Brief Case

Search the Pension Law Library

Limit to:Advanced options
Searches the code/regs in effect on that date.
Words mode supports "quoted phrases", +required and -excluded terms.
Document types:
Go to 120 T.C. 62 (not yet in the library — opens the official source)
83 documents · 0.23sAllIRCERISAPBGCJoint Board
  1. T.C. Memo. 1996-263 — Richard J. & Adele S. Montgomery v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJun 11, 1996related by meaning
    g, we give effect to the plain meaning of the words used therein and sustain respondent's determination that petitioners are liable for the 10-percent additional tax under section 72(t). We have considered petitioners' remaining arguments and find them unpersuasive. 3. Conclusion In order to give effect to our disposit…
  2. 78 FR 13781 — Filings Required of Multiple Employer Welfare Arrangements and Certain Other Related Entities
    ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Mar 1, 2013
    …Minutes]   Fully-insured Not fully-insured One State Multi States One State Multi States New Filing 120 120 120 120 Part I 5 5 5 5 Part II 60 120 60 120 Part III 15 15 30 30 Table 2—Hour Burden To Prepare Form M-1, In-House Preparation   Fully-insured Not fully-insured Total One State Multi States One State Multi State…
  3. 56 T.C. 263 — Smith v. Comm'r
    IRCCourt RulingsMay 12, 1971related by meaning
    g $1,000, may (under regulations prescribed by the Secretary or his delegate) be returned on the basis and in the manner prescribed in subsection (a). Harold and Caroline reported $10,224.57 as long-term capital gain in. 1964 and $30,673.70 as long-term capital gain in each subsequent year. Assuming that the annual pay…
  4. 89 FR 100138 — Taxable Income or Loss and Currency Gain or Loss With Respect to a Qualified Business Unit
    IRCFinal Rules (FR)Dec 11, 2024
    of ¥120,000; raw land with a basis of ¥55,000 ($500 translated under § 1.987-2(d)(2) at the historic rate of $1 = ¥110); and liabilities of ¥10,000. ( 3) Under paragraphs (e)(1)(i) and (ii) of this section, U.S. Corp will translate these items as follows. The ¥120,000 is a marked asset and the ¥10,000 liability is a ma…
  5. T.C. Summary Opinion 2019-1 — Christopher John Totten v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJan 29, 2019related by meaning
    $1,875, but that the amount is limited to $1,500 pursuant to section 25C(b). Petitioner introduced at trial (1) an invoice from Crums Climate Control, Inc. (invoice), dated April 28, 2009, and (2) a Certificate of Product Ratings by the Air-Conditioning, Heating, and Refrigeration Institute (AHRI certificate) dated Oct…
  6. 125 T.C. No. 5 — 100 Oak Street Corporation v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsSep 15, 2005related by meaning
    125 T.C. No. 5 UNITED STATES TAX COURT SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, . Respondent 100 OAK STREET CORPbRATION, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket Nos. 8398-04L, 8399-04L. Filed September 15, 200 . saan. Ps are qualified labor. organi…
  7. 76 FR 76222 — Filings Required of Multiple Employer Welfare Arrangements and Certain Other Related Entities
    ERISAProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Dec 6, 2011
    …m [Minutes]   Fully-insured Self-insured   One State Multi States One State Multi States New Filing 120 120 120 120 Part I 5 5 5 5 Part II 60 120 60 120 ( printed page 76229) Part III 15 15 30 30 Table 2—Hour Burden To Prepare Form M-1, In-House Preparation   Fully-insured Self-insured Total One State Multi States One …
  8. 148 T.C. No. 14 — John C. Trimmer & Susan Trimmer v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsApr 20, 2017related by meaning
    402(c)(3)(B). See SERVED Apr 20 2017 - 2 - Rev. Proc. 2003-16, 2003-1 C.B. 359, as modified retrospectively by Rev. Proc. 2016-47, 2016-37 I.R.B. 346. Ideld, further, the Tax Court has jurisdiction in this deficiency proceeding to review R's denial of Ps' request for a waiver of the 60day rollover requirement. Held, fu…
  9. IRCRegulationsDec 30, 2016
    …t $85, two have agreed to accept $100, two have agreed to accept $110, three have agreed to accept $120, and one has agreed to accept $150. Under the agreement, the plan agrees to pay the providers 80% of the agreed amount, with the individual receiving the service responsible for the remaining 20%. (ii) Conclusion. In…
