Brief Case

Search the Pension Law Library

Limit to:Advanced options
Searches the code/regs in effect on that date.
Words mode supports "quoted phrases", +required and -excluded terms.
Document types:
Go to Rev. Rul. 1969-649 (not yet in the library — opens the official source)
71 documents · 0.17sAllIRCERISAPBGCJoint Board
  1. Rev. Proc. 2006-3 — Areas in which rulings will not be issued (domestic areas). This procedure provides a revised list of those provisions of the Code under the jurisdiction of th…
    IRCRevenue ProceduresJan 3, 2006★ strong match
    ion letters, see, respectively, section 8 of Rev. Proc. 2006-4 (this Bulletin) and section 3.02 of Rev. Proc. 2006-6 (this Bulletin). .02 Changes. (1) New section 3.01(3) (Sections 61, 451, and 1001.—Gross Income Defined...) has been added. See Rev. Proc. 2005-61, 2005-37 I.R.B. 507. (2) Section 3.01(9) (Section 105(h)…
  2. Rev. Proc. 2005-3 — Areas in which rulings will not be issued (domestic areas). This procedure provides a revised list of those provisions of the Code under the jurisdiction of th…
    IRCRevenue ProceduresJan 3, 2005★ strong match
    …rust that is excepted from the application of the generation-skipping transfer tax because it was irrevocable on September 25, 1985, will lose its excepted status if the situs of the trust is changed from the United States to a situs outside of the United States. (50)
  3. Notice 2014-19 — The purpose of this notice is to provide guidance on the application (including the retroactive application) of the decision in United States v. Windsor, 570 U…
    IRCNoticesApr 21, 2014★ strong match
    …nconstitutional because it violates Fifth Amendment principles. Subsequent to the Windsor decision, Rev. Rul. 2013–17 held the following: (1) For Federal tax purposes, the terms “spouse,” “husband and wife,” “husband,” and “wife” include an individual married to a person of the same sex if the individuals are lawfully …
  4. 85 T.C. 511; 85 T.C. No. 29 — Reinhardt v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsSep 30, 1985★ strong match
    … employers has nothing to do with the issue before the Court. As in Ridenour, petitioner also cites Rev. Rul. 69-647, 1969-2 C.B. 100, to support his position. In Rev. Rul. 69-647, the Commissioner ruled that an employee who retired from full-time employment but continued to provide advisory opinions on an irregular ba…
  5. Notice 2012-6 — This notice extends and expands the transition relief provided under Rev. Rul. 2011-1, 2011-2 I.R.B. 251, and Rev. Rul. 2008-40, 2008-2 C.B. 166, for certain g…
    IRCNoticesJan 17, 2012
    (24) of the Internal Revenue Code (Code) (§ 401(a)(24) plans) to be amended to satisfy the applicable requirements of Rev. Rul. 2011-1. II. BACKGROUND Rev. Rul. 81-100, 1981-1 C.B. 326, provides that qualified retirement plans and individual retirement accounts are permitted to pool their assets for investment purposes…
  6. Rev. Proc. 2025-3 — The revenue procedure updates Rev. Proc. 2024-3, 2024-1 I.R.B.143, to provide a revised list of areas under the jurisdiction of the Associate Chief Counsel (Co…
    IRCRevenue ProceduresDec 30, 2024★ strong match
    …nsferor; Basis to Distributees; Basis to Corporations.—The issues described as being under study in Rev. Rul. 2006-2, 2006-1 C.B. 261. (3) Section 401.—Qualified Pension, Profit-Sharing, and Stock Bonus Plans.—Whether a program providing a limited period during which certain retirees who are currently receiving lifetim…
  7. 160 T.C. No. 3 — 3M Company and Subsidiaries v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsFeb 9, 2023
    t ions on allocations of income under section 482 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954. The 1969 revision to the Code of Federal Regulations contained regulations promulgated on or before December 31, 1968. See 26 (p art 1 (secs. 1.401-1.500)) C.F.R. v ( 1969). Included in the 1969 revision was section 1.482-1, which c…
  8. Rev. Proc. 2025-4 — This document updates Rev. Proc. 2024-4, 2024-1 IRB 160, relating to the types of advice the IRS provides to taxpayers on issues under the jurisdiction of the …
    IRCRevenue ProceduresSuperseded Dec 30, 2024★ strong match
    …or Group or Pooled Trust Ruling, demonstrating how the group trust satisfies the criteria listed in Rev. Rul. 2011-1, together with the trust instrument and related documents. Rev. Rul. 2004-67 extends the ability to participate in group trusts to eligible governmental plans under § 457(b) and clarifies the ability of …
  9. Rev. Rul. 2014-9 — This revenue ruling provides simplified safe harbor due diligence procedures a plan administrator may use in order to be deemed to have reasonably concluded th…
    IRCRevenue RulingsApr 21, 2014related by meaning
    …the decision in United States v. Windsor, 570 U.S. ___, 133 S. Ct. 2675 (2013), and the holdings of Rev. Rul. 2013–17, 2013–38 I.R.B. 201 (Sept. 16, 2013), to retirement plans qualified under section 401(a) of the Internal Revenue Code (Code). Rev. Rul. 2013–17 is amplified.
