Brief Case

Search the Pension Law Library

Limit to:Advanced options
Searches the code/regs in effect on that date.
Words mode supports "quoted phrases", +required and -excluded terms.
Document types:
Go to I.R.C. § 1399 (not yet in the library — opens the official source)
72 documents · 0.18sAllIRCERISAPBGCJoint Board
  1. 61 T.C. 605; 61 T.C. No. 65 — Estate of Silverman v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsFeb 4, 1974related by meaning
    …se of the provisions of section 2039 even though a literal reading of the words of the section was susceptible of such an interpretation. Based on our interpretation of section 2039(c) and considering the rationale of the Second Circuit in Commissioner v. Estate of Albright, supra, we conclude that the payments receive…
  2. 144 T.C. No. 9 — Ralim S. El v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsMar 12, 2015related by meaning
    nd.8 SSeveral recent cases cite Bunney v. Commissioner, 114 T.C. 259, 265 (2000) (citing Matthews v. Commissioner, 92 T.C. 351, 361-362 (1989), aff'd, 907 F.2d 1173 (D.C. Cir. 1990)), where we held that the taxpayer "has the burden of proving his entitlement to any of * * * [the sec. 72(t)(2)(A)] exceptions." Sg g, Hyd…
  3. 29 C.F.R. § 2550.408b-2(c)(1)(x) — General statutory exemption for services or office space.
    ERISARegulationsSep 1, 2017related by meaning
    (c)(1)(x) (x) Preemption of State law. Nothing in this section shall be construed to supersede any provision of State law that governs disclosures by parties that provide the services described in this section, except to the extent that such law prevents the application of a requirement of this section. (c)(1)(xi) (xi)…
  4. T.C. Memo. 2015-128 — James Boneparte, Jr. v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJul 13, 2015related by meaning
    claimed medical transportation expenses and that he falls under the exception in section 72(t)(2)(B). As discussed supra Part II.A, petitioner is not entitled to deduct his claimed medical transportation expenses under section 213(a). Therefore, he does not fall under the exception in section 72(t)(2)(B) and he is lia…
  5. Rev. Proc. 2005-3 — Areas in which rulings will not be issued (domestic areas). This procedure provides a revised list of those provisions of the Code under the jurisdiction of th…
    IRCRevenue ProceduresJan 3, 2005related by meaning
    ributions, in one taxable year or in each of several years, amounts forgiven by the taxpayer in each of several years by endorsement on the note. (19) Section 213.—Medical, Dental, Etc., Expenses.—Whether a capital expenditure for an item that is ordinarily used for personal, living, or family purposes, such as a swimm…
  6. T.D. 9331 — Final regulations amend section 408(a) of the Code with regard to the requirements under section 408(a) for non-bank trustees for deemed IRAs. The regulations …
    IRCTreasury DecisionsAug 6, 2007related by meaning
    to the electronic filing of certain statements that taxpayers are required to include on or with their federal income tax returns. T.D. 9332 T.D. 9332 Final, temporary, and proposed regulations under sections 883(a) and (c) of the Code relate to the exclusion from gross income of income derived by certain foreign corpo…
  7. 82 T.C. 843; 82 T.C. No. 65 — Green v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsMay 30, 1984related by meaning
    ents of section 2039(c)(3). Due to concessions and in order to reflect petitioner’s claim for an overpayment, Decision will be entered under Rule 155. Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 as amended and in effect at the date of death, and all references to Rules ar…
  8. T.C. Memo. 2024-24 — James Elbert Aldridge, Jr. & Shirley Lorraine Aldridge v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsFeb 21, 2024related by meaning
    is obtained on or before the date the IRS issues a notice of deficiency.”), aff’ g in part, rev’g in part and remanding T.C. Memo. 2020-99; Kroner v. Commissioner, 48 F.4th 1272, 1276– 81 (11th Cir. 2022), rev’g in part T.C. Memo. 202073; Laidlaw’s Harley Davidson Sales, Inc. v. Commissioner , 29 F.4th 1066, 1071– 74 …
  9. Notice 2008-113 — This notice provides taxpayers the ability to correct certain operational failures to comply with section 409A of the Code, or to limit the amount of additiona…
    IRCNoticesModified Dec 22, 2008
    …ecurities and Exchange Commission under § 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, 15 USC 78p, without regard to whether the service recipient has any class of equity securities registered under § 12 of such Act, 15 USC 78l. See 17 CFR § 240.16a-1(a) (beneficial owner) and (f) (officer). In the case of a …
  10. Notice 2007-100 — This notice provides transition relief and guidance on the correction of certain failures of a nonqualified deferred compensation plan to comply with section 4…
    IRCNoticesObsolete Dec 26, 2007
