Brief Case

Search the Pension Law Library

Limit to:Advanced options
Searches the code/regs in effect on that date.
Words mode supports "quoted phrases", +required and -excluded terms.
Document types:
Go to T.C. Memo. 1988-224 (not yet in the library — opens the official source)
57 documents · 0.07sAllIRCERISAPBGCJoint Board
  1. DOL Office of Administrative Law Judges — U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, PENSION AND WELFARE BENEFITS ADMINISTRATION v. RICHARD L. SMITH and SMITH ADMINISTRATORS
    ERISACourt RulingsJan 20, 1998
    …Loan No. 1310001. Ex. C23. 10CD No. 11813-17572 was outstanding from October 13, 1987 to January 1, 1988 at an annual interest rate of 7.00%. Ex. C10. 11CD No. 11813-17579 was outstanding from October 19, 1987 to January 1, 1988 at an annual interest rate of 7.00%. Ex. C26. 12CD No. 11813-17578 was outstanding from Oct…
  2. 81 FR 21147 — Amendment to and Partial Revocation of Prohibited Transaction Exemption (PTE) 84-24 for Certain Transactions Involving Insurance Agents and Brokers, Pension Co…
    ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Apr 8, 2016related by meaning
    nancial institution, an insurance company, or a broker-dealer. Back to Citation 8.  Cerulli Associates, “Retirement Markets 2015.” Back to Citation 9.  The Department initially proposed an amendment to its regulation defining a fiduciary within the meaning of ERISA section 3(21)(A)(ii) and Code section 4975(e)(3)(B) on…
  3. DOL Office of Administrative Law Judges — U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, PENSION AND WELFARE BENEFITS ADMINISTRATION v. GEORGE H. ROBINSON, ADMINISTRATOR ANSWERING SERVICE, INC. ESOP
    ERISACourt RulingsFeb 2, 1993
    ed nonvested accounts. Respondent's 1988 annual report for the ESOP plan showed a total of 190 participants, including 31 retired or separated persons entitled to future benefits; 103 active employees fully vested; 38 employees partially vested; and 18 employees nonvested. The Laine, Appold year-end 1988 audit stated t…
  4. 89 FR 32302 — Amendment to Prohibited Transaction Exemption 84-24
    ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Apr 25, 2024related by meaning
    als issued by the SEC or its staff, the Department retains interpretive authority with respect to satisfaction of this exemption. Back to Citation 12.  To the extent a party receives ongoing compensation for a recommendation that was made before the Applicability Date, including through a systematic purchase payment or…
  5. DOL Office of Administrative Law Judges — U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, PENSION AND WELFARE BENEFITS ADMINISTRATION v. BRANIFF, INC.
    ERISACourt RulingsSep 27, 1993
    …mely annual reports with the IRS for each of the plans, including plan 504, for the plan year ended 1988. This information was transmitted by the IRS to the Department of Labor ("DOL") (Joint Stipulation of fact paragraph 10). 7. Based on Braniff's interpretation of the regulations at 29 C.F.R. § 2520.103-8, Braniff di…
  6. DOL EBSA (final agency order) — U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, PENSION AND WELFARE BENEFITS ADMINISTRATION v. SPALDING AND EVENFLO COMPANIES, INC.
    ERISACourt RulingsNov 18, 1994★ strong match
    oximately $2,700,000. Audits for 1988 by Deloitte & Touche which were submitted to the Department on February 25, 1992 showed that the three plans had combined total assets, including unreimbursed claims, of $521,000. In 1988, absent an applicable exemption from ERISA's reporting requirements, Plans AA, FF and H each r…
  7. 81 FR 43430 — Department of Labor Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act Catch-Up Adjustments
    ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Jul 1, 2016
    …801.42—Civil Money Penalties—Assessment Section 6(a)(1) of the Employee Polygraph Protection Act of 1988 (EPPA), 29 U.S.C. 2005(a)(1) and existing 29 CFR 801.42(a) impose a civil money penalty of not more than $10,000 for any violation of the EPPA or of part 801. The maximum penalty amount last established by statute o…
  8. DOL Office of Administrative Law Judges — UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, PENSION AND WELFARE BENEFITS ADMINISTRATION v. T. W. TAGGART
    ERISACourt RulingsAug 25, 1995★ strong match
    …was required to pay Respondent AMCI $100,000.00 per year for five calendar years beginning with the 1988 calendar year. (Stip. Fact 23; J-Ex. 16). 36. Under the terms of the consulting agreement, MPEHA was required to reimburse Respondent AMCI for reasonable and necessary travel and other expenses. (Stip. Fact 24; J-Ex…
  9. DOL Office of Administrative Law Judges — UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, PENSION AND WELFARE BENEFITS ADMINISTRATION v. MERSKIN & MERSKIN, P.C.
