ERISACourt RulingsFeb 22, 2000
he years 1992 - 1996, but that only the years 1995 and 1996
were sent to the DOL because that is all that the settlement
agreement called for. (T 145) Mr. Arneson confirmed that he (they) did not
respond immediately to Mrs. Palaoro's letter of April 26, 1999. (T
148) In August, 1999, [just before the hearing] they sent…
90 FR 3667 — Prohibited Transaction Exemption (PTE) 2002-51 To Permit Certain Transactions Identified in the Voluntary Fiduciary Correction Program ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Jan 15, 2025related by meaning
e use of the SCC and suggested that the Department should allow self-correctors to choose whether (a) to provide notice to interested persons (but
not to EBSA) or (b) make the plan contribution. After considering these comments, the Department has not made this change. Self-correctors have a streamlined procedure for s…
81 FR 21181 — Amendment to and Partial Revocation of Prohibited Transaction Exemption (PTE) 86-128 for Securities Transactions Involving Employee Benefit Plans and Broker-De… ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Apr 8, 2016related by meaning
the preamble to the accompanying final rule, which contained information relevant to the costs and administrative burdens attendant to the proposals. The Department took into account such public comments in connection with making changes to the prohibited transaction exemption, analyzing the economic impact of the prop…
ERISACourt RulingsFeb 1, 1993
Respondent's statement of
reasonable cause, due January 13, 1992, that was filed subsequent
to January 13 if Respondent describes in the statement of reasonable cause what is intended to be produced and a reasonable
time frame within which to produce these items. This letter was
received on or about January 8, 1992.
1…
ERISACourt RulingsJul 26, 1995
d to the DOL twice previously.
In mid January, 1992 NIP did two things of import. on
January 16, 1992, it filed suit in District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, alleging that the Department's failure
to consider NIP's letter of April 12, 1991, as a timely statement
of reasonable cause unfairly deprived …
ERISACourt RulingsMar 20, 1995
…e Department [of
Labor]."
The Respondent was also notified of the 45-day time limit in the April 3, 1992, letter of
rejection, which it received on April 7, 1992. Respondent sent in the requested additional
information by letter of May 21, 1992; 48 days after the date of the April
3, 1992, Notice, but only 44 days afte…
81 FR 21147 — Amendment to and Partial Revocation of Prohibited Transaction Exemption (PTE) 84-24 for Certain Transactions Involving Insurance Agents and Brokers, Pension Co… ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Apr 8, 2016related by meaning
Document Headings
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
the following:
the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file numb…
ERISACourt RulingsNov 18, 1994★ strong match
…L may bring after the date of
adoption, even if it is based, as this one is, on violations prior to 1992. Indeed, the stated purpose of T.R. 92-01 was to
expand the categories of violations as to which the DOL would not
assert a violation beyond the limited categories contained in
T.R. 88-1. The preamble to T.R. 92-01 …
87 FR 70753 — Prohibited Transaction Exemption (PTE) 2002-51 To Permit Certain Transactions Identified in the Voluntary Fiduciary Correction Program ERISAProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Nov 21, 2022related by meaning
an]. If the terms of the class exemption are met, [Insert Name of Applicant] will qualify for relief from the excise taxes that would otherwise apply. One of the requirements for excise tax relief is for [Insert Name of Applicant] to provide you with this notice so you have an opportunity to provide comments to EBSA ab…
ERISADOL Technical Releases★ strong match
1991).
Signed at Washington, DC, this 28th day of May 1992
Alan D. Lebowitz
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Program Operations
U.S. Department of Labor Pension and Welfare Benefits Administration
ERISACourt RulingsJun 9, 2000
…eiving the notice, Respondent contacted the PWBA by telephone on
April 8, 1992. A telephone contact memorandum from the Division of
Reporting Compliance indicates that Respondent was told that PWBA
expected a separate IQPA for the Piedmont plan from January 1,
1989, until the date of the merger, September 1, 1989.4 (J-…
80 FR 22021 — Proposed Amendment to and Proposed Partial Revocation of Prohibited Transaction Exemption (PTE) 86-128 for Securities Transactions Involving Employee Benefit P… ERISAProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Apr 20, 2015related by meaning
Document Headings
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
the following:
the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file numb…
89 FR 32302 — Amendment to Prohibited Transaction Exemption 84-24 ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Apr 25, 2024related by meaning
Document Headings
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
the following:
the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file numb…
ERISACourt RulingsFeb 2, 1993
14, 1992, certain
special procedural rules were prescribed for the presentation of
evidence and argument by the parties in written form. In accordance with those procedural rules, Respondent's opening statement dated
April 2, 1992, with attached Exhibits "A" through "I"; Pt/BA's
opening statement dated May 24, 1992, wi…
81 FR 21139 — Amendment to Prohibited Transaction Exemption (PTE) 75-1, Part V, Exemptions From Prohibitions Respecting Certain Classes of Transactions Involving Employee Be… ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Apr 8, 2016related by meaning
under section 4975 of the Code] is hereby transferred to the Secretary of Labor”).
Back to Citation
9.
29 CFR 2550.408b-2(e); 26 CFR 54.4975-6(a)(5). Back to Citation
10.
See
PTE 86-128, Exemption for Securities Transactions Involving Employee Benefit Plans and Broker-Dealers, 51 FR 41686 (November 18, 1986), as ame…
ERISACourt RulingsApr 27, 1995
…rring the full penalty was
created. Such overdue reports were required to be filed between
arch 23, 1992 and September 30, 1992. A one thousand dollar
(
,000) late fee was to be included with each overdue report filed
under this procedure.
In accordance with the USDL 92-158 procedure, the Respondent
filed its Forms 550…
89 FR 32260 — Amendment to Prohibited Transaction Exemption 2020-02 ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Apr 25, 2024related by meaning
4.
See John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. Co.
v.
Harris Trust & Sav. Bank,
510 U.S. 86, 98 (1993).
Back to Citation
105.
See BancOklahoma Mortg. Corp.
v. Capital Title Co., Inc.,
194 F.3d 1089 (10th Cir. 1999) (stating that McCarran-Ferguson Act bars the application of a Federal statute only if (1) the Federal statute doe…
ERISACourt RulingsSep 27, 1993
…
17. DOL sent to Braniff a "Notice of
Determination on Statement of Reasonable Causeö, dated May 8,
1992, which stated, among other things, that Braniff was required
to file an Answer to the Notice of Determination with the Of f ice
of Administrative Law Judges ("OALJ") within thirty days thereafter
in order to avoid e…
90 FR 28007 — Selection of Annuity Providers-Safe Harbor for Individual Account Plans ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Jul 1, 2025related by meaning
…plicable policies in those guidelines.
J. Review Under Additional Executive Orders and Presidential Memoranda
90 FR 28004 — Removal of Interpretive Bulletins Relating to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Jul 1, 2025related by meaning
977) (“The attention of interested parties is directed to the fact that regulation 2550.408c-2 replaces Interpretive Bulletin 75-6”).
Back to Citation 7.
41 FR 3289 (Jan. 22, 1976).
Back to Citation
8.
43 FR 47713 (Oct. 17, 1978). Congress subsequently ratified Reorganization Plan No. 4 in 1984. See Sec. 1, Public La…