81 FR 21181 — Amendment to and Partial Revocation of Prohibited Transaction Exemption (PTE) 86-128 for Securities Transactions Involving Employee Benefit Plans and Broker-De… ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Apr 8, 2016related by meaning
tion.
Back to Citation
14.
67 FR 64137 (October 17, 2002).
Back to Citation
15.
See
Advisory Opinion 2011-08A (June 21, 2011).
Back to Citation
16. As noted above, for purposes of this amendment, the terms “Individual Retirement Account” or “IRA” mean any account or annuity described in Code section 4975(e)(1)(B) t…
90 FR 3667 — Prohibited Transaction Exemption (PTE) 2002-51 To Permit Certain Transactions Identified in the Voluntary Fiduciary Correction Program ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Jan 15, 2025related by meaning
an]. If the terms of the class exemption are met, [Insert Name of Applicant] will qualify for relief from the excise taxes that would otherwise apply. One of the requirements for excise tax relief is for [Insert Name of Applicant] to provide you with this notice so you have an opportunity to provide comments to EBSA ab…
ERISACourt RulingsFeb 22, 2000★ strong match
…, I find them to
be accurate representations of the condition of the two Plans, as of September 30, 1997. In addition, I do not question the time that
was necessary to devote to the documents from December through the
submission of the documents in April, 1999. (T 113 - 114)
With regard to the conversations with Mr.
Du…
ERISACourt RulingsOct 31, 1997
…ISA > USDOL v. Board of Trustees of the
Schenectady Local 105 Annuity Fund, 95-RIS-40 (ALJ Oct. 31,
1997)
USDOL/OALJ Reporter
USDOL v. Board of Trustees of the Schenectady Local 105
Annuity Fund, 95-RIS-40 (ALJ Oct. 31, 1997)
U.S. Department of Labor
Office of Administrative Law Judges
525 Vine Street - Suite 900
Cinci…
80 FR 22021 — Proposed Amendment to and Proposed Partial Revocation of Prohibited Transaction Exemption (PTE) 86-128 for Securities Transactions Involving Employee Benefit P… ERISAProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Apr 20, 2015related by meaning
s) earned in connection with the transactions covered by the exemption.
Back to Citation
7.
67 FR 64137 (October 17, 2002).
Back to Citation
8.
See Advisory Opinion 2011-08A (June 21, 2011).
Back to Citation
9.
This proposal would move the definitions from Section I to Section VII. The other sections are re-ordered…
81 FR 21147 — Amendment to and Partial Revocation of Prohibited Transaction Exemption (PTE) 84-24 for Certain Transactions Involving Insurance Agents and Brokers, Pension Co… ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Apr 8, 2016related by meaning
tion
45.
15 U.S.C. 80b-11(g)(1).
Back to Citation
46.
See e.g., Fish
v.
GreatBanc Trust Company,
749 F.3d 671 (7th Cir. 2014).
Back to Citation
47. As a practical matter, one way for financial institutions to ensure that they can meet this burden is by implementing strong anti-conflict policies and procedures, and …
81 FR 43430 — Department of Labor Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act Catch-Up Adjustments ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Jul 1, 2016
…nformation upon request. Existing § 702.204 provides that an employer who, on or after November 17, 1997, knowingly and willfully fails or refuses to file any report required by § 702.201 or who knowingly or willfully makes a false statement or misrepresentation on any report shall be subject to a civil penalty not to …
ERISADOL Technical ReleasesJul 1, 1997
…group health plans and group health insurance coverage for plan years beginning on or after July 1, 1997. The Departments of the Treasury, Labor, and Health and Human Services (the Departments) issued interim final regulations implementing these group market provisions at 26 CFR 54.9801-1T through 54.9801-6T, 54.9802-1…
ERISACourt RulingsOct 14, 1999
…ponded by letter dated March
2, 1999, from Gregory L. Pfirman, stating that subsequent to a
January 1997 valuation, Comgraphix stock became worthless and the
company discontinued operations in June 1997, entering into
negotiations with Racom Information Technologies (Racom) for the
sale of its assets to Racom. The lett…
ERISACourt RulingsMar 23, 2001
qualified 1997 IQPA
report. GX 5; RX B.