    ERISACourt RulingsApr 27, 1995★ strong match
    …hereinafter referred to as "the Respondent"] for the late filing of annual reports for fiscal years 1988, 1989, 1990 and 1991. Under Section 104(a)(1)(A) of ERISA, the administrator of an employee benefit plan is required to file an annual report within 210 days of the close of the plan year. The annual report appears …
  10. TR 1988-01 — Technical Release 88-01
    ERISADOL Technical ReleasesAug 12, 1988★ strong match
    …lief retroactive to the effective date of the regulation, to the following address by September 30, 1988: Office of Regulations and Interpretations Pension and Welfare Benefits Administration Room N-5671, U.S. Department of Labor Washington, D.C. 20210
  11. 89 FR 32346 — Amendment to Prohibited Transaction Exemptions 75-1, 77-4, 80-83, 83-1, and 86-128
    ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Apr 25, 2024related by meaning
    t. Life Ins. Co. v. Harris Trust & Sav. Bank, 510 U.S. 86, 98 (1993). Back to Citation 40.   See BancOklahoma Mortg. Corp. v. Capital Title Co., Inc., 194 F.3d 1089 (10th Cir. 1999) (stating that McCarran-Ferguson Act bars the application of a Federal statute only if (1) the Federal statute does not specifically relate…
  12. 90 FR 3667 — Prohibited Transaction Exemption (PTE) 2002-51 To Permit Certain Transactions Identified in the Voluntary Fiduciary Correction Program
    ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Jan 15, 2025related by meaning
    act me if you have any questions at [Insert Telephone Number of a Person Employed by the Applicant Who Is Knowledgeable About this Matter]. Sincerely, [Insert Name and Title of Person Employed by the Applicant] Footnotes 1.  Under Reorganization Plan No. 4 of 1978, 5 U.S.C. App., the authority of the Secretary of Treas…
  13. 81 FR 21181 — Amendment to and Partial Revocation of Prohibited Transaction Exemption (PTE) 86-128 for Securities Transactions Involving Employee Benefit Plans and Broker-De…
    ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Apr 8, 2016related by meaning
    proposal and updated economic analysis. The first proposed amendment to the rule was withdrawn on April 20, 2015, see80 FR 21927. Back to Citation 10.  Subsequent to the issuance of these regulations, Reorganization Plan No. 4 of 1978, 5 U.S.C. App. (2010), divided rulemaking and interpretive authority between the Secr…
  14. DOL Office of Administrative Law Judges — U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, PENSION AND WELFARE BENEFITS ADMINISTRATION v. SPALDING AND EVENFLO COMPANIES, INC.
    ERISACourt RulingsFeb 1, 1993
    …nded differently. For example, the medical and dental plans were paid for by Spalding until July 1, 1988, when employees began making contributions. The life insurance was a cafeteria plan in which Spalding paid for a benefit equal to the employee's salary, and the employee had an option of paying for an increase in be…
  15. 80 FR 22010 — Proposed Amendment to and Proposed Partial Revocation of Prohibited Transaction Exemption (PTE) 84-24 for Certain Transactions Involving Insurance Agents and B…
    ERISAProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Apr 20, 2015related by meaning
    Document Headings Document headings vary by document type but may contain the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document the number of the CFR title and the number of each part the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly related to the agency docket number / agency internal file numb…
  16. 90 FR 28004 — Removal of Interpretive Bulletins Relating to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
    ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Jul 1, 2025related by meaning
    977) (“The attention of interested parties is directed to the fact that regulation 2550.408c-2 replaces Interpretive Bulletin 75-6”). Back to Citation 7.  41 FR 3289 (Jan. 22, 1976). Back to Citation 8.  43 FR 47713 (Oct. 17, 1978). Congress subsequently ratified Reorganization Plan No. 4 in 1984. See Sec. 1, Public La…
  17. 89 FR 5624 — Automatic Portability Transaction Regulations
    ERISAProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Jan 29, 2024related by meaning
    nhancing the Intergovernmental Partnership, 58 FR 58093 (Oct. 28, 1993). Back to Citation 194.  Federalism, 64 FR 153 (Aug. 4, 1999). Back to Citation [FR Doc. 2024-01208 Filed 1-26-24; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510-29-P
  18. ERISARegulationsJan 1, 2017related by meaning
    [Reserved]
  19. 81 FR 20946 — Definition of the Term “Fiduciary”; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice
    ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Apr 8, 2016related by meaning
    -21(d). Back to Citation 48.  Reorganization Plan No. 4 of 1978 (5 U.S.C. App. (2000)). Back to Citation 49.  Id. at section 102. Back to Citation 50.  Reorganization Plan, Message of the President. Back to Citation 51.   See, e.g., Public Citizen v. Dep't of Health and Human Servs., 332 F.3d 654, 668 (2003) (the ratif…
  20. 89 FR 32260 — Amendment to Prohibited Transaction Exemption 2020-02
    ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Apr 25, 2024related by meaning
    4.   See John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Harris Trust & Sav. Bank, 510 U.S. 86, 98 (1993). Back to Citation 105.   See BancOklahoma Mortg. Corp. v. Capital Title Co., Inc., 194 F.3d 1089 (10th Cir. 1999) (stating that McCarran-Ferguson Act bars the application of a Federal statute only if (1) the Federal statute doe…