ERISACourt RulingsJan 20, 1998
…Loan No. 1310001. Ex. C23.
10CD No.
11813-17572 was outstanding from October 13, 1987 to January 1,
1988 at an annual interest rate of 7.00%. Ex. C10.
11CD No.
11813-17579 was outstanding from October 19, 1987 to January 1,
1988 at an annual interest rate of 7.00%. Ex. C26.
12CD No.
11813-17578 was outstanding from Oct…
ERISACourt RulingsFeb 2, 1993
ed nonvested accounts.
Respondent's 1988 annual report for the ESOP plan showed a total
of 190 participants, including 31 retired or separated persons entitled to future benefits; 103 active employees fully vested; 38
employees partially vested; and 18 employees nonvested.
The Laine, Appold year-end 1988 audit stated
t…
ERISACourt RulingsSep 27, 1993
…mely annual reports with the IRS for each of the plans, including plan 504, for the plan year ended
1988. This information was transmitted by the IRS to the Department
of Labor ("DOL") (Joint Stipulation of fact paragraph 10).
7. Based on Braniff's interpretation of the
regulations at 29 C.F.R. § 2520.103-8, Braniff di…
89 FR 32302 — Amendment to Prohibited Transaction Exemption 84-24 ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Apr 25, 2024related by meaning
r” a State law is to hinder its operation or “frustrate [a] goal of that law.”
Humana Inc. V. Forsyth,
525 U.S. 299, 308 (1999).
Back to Citation
113. Reorganization Plan No. 4 of 1978 (5 U.S.C. App. 1 (2018)) generally transferred the authority of the Secretary of the Treasury to grant administrative exemptions under…
ERISACourt RulingsNov 18, 1994★ strong match
oximately $2,700,000.
Audits for 1988 by Deloitte & Touche which were submitted to the
Department on February 25, 1992 showed that the three plans had combined total assets, including unreimbursed claims, of
$521,000.
In 1988, absent an applicable exemption from ERISA's
reporting requirements, Plans AA, FF and H each r…
81 FR 21147 — Amendment to and Partial Revocation of Prohibited Transaction Exemption (PTE) 84-24 for Certain Transactions Involving Insurance Agents and Brokers, Pension Co… ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Apr 8, 2016related by meaning
Document Headings
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
the following:
the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file numb…
81 FR 43430 — Department of Labor Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act Catch-Up Adjustments ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Jul 1, 2016
…801.42—Civil Money Penalties—Assessment
Section 6(a)(1) of the Employee Polygraph Protection Act of 1988 (EPPA), 29 U.S.C. 2005(a)(1) and existing 29 CFR 801.42(a) impose a civil money penalty of not more than $10,000 for any violation of the EPPA or of part 801. The maximum penalty amount last established by statute o…
ERISACourt RulingsAug 25, 1995★ strong match
…was
required to pay Respondent AMCI $100,000.00 per year for five
calendar years beginning with the 1988 calendar year. (Stip.
Fact 23; J-Ex. 16).
36. Under the terms of the consulting agreement, MPEHA was
required to reimburse Respondent AMCI for reasonable and
necessary travel and other expenses. (Stip. Fact 24; J-Ex…
90 FR 3667 — Prohibited Transaction Exemption (PTE) 2002-51 To Permit Certain Transactions Identified in the Voluntary Fiduciary Correction Program ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Jan 15, 2025related by meaning
act me if you have any questions at [Insert Telephone Number of a Person Employed by the Applicant Who Is Knowledgeable About this Matter].
Sincerely, [Insert Name and Title of Person Employed by the Applicant]
Footnotes
1.
Under Reorganization Plan No. 4 of 1978, 5 U.S.C. App., the authority of the Secretary of Treas…
ERISACourt RulingsApr 27, 1995★ strong match
ely filing of annual reports for the
fiscal years 1988, 1989, 1990 and 1991. Therefore,
ORDER
IT IS ORDERED that assessment of the civil money penalty against the Respondent in the total amount of four thousand dollars
($4,000) is hereby REVERSED.
