Brief Case

Search the Pension Law Library

Limit to:Advanced options
Searches the code/regs in effect on that date.
Words mode supports "quoted phrases", +required and -excluded terms.
Document types:
Go to T.C. Memo. 2005-144 (not yet in the library — opens the official source)
52 documents · 0.08sAllIRCERISAPBGCJoint Board
  1. DOL Office of Administrative Law Judges — USDOL, EMPLOYEE BENEFITS SECURITY ADMINISTRATION v. PLAN ADMINISTRATOR, WHITE MOUNTAIN APACHE TRIBE RETIREMENT SAVINGS AND 401(K) PROFIT SHARING PLAN ANNUAL RE…
    ERISACourt RulingsNov 30, 2016
    …. Plan and Go lden Day Schools, I nc ., 2013 - RIS - 00002, slip op. at 10 (ALJ May 28, 2014); EBSA Memo in Supp. at 9-10. Conversely, Respondent first asserts EBSA is not entitled to deference and its action in assessing the civil penalty in this case is an abuse of discretion. WMAT Memo in Supp. at 20. WMAT then appe…
  2. 90 FR 3667 — Prohibited Transaction Exemption (PTE) 2002-51 To Permit Certain Transactions Identified in the Voluntary Fiduciary Correction Program
    ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Jan 15, 2025related by meaning
    e use of the SCC and suggested that the Department should allow self-correctors to choose whether (a) to provide notice to interested persons (but not to EBSA) or (b) make the plan contribution. After considering these comments, the Department has not made this change. Self-correctors have a streamlined procedure for s…
  3. 81 FR 21147 — Amendment to and Partial Revocation of Prohibited Transaction Exemption (PTE) 84-24 for Certain Transactions Involving Insurance Agents and Brokers, Pension Co…
    ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Apr 8, 2016related by meaning
    failure to maintain the required records with respect to a given transaction or set of transactions does not affect the relief for other transactions. The Department has accepted these comments and made the requested revisions. Thus, the Department specifically clarified that “[f]ailure to maintain the required records…
  4. 76 FR 66136 — Investment Advice-Participants and Beneficiaries
    ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Oct 25, 2011
    … Labor has authority to interpret certain provisions of Code section 4975. Back to Citation 16.  AO 2005-23A (Dec. 7, 2005). This opinion further states that where someone who is already a plan fiduciary responds to participant questions concerning the advisability of taking a distribution or the investment of amounts …
  5. 81 FR 21181 — Amendment to and Partial Revocation of Prohibited Transaction Exemption (PTE) 86-128 for Securities Transactions Involving Employee Benefit Plans and Broker-De…
    ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Apr 8, 2016related by meaning
    with other existing class exemptions as well as the recordkeeping provisions of the other exemptions published in this issue of the Federal Register . One commenter addressed the proposed record keeping requirement. The commenter suggested that the requirement should contain a “reasonableness” standard. The commenter a…
  6. 75 FR 65263 — Definition of the Term “Fiduciary”
    ERISAProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Oct 22, 2010
    …R 2509.08-2. Back to Citation 11.   See 29 CFR 2509.96-1(c). Back to Citation 12.  Advisory Opinion 2005-23A (Dec. 7, 2005). Back to Citation 13.   See Advisers Act section 202(a)(11)(A)-(G), 15 U.S.C. 80b-2(a)(11)(A)-(G). Back to Citation 14.   SEC
  7. 81 FR 21139 — Amendment to Prohibited Transaction Exemption (PTE) 75-1, Part V, Exemptions From Prohibitions Respecting Certain Classes of Transactions Involving Employee Be…
    ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Apr 8, 2016related by meaning
    under section 4975 of the Code] is hereby transferred to the Secretary of Labor”). Back to Citation 9.  29 CFR 2550.408b-2(e); 26 CFR 54.4975-6(a)(5). Back to Citation 10.   See PTE 86-128, Exemption for Securities Transactions Involving Employee Benefit Plans and Broker-Dealers, 51 FR 41686 (November 18, 1986), as ame…
  8. 82 FR 56545 — 18-Month Extension of Transition Period and Delay of Applicability Dates; Best Interest Contract Exemption (PTE 2016-01); Class Exemption for Principal Transac…
    ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Nov 29, 2017related by meaning
    uld have been required for the January 1, 2018 applicability date, but is based on continued adherence to the Impartial Conduct Standards.”). See also Comment Letter #82 (Standard Insurance Company and Standard Retirement Services, Inc.) (“we ask that The Department also extend the temporary enforcement policy providin…
  9. 83 FR 28912 — Definition of “Employer” Under Section 3(5) of ERISA-Association Health Plans
    ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Jun 21, 2018
    … final rule's net impact on the federal budget is likely to be negative, increasing the deficit. In 2005, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimated the potential budget impacts of a 2005 legislative proposal to expand AHPs. As noted earlier, that legislative proposal predated the ACA and differed from this final …
  10. 87 FR 70753 — Prohibited Transaction Exemption (PTE) 2002-51 To Permit Certain Transactions Identified in the Voluntary Fiduciary Correction Program
    ERISAProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Nov 21, 2022related by meaning
    he Department no longer believes that posting the notification is reasonably calculated to ensure that interested persons actually receive the notice. The Department has reviewed several notices to interested persons submitted to the applicable Regional Offices and found that some of them do not meet the applicable req…
  11. 83 FR 614 — Definition of “Employer” Under Section 3(5) of ERISA-Association Health Plans
    ERISAProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Jan 5, 2018
    …als was $371 per month.[55] Forty-two million individuals under age 65 were covered by Medicaid. In 2005, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimated the potential budget impacts of a 2005 legislative proposal to expand AHPs. Under the 2005 legislation and contemporaneous law, many individuals joining AHPs previous…
  12. DOL Office of Administrative Law Judges — USDOL, EMPLOYEE BENEFITS SECURITY ADMINISTRATION v. PLAN ADMINISTRATOR, CAVALLO POINT LODGE 401(K) PLAN
    ERISACourt RulingsNov 10, 2015
    … of this matter” by failing to comply with the regulations at 29 C.F.R. § 2560.502(c)(2)(e) - (f). (Memo in Support at 2 Respondent appears to be arguing that the May 20, 2015 letter s hould be considered the applicable Notice of Intent to Assess a Penalty . 3 On September 11, 2015, this Office faxed counsel for Respon…
  13. DOL Office of Administrative Law Judges — USDOL, EBSA v. PLAN ADMINISTRATOR, HOME OF ECONOMY 401(K) PLAN, HOME OF ECONOMY, INC.
