Brief Case

Search the Pension Law Library

Limit to:Advanced options
Searches the code/regs in effect on that date.
Words mode supports "quoted phrases", +required and -excluded terms.
Document types:
Go to 5 T.C. 431 (not yet in the library — opens the official source)
90 documents · 0.19sAllIRCERISAPBGCJoint Board
  1. Notice 2021-57 — Notice 2021-57 provides guidance to multiemployer defined benefit pension plan sponsors and actuaries on the application of funding relief under IRC § 431 and …
    IRCNoticesNov 1, 2021
    … plan sponsor’s calculations of plan losses unless such calculations are clearly erroneous. Section 431(b)(8)(B)(iii) provides that if both the special amortization rule of section 431(b)(8)(A) and the special asset valuation rule of section 431(b)(8)(B) apply for a plan year, then the plan is required to treat any red…
  2. Notice 2010-83 — Funding relief for multiemployer defined benefit plans under PRA 2010. This notice provides guidance in the form of questions and answers for sponsors of multi…
    IRCNoticesDec 20, 2010
    …rules substantially similar to the rules prescribed by the Secretary for purposes of § 165. Section 431(d) provides for the extension of certain amortization periods applicable under § 431. Under § 431(b)(8)(A)(ii)(I), the amortization period under the special amortization rule cannot be further extended under § 431(d)…
  3. T.C. Memo. 2005-173 — Transport Labor Contract/Leasing, Inc. & Subsidiaries v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJul 14, 2005related by meaning
    ld a second trial at which petitioner would introduce new evidence in support of that position. With respect to petitioner's tax duplication argument, petitioner asserts: As a result of the Court's Opinion in this case and without a Rule 155 proceeding, respondent will be in a windfall position-it will have collected t…
  4. Rev. Proc. 2010-52 — This document describes the procedure by which the plan sponsor of a multiemployer pension plan may request and obtain approval of an extension of an amortizat…
    IRCRevenue ProceduresDec 27, 2010
    …cretary of the Treasury has interpretive and enforcement jurisdiction over both provisions. Section 431(d)(1) provides that if the plan sponsor of a multiemployer plan submits to the Secretary of the Treasury an application for an extension of the amortization period for any unfunded liability described in § 431(b)(2)(…
  5. Notice 2010-56 — This notice provides guidance on filing Form 5500 and Schedule MB for multiemployer defined benefit plans for plan sponsors who are considering use of the spec…
    IRCNoticesAug 16, 2010
    …rtifications already made. In the case of an applicable plan year that ends before guidance under § 431(b)(8) is issued, the special rules may be applied for the applicable plan year (subject to the requirements of § 431(b)(8), including the restriction on plan amendments under § 431(b)(8)(D)) without regard to whether…
  6. T.C. Memo. 2005-124 — Henry Uscinski and Jacqueline Uscinski v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsMay 25, 2005related by meaning
    s to expedite litigation and avoid the expense of unnecessary trials. Fla. Peach Corp. v. Commissioner , 90 T.C. 678, 681 (1988). A motion for summary judgment may be granted where there is no dispute as to a material fact and a decision may be rendered as a matter of law. See Rule 121. The moving party bears the burde…
  7. T.C. Summary Opinion 2005-71 — Vincent A. Suarez, Jr. & Esther Suarez v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJun 6, 2005related by meaning
    a matter of legislative grace, and the burden of clearly showing the right to the claimed deduction is on the taxpayer. INDOPCO, Inc. v. Commissioner , 503 U.S. 79, 84 (1992). We are bound by the Internal Revenue Code, and it is within the province of the legislature to decide the circumstances of inclusion, deductions…
  8. 160 T.C. No. 3 — 3M Company and Subsidiaries v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsFeb 9, 2023related by meaning
    ........ 224 C. Generally applicable ............................................. 229 D. Not part of commercial transaction ..................... 229 E. Exhaustion of remedies ........................................ 229 F. Restriction on payment in any form .................... 230 G. Circumvention or violation of re…
  9. 59 T.C. 598; 59 T.C. No. 59 — Thriftimart, Inc. v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJan 31, 1973related by meaning
    for any payment of any specific amount to any employee until the conditions of that employee having medical services or being away from work occurred. In Simplified Tax Records, Inc., 41 T.C. 75, 79 (1963), in disallowing a deduction to the taxpayer for a reserve for the estimated future cost of preparing subscribers’ …
  10. 85 T.C. 511; 85 T.C. No. 29 — Reinhardt v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsSep 30, 1985related by meaning
