90 FR 3667 — Prohibited Transaction Exemption (PTE) 2002-51 To Permit Certain Transactions Identified in the Voluntary Fiduciary Correction Program ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Jan 15, 2025related by meaning
…y of Labor.
Back to Citation
2.
67 FR 15062 (March 28, 2002); 70 FR. 17516 (April 6, 2005); 71 FR. 20262 (April 19, 2006).
Back to Citation
3.
5 U.S.C. App.
Back to Citation
4.
87 FR 71164 (Nov. 21, 2022).
Back to Citation
5.
87 FR 70753 (Nov. 21, 2022).
Back to Citation
6.
Enacted on December 29, 2022, as Divisio…
ERISACourt RulingsFeb 22, 2000
he years 1992 - 1996, but that only the years 1995 and 1996
were sent to the DOL because that is all that the settlement
agreement called for. (T 145) Mr. Arneson confirmed that he (they) did not
respond immediately to Mrs. Palaoro's letter of April 26, 1999. (T
148) In August, 1999, [just before the hearing] they sent…
89 FR 32260 — Amendment to Prohibited Transaction Exemption 2020-02 ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Apr 25, 2024related by meaning
…enefits Security Administration, U.S. Department of Labor.
ACTION:
Amendment to Class Exemption PTE 2020-02.
SUMMARY:
This document contains a notice of amendment to class prohibited transaction exemption (PTE) 2020-02, which provides relief for investment advice fiduciaries to receive certain compensation that otherwi…
ERISACourt RulingsFeb 1, 1993
Respondent's statement of
reasonable cause, due January 13, 1992, that was filed subsequent
to January 13 if Respondent describes in the statement of reasonable cause what is intended to be produced and a reasonable
time frame within which to produce these items. This letter was
received on or about January 8, 1992.
1…
ERISACourt RulingsJul 26, 1995
d to the DOL twice previously.
In mid January, 1992 NIP did two things of import. on
January 16, 1992, it filed suit in District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, alleging that the Department's failure
to consider NIP's letter of April 12, 1991, as a timely statement
of reasonable cause unfairly deprived …
ERISACourt RulingsMar 20, 1995
…e Department [of
Labor]."
The Respondent was also notified of the 45-day time limit in the April 3, 1992, letter of
rejection, which it received on April 7, 1992. Respondent sent in the requested additional
information by letter of May 21, 1992; 48 days after the date of the April
3, 1992, Notice, but only 44 days afte…
ERISACourt RulingsNov 18, 1994★ strong match
…L may bring after the date of
adoption, even if it is based, as this one is, on violations prior to 1992. Indeed, the stated purpose of T.R. 92-01 was to
expand the categories of violations as to which the DOL would not
assert a violation beyond the limited categories contained in
T.R. 88-1. The preamble to T.R. 92-01 …
ERISADOL Technical Releases★ strong match
1991).
Signed at Washington, DC, this 28th day of May 1992
Alan D. Lebowitz
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Program Operations
U.S. Department of Labor Pension and Welfare Benefits Administration
87 FR 70753 — Prohibited Transaction Exemption (PTE) 2002-51 To Permit Certain Transactions Identified in the Voluntary Fiduciary Correction Program ERISAProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Nov 21, 2022related by meaning
he Department no longer believes that posting the notification is reasonably calculated to ensure that interested persons actually receive the notice. The Department has reviewed several notices to interested persons submitted to the applicable Regional Offices and found that some of them do not meet the applicable req…
ERISAProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Nov 21, 2022related by meaning
…d PTE 2002-51 remain available during the Department's consideration of the changes.
B. VFC Program 2022 Amendments
The VFC Program 2022 Amendments set forth in this document would retain the fundamentals of the current VFC Program. To facilitate reference to the Program, this document includes a restatement of the Pro…
ERISACourt RulingsJun 9, 2000
…eiving the notice, Respondent contacted the PWBA by telephone on
April 8, 1992. A telephone contact memorandum from the Division of
Reporting Compliance indicates that Respondent was told that PWBA
expected a separate IQPA for the Piedmont plan from January 1,
1989, until the date of the merger, September 1, 1989.4 (J-…
89 FR 32302 — Amendment to Prohibited Transaction Exemption 84-24 ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Apr 25, 2024related by meaning
…never individualized questions or concerns arise.
