Brief Case

Search the Pension Law Library

Limit to:Advanced options
Searches the code/regs in effect on that date.
Words mode supports "quoted phrases", +required and -excluded terms.
Document types:
Go to T.C. Summary Op. 2012-11 (not yet in the library — opens the official source)
60 documents · 0.07sAllIRCERISAPBGCJoint Board
  1. DOL Office of Administrative Law Judges — USDOL, EBSA v. PLAN ADMINISTRATOR, HOME OF ECONOMY 401(K) PLAN, HOME OF ECONOMY, INC.
    ERISACourt RulingsJun 26, 2013
    …ile an IQPA report with its Form 5500 Annual Report for the 2007 and 2009 plan years. On August 27, 2012, HOE filed Answers to both penalties. On September 6, 2012, the Chief Judge issued Notices of Docketing for both cases and assigned case numbers 2012 - RIS - 00113 and 2012 - RIS - 00114 . On October 3, 2012, EBSA f…
  2. DOL Office of Administrative Law Judges — USDOL, EMPLOYEE BENEFITS SECURITY ADMINISTRATION v. PLAN ADMINISTRATOR, WHITE MOUNTAIN APACHE TRIBE RETIREMENT SAVINGS AND 401(K) PROFIT SHARING PLAN ANNUAL RE…
    ERISACourt RulingsNov 30, 2016
    …earing Order on August 19, 2015 set ting the hearing for December 14, 2015. EBSA filed a motion for summary decision on November 13, 2015 seeking summary decision in its favor affirming the penalty assessed against WMAT. 2 On February 12, 2016 , EBSA filed a Motion to Extend Trial Date seeking a stay of the hearing unt…
  3. 81 FR 21181 — Amendment to and Partial Revocation of Prohibited Transaction Exemption (PTE) 86-128 for Securities Transactions Involving Employee Benefit Plans and Broker-De…
    ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Apr 8, 2016related by meaning
    tion. Back to Citation 14.  67 FR 64137 (October 17, 2002). Back to Citation 15.   See Advisory Opinion 2011-08A (June 21, 2011). Back to Citation 16.  As noted above, for purposes of this amendment, the terms “Individual Retirement Account” or “IRA” mean any account or annuity described in Code section 4975(e)(1)(B) t…
  4. 89 FR 32260 — Amendment to Prohibited Transaction Exemption 2020-02
    ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Apr 25, 2024related by meaning
    as domestic crimes and are signs of potential serious compliance and integrity failures, whether prosecuted domestically or in foreign jurisdictions. The Department does not expect that questions regarding “substantially equivalent” will arise frequently, and even less so with the Final Amendment's use of the term “Co…
  5. 80 FR 22021 — Proposed Amendment to and Proposed Partial Revocation of Prohibited Transaction Exemption (PTE) 86-128 for Securities Transactions Involving Employee Benefit P…
    ERISAProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Apr 20, 2015related by meaning
    s) earned in connection with the transactions covered by the exemption. Back to Citation 7.  67 FR 64137 (October 17, 2002). Back to Citation 8.   See Advisory Opinion 2011-08A (June 21, 2011). Back to Citation 9.  This proposal would move the definitions from Section I to Section VII. The other sections are re-ordered…
  6. 29 C.F.R. § 2520.104b-3(b) — Summary of material modifications to the plan and changes in the information required to be included in the summary plan description.
    ERISARegulationsJan 1, 2017
    (b) (b) The summary of material modifications to the plan or changes in information required to be included in the summary plan description need not be furnished separately if the changes or modifications are described in a timely summary plan description. For example, a calendar year plan adopts a material modificatio…
  7. TR 2012-02 — Technical Release 2012-02
    ERISADOL Technical ReleasesAug 31, 2012★ strong match
    irs.gov/file_source/pub/irs-drop/n-11-36.pdf. Department of Labor Technical Release 2012-01, IRS Notice 2012-17, and HHS FAQs issued February 9, 2012. IRS Notice 2012-58 provides guidance regarding the measurement period that may be used under Code section 4980H. That guidance provides a safe harbor method under which …
  8. 79 FR 13949 — Amendment Relating to Reasonable Contract or Arrangement Under Section 408(b)(2)-Fee Disclosure
    ERISAProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Mar 12, 2014★ strong match
    As discussed earlier in this preamble, commenters advocating for a summary stressed the need for medium and small plan fiduciaries to have a summary of the required disclosures to help them navigate through and analyze highly technical disclosures that are scattered throughout multiple documents. They argue that servic…
  9. 82 FR 41365 — Extension of Transition Period and Delay of Applicability Dates; Best Interest Contract Exemption (PTE 2016-01); Class Exemption for Principal Transactions in …
    ERISAProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Aug 31, 2017related by meaning
    s proposal is subject to the Congressional Review Act (CRA) provisions of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.) and will be transmitted to Congress and the Comptroller General for review if finalized. The proposal is a “major rule” as that term is defined in 5 U.S.C. 804,…
  10. 82 FR 56545 — 18-Month Extension of Transition Period and Delay of Applicability Dates; Best Interest Contract Exemption (PTE 2016-01); Class Exemption for Principal Transac…
    ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Nov 29, 2017related by meaning
