Brief Case

Search the Pension Law Library

Limit to:Advanced options
Searches the code/regs in effect on that date.
Words mode supports "quoted phrases", +required and -excluded terms.
Document types:
Go to T.C. Memo. 2005-131 (not yet in the library — opens the official source)
48 documents · 0.09sAllIRCERISAPBGCJoint Board
  1. DOL Office of Administrative Law Judges — USDOL, EMPLOYEE BENEFITS SECURITY ADMINISTRATION v. PLAN ADMINISTRATOR, WHITE MOUNTAIN APACHE TRIBE RETIREMENT SAVINGS AND 401(K) PROFIT SHARING PLAN ANNUAL RE…
    ERISACourt RulingsNov 30, 2016
    …. Plan and Go lden Day Schools, I nc ., 2013 - RIS - 00002, slip op. at 10 (ALJ May 28, 2014); EBSA Memo in Supp. at 9-10. Conversely, Respondent first asserts EBSA is not entitled to deference and its action in assessing the civil penalty in this case is an abuse of discretion. WMAT Memo in Supp. at 20. WMAT then appe…
  2. 90 FR 3667 — Prohibited Transaction Exemption (PTE) 2002-51 To Permit Certain Transactions Identified in the Voluntary Fiduciary Correction Program
    ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Jan 15, 2025related by meaning
    e use of the SCC and suggested that the Department should allow self-correctors to choose whether (a) to provide notice to interested persons (but not to EBSA) or (b) make the plan contribution. After considering these comments, the Department has not made this change. Self-correctors have a streamlined procedure for s…
  3. 81 FR 21181 — Amendment to and Partial Revocation of Prohibited Transaction Exemption (PTE) 86-128 for Securities Transactions Involving Employee Benefit Plans and Broker-De…
    ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Apr 8, 2016related by meaning
    the preamble to the accompanying final rule, which contained information relevant to the costs and administrative burdens attendant to the proposals. The Department took into account such public comments in connection with making changes to the prohibited transaction exemption, analyzing the economic impact of the prop…
  4. 89 FR 32346 — Amendment to Prohibited Transaction Exemptions 75-1, 77-4, 80-83, 83-1, and 86-128
    ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Apr 25, 2024related by meaning
    nd in its text, PTE 2020-02 has been broadly amended to encompass compensation for advice irrespective of the product recommended. Back to Citation 6.  ERISA section 408(a) and Code section 4975(c)(2), expressly permit the Department (through the Reorganization Plan No. 4 of 1978) to grant “a conditional or uncondition…
  5. 89 FR 32260 — Amendment to Prohibited Transaction Exemption 2020-02
    ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Apr 25, 2024related by meaning
    Treasury. This clarification was in the preamble to the December 2020 grant of PTE 2020-02, and the Department is now adding it to the operative text. Although the proposed broader recordkeeping condition is consistent with other exemptions, the Department understands commenters' concerns that broader access to the doc…
  6. 76 FR 66136 — Investment Advice-Participants and Beneficiaries
    ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Oct 25, 2011★ strong match
    … Labor has authority to interpret certain provisions of Code section 4975. Back to Citation 16.  AO 2005-23A (Dec. 7, 2005). This opinion further states that where someone who is already a plan fiduciary responds to participant questions concerning the advisability of taking a distribution or the investment of amounts …
  7. 75 FR 65263 — Definition of the Term “Fiduciary”
    ERISAProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Oct 22, 2010
    …R 2509.08-2. Back to Citation 11.   See 29 CFR 2509.96-1(c). Back to Citation 12.  Advisory Opinion 2005-23A (Dec. 7, 2005). Back to Citation 13.   See Advisers Act section 202(a)(11)(A)-(G), 15 U.S.C. 80b-2(a)(11)(A)-(G). Back to Citation 14.   SEC
  8. 81 FR 21139 — Amendment to Prohibited Transaction Exemption (PTE) 75-1, Part V, Exemptions From Prohibitions Respecting Certain Classes of Transactions Involving Employee Be…
    ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Apr 8, 2016related by meaning
    75(e)(1) of the Code are included within the scope of relief provided by PTE 75-1 because it was issued jointly by the Department and the Service. See PTE 2002-13, 67 FR 9483 (March 1, 2002) (preamble discussion). For simplicity and consistency with the other new exemptions and amendments to other existing exemptions p…
  9. 83 FR 28912 — Definition of “Employer” Under Section 3(5) of ERISA-Association Health Plans
    ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Jun 21, 2018
    … final rule's net impact on the federal budget is likely to be negative, increasing the deficit. In 2005, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimated the potential budget impacts of a 2005 legislative proposal to expand AHPs. As noted earlier, that legislative proposal predated the ACA and differed from this final …
  10. 83 FR 614 — Definition of “Employer” Under Section 3(5) of ERISA-Association Health Plans
    ERISAProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Jan 5, 2018
    …als was $371 per month.[55] Forty-two million individuals under age 65 were covered by Medicaid. In 2005, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimated the potential budget impacts of a 2005 legislative proposal to expand AHPs. Under the 2005 legislation and contemporaneous law, many individuals joining AHPs previous…
  11. DOL Office of Administrative Law Judges — USDOL, EMPLOYEE BENEFITS SECURITY ADMINISTRATION v. PLAN ADMINISTRATOR, CAVALLO POINT LODGE 401(K) PLAN
    ERISACourt RulingsNov 10, 2015
    … of this matter” by failing to comply with the regulations at 29 C.F.R. § 2560.502(c)(2)(e) - (f). (Memo in Support at 2 Respondent appears to be arguing that the May 20, 2015 letter s hould be considered the applicable Notice of Intent to Assess a Penalty . 3 On September 11, 2015, this Office faxed counsel for Respon…
  12. DOL Office of Administrative Law Judges — USDOL, EBSA v. PLAN ADMINISTRATOR, HOME OF ECONOMY 401(K) PLAN, HOME OF ECONOMY, INC.