  10. Treas. Reg. § 1.410(b)-4(c)(5) — Nondiscriminatory classification test.
    IRCRegulationsSep 9, 2016
    …rate the rules in this paragraph (c). Example 1.Employer A has 200 nonexcludable employees, of whom 120 are nonhighly compensated employees and 80 are highly compensated employees. Employer A maintains a plan that benefits 60 nonhighly compensated employees and 72 highly compensated employees. Thus, the plan's ratio pe…
  11. 95 T.C. 132; 95 T.C. No. 11 — Thoburn v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsAug 13, 1990related by meaning
    YE deficiency Sec. 6651(a)(1) Sec. 6651(a)(2) 12/31/80 $1,596 $359 $399 12/31/81 4,263 959 1,066 12/31/82 6,943 1,562 1,389 12/31/83 9,349 2,104 1,309 12/31/84 11,643 2,620 931 12/31/85 14,045 2,528 281 Respondent also determined a deficiency in second-tier tax under sec. 4975(b) of $295,956. Robert H. McCollough Docke…
  12. T.C. Memo. 2010-200 — Cheryl Elizabeth & Don Edward Hill v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsSep 13, 2010related by meaning
    hdrawal From Pensio n Section tax on early defined in s within one o With re not dispute retirement p distribution for petition fall under o : With re held that it enumerated is Commissioner Commissioner T .C . 215, 22, 1998-407 ; Pu : 72(t)(1) generally imposes a 10-percent additiona l distributions from "a qualified …
  13. T.C. Memo. 2015-61 — Kevin R. Gurule & Dawn M. Gurule v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsMar 31, 2015related by meaning
    ioners' economic hardship claim. The administrative record also does not show that Settlement Officer Degiovanni considered or followed the three-step process for levying upon retirement accounts pursuant to the IRM even though she was aware that petitioners were using the section 401(k) plan account to pay necessary l…
  14. T.D. 9694 — These final regulations provide guidance on the application of § 162(m)(6). Section 162(m)(6) limits the allowable deduction for remuneration for services prov…
    IRCTreasury DecisionsOct 6, 2014
    …ced by the amount of AIR ($500,000 − $300,000). The reduced deduction limit is then applied to M’s $120,000 of DDR attributable to services performed by M in N’s 2016 taxable year that is paid in 2020. Because the reduced deduction limit of $200,000 is greater than the $120,000 of DDR, N may deduct the entire $120,000 …
  15. REG-106796-12 — These proposed regulations provide guidance on the application of section 162(m)(6). Section 162(m)(6) limits the allowable deduction for remuneration for serv…
    IRCProposed Rules (FR)Proposed May 28, 2013
    … individual remuneration ($500,000 - $300,000). The reduced deduction limitation is applied to M’s $120,000 of deferred deduction remuneration attributable to services performed by M in N’s 2016 taxable year that is paid in 2020. Because the reduced deduction limitation of $200,000 is greater than the $120,000 of defer…
  16. T.C. Memo. 2012-104 — Jerald W. & Claudia K. White v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsApr 11, 2012related by meaning
    T.C. Memo. 2012-104 JNITED STATES TAX COURT JERALD W. WHITE AND CLAUDIA K. WHITE, Petitioners y. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent DIOGENES HOLDINGS, INC., Petitioner y. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket Nos. 22514-07, 22515-07. Filed April 11, 2012. David E. Price and Adria S. Price, for p…
  17. 108 T.C. No. 5 — George & Elam Campbell v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsFeb 18, 1997related by meaning
    s from petitioner's IRA's in the total amount of $181,481. Of this amount, petitioners reported $8,762 as the taxable amount. The Notice of Deficiency In the notice of deficiency, respondent determined that the difference between the amount distributed from petitioner's IRA's (i.e., $90,662.11 + $90,818.53 = $181,480.6…
  18. IRCRegulationsSep 17, 2024
    …te the application of this paragraph (a)(3): Example 1.(i) Employee A, an HCE with compensation of $120,000, is eligible to make elective contributions under Plan S and Plan T, two profit-sharing plans maintained by Employer H with calendar year plan years, each of which includes a cash or deferred arrangement. During …
  19. T.C. Memo. 1996-272 — Tommy L. & Patricia A. Hobson v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJun 12, 1996related by meaning
    1 Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the year at issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and (continued...) T.C. Memo. 1996-272 UNITED STATES TAX COURT TOMMY L. AND PATRICIA A. HOBSON, Petitioners v . COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL R…
  20. T.C. Memo. 1997-159 — Robert Charles Fohrmeister v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsMar 31, 1997related by meaning
    tax as provided by section 72(t). Section 72(t) generally provides for a 10-percent additional tax on a distribution from a qualified plan, unless the distribution comes within one of the statutory exceptions. Sec. 72(t)(1) and (2). At issue here is the exception provided in section 72(t)(2)(A)(iii), pertaining to dist…