    s not being an employee, and only if the taxpayer has not, after 1977, treated any individual holding a substantially similar position as an employee. "The Clinic has continuously treated its shareholder doctors as employees. Therefore, under section 530(a)(3) of the Act, the Clinic would not be entitled to section 530…
  11. 97 T.C. 237; 97 T.C. No. 14 — Guilzon v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsAug 6, 1991related by meaning
    itle (other than this subsection) applies with respect to such amount. The pertinent portion of sec. 1.72-2(a)(3)(i), Income Tax Regs., is as follows: Sections 402 and 403 provide that certain distributions by employees’ trusts and certain payments under employee plans are taxable under section 72. * * * For purposes o…
  12. Rev. Proc. 2008-67 — This document sets forth the procedure by which the sponsor of a multiemployer pension plan may request and obtain approval of an extension of an amortization …
    IRCRevenue ProceduresSuperseded Dec 1, 2008
    …cretary of the Treasury has interpretive and enforcement jurisdiction over both provisions. Section 431(d)(1) provides that if the plan sponsor of a multiemployer plan submits to the Secretary of the Treasury an application for an extension of the amortization period for any unfunded liability, and includes the certifi…
  13. 80 T.C. 239; 80 T.C. No. 4 — Feichtinger v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJan 20, 1983related by meaning
    sue in this case is within the scope of respondent’s authority and is reasonable, it is not necessary to classify it as legislative or interpretative. Respondent’s position is that the disputed regulation appropriately implements section 415, which was intended by Congress to allow automatic increases in benefits based…
  14. REG-143601-06 — Proposed regulations under section 430 of the Code provide generally applicable mortality tables to be used in determining present value or making any computat…
    IRCProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Jun 11, 2007
    … to individuals who are disabled within the meaning of Title II of the Social Security Act. Section 431, which was added by PPA, specifies the minimum funding requirements that apply to multiemployer plans. Under section 431(c)(6)(B), a plan’s full funding limitation cannot be less than the excess (if any) of 90 percen…
  15. PLR 201103059 — Minimum Funding Standards
    IRCPrivate Letter RulingsJan 21, 2011
    '"- \ Significant Index Number 0431.00-00 201103059 DEPARTMENTOFTHETREASURY INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224 • TAX EXEMPT AND OCT 27 lOlO GOVERNMENT ENTITIES DIVISION Re: Taxpayer = Dear This letter constitutes notice that approval has been granted for your request for a 5-year automatic extension for am…
  16. 29 T.C. 632 — General Retail Corp. v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsDec 31, 1957related by meaning
    y its shareholders, partners, or beneficiaries. Sec. 430 (e) (1). As stipulated. Sec. 430 (e) (2) (B). Sec. 430 (e) (2) (B) (1). Sec. 445 (g) (2) (B). Sec. 503 (a) (1), made applicable by sec. 445 (g) (3).
  17. PLR 201616012 — Minimum Funding Standards for Multiemployer Plans
    IRCPrivate Letter RulingsApr 15, 2016
    …e unfunded liabilities as of June 1, 2014, for the above~named Plan which are described in sections 431 (b)(2)(B) and 431 (b)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code ("Code"), and sections 304(b)(2)(8) and 304(b)(4) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 ("ERISA"). This extension is effective with the plan year…
  18. 109 T.C. No. 9 — Square D Company and Subsidiaries v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsOct 9, 1997related by meaning
    einafter referred to as the instant case). The instant case is before the Court on - 3 - 1 All Code and section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the year at issue. All Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure. the parties' cross-motions for partial summary judgment. …
  19. T.C. Memo. 1998-13 — Francisco A. Murillo v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJan 12, 1998related by meaning
    the deduction would frustrate a sharply defined Federal or State policy. Wood v. United States , 863 F.2d 417 (5th Cir. 1989); Fuller v. Commissioner , 213 F.2d 102 (10th Cir. 1954), affg. 20 T.C. 308 (1953); Holmes Enterprises v. Commissioner , 69 T.C. 114 (1977). The test of nondeductibility is the severity and imme…
  20. PLR 201526024 — Minimum Funding Standards for Multiemployer Plans
    IRCPrivate Letter RulingsJun 26, 2015
    Significant Index Number 0431.00-00 TAX EXEMPT AND GOVERNMENT ENTITIES DIVISION Re: (Plan No. EIN: DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224 APR 0 2 2015 ) ("Plan") 201126024 Taxpayer= Dear This letter constitutes notice that approval has been granted for your request for a 5-year autom…