    …ecurities and Exchange Commission under § 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, 15 USC 78p, without regard to whether the service recipient has any class of equity securities registered under § 12 of such Act, 15 USC 78l. See 17 CFR § 240.16a-1(a) (beneficial owner) and (f) (officer). In the case of a …
  11. 88 FR 60018 — Increased Credit or Deduction Amounts for Satisfying Certain Prevailing Wage and Registered Apprenticeship Requirements
    IRCProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Aug 30, 2023related by meaning
    payroll records would not provide the IRS with useful information and would also involve substantial burdens for taxpayers to report such information. Comments are requested on the requirements in the proposed regulations, including specifically, whether there are less burdensome alternatives that ensure the IRS has su…
  12. Ann. 2005-33 — This document contains corrections to final regulations (T.D. 9166, 2005-8 I.R.B. 558) under section 9801 of the Code governing portability requirements for gr…
    IRCAnnouncementsMay 9, 2005
    …ALTH PLANS Par. 1. The authority citation for part 2590 continues to read as follows: Authority: 29 USC 1027, 1059, 1135, 1161-1168, 1169, 1181-1183, 1181 note, 1185, 1185a, 1185b, 1191, 1191a, 1191b, and 1191c, sec. 101(g), Public Law 104-191, 101 Stat. 1936; sec. 401(b), Public Law 105-200, 112 Stat. 645 (42 USC 651 …
  13. ERISA § 305(g)(4) (29 U.S.C. § 1085) — Additional funding rules for multiemployer plans in endangered status or critical status
    ERISACode / StatuteJan 24, 2020
    …aph (3) shall continue to be disregarded in determining the highest contribution rate under section 1399(c) of this title for plan years during which the plan was in endangered or critical status. (g)(5) (5) Simplified calculations The Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation shall prescribe simplified methods for the appl…
  14. 75 FR 41726 — Interim Final Rules for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers Relating to Coverage of Preventive Services Under the Patient Protection and Affordable…
    IRCFinal Rules (FR)Jul 19, 2010
    …ursuant to the authority contained in sections 2701 through 2763, 2791, and 2792 of the PHS Act (42 USC 300gg through 300gg-63, 300gg-91, and 300gg-92), as amended.
  15. ERISA § 4211(b)(3)(B)(ii)(II) (29 U.S.C. § 1391) — Methods for computing withdrawal liability
    PBGCCode / StatuteJan 6, 2017
    …sor determines in that plan year will not be assessed as a result of the operation of section 1389, 1399(c)(1)(B), or 1405 of this title against an employer to whom a notice described in section 1399 of this title has been sent, and
  16. T.C. Memo. 2011-58 — Erin N. Hellweg v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsMar 9, 2011related by meaning
    ds of thousands of dollars in DISC commissions each year from a well-established business, and a 25-percent share in a company receiving such a steady stream of income should have been worth a large amount. -28IV. Section 6662(a) Penalty Section 6662(a) and (b) (1) and (2) imposes an accuracyrelated penalty of 20 perce…
  17. 29 C.F.R. § 4000.21 — What are these rules for determining the filing or issuance date about?
    PBGCRegulationsJan 1, 2017
    …r than in the PBGC's own regulations (e.g., requirements under the Internal Revenue Code (Title 26, USC)). In meeting those requirements, you should follow any applicable rules under those requirements for determining the filing and issuance date. (Subpart A tells you what filing methods you may use for filings with us…
  18. T.C. Summary Opinion 2013-96 — Samuel & Lilian Brach v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsDec 2, 2013related by meaning
    or disbarment of any practitioner". 31 C.F.R. sec. 10.4(a)(2007). - 6 - or the Form 1099-R issued by Guardian.5 After preparing the return, Mr. Neuman reviewed it with petitioners, who then timely filed it. In March 2012 respondent issued to petitioners a notice of deficiency for 2010, determining a deficiency of $6,94…
  19. 29 C.F.R. § 4000.26(b) — What if I use a commercial delivery service?
    PBGCRegulationsJan 1, 2017
    …t use a “designated delivery service” under section 7502(f) of the Internal Revenue Code (Title 26, USC). Our Web site, http://www.pbgc.gov, lists those designated delivery services. You should make sure that both the provider and the particular type of delivery (such as two-day delivery) are designated.
  20. 29 C.F.R. § 4000.41 — What are these computation-of-time rules about?
    PBGCRegulationsJan 22, 2018
    …r than in the PBGC's own regulations (e.g., requirements under the Internal Revenue Code (Title 26, USC)). In meeting those requirements, you should follow any applicable computation-of-time rules under those other requirements. (Subpart A tells you what filing methods you may use for filings with us. Subpart B tells y…