Furthermore, IT IS ORDERED that, in the event of future
noncompliance wi…
ERISACourt RulingsFeb 1, 1993
…nded
differently. For example, the medical and dental plans were paid
for by Spalding until July 1, 1988, when employees began making
contributions. The life insurance was a cafeteria plan in which
Spalding paid for a benefit equal to the employee's salary, and the
employee had an option of paying for an increase in be…
90 FR 28004 — Removal of Interpretive Bulletins Relating to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Jul 1, 2025related by meaning
977) (“The attention of interested parties is directed to the fact that regulation 2550.408c-2 replaces Interpretive Bulletin 75-6”).
Back to Citation 7.
41 FR 3289 (Jan. 22, 1976).
Back to Citation
8.
43 FR 47713 (Oct. 17, 1978). Congress subsequently ratified Reorganization Plan No. 4 in 1984. See Sec. 1, Public La…
89 FR 32260 — Amendment to Prohibited Transaction Exemption 2020-02 ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Apr 25, 2024related by meaning
4.
See John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. Co.
v.
Harris Trust & Sav. Bank,
510 U.S. 86, 98 (1993).
Back to Citation
105.
See BancOklahoma Mortg. Corp.
v. Capital Title Co., Inc.,
194 F.3d 1089 (10th Cir. 1999) (stating that McCarran-Ferguson Act bars the application of a Federal statute only if (1) the Federal statute doe…
ERISADOL Technical ReleasesAug 12, 1988
…ions to Cafeteria Plans and Consideration of a Regulatory Exemption
For Release: Friday, August 12, 1988
Contact: Mark Greenstein
Office: (202) 523-7901
Printable Version
The Department of Labor's Pension and Welfare Benefits Administration today announced its enforcement policy with respect to the application of its r…
85 FR 82798 — Prohibited Transaction Exemption 2020-02, Improving Investment Advice for Workers & Retirees ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Dec 18, 2020related by meaning
ired notice and comment rulemaking, citing
Am. Min. Cong.
v.
Mine Safety & Health Admin.,
995 F.2d 1106, 1112 (D.C. Cir. 1993), and
Chao
v.
Rothermel, 327 F.3d 223, 227 (3d Cir. 2003). The Department disagrees that the factors cited in these cases are satisfied. In this regard, there would be an adequate legislative ba…
81 FR 21181 — Amendment to and Partial Revocation of Prohibited Transaction Exemption (PTE) 86-128 for Securities Transactions Involving Employee Benefit Plans and Broker-De… ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Apr 8, 2016related by meaning
proposal and updated economic analysis. The first proposed amendment to the rule was withdrawn on April 20, 2015,
see80 FR 21927.
Back to Citation
10. Subsequent to the issuance of these regulations, Reorganization Plan No. 4 of 1978, 5 U.S.C. App. (2010), divided rulemaking and interpretive authority between the Secr…
ERISARegulationsJan 1, 2017related by meaning
[Reserved]
81 FR 20946 — Definition of the Term “Fiduciary”; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Apr 8, 2016related by meaning
-21(d).
Back to Citation
48.
Reorganization Plan No. 4 of 1978 (5 U.S.C. App. (2000)).
Back to Citation
49.
Id. at section 102.
Back to Citation
50. Reorganization Plan, Message of the President.
Back to Citation
51.
See, e.g., Public Citizen
v.
Dep't of Health and Human Servs.,
332 F.3d 654, 668 (2003) (the ratif…
89 FR 5624 — Automatic Portability Transaction Regulations ERISAProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Jan 29, 2024related by meaning
nhancing the Intergovernmental Partnership, 58 FR 58093 (Oct. 28, 1993).
Back to Citation
194.
Federalism, 64 FR 153 (Aug. 4, 1999).
Back to Citation [FR Doc. 2024-01208 Filed 1-26-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-29-P
76 FR 66637 — Prohibited Transaction Exemption Procedures; Employee Benefit Plans ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Oct 27, 2011related by meaning
to Citation
1.
Section 102 of Presidential Reorganization Plan No. 4 of 1978 (3 CFR part 332 (1978),
reprinted in
5 U.S.C. app. at 672 (2006),
and in 92 Stat. 3790 (1978)), effective December 31, 1978, generally transferred the authority of the Secretary of the Treasury to issue administrative exemptions under section…