Brief Case

Search the Pension Law Library

Limit to:Advanced options
Searches the code/regs in effect on that date.
Words mode supports "quoted phrases", +required and -excluded terms.
Document types:
Go to T.C. Memo. 1991-144 (not yet in the library — opens the official source)
42 documents · 0.07sAllIRCERISAPBGCJoint Board
  1. DOL EBSA (final agency order) — U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, PENSION AND WELFARE BENEFITS ADMINISTRATION v. SPALDING AND EVENFLO COMPANIES, INC.
    ERISACourt RulingsNov 18, 1994★ strong match
    … over 100 employees. The 1988 annual report for each plan was due on July 31, 1989. On February 19, 1991, the DOL notified Spalding that the annual reports filed for 1988 for the three plans were deficient because these plans were not exempt from the requirements that plans with 100 or more participants must attach a r…
  2. DOL Office of Administrative Law Judges — U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, PENSION AND WELFARE BENEFITS ADMINISTRATION v. SPALDING AND EVENFLO COMPANIES, INC.
    ERISACourt RulingsFeb 1, 1993
    h 13, 1991, attorney Richard B. Fellows responded on Respondent's behalf by letter to Joseph Roberts of DRC, referencing a telephone conversation with r. Roberts on March 13, 1991, and advising that steps were being taken to compile an accountant's report, and an attempt would be made to file these accountant's reports…
  3. DOL EBSA (final agency order) — U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, PENSION AND WELFARE BENEFITS ADMINISTRATION v. NORTHWESTERN INSTITUTE OF PSYCHIATRY
    ERISACourt RulingsJul 26, 1995
    …e under the penalties of perjury. TYCOR responded to the Notice of Intent by letter dated April 12, 1991. This letter enclosed the Statement of Net Assets in comparative format, a Schedule of Assets Held for Investment, and a Schedule of Reportable Transactions, along with another copy of the previously submitted IQPA'…
  4. 81 FR 21147 — Amendment to and Partial Revocation of Prohibited Transaction Exemption (PTE) 84-24 for Certain Transactions Involving Insurance Agents and Brokers, Pension Co…
    ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Apr 8, 2016related by meaning
    Underwriter” is defined in the same manner as that term is defined in section 2(a)(29) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80a-2(a)(29)). (n) The term “relative” means a “relative” as that term is defined in ERISA section 3(15) (or a “member of the family” as that term is defined in Code section 4975(e)(6)…
  5. 89 FR 32302 — Amendment to Prohibited Transaction Exemption 84-24
    ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Apr 25, 2024related by meaning
    Document Headings Document headings vary by document type but may contain the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document the number of the CFR title and the number of each part the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly related to the agency docket number / agency internal file numb…
  6. 81 FR 21181 — Amendment to and Partial Revocation of Prohibited Transaction Exemption (PTE) 86-128 for Securities Transactions Involving Employee Benefit Plans and Broker-De…
    ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Apr 8, 2016related by meaning
    tion. Back to Citation 14.  67 FR 64137 (October 17, 2002). Back to Citation 15.   See Advisory Opinion 2011-08A (June 21, 2011). Back to Citation 16.  As noted above, for purposes of this amendment, the terms “Individual Retirement Account” or “IRA” mean any account or annuity described in Code section 4975(e)(1)(B) t…
  7. DOL Office of Administrative Law Judges — U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, PENSION AND WELFARE BENEFITS ADMINISTRATION v. GEORGE H. ROBINSON, ADMINISTRATOR ANSWERING SERVICE, INC. ESOP
    ERISACourt RulingsFeb 2, 1993
    …"Portfolio Summary" as of December 31, 1988 that is summarized above. By a letter dated January 11, 1991, Ft/BA gave notice to Respondent that it intended to assess a penalty for the continued failure to submit a satisfactory annual report, one which included an independent audit opinion. Respondent replied on February…
  8. 90 FR 3667 — Prohibited Transaction Exemption (PTE) 2002-51 To Permit Certain Transactions Identified in the Voluntary Fiduciary Correction Program
    ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Jan 15, 2025related by meaning
    e use of the SCC and suggested that the Department should allow self-correctors to choose whether (a) to provide notice to interested persons (but not to EBSA) or (b) make the plan contribution. After considering these comments, the Department has not made this change. Self-correctors have a streamlined procedure for s…
  9. DOL Office of Administrative Law Judges — U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, PENSION AND WELFARE BENEFITS ADMINISTRATION v. BRANIFF, INC.
    ERISACourt RulingsSep 27, 1993
    …owing the receipt of the above mentioned letters, Braniff informed DOL by letter dated February 22, 1991, that it was advised by its accountant that no IQPA report was required with its filings of the annual reports due to the plans' funding arrangement under a 501(c)(9) trust (Joint Exhibit 4). 10. On September 6, 199…
  10. DOL Office of Administrative Law Judges — UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, PENSION AND WELFARE BENEFITS ADMINISTRATION v. MERSKIN & MERSKIN, P.C.
