Brief Case

Search the Pension Law Library

Limit to:Advanced options
Searches the code/regs in effect on that date.
Words mode supports "quoted phrases", +required and -excluded terms.
Document types:
Go to T.C. Memo. 1997-72 (not yet in the library — opens the official source)
52 documents · 0.06sAllIRCERISAPBGCJoint Board
  1. 90 FR 3667 — Prohibited Transaction Exemption (PTE) 2002-51 To Permit Certain Transactions Identified in the Voluntary Fiduciary Correction Program
    ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Jan 15, 2025related by meaning
    act me if you have any questions at [Insert Telephone Number of a Person Employed by the Applicant Who Is Knowledgeable About this Matter]. Sincerely, [Insert Name and Title of Person Employed by the Applicant] Footnotes 1.  Under Reorganization Plan No. 4 of 1978, 5 U.S.C. App., the authority of the Secretary of Treas…
  2. 81 FR 21181 — Amendment to and Partial Revocation of Prohibited Transaction Exemption (PTE) 86-128 for Securities Transactions Involving Employee Benefit Plans and Broker-De…
    ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Apr 8, 2016related by meaning
    with other existing class exemptions as well as the recordkeeping provisions of the other exemptions published in this issue of the Federal Register . One commenter addressed the proposed record keeping requirement. The commenter suggested that the requirement should contain a “reasonableness” standard. The commenter a…
  3. 81 FR 21147 — Amendment to and Partial Revocation of Prohibited Transaction Exemption (PTE) 84-24 for Certain Transactions Involving Insurance Agents and Brokers, Pension Co…
    ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Apr 8, 2016related by meaning
    upremacy when the two regimes cannot be harmonized or accommodated”). Back to Citation 50.   See BancOklahoma Mortg. Corp. v. Capital Title Co., Inc., 194 F.3d 1089 (10th Cir. 1999) (stating that McCarran-Ferguson Act bars the application of a federal statute only if (1) the federal statute does not specifically relate…
  4. 81 FR 21139 — Amendment to Prohibited Transaction Exemption (PTE) 75-1, Part V, Exemptions From Prohibitions Respecting Certain Classes of Transactions Involving Employee Be…
    ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Apr 8, 2016related by meaning
    under section 4975 of the Code] is hereby transferred to the Secretary of Labor”). Back to Citation 9.  29 CFR 2550.408b-2(e); 26 CFR 54.4975-6(a)(5). Back to Citation 10.   See PTE 86-128, Exemption for Securities Transactions Involving Employee Benefit Plans and Broker-Dealers, 51 FR 41686 (November 18, 1986), as ame…
  5. 87 FR 70753 — Prohibited Transaction Exemption (PTE) 2002-51 To Permit Certain Transactions Identified in the Voluntary Fiduciary Correction Program
    ERISAProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Nov 21, 2022related by meaning
    act me if you have any questions at [Insert Telephone Number of a Person Employed by the Applicant Who Is Knowledgeable About this Matter]. Sincerely, [Insert Name and Title of Person Employed by the Applicant] Footnotes 1.   See 2022 Program Notice, Section D, “Regulatory Impact Analysis.” Back to Citation 2.  5 U.S.C…
  6. DOL Office of Administrative Law Judges — USDOL v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE SCHENECTADY LOCAL 105 ANNUITY FUND
    ERISACourt RulingsOct 31, 1997
    …ISA > USDOL v. Board of Trustees of the Schenectady Local 105 Annuity Fund, 95-RIS-40 (ALJ Oct. 31, 1997) USDOL/OALJ Reporter USDOL v. Board of Trustees of the Schenectady Local 105 Annuity Fund, 95-RIS-40 (ALJ Oct. 31, 1997) U.S. Department of Labor Office of Administrative Law Judges 525 Vine Street - Suite 900 Cinci…
  7. DOL Office of Administrative Law Judges — UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, PENSION AND WELFARE BENEFITS ADMINISTRATION v. CURRENT DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
    ERISACourt RulingsFeb 22, 2000
    …, I find them to be accurate representations of the condition of the two Plans, as of September 30, 1997. In addition, I do not question the time that was necessary to devote to the documents from December through the submission of the documents in April, 1999. (T 113 - 114) With regard to the conversations with Mr. Du…
  8. 81 FR 43430 — Department of Labor Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act Catch-Up Adjustments
    ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Jul 1, 2016
    …nformation upon request. Existing § 702.204 provides that an employer who, on or after November 17, 1997, knowingly and willfully fails or refuses to file any report required by § 702.201 or who knowingly or willfully makes a false statement or misrepresentation on any report shall be subject to a civil penalty not to …
  9. TR 1997-02 — Technical Release 97-02
    ERISADOL Technical ReleasesJul 1, 1997
    …group health plans and group health insurance coverage for plan years beginning on or after July 1, 1997. The Departments of the Treasury, Labor, and Health and Human Services (the Departments) issued interim final regulations implementing these group market provisions at 26 CFR 54.9801-1T through 54.9801-6T, 54.9802-1…
  10. DOL Office of Administrative Law Judges — USDOL v. COMPGRAPHIX, INC
    ERISACourt RulingsOct 14, 1999
    …ponded by letter dated March 2, 1999, from Gregory L. Pfirman, stating that subsequent to a January 1997 valuation, Comgraphix stock became worthless and the company discontinued operations in June 1997, entering into negotiations with Racom Information Technologies (Racom) for the sale of its assets to Racom. The lett…
