Brief Case
Pension Resource

Search the Pension Law Library

Limit to:Advanced options
Searches the code/regs in effect on that date.
Words mode supports "quoted phrases", +required and -excluded terms.
Document types:
Go to T.C. Memo. 1999-66 (not yet in the library — opens the official source)
54 documents · 0.06sAllIRCERISAPBGCJoint Board
  1. DOL Office of Administrative Law Judges — UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, PENSION AND WELFARE BENEFITS ADMINISTRATION v. CURRENT DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
    ERISACourt RulingsFeb 22, 2000
    …he matter, and conclude that he did deposit the check in the said mailbox on Thursday, December 31, 1999, at on or about 4:30 p.m.; that it was not picked-up on that date, and that, due to the intervening New Year' s holiday on Friday, January 1, 1999, and the weekend of January 2 and 3, 1999, the pick-up was not made …
  2. 81 FR 21181 — Amendment to and Partial Revocation of Prohibited Transaction Exemption (PTE) 86-128 for Securities Transactions Involving Employee Benefit Plans and Broker-De…
    ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Apr 8, 2016related by meaning
    tion. Back to Citation 14.  67 FR 64137 (October 17, 2002). Back to Citation 15.   See Advisory Opinion 2011-08A (June 21, 2011). Back to Citation 16.  As noted above, for purposes of this amendment, the terms “Individual Retirement Account” or “IRA” mean any account or annuity described in Code section 4975(e)(1)(B) t…
  3. 89 FR 32346 — Amendment to Prohibited Transaction Exemptions 75-1, 77-4, 80-83, 83-1, and 86-128
    ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Apr 25, 2024★ strong match
    nd in its text, PTE 2020-02 has been broadly amended to encompass compensation for advice irrespective of the product recommended. Back to Citation 6.  ERISA section 408(a) and Code section 4975(c)(2), expressly permit the Department (through the Reorganization Plan No. 4 of 1978) to grant “a conditional or uncondition…
  4. 89 FR 32260 — Amendment to Prohibited Transaction Exemption 2020-02
    ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Apr 25, 2024★ strong match
    … Citation 105.   See BancOklahoma Mortg. Corp. v. Capital Title Co., Inc., 194 F.3d 1089 (10th Cir. 1999) (stating that McCarran-Ferguson Act bars the application of a Federal statute only if (1) the Federal statute does not specifically relate to the business of insurance; (2) a State statute has been enacted for the …
  5. 81 FR 21139 — Amendment to Prohibited Transaction Exemption (PTE) 75-1, Part V, Exemptions From Prohibitions Respecting Certain Classes of Transactions Involving Employee Be…
    ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Apr 8, 2016related by meaning
    under section 4975 of the Code] is hereby transferred to the Secretary of Labor”). Back to Citation 9.  29 CFR 2550.408b-2(e); 26 CFR 54.4975-6(a)(5). Back to Citation 10.   See PTE 86-128, Exemption for Securities Transactions Involving Employee Benefit Plans and Broker-Dealers, 51 FR 41686 (November 18, 1986), as ame…
  6. 90 FR 3667 — Prohibited Transaction Exemption (PTE) 2002-51 To Permit Certain Transactions Identified in the Voluntary Fiduciary Correction Program
    ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Jan 15, 2025related by meaning
    act me if you have any questions at [Insert Telephone Number of a Person Employed by the Applicant Who Is Knowledgeable About this Matter]. Sincerely, [Insert Name and Title of Person Employed by the Applicant] Footnotes 1.  Under Reorganization Plan No. 4 of 1978, 5 U.S.C. App., the authority of the Secretary of Treas…
  7. 81 FR 21147 — Amendment to and Partial Revocation of Prohibited Transaction Exemption (PTE) 84-24 for Certain Transactions Involving Insurance Agents and Brokers, Pension Co…
    ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Apr 8, 2016related by meaning
    failure to maintain the required records with respect to a given transaction or set of transactions does not affect the relief for other transactions. The Department has accepted these comments and made the requested revisions. Thus, the Department specifically clarified that “[f]ailure to maintain the required records…
  8. 80 FR 22021 — Proposed Amendment to and Proposed Partial Revocation of Prohibited Transaction Exemption (PTE) 86-128 for Securities Transactions Involving Employee Benefit P…
    ERISAProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Apr 20, 2015related by meaning
    s) earned in connection with the transactions covered by the exemption. Back to Citation 7.  67 FR 64137 (October 17, 2002). Back to Citation 8.   See Advisory Opinion 2011-08A (June 21, 2011). Back to Citation 9.  This proposal would move the definitions from Section I to Section VII. The other sections are re-ordered…
  9. DOL Office of Administrative Law Judges — USDOL v. COMPGRAPHIX, INC
    ERISACourt RulingsOct 14, 1999
    …partment of Labor Office of Administrative Law Judges Heritage Plaza Bldg. - Suite 530 111 Veterans Memorial Blvd etairie, LA 70005 (504) 589-6201 (504) 589-6268 (FAX) DATE: October 14, 1999 CASE NO.: 1999-RIS-53 In the Matter of U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, PENSION AND WELFARE BENEFITS ADMINISTRATION, Complainant v. COMP…
  10. 88 FR 11793 — Annual Reporting and Disclosure
    ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Feb 24, 2023