  10. T.C. Memo. 2004-260 — Joseph R. Rollins v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsNov 15, 2004
    …1-552, 6, 28-29 (1969), 1969-3 C.B. 426, 442-443; also see Staff of the Joint Committee on Internal Revenue Taxation, General Explanation of the Tax Reform Act of 1969 (hereinafter sometimes referred to as the TRA '69 Blue Book) 3, 30-31. The Senate Finance Committee described its conclusions as follows: 9 Sec. 503 of …
  11. Rev. Rul. 2011-1 — This ruling modifies the rules for group trusts described in Rev. Rul. 81-100, 1981-1 C.B. 326, as clarified and modified by Rev. Rul. 2004-67, 2004-2 C.B. 28.…
    IRCRevenue RulingsModified Jan 10, 2011
    by reason of section 833(c)(5) of the Code. Rev. Proc. 2008-52 modified. Notice 2010-79 clarified and modified. Rev. Proc. 2011-12 Rev. Proc. 2011-12 Cost-of-living adjustments for 2011. This procedure sets forth the 2011 cost-of-living adjustments to certain items due to inflation as required under various provisions…
  12. Rev. Rul. 2009-18 — Tax-sheltered annuity contracts. This ruling notes that a number of guidance documents had become outdated due to numerous intervening statutory revisions enac…
    IRCRevenue RulingsJul 6, 2009related by meaning
    …unting or taxable year on behalf of a foreign corporation by its controlling domestic shareholders. Rev. Proc. 2009-31 Rev. Proc. 2009-31 This procedure provides guidance regarding the granting or revocation of consent to treat intercompany transactions on a separate entity basis under regulations section 1.1502-13(e)(…
  13. REG-142695-05 — Proposed regulations under section 125 of the Code provide guidance on cafeteria plans. EE-16-79, EE-130-86, REG-243025-96, and REG-117162-99 withdrawn. Rev. R…
    IRCProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Sep 24, 2007
    …ement are included in the employee’s gross income, even amounts paid to reimburse medical care. See Rev. Rul. 2006-36, 2006-36 I.R.B. 353; Rev. Rul. 2005-24, 2005-1 C.B. 892; Rev. Rul. 2003-102, 2003-2 C.B. 559; Notice 2002-45, 2002-2 C.B. 93; Rev. Rul. 2002-41, 2002-2 C.B. 75; Rev. Rul. 69-141, 1969-1 C.B. 48. New sec…
  14. Rev. Proc. 2017-4 — This procedure contains consolidated and revised procedures for determination letters and letter rulings issued by the Commissioner, Tax Exempt and Government …
    IRCRevenue ProceduresJan 3, 2017★ strong match
    …or Group or Pooled Trust Ruling, demonstrating how the group trust satisfies the criteria listed in Rev. Rul. 2011–1, together with the trust instrument and related documents. Rev. Rul. 2004–67 extends the ability to participate in group trusts to eligible governmental plans under § 457(b) and clarifies the ability of …
  15. T.C. Memo. 2010-115 — Ronald D. & Lorie A. Jelling v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsMay 27, 2010
    …tar Plan, the applicable Federal rate was 3 .89 percent for a short-term loan compounded annually . Rev . Rul . 2005-66, 2005-2 C .B . 686 . Mid- and long-term rates were higher . Id . In March 2006, when Mogelefsky withdrew from Benistar Plan, the applicable Federal rate .was 4 .58 percent for a short-term loan compou…
  16. PLR 202417010 — Qualified Pension, Profit-Sharing, and Stock Bonus Plan
    IRCPrivate Letter RulingsApr 26, 2024
    t cause Taxpayer to fail to qualify as an 81-100 group trust within the meaning of Rev. Rul. 2011-1. LAW AND ANALYSIS Rev. Rul. 81-100, as modified, 1 provides that certain retiree benefit plans and other arrangements are permitted to pool their assets for investment purposes in an “81-100 group trust” if certain speci…
  17. 66 T.C. 324 — Bianchi v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsMay 20, 1976
    Rev. Rul. 69-421 (Part 2(j)(l)), 1969-2 C.B. 59, 64, sets forth respondent’s position rejecting the prior service of self-employed individuals — partners and sole proprietors — for both prior service benefits and eligibility requirements. He, therefore, concludes that the prior services of a sole proprietor cannot be c…
  18. Rev. Proc. 2020-4 — This revenue procedure contains information on the types of advice provided by the Commissioner, Tax Exempt and Government Entities Division, Employee Plans Ru…
    IRCRevenue ProceduresJan 2, 2020★ strong match
    …or Group or Pooled Trust Ruling, demonstrating how the group trust satisfies the criteria listed in Rev. Rul. 2011–1, together with the trust instrument and related documents. Rev. Rul. 2004–67 extends the ability to participate in group trusts to eligible governmental plans under § 457(b) and clarifies the ability of …
  19. Rev. Rul. 2009-40 — 2010 covered compensation tables; permitted disparity. The covered compensation tables under section 401 of the Code for the year 2010 are provided for use in …
    IRCRevenue RulingsDec 28, 2009related by meaning
    …ations now classified as private foundations. Announcement 2009-90 Announcement 2009-90 The IRS has revoked its determination that Twenty First Century World — TEMENOS of San Rafael, CA, qualifies as an organization described in sections 501(c)(3) and 170(c)(2) of the Code. ESTATE TAX T.D. 9473 T.D. 9473 Final regulati…
  20. 82 T.C. 152; 82 T.C. No. 14 — Baetens v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJan 26, 1984
    …avorable tax treatment than compensation that was paid currently. Thus, under the Tax Reform Act of 1969, capital gains treatment was limited to only that portion of a lump-sum distribution attributable to contributions made before 1970. Thus, Congress itself made the tax treatment dependent upon the time of the contri…