See, e.g.,
Prohibited Transaction Exemption (PTE) 2023-15, 88 FR 42953 (July 5, 2023); 2023-14, 88 FR 36337 (June 2, 2023); 2023-13, 88 FR 26336 (Apr. 28, 2023); 2023-02, 88 FR 4023 (Jan. 23, 2023); 2023-01, 88 FR 1418 (Jan. 10, 2023); 2022-01, 87 FR 23249 (Apr. 19, 202…
ERISACourt RulingsFeb 2, 1993
14, 1992, certain
special procedural rules were prescribed for the presentation of
evidence and argument by the parties in written form. In accordance with those procedural rules, Respondent's opening statement dated
April 2, 1992, with attached Exhibits "A" through "I"; Pt/BA's
opening statement dated May 24, 1992, wi…
89 FR 32346 — Amendment to Prohibited Transaction Exemptions 75-1, 77-4, 80-83, 83-1, and 86-128 ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Apr 25, 2024related by meaning
…e proposed recordkeeping requirements applicable to Section VII of PTE 86-128. However, as with PTE 2020-02, the Department intends to monitor compliance with the exemption closely and may revisit whether expanding the recordkeeping requirement is appropriate in the future. Any future amendments would be preceded by no…
88 FR 9408 — Amendment and Restatement of Voluntary Fiduciary Correction Program ERISAProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Feb 14, 2023related by meaning
…r revisions to the VFC Program and PTE 2002-51. Signed at Washington, DC, this 1st day of February, 2023.
Lisa M. Gomez,
Assistant Secretary, Employee Benefits Security Administration, Department of Labor.
Footnotes
1.
Under Reorganization Plan No. 4 of 1978, 5 U.S.C. App. at 237 (2012), the authority of the Secretary…
ERISACourt RulingsApr 27, 1995
…rring the full penalty was
created. Such overdue reports were required to be filed between
arch 23, 1992 and September 30, 1992. A one thousand dollar
(
,000) late fee was to be included with each overdue report filed
under this procedure.
In accordance with the USDL 92-158 procedure, the Respondent
filed its Forms 550…
85 FR 2292 — Department of Labor Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act Annual Adjustments for 2020 ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Jan 15, 2020related by meaning
PART 655—TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT OF FOREIGN WORKERS IN THE UNITED STATES
1. The authority citation for part 655 continues to read as follows:
Authority: Section 655.0 issued under 8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(15)(E)(iii), 1101(a)(15)(H)(i) and (ii), 8 U.S.C. 1103(a)(6), 1182(m), (n) and (t), 1184(c), (g), and (j), 1188, and 1288(c) …
ERISACourt RulingsSep 27, 1993
…
17. DOL sent to Braniff a "Notice of
Determination on Statement of Reasonable Causeö, dated May 8,
1992, which stated, among other things, that Braniff was required
to file an Answer to the Notice of Determination with the Of f ice
of Administrative Law Judges ("OALJ") within thirty days thereafter
in order to avoid e…
ERISARegulationsJan 1, 2017
…tions occurring on or after the first day of the second plan year beginning on or after October 13, 1992.
(g)(2) (2) This section is effective with respect to transactions occurring under a plan maintained pursuant to one or more collective bargaining agreements between employee representatives and one or more employer…
ERISACourt RulingsDec 21, 1993
… 2560.502c-2(g).
In an attempt to collect the penalty that had been assessed
on NIP, on October 11, 1992 the DOL sent NIP a letter stating its
intent to collect the now assessed penalty.
On October 21, 1991 NIP filed another incomplete Form 5500
but for unexplained reasons it was not signed.
On January 17, 1992 NIP fil…