  11. DOL Office of Administrative Law Judges — USDOL, EBSA v. SCHNEIDERMAN'S FURNITURE, INC.
    ERISACourt RulingsMar 23, 2001
    qualified 1997 IQPA report. GX 5; RX B. 10. PWBA issued a Notice of Intent to Assess a Penalty on or about January 14, 2000, reiterating that the 1997 IQPA report was deficient because the scope of the audit was inappropriately limited,1 and proposing a penalty of $50,000 against Schneiderman's for its failure to file …
  12. TR 1997-01 — Technical Release 97-01
    ERISADOL Technical ReleasesJul 1, 1997
    …group health plans and group health insurance coverage for plan years beginning on or after July 1, 1997. The Departments of the Treasury, Labor, and Health and Human Services (the Departments) issued regulations implementing these group market provisions at 26 CFR 54.9801-1T through 54.9801-6T, 54.9802-1T, 54.9831-1T …
  13. 29 C.F.R. § 2510.3-102(h) — Definition of “plan assets”—participant contributions.
    ERISARegulationsJan 1, 2017
    …tion applies to collectively bargained plans no sooner than the later of— (h)(1)(i) (i) February 3, 1997; or (h)(1)(ii) (ii) The first day of the plan year that begins after the expiration of the last to expire of any applicable bargaining agreement in effect on August 7, 1996. (h)(2) (2) Until paragraph (b) of this se…
  14. 80 FR 22004 — Proposed Amendment to Prohibited Transaction Exemption (PTE) 75-1, Part V, Exemptions From Prohibitions Respecting Certain Classes of Transactions Involving Em…
    ERISAProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Apr 20, 2015related by meaning
    on, at 26 CFR 54.4975-9(c), which interprets Code section 4975(e)(3). Back to Citation 6.  Advisory Opinion 76-65A (June 7, 1976). Back to Citation 7.  The Department initially proposed an amendment to its regulation under ERISA section 3(21)(A)(ii) and Code section 4975(e)(3)(B) on October 22, 2010, at 75 FR 65263. It…
  15. DOL Office of Administrative Law Judges — USDOL v. EL DORADO FURNITURE CORP.
    ERISACourt RulingsFeb 21, 1997
    …h Case Status DOL Home > OALJ > ERISA > USDOL v. El Dorado Furniture Corp., 94-RIS-11 (ALJ Feb. 21, 1997) USDOL/OALJ Reporter USDOL v. El Dorado Furniture Corp., 94-RIS-11 (ALJ Feb. 21, 1997) U.S. Department of Labor Office of Administrative Law Judges 2600 Mt. Ephraim Avenue Camden, New Jersey 08104 Phone: 609-757-531…
  16. 88 FR 76032 — Proposed Amendment to Prohibited Transaction Exemptions 75-1, 77-4, 80-83, 83-1, and 86-128
    ERISAProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Nov 3, 2023related by meaning
    nd that the Department may request such information. (4) Failure to maintain the required records necessary to determine whether ( printed page 76045) the conditions of this exemption have been met will result in the loss of the exemption only for the transaction or transactions for which records are missing or have no…
  17. DOL Office of Administrative Law Judges — USDOL v. BR HOLDINGS, LTD. d/b/a RACINE STEEL CASTINGS
    ERISACourt RulingsMay 2, 1997
    … DMS Search Case Status DOL Home > OALJ > ERISA > USDOL v. BR Holdings, Ltd., 97-RIS-11 (ALJ May 2, 1997) USDOL/OALJ Reporter USDOL v. BR Holdings, Ltd., 97-RIS-11 (ALJ May 2, 1997) U.S. Department of Labor Office of Administrative Law Judges 800 K Street, NW Washington, DC 20001-8002 Date Issued: May 2, 1997 Case No.:…
  18. 89 FR 32260 — Amendment to Prohibited Transaction Exemption 2020-02
    ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Apr 25, 2024related by meaning
    Document Headings Document headings vary by document type but may contain the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document the number of the CFR title and the number of each part the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly related to the agency docket number / agency internal file numb…
  19. 75 FR 53172 — Prohibited Transaction Exemption Procedures; Employee Benefit Plans
    ERISAProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Aug 30, 2010related by meaning
    he same investment manager, and the execution of certain foreign exchange transactions between a plan and a bank or broker-dealer. Back to Citation 3.  Additional information concerning the requirements for obtaining administrative relief under PTE 96-62 (as amended) may be obtained by accessing the complete text of th…
  20. 89 FR 43675 — Prohibited Transaction Exemption 2006-06 for Services Provided in Connection With the Termination of Abandoned Individual Account Plans
    ERISAFinal Rules (FR)May 17, 2024related by meaning
    burden for this new condition because it is expected to be de minimis and included in other notices sent to the Department. G. Paperwork Reduction Act In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)), the Department solicited comments concerning the information collection requireme…