    ERISACourt RulingsJun 26, 2013
    …)(1). 28 Id . § 2560.502c-2(d) - (e). 29 U.S. Dep’t of Labor, EBSA v. Callaghan & Callaghan, Inc. , 2005 - RIS - 99, slip op. at 3 (ALJ, Apr. 24, 2006). 30 U.S. Dep’t of Labor, EBSA v. Synergy Manufacturing Technology, Inc. , 2005 - RIS - 20, slip op. at 6 (ALJ, Feb. 21, 2007). 31 U.S. Dep’t of Labor, PWBA v. Spalding …
  14. 80 FR 22004 — Proposed Amendment to Prohibited Transaction Exemption (PTE) 75-1, Part V, Exemptions From Prohibitions Respecting Certain Classes of Transactions Involving Em…
    ERISAProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Apr 20, 2015related by meaning
    to Citation 11.   See Preamble to PTE 75-1, Part V, 40 FR 50845 (Oct. 31, 1975); ERISA Advisory Opinion 86-12A (March 19, 1986). Back to Citation 12.  Because of this limitation, the Department views it as unnecessary to condition this exemption on the fiduciary's adherence to the impartial conduct standards, including…
  15. 90 FR 4192 — Voluntary Fiduciary Correction Program
    ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Jan 15, 2025★ strong match
    …to the Secretary of Labor. Back to Citation 2.  67 FR 15062 (March 28, 2002), 70 FR 17516 (April 6, 2005), 71 FR 20262 (April 19, 2006). Back to Citation 3.  EBSA acknowledges that it has experience with certain transactions fitting within one or more of the listed categories of transactions, even if not specifically n…
  16. 87 FR 45204 — Proposed Amendment to Prohibited Transaction Class Exemption 84-14 (the QPAM Exemption)
    ERISAProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Jul 27, 2022★ strong match
    … and General Rules” were redesignated as Part VI. Back to Citation 14.  Section I(a) was amended in 2005 to permit transactions involving parties in interest and disqualified persons with respect to a Plan if the assets of the Plan managed by the QPAM in the fund, when combined with the assets of other Plans establishe…
  17. 80 FR 21928 — Definition of the Term “Fiduciary”; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice
    ERISAProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Apr 20, 2015
    … proceeds of a contemplated plan distribution was not fiduciary investment advice. Advisory Opinion 2005-23A (Dec. 7, 2005). The Department specifically asked for comments as to whether the final rule should include such recommendations as fiduciary advice.
  18. 80 FR 22010 — Proposed Amendment to and Proposed Partial Revocation of Prohibited Transaction Exemption (PTE) 84-24 for Certain Transactions Involving Insurance Agents and B…
    ERISAProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Apr 20, 2015related by meaning
    mendments and revocations would affect participants and beneficiaries of plans, IRA owners and certain fiduciaries of plans and IRAs. DATES: Comments: Written comments must be received by the Department on or before July 6, 2015. Applicability: The Department proposes to make this amendment and partial revocation appli…
  19. 89 FR 5624 — Automatic Portability Transaction Regulations
    ERISAProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Jan 29, 2024
    …ection 408(a) and an individual retirement annuity described in Code section 408(b). See IRS Notice 2005-5, 2005-1 C.B. 337, regarding the applicability of Code section 401(a)(31)(B) to retirement plans under Code sections 401(a), 401(k), 403(a), 403(b), and 457(b) ( https://www.irs.gov/​irb/​2005-03_​IRB). Back to Cit…
  20. 82 FR 57664 — 18-Month Extension of Transition Period and Delay of Applicability Dates; Best Interest Contract Exemption (PTE 2016-01); Class Exemption for Principal Transac…
    ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Dec 7, 2017related by meaning
    , correct footnote 66 to read “ See, e.g., Comment Letter #121 (HSBC North America Holdings Inc.); Comment Letter #124 (Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP).” 2. On page 56559, second column, add the following language to the end of Congressional Review Act discussion: “Although the CRA generally requires that major rules beco…