Brief Case

Search the Pension Law Library

Limit to:Advanced options
Searches the code/regs in effect on that date.
Words mode supports "quoted phrases", +required and -excluded terms.
Document types:
Go to I.R.C. § 7528 (not yet in the library — opens the official source)
72 documents · 0.25sAllIRCERISAPBGCJoint Board
  1. Rev. Proc. 2019-4 — This procedure contains revised procedures for determination letters and letter rulings issued by the Commissioner, Tax Exempt Agreements Office. Rev. Proc. 20…
    IRCRevenue ProceduresJan 2, 2019
    …NG ADVICE FROM EMPLOYEE PLANS RULINGS AND AGREEMENTS? Legislation authorizing user fees .01 Section 7528 directs the Secretary of the Treasury or a delegate (the “Secretary”) to establish a program requiring the payment of user fees for requests to Employee Plans Rulings and Agreements for letter rulings, opinion lette…
  2. Rev. Proc. 2018-4 — This procedure contains revised procedures for determination letters and letter rulings issued by the Commissioner, Tax Exempt and Government Entities Division…
    IRCRevenue ProceduresJan 2, 2018
    …NG ADVICE FROM EMPLOYEE PLANS RULINGS AND AGREEMENTS? Legislation authorizing user fees .01 Section 7528 directs the Secretary of the Treasury or a delegate (the “Secretary”) to establish a program requiring the payment of user fees for requests to Employee Plans Rulings and Agreements for letter rulings, opinion lette…
  3. T.C. Summary Opinion 2006-8 — Terry Fred Burnham v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJan 26, 2006related by meaning
    ate are treated as payments not received as an annuity and are taxable. Sec. 72(e)(2)(A). There is simply not sufficient information in this record to reach a conclusion whether some portion of the $8,000 payment is not includable in income. The Court and respondent encouraged - 10 - petitioner to provide sufficient in…
  4. Rev. Proc. 2017-4 — This procedure contains consolidated and revised procedures for determination letters and letter rulings issued by the Commissioner, Tax Exempt and Government …
    IRCRevenue ProceduresJan 3, 2017
    …NG ADVICE FROM EMPLOYEE PLANS RULINGS AND AGREEMENTS? Legislation authorizing user fees .01 Section 7528 directs the Secretary of the Treasury or a delegate (the “Secretary”) to establish a program requiring the payment of user fees for requests to Employee Plans Rulings and Agreements for letter rulings, opinion lette…
  5. 144 T.C. No. 9 — Ralim S. El v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsMar 12, 2015related by meaning
    nd.8 SSeveral recent cases cite Bunney v. Commissioner, 114 T.C. 259, 265 (2000) (citing Matthews v. Commissioner, 92 T.C. 351, 361-362 (1989), aff'd, 907 F.2d 1173 (D.C. Cir. 1990)), where we held that the taxpayer "has the burden of proving his entitlement to any of * * * [the sec. 72(t)(2)(A)] exceptions." Sg g, Hyd…
  6. T.C. Memo. 2024-24 — James Elbert Aldridge, Jr. & Shirley Lorraine Aldridge v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsFeb 21, 2024related by meaning
    is obtained on or before the date the IRS issues a notice of deficiency.”), aff’ g in part, rev’g in part and remanding T.C. Memo. 2020-99; Kroner v. Commissioner, 48 F.4th 1272, 1276– 81 (11th Cir. 2022), rev’g in part T.C. Memo. 202073; Laidlaw’s Harley Davidson Sales, Inc. v. Commissioner , 29 F.4th 1066, 1071– 74 …
  7. T.C. Memo. 2017-5 — Brian E. Harriss v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJan 5, 2017related by meaning
    n has been previously rejected by this Court as baseless and subject to the imposition of sec. 6673 penalties. See Waltner v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2014-35, , __ F. App'x __, 2016 WL 5800492 (9th Cir. Oct. 5, 2016); Nelson v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2012-232, M, 540 F. App'x 924 (11th Cir. 2013). - 10 - [*10] suppo…
  8. 97 T.C. 237; 97 T.C. No. 14 — Guilzon