    ERISACourt RulingsJun 26, 2013
    …)(1). 28 Id . § 2560.502c-2(d) - (e). 29 U.S. Dep’t of Labor, EBSA v. Callaghan & Callaghan, Inc. , 2005 - RIS - 99, slip op. at 3 (ALJ, Apr. 24, 2006). 30 U.S. Dep’t of Labor, EBSA v. Synergy Manufacturing Technology, Inc. , 2005 - RIS - 20, slip op. at 6 (ALJ, Feb. 21, 2007). 31 U.S. Dep’t of Labor, PWBA v. Spalding …
  13. 90 FR 4192 — Voluntary Fiduciary Correction Program
    ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Jan 15, 2025★ strong match
    …to the Secretary of Labor. Back to Citation 2.  67 FR 15062 (March 28, 2002), 70 FR 17516 (April 6, 2005), 71 FR 20262 (April 19, 2006). Back to Citation 3.  EBSA acknowledges that it has experience with certain transactions fitting within one or more of the listed categories of transactions, even if not specifically n…
  14. 81 FR 21147 — Amendment to and Partial Revocation of Prohibited Transaction Exemption (PTE) 84-24 for Certain Transactions Involving Insurance Agents and Brokers, Pension Co…
    ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Apr 8, 2016related by meaning
    failure to maintain the required records with respect to a given transaction or set of transactions does not affect the relief for other transactions. The Department has accepted these comments and made the requested revisions. Thus, the Department specifically clarified that “[f]ailure to maintain the required records…
  15. 87 FR 70753 — Prohibited Transaction Exemption (PTE) 2002-51 To Permit Certain Transactions Identified in the Voluntary Fiduciary Correction Program
    ERISAProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Nov 21, 2022related by meaning
    he Department no longer believes that posting the notification is reasonably calculated to ensure that interested persons actually receive the notice. The Department has reviewed several notices to interested persons submitted to the applicable Regional Offices and found that some of them do not meet the applicable req…
  16. 80 FR 21928 — Definition of the Term “Fiduciary”; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice
    ERISAProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Apr 20, 2015
    … proceeds of a contemplated plan distribution was not fiduciary investment advice. Advisory Opinion 2005-23A (Dec. 7, 2005). The Department specifically asked for comments as to whether the final rule should include such recommendations as fiduciary advice.
  17. 80 FR 22004 — Proposed Amendment to Prohibited Transaction Exemption (PTE) 75-1, Part V, Exemptions From Prohibitions Respecting Certain Classes of Transactions Involving Em…
    ERISAProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Apr 20, 2015related by meaning
    to Citation 11.   See Preamble to PTE 75-1, Part V, 40 FR 50845 (Oct. 31, 1975); ERISA Advisory Opinion 86-12A (March 19, 1986). Back to Citation 12.  Because of this limitation, the Department views it as unnecessary to condition this exemption on the fiduciary's adherence to the impartial conduct standards, including…
  18. 89 FR 5624 — Automatic Portability Transaction Regulations
    ERISAProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Jan 29, 2024
    …ection 408(a) and an individual retirement annuity described in Code section 408(b). See IRS Notice 2005-5, 2005-1 C.B. 337, regarding the applicability of Code section 401(a)(31)(B) to retirement plans under Code sections 401(a), 401(k), 403(a), 403(b), and 457(b) ( https://www.irs.gov/​irb/​2005-03_​IRB). Back to Cit…
  19. 91 FR 16088 — Fiduciary Duties in Selecting Designated Investment Alternatives
    ERISAProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Mar 31, 2026
    …and persuasion on the elements of their claim. Schaffer ex rel. Schaffer v. Weast, 546 U.S. 49, 58 (2005) (“[P]laintiffs bear the burden of persuasion regarding the essential aspects of their claims”). This is true not just with respect to the existence of a breach (as relevant here, whether a fiduciary failed to follo…
  20. 89 FR 43675 — Prohibited Transaction Exemption 2006-06 for Services Provided in Connection With the Termination of Abandoned Individual Account Plans
    ERISAFinal Rules (FR)May 17, 2024related by meaning
    burden for this new condition because it is expected to be de minimis and included in other notices sent to the Department. G. Paperwork Reduction Act In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)), the Department solicited comments concerning the information collection requireme…