    uld have been required for the January 1, 2018 applicability date, but is based on continued adherence to the Impartial Conduct Standards.”). See also Comment Letter #82 (Standard Insurance Company and Standard Retirement Services, Inc.) (“we ask that The Department also extend the temporary enforcement policy providin…
  11. 89 FR 43675 — Prohibited Transaction Exemption 2006-06 for Services Provided in Connection With the Termination of Abandoned Individual Account Plans
    ERISAFinal Rules (FR)May 17, 2024★ strong match
    section 4975(c)(2) necessitate proposing an amendment to the exemption. Back to Citation 26.   See 29 CFR 2578.1(d)(2)(v). Back to Citation 27.   See Section I(a)(3) of this exemption amendment. Back to Citation 28.   See paragraph 29 CFR 2578.1(c)(3) of the QTA Regulation or in the case of a QTA described in Section …
  12. 89 FR 32346 — Amendment to Prohibited Transaction Exemptions 75-1, 77-4, 80-83, 83-1, and 86-128
    ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Apr 25, 2024related by meaning
    nd in its text, PTE 2020-02 has been broadly amended to encompass compensation for advice irrespective of the product recommended. Back to Citation 6.  ERISA section 408(a) and Code section 4975(c)(2), expressly permit the Department (through the Reorganization Plan No. 4 of 1978) to grant “a conditional or uncondition…
  13. 76 FR 76222 — Filings Required of Multiple Employer Welfare Arrangements and Certain Other Related Entities
    ERISAProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Dec 6, 2011
    …pdated copy of the Form M-1 by March 1, 2013 because the last date ECE B was originated was June 1, 2012 (which is less than 3 years prior to the March 1, 2013 due date). Furthermore, the administrator of ECE B must file the Form M-1 by March 1, 2014 and again by March 1, 2015 (because July 1, 2012 is less than three y…
  14. 90 FR 3667 — Prohibited Transaction Exemption (PTE) 2002-51 To Permit Certain Transactions Identified in the Voluntary Fiduciary Correction Program
    ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Jan 15, 2025related by meaning
    act me if you have any questions at [Insert Telephone Number of a Person Employed by the Applicant Who Is Knowledgeable About this Matter]. Sincerely, [Insert Name and Title of Person Employed by the Applicant] Footnotes 1.  Under Reorganization Plan No. 4 of 1978, 5 U.S.C. App., the authority of the Secretary of Treas…
  15. 85 FR 31884 — Default Electronic Disclosure by Employee Pension Benefit Plans Under ERISA
    ERISAFinal Rules (FR)May 27, 2020
    …ment plans, they will not be affected by this new safe harbor. Back to Citation 150.  5 U.S.C. 601 (2012). Back to Citation 151.  5 U.S.C. 551 (2012). Back to Citation 152.  The Department consulted with the Small Business Administration Office of Advocacy in making this determination as required by 5 U.S.C. 603(c) and…
  16. 87 FR 70753 — Prohibited Transaction Exemption (PTE) 2002-51 To Permit Certain Transactions Identified in the Voluntary Fiduciary Correction Program
    ERISAProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Nov 21, 2022related by meaning
    he Department no longer believes that posting the notification is reasonably calculated to ensure that interested persons actually receive the notice. The Department has reviewed several notices to interested persons submitted to the applicable Regional Offices and found that some of them do not meet the applicable req…
  17. 29 C.F.R. § 2520.104b-2(b)(2) — Summary plan description.
    ERISARegulationsJan 1, 2017
    …ich no amendments have been made between the end of the time period covered by the last distributed summary plan description (or updated summary plan description), described in section 102 of the Act, and the next occurring applicable date described in paragraph (b)(1) of this section, for purposes of the requirement t…
  18. 89 FR 32302 — Amendment to Prohibited Transaction Exemption 84-24
    ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Apr 25, 2024related by meaning
    … 26, 2019); PTE 2016-11, 81 FR 75150 (Oct. 28, 2016); PTE 2016-10, 81 FR 75147 (Oct. 28, 2016); PTE 2012-08, 77 FR 19344 (March 30, 2012); PTE 2004-13, 69 FR 54812 (Sept. 10, 2004).
  19. 87 FR 45204 — Proposed Amendment to Prohibited Transaction Class Exemption 84-14 (the QPAM Exemption)
    ERISAProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Jul 27, 2022related by meaning
    r desires to enter into a party in interest transaction with its plan but leaves the ultimate determination and review to a QPAM. Back to Citation 37.  Proposed Amendment to PTE 84-14, 68 FR 52419, 52423 (Sept. 3, 2003). Back to Citation 38.  For purposes of these changes, the Department used March 1984 and December 20…
  20. 88 FR 76032 — Proposed Amendment to Prohibited Transaction Exemptions 75-1, 77-4, 80-83, 83-1, and 86-128
    ERISAProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Nov 3, 2023related by meaning
    011). I. PTE 75-1, Part I, Agency transactions and services, subparts (b) and (c), are revoked in their entirety. II. Part II, Principal transactions, the first sentence of subpart (2) is revoked; the sentence beginning “The exemptions set forth in (1) and (2) is designated as Part II(2) and amended to read, “The exemp…