreimbursed claims, of $521,000. In 1988, absent an applicable exemption from ERISA's reporting requirements, Plans AA, FF and H each r…
  7. DOL Office of Administrative Law Judges — UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, PENSION AND WELFARE BENEFITS ADMINISTRATION v. T. W. TAGGART
    ERISACourt RulingsAug 25, 1995★ strong match
    …was required to pay Respondent AMCI $100,000.00 per year for five calendar years beginning with the 1988 calendar year. (Stip. Fact 23; J-Ex. 16). 36. Under the terms of the consulting agreement, MPEHA was required to reimburse Respondent AMCI for reasonable and necessary travel and other expenses. (Stip. Fact 24; J-Ex…
  8. 81 FR 21147 — Amendment to and Partial Revocation of Prohibited Transaction Exemption (PTE) 84-24 for Certain Transactions Involving Insurance Agents and Brokers, Pension Co…
    ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Apr 8, 2016related by meaning
    notes 1.  PTE 84-24, 49 FR 13208 (Apr. 3, 1984), as corrected, 49 FR 24819 (June 15, 1984), as amended, 71 FR 5887 (Feb. 3, 2006). Back to Citation 2.  Code section 4975(c)(2) authorizes the Secretary of the Treasury to grant exemptions from the parallel prohibited transaction provisions of the Code. Reorganization Pla…
  9. 81 FR 43430 — Department of Labor Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act Catch-Up Adjustments
    ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Jul 1, 2016
    …801.42—Civil Money Penalties—Assessment Section 6(a)(1) of the Employee Polygraph Protection Act of 1988 (EPPA), 29 U.S.C. 2005(a)(1) and existing 29 CFR 801.42(a) impose a civil money penalty of not more than $10,000 for any violation of the EPPA or of part 801. The maximum penalty amount last established by statute o…
  10. DOL Office of Administrative Law Judges — UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, PENSION AND WELFARE BENEFITS ADMINISTRATION v. MERSKIN & MERSKIN, P.C.
    ERISACourt RulingsApr 27, 1995★ strong match
    …hereinafter referred to as "the Respondent"] for the late filing of annual reports for fiscal years 1988, 1989, 1990 and 1991. Under Section 104(a)(1)(A) of ERISA, the administrator of an employee benefit plan is required to file an annual report within 210 days of the close of the plan year. The annual report appears …
  11. 90 FR 3667 — Prohibited Transaction Exemption (PTE) 2002-51 To Permit Certain Transactions Identified in the Voluntary Fiduciary Correction Program
    ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Jan 15, 2025related by meaning
    e use of the SCC and suggested that the Department should allow self-correctors to choose whether (a) to provide notice to interested persons (but not to EBSA) or (b) make the plan contribution. After considering these comments, the Department has not made this change. Self-correctors have a streamlined procedure for s…
  12. DOL Office of Administrative Law Judges — U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, PENSION AND WELFARE BENEFITS ADMINISTRATION v. SPALDING AND EVENFLO COMPANIES, INC.
    ERISACourt RulingsFeb 1, 1993
    …nded differently. For example, the medical and dental plans were paid for by Spalding until July 1, 1988, when employees began making contributions. The life insurance was a cafeteria plan in which Spalding paid for a benefit equal to the employee's salary, and the employee had an option of paying for an increase in be…
  13. 89 FR 32302 — Amendment to Prohibited Transaction Exemption 84-24
    ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Apr 25, 2024related by meaning
    als issued by the SEC or its staff, the Department retains interpretive authority with respect to satisfaction of this exemption. Back to Citation 12.  To the extent a party receives ongoing compensation for a recommendation that was made before the Applicability Date, including through a systematic purchase payment or…
  14. 80 FR 22021 — Proposed Amendment to and Proposed Partial Revocation of Prohibited Transaction Exemption (PTE) 86-128 for Securities Transactions Involving Employee Benefit P…
    ERISAProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Apr 20, 2015related by meaning
    s) earned in connection with the transactions covered by the exemption. Back to Citation 7.  67 FR 64137 (October 17, 2002). Back to Citation 8.   See Advisory Opinion 2011-08A (June 21, 2011). Back to Citation 9.  This proposal would move the definitions from Section I to Section VII. The other sections are re-ordered…
  15. TR 1988-01 — Technical Release 88-01
    ERISADOL Technical ReleasesAug 12, 1988
    …ions to Cafeteria Plans and Consideration of a Regulatory Exemption For Release: Friday, August 12, 1988 Contact: Mark Greenstein Office: (202) 523-7901 Printable Version The Department of Labor's Pension and Welfare Benefits Administration today announced its enforcement policy with respect to the application of its r…
  16. 88 FR 76032 — Proposed Amendment to Prohibited Transaction Exemptions 75-1, 77-4, 80-83, 83-1, and 86-128
    ERISAProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Nov 3, 2023related by meaning
    nd that the Department may request such information. (4) Failure to maintain the required records necessary to determine whether ( printed page 76045) the conditions of this exemption have been met will result in the loss of the exemption only for the transaction or transactions for which records are missing or have no…
  17. TR 1992-01 — Technical Release 92-01
    ERISADOL Technical Releases★ strong match
    provide interim relief to plan sponsors and fiduciaries of certain contributory welfare plans pending consideration of these issues by the Department. In the case of a cafeteria plan described in section 125 of the Internal Revenue Code, the Department will not assert a violation in any enforcement proceeding solely be…
  18. 90 FR 28004 — Removal of Interpretive Bulletins Relating to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
    ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Jul 1, 2025related by meaning
    977) (“The attention of interested parties is directed to the fact that regulation 2550.408c-2 replaces Interpretive Bulletin 75-6”). Back to Citation 7.  41 FR 3289 (Jan. 22, 1976). Back to Citation 8.  43 FR 47713 (Oct. 17, 1978). Congress subsequently ratified Reorganization Plan No. 4 in 1984. See Sec. 1, Public La…
  19. 87 FR 45204 — Proposed Amendment to Prohibited Transaction Class Exemption 84-14 (the QPAM Exemption)
    ERISAProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Jul 27, 2022related by meaning
    r desires to enter into a party in interest transaction with its plan but leaves the ultimate determination and review to a QPAM. Back to Citation 37.  Proposed Amendment to PTE 84-14, 68 FR 52419, 52423 (Sept. 3, 2003). Back to Citation 38.  For purposes of these changes, the Department used March 1984 and December 20…
  20. 76 FR 66136 — Investment Advice-Participants and Beneficiaries
    ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Oct 25, 2011related by meaning
    001-09A (December 14, 2001); and AO 97-15A (May 22, 1997). Back to Citation 5.  Public Law 109-280, 120 Stat. 780 (Aug. 17, 2006). Back to Citation 6.  Under Reorganization Plan No. 4 of 1978 (43 FR 47713, Oct. 17, 1978), 5 U.S.C. App. 1, 92 Stat. 3790, the authority of the Secretary of the Treasury to issue rulings un…