    Agencies in estimating burden related to the Form 5500 Annual Return/Report since 1999. See 65 FR 21068, 21077-78 (Apr. 19, 2000); Borden, William S., Estimates of the Burden for Filing Form 5500: The Change in Burden from the 1997 to the 1999 Forms, Mathematica Policy Research, submitted to DOL May 25, 1999.[46] The c…
  11. 87 FR 70753 — Prohibited Transaction Exemption (PTE) 2002-51 To Permit Certain Transactions Identified in the Voluntary Fiduciary Correction Program
    ERISAProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Nov 21, 2022related by meaning
    act me if you have any questions at [Insert Telephone Number of a Person Employed by the Applicant Who Is Knowledgeable About this Matter]. Sincerely, [Insert Name and Title of Person Employed by the Applicant] Footnotes 1.   See 2022 Program Notice, Section D, “Regulatory Impact Analysis.” Back to Citation 2.  5 U.S.C…
  12. 86 FR 51284 — Annual Reporting and Disclosure
    ERISAProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Sep 15, 2021
    … been used by the Agencies in estimating burden related to the Form 5500 Annual Return/Report since 1999. See65 FR 21068, 21077-78 (Apr. 19, 2000); Borden, William S., Estimates of the Burden for Filing Form 5500: The Change in Burden from the 1997 to the 1999 Forms, Mathematica Policy Research, submitted to DOL May 25…
  13. 81 FR 47496 — Annual Reporting and Disclosure
    ERISAProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Jul 21, 2016
    … been used by the Agencies in estimating burden related to the Form 5500 Annual Return/Report since 1999. See65 FR 21068, 21077-78 (Apr. 19, 2000); Borden, William S., Estimates of the Burden for Filing Form 5500: The Change in Burden from the 1997 to the 1999 Forms, Mathematica Policy Research, submitted to DOL May 25…
  14. DOL Office of Administrative Law Judges — United States Department of Labor, Pension and Welfare Benefits Administration
    ERISACourt RulingsJun 9, 2000
    … order to protect the pecuniary interests of the people covered under these plans. 29 U.S.C. § 1001(1999). As such, ERISA requires administrators of employee benefits plans to file an annual report for each employee benefit plan covered including an IQPA for the plan year. 29 U.S.C. § 1023(1999). ERISA further requires…
  15. 87 FR 45204 — Proposed Amendment to Prohibited Transaction Class Exemption 84-14 (the QPAM Exemption)
    ERISAProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Jul 27, 2022related by meaning
    …to Citation 45.  2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq. (1995). Back to Citation 46.  Federalism, 64 FR 153 (Aug. 4, 1999). Back to Citation 47.  5 U.S.C. 804(2) (1996). Back to Citation 48.  Regulatory Planning and Review, 58 FR 51735 (Oct. 4, 1993). Back to Citation 49.
  16. 90 FR 28004 — Removal of Interpretive Bulletins Relating to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
    ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Jul 1, 2025★ strong match
    977) (“The attention of interested parties is directed to the fact that regulation 2550.408c-2 replaces Interpretive Bulletin 75-6”). Back to Citation 7.  41 FR 3289 (Jan. 22, 1976). Back to Citation 8.  43 FR 47713 (Oct. 17, 1978). Congress subsequently ratified Reorganization Plan No. 4 in 1984. See Sec. 1, Public La…
  17. 75 FR 53172 — Prohibited Transaction Exemption Procedures; Employee Benefit Plans
    ERISAProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Aug 30, 2010related by meaning
    he same investment manager, and the execution of certain foreign exchange transactions between a plan and a bank or broker-dealer. Back to Citation 3.  Additional information concerning the requirements for obtaining administrative relief under PTE 96-62 (as amended) may be obtained by accessing the complete text of th…
  18. 89 FR 23090 — Amendment to Prohibited Transaction Class Exemption 84-14 for Transactions Determined by Independent Qualified Professional Asset Managers (the QPAM Exemption)
    ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Apr 3, 2024★ strong match
    as well. Back to Citation 52.  Section I(k) of the Proposed Amendment has been renumbered in the Final Amendment as Section I(j). Back to Citation 53.  The Department additionally clarifies that the certification of the independent audit would come at some point after an individual exemption is granted and the One-Year…
  19. 88 FR 76032 — Proposed Amendment to Prohibited Transaction Exemptions 75-1, 77-4, 80-83, 83-1, and 86-128
    ERISAProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Nov 3, 2023related by meaning
    nd that the Department may request such information. (4) Failure to maintain the required records necessary to determine whether ( printed page 76045) the conditions of this exemption have been met will result in the loss of the exemption only for the transaction or transactions for which records are missing or have no…
  20. DOL Office of Administrative Law Judges — USDOL, EBSA v. PLAN ADMINISTRATOR, HOME OF ECONOMY 401(K) PLAN, HOME OF ECONOMY, INC.
    ERISACourt RulingsJun 26, 2013
    …es, LTD , 2005 - RIS - 00115 (ALJ, Oct. 19, 2006); U.S. Dep’t of Labor, PWBA v. Compgraphix, Inc. , 1999 - RIS - 53 (A LJ, Oct. 14, 1999). 46 U.S. Dep’t of Labor, EBSA v. Dutch American Import Co. , 2009 - RIS - 14, slip op. at 9 (ALJ, Jan. 6, 2010); see also U.S. Dep’t of Labor, EBSA v. P.E.C. Contracting Engineers , …