10. PWBA issued a Notice of Intent to Assess a
Penalty on or about January 14, 2000, reiterating that the 1997 IQPA report was deficient because the scope of the audit was
inappropriately limited,1 and proposing a penalty of $50,000 against
Schneiderman's for its failure to file …
ERISADOL Technical ReleasesJul 1, 1997
…group health plans and group health insurance coverage for plan years beginning on or after July 1, 1997. The Departments of the Treasury, Labor, and Health and Human Services (the Departments) issued regulations implementing these group market provisions at 26 CFR 54.9801-1T through 54.9801-6T, 54.9802-1T, 54.9831-1T …
87 FR 70753 — Prohibited Transaction Exemption (PTE) 2002-51 To Permit Certain Transactions Identified in the Voluntary Fiduciary Correction Program ERISAProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Nov 21, 2022related by meaning
an]. If the terms of the class exemption are met, [Insert Name of Applicant] will qualify for relief from the excise taxes that would otherwise apply. One of the requirements for excise tax relief is for [Insert Name of Applicant] to provide you with this notice so you have an opportunity to provide comments to EBSA ab…
ERISARegulationsJan 1, 2017
…tion applies to collectively bargained plans no sooner than the later of—
(h)(1)(i) (i) February 3, 1997; or
(h)(1)(ii) (ii) The first day of the plan year that begins after the expiration of the last to expire of any applicable bargaining agreement in effect on August 7, 1996.
(h)(2) (2) Until paragraph (b) of this se…
89 FR 32302 — Amendment to Prohibited Transaction Exemption 84-24 ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Apr 25, 2024related by meaning
(2), (3); 29 U.S.C. 1108(a)(2), (3); Code section 4975(c)(2)(B), (C).
Back to Citation
32.
NAIC Model Regulation at section 5.I.
Back to Citation
33. NAIC Model Regulation at section 5.B.
Back to Citation
34.
NAIC Model Regulation at section 5.J.
Back to Citation
35.
See Staff Bulletin: Standards of Conduct for Bro…
ERISACourt RulingsFeb 21, 1997
…h
Case Status
DOL Home > OALJ > ERISA > USDOL v. El Dorado Furniture Corp.,
94-RIS-11 (ALJ Feb. 21, 1997)
USDOL/OALJ Reporter
USDOL v. El Dorado Furniture Corp., 94-RIS-11 (ALJ
Feb. 21, 1997)
U.S. Department of Labor
Office of Administrative Law Judges
2600 Mt. Ephraim Avenue
Camden, New Jersey 08104
Phone: 609-757-531…
81 FR 21139 — Amendment to Prohibited Transaction Exemption (PTE) 75-1, Part V, Exemptions From Prohibitions Respecting Certain Classes of Transactions Involving Employee Be… ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Apr 8, 2016related by meaning
under section 4975 of the Code] is hereby transferred to the Secretary of Labor”).
Back to Citation
9.
29 CFR 2550.408b-2(e); 26 CFR 54.4975-6(a)(5). Back to Citation
10.
See
PTE 86-128, Exemption for Securities Transactions Involving Employee Benefit Plans and Broker-Dealers, 51 FR 41686 (November 18, 1986), as ame…
ERISACourt RulingsMay 2, 1997
…
DMS Search
Case Status
DOL Home > OALJ > ERISA > USDOL v. BR Holdings, Ltd., 97-RIS-11
(ALJ May 2, 1997)
USDOL/OALJ Reporter
USDOL v. BR Holdings, Ltd., 97-RIS-11 (ALJ May 2,
1997)
U.S. Department of Labor
Office of Administrative Law Judges
800 K Street, NW
Washington, DC 20001-8002
Date Issued: May 2, 1997
Case No.:…
89 FR 32260 — Amendment to Prohibited Transaction Exemption 2020-02 ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Apr 25, 2024related by meaning
4.
See John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. Co.
v.
Harris Trust & Sav. Bank,
510 U.S. 86, 98 (1993).
Back to Citation
105.
See BancOklahoma Mortg. Corp.
v. Capital Title Co., Inc.,
194 F.3d 1089 (10th Cir. 1999) (stating that McCarran-Ferguson Act bars the application of a Federal statute only if (1) the Federal statute doe…
87 FR 45204 — Proposed Amendment to Prohibited Transaction Class Exemption 84-14 (the QPAM Exemption) ERISAProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Jul 27, 2022related by meaning
r desires to enter into a party in interest transaction with its plan but leaves the ultimate determination and review to a QPAM.
Back to Citation
37. Proposed Amendment to PTE 84-14, 68 FR 52419, 52423 (Sept. 3, 2003).
Back to Citation
38.
For purposes of these changes, the Department used March 1984 and December 20…
89 FR 43675 — Prohibited Transaction Exemption 2006-06 for Services Provided in Connection With the Termination of Abandoned Individual Account Plans ERISAFinal Rules (FR)May 17, 2024related by meaning
burden for this new condition because it is expected to be de minimis and included in other notices sent to the Department.
G. Paperwork Reduction Act In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)), the Department solicited comments concerning the information collection requireme…