Brief Case

Search the Pension Law Library

Limit to:Advanced options
Searches the code/regs in effect on that date.
Words mode supports "quoted phrases", +required and -excluded terms.
Document types:
Go to T.C. Memo. 1998-463 (not yet in the library — opens the official source)
58 documents · 0.26sAllIRCERISAPBGCJoint Board
  1. 160 T.C. No. 3 — 3M Company and Subsidiaries v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsFeb 9, 2023★ strong match
    …nation of the 1982 trademark licensing agreement and the 1983 licensing agreement; execution of the 1998 trademark licenses; stipulations related to Brazilian law On August 18, 1998, 3M Company and 3M Brazil entered into an agreemen t terminating the 1982 trademark licensing agreement, effective January 1, 1998. On Aug…
  2. T.C. Memo. 2007-343 — Ramzy M. & Lena Kopty v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsNov 21, 2007
    …rwork was received from petitioner by Norwest's office in Boulder, Colorado, on or about October 7, 1998, and was forwarded to Norwest's home office in Minneapolis, Minnesota . The paperwork and the stock certificate were then sent to the transfer agent on or about October 20, 1998, and the shares of stock were registe…
  3. T.C. Memo. 2005-173 — Transport Labor Contract/Leasing, Inc. & Subsidiaries v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJul 14, 2005related by meaning
    er for calendar year 1993 except that the reference to "20% reduction" was changed to "50% percent reduction" in order to reflect changes made to sec. 274(n)(1) by the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993 (OBRA 1993), Pub. L. 103-66, sec. 13209(a), 107 Stat. 469. In this connection, prior to its amendment by OBRA …
  4. T.C. Memo. 2004-287 — Michael J. Barkley v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsDec 28, 2004
    … of time to file. Petitioner also did not file timely income tax returns for years before and after 1998. Petitioner filed his 1994 return on August 8, 1996, his 1995 return on February 13, 1998, his 1996 return on November 23, 1998, his 1997 return on February 4, 2001, and his 1999 return on June 6, 2002. On January 1…
  5. T.C. Memo. 1996-502 — Elaine S. Bennett v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsNov 7, 1996related by meaning
    is written, and, even if petitioner's argument might accord with good policy, we are not at liberty to rewrite such section because we might deem its effects susceptible of improvement. Commissioner v. Lundy , 516 U.S. 116 S. Ct. 647, 656-657 (Jan. 17, 1996) (citing Badaracco v. Commissioner , 464 U.S. 386, 398 (1984))…
  6. T.C. Memo. 2001-55 — Taylor Miller v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsMar 6, 2001★ strong match
    v. Commissioner , T.C. Memo. 1998-140; Reiher v. Commissioner , T.C. Memo. 1998-75; Easter v. Commissioner , T.C. Memo. 1998-8; Brewer v. Commissioner , T.C. Memo. 1997-542, affd. without published opinion 172 F.3d 875 (9th Cir. 1999); Gillette v. Commissioner , T.C. Memo. 1997-301; Hayes v. Commissioner , T.C. Memo. 1…
  7. T.C. Memo. 2004-258 — Isabel Molina & Isaac Molina, Jr. v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsNov 10, 2004★ strong match
    …ent’s litigating position that the distribution occurred in 2000. See Garcia v. Commissioner , T.C. Memo. 1998-203 (reaching this conclusion regarding another question and answer contained in the same proposed regulation), affd. without published opinion 190 F.3d 538 (5th Cir. 1999). Additionally, the substantially lev…
  8. T.C. Memo. 1998-36 — Neil M. Baizer v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJan 27, 1998related by meaning
    began on the date that the prohibited transaction occurred, May 31, 1988, and ended on the -14- 8 Petitioner contends that the second-tier tax of sec. 4975(b) is not applicable because of ERISA sec. 502(i), 29 U.S.C. 1132(i) (1988). ERISA sec. 502(i) provides the following: In the case of a transaction prohibited by se…
  9. T.C. Summary Opinion 2007-180 — Suzanne E. Barrera, a.k.a. Suzanne E. Battle v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsOct 24, 2007
    …eview because she trusted that Mr. Barrera “would do the best” for her and her family. - 13 - 7 The 1998 collection notice was not in respondent’s administrative record and was not presented as evidence at trial. Respondent introduced Form 4340, Certificate of Assessments, Payments, and Other Specified Matters, dated M…
  10. T.C. Summary Opinion 2002-108 — Claudia J. Dunn v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsAug 22, 2002
    am at the University of Phoenix commenced on September 30, 1998. The “Student Schedule Listing” provided by petitioner shows only two courses in 1998, “Role of the Nurse Practitioner,” a three-credit course held at 6 p.m. each Wednesday between September 30, 1998 and November 4, 1998, and “Advanced Nursing Theory,” als…