    ERISACourt RulingsApr 27, 1995★ strong match
    …to as "the Respondent"] for the late filing of annual reports for fiscal years 1988, 1989, 1990 and 1991. Under Section 104(a)(1)(A) of ERISA, the administrator of an employee benefit plan is required to file an annual report within 210 days of the close of the plan year. The annual report appears as a completed Form 5…
  11. DOL Office of Administrative Law Judges — UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, PENSION AND WELFARE BENEFITS ADMINISTRATION v. RHODE ISLAND BRICKLAYERS & ALLIED CRAFTSMEN PENSION FUND
    ERISACourt RulingsMay 30, 1995
    …by both parties. In addition, DOL submitted Complainant's Brief on March 10, 1995, and Respondent's Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Complainant's Assessment of Civil Penalty was filed on March 13, 1995. [Page 2] Findings of Fact The parties filed a Joint Statement of Facts Not in Dispute that are incorporated herein…
  12. 80 FR 22010 — Proposed Amendment to and Proposed Partial Revocation of Prohibited Transaction Exemption (PTE) 84-24 for Certain Transactions Involving Insurance Agents and B…
    ERISAProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Apr 20, 2015related by meaning
    minimized, collection instruments are clearly understood, and the Department can properly assess the impact of collection requirements on respondents. Currently, the Department is soliciting comments concerning the proposed information collection request (ICR) included in the Proposed Amendment to and Proposed Partial …
  13. DOL Office of Administrative Law Judges — UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, PENSION AND WELFARE BENEFITS ADMINISTRATION v. CINPAC, INC./LIBBY LEE TOYS, INC.
    ERISACourt RulingsMar 20, 1995related by meaning
    l information by letter of May 21, 1992; 48 days after the date of the April 3, 1992, Notice, but only 44 days after its April 7, 1992, receipt of the Notice. Complainant contends the Respondent's submission was not timely, based on the date of the Notice. Respondent contends its submission was timely, based on the rec…
  14. 89 FR 32346 — Amendment to Prohibited Transaction Exemptions 75-1, 77-4, 80-83, 83-1, and 86-128
    ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Apr 25, 2024related by meaning
    t. Life Ins. Co. v. Harris Trust & Sav. Bank, 510 U.S. 86, 98 (1993). Back to Citation 40.   See BancOklahoma Mortg. Corp. v. Capital Title Co., Inc., 194 F.3d 1089 (10th Cir. 1999) (stating that McCarran-Ferguson Act bars the application of a Federal statute only if (1) the Federal statute does not specifically relate…
  15. DOL Office of Administrative Law Judges — UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, PENSION AND WELFARE BENEFITS ADMINISTRATION v. CURRENT DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
    ERISACourt RulingsFeb 22, 2000★ strong match
    's payment of the amount set forth in the settlement agreement to be made by December 31, 1998, and fulfillment of all other terms of said agreement." [Page 2] The decision and order specifically provided that, "The Court shall retain jurisdiction over this action for purposes of enforcing the terms of this settlement …
  16. DOL Office of Administrative Law Judges — UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, PENSION AND WELFARE BENEFITS ADMINISTRATION v. SOCIEDAD PARA ASISTENCIA LEGAL MONEY PURCHASE PLAN
    ERISACourt RulingsMar 29, 1995
    …n also advised Respondent that he had a 45 day penalty-free period within which to file a corrected 1991 Annual Report. EX 2. 5. On November 26, 1993, Respondent informed PWBA that a IQPA had been retained to audit the Fund and prepare a corrected 1991 Annual Report. Respondent stated that the new audit would be submit…
  17. 87 FR 45204 — Proposed Amendment to Prohibited Transaction Class Exemption 84-14 (the QPAM Exemption)
    ERISAProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Jul 27, 2022related by meaning
    r desires to enter into a party in interest transaction with its plan but leaves the ultimate determination and review to a QPAM. Back to Citation 37.  Proposed Amendment to PTE 84-14, 68 FR 52419, 52423 (Sept. 3, 2003). Back to Citation 38.  For purposes of these changes, the Department used March 1984 and December 20…
  18. 90 FR 28004 — Removal of Interpretive Bulletins Relating to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
    ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Jul 1, 2025related by meaning
    977) (“The attention of interested parties is directed to the fact that regulation 2550.408c-2 replaces Interpretive Bulletin 75-6”). Back to Citation 7.  41 FR 3289 (Jan. 22, 1976). Back to Citation 8.  43 FR 47713 (Oct. 17, 1978). Congress subsequently ratified Reorganization Plan No. 4 in 1984. See Sec. 1, Public La…
  19. DOL Office of Administrative Law Judges — U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, PENSION AND WELFARE BENEFITS ADMINISTRATION v. BAKERY AND CONFECTIONERY WORKERS LOCAL 125 HEALTH AND WELFARE TRUST FUND
    ERISACourt RulingsApr 12, 1995
    … timely correct deficiencies and file an acceptable annual report for the plan year ending June 30, 1991, as required by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 ("ERISA" or "the Act"), as amended, 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001, et seq. On March 14, 1995, a hearing was held where the parties were afforded a full opportu…
  20. TR 1992-01 — Technical Release 92-01
    ERISADOL Technical Releasesrelated by meaning
    1991). Signed at Washington, DC, this 28th day of May 1992 Alan D. Lebowitz Deputy Assistant Secretary for Program Operations U.S. Department of Labor Pension and Welfare Benefits Administration