  11. Rev. Proc. 2021-30 — Rev. Proc. 2021-30 adds two new benefit overpayment correction methods that encourage employers to avoid seeking recoupment of benefit overpayments made to par…
    IRCRevenue ProceduresModified Aug 2, 2021
    …Period) +12% If the $5,000 corrective contribution had been contributed for Employee X on March 31, 1998, (1) Earnings for 1998 would have been increased by the amount of the Earnings on the additional $5,000 contribution from March 31, 1998 through December 31, 1998 and would have been allocated as 1998 Earnings in pr…
  12. T.C. Memo. 1998-318 — Howard E. Clendenen, Inc. v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsSep 3, 1998related by meaning
    …his Court under substantially identical circumstances. See Steel Balls, Inc. v. Commissioner , T.C. Memo. 1995-266, affd. without published opinion 89 F.3d 841 (8th Cir. 1996). 6 We rejected the same argument presented herein and concluded that respondent's position was clearly supported by the statute and regulations.…
  13. Rev. Proc. 2018-52 — The revenue procedure modifies and supersedes Rev. Proc. 2016–51, 2016–42 I.R.B. 465, which sets forth the Employee Plans Compliance Resolution System (“EPCRS”…
    IRCRevenue ProceduresOct 15, 2018
    …Period) +12% If the $5,000 corrective contribution had been contributed for Employee X on March 31, 1998, (1) Earnings for 1998 would have been increased by the amount of the Earnings on the additional $5,000 contribution from March 31, 1998 through December 31, 1998 and would have been allocated as 1998 Earnings in pr…
  14. Rev. Proc. 2016-51 — This revenue procedure updates the comprehensive system of correction programs for sponsors of retirement plans that are intended to satisfy the requirements o…
    IRCRevenue ProceduresOct 17, 2016
    …Period) +12% If the $5,000 corrective contribution had been contributed for Employee X on March 31, 1998, (1) Earnings for 1998 would have been increased by the amount of the Earnings on the additional $5,000 contribution from March 31, 1998 through December 31, 1998 and would have been allocated as 1998 Earnings in pr…
  15. Rev. Proc. 2008-50 — This procedure updates the comprehensive system of correction programs for sponsors of retirement plans that are intended to satisfy the requirements of sectio…
    IRCRevenue ProceduresSep 2, 2008
    …Period) +12% If the $5,000 corrective contribution had been contributed for Employee X on March 31, 1998, (1) earnings for 1998 would have been increased by the amount of the earnings on the additional $5,000 contribution from March 31, 1998 through December 31, 1998 and would have been allocated as 1998 earnings in pr…
  16. Rev. Proc. 2006-27 — Administrative programs; correction programs. This procedure updates and expands upon the Service’s comprehensive Employee Plans Compliance Resolution System (…
    IRCRevenue ProceduresSuperseded May 30, 2006
    …Period) +12% If the $5,000 corrective contribution had been contributed for Employee X on March 31, 1998, (1) earnings for 1998 would have been increased by the amount of the earnings on the additional $5,000 contribution from March 31, 1998 through December 31, 1998, and would have been allocated as 1998 earnings in p…
  17. T.C. Memo. 1996-365 — Timothy W. & Suzanne M. Coffield v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsAug 8, 1996related by meaning
    to the Internal Revenue Code by section 302 of the Taxpayer Bill of Rights 2, Pub. L. 104-168, authorizes this Court to review the Secretary's failure to abate interest with respect to requests for abatement after July 30, 1996. Because this case does not involve a request for abatement after July 30, 1996, we lack jur…
  18. T.C. Memo. 1998-203 — Ramon A. & Bertha E. Garcia v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJun 3, 1998★ strong match
    …stituted a modification of the terms of the notes. We have previously noted that a technical advice memorandum is merely a ruling given to a specific taxpayer based upon the taxpayer's specific facts and is not a ruling of general application. See Golden Belt Tel. Association, Inc. v. Commissioner , 108 T.C. 498, 506 (…
  19. T.C. Memo. 1997-277 — Margaret M. Merker v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJun 18, 1997related by meaning
    … years in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure. T.C. Memo. 1997-277 UNITED STATES TAX COURT MARGARET M. MERKER, Petitioner v . COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 26855-95. Filed June 18, 1997. Margaret M. Merker, pro se. Marjory A. Gilbert , for respon…
  20. Treas. Reg. § 1.408A-6(c) — Distributions.
    IRCRegulationsSep 17, 2024
    …ple, if a calendar-year taxpayer who received a distribution from a traditional IRA on December 31, 1998, makes a conversion contribution by contributing the distributed amount to a Roth IRA on February 25, 1999 in a qualifying rollover contribution and makes a regular contribution for 1998 on the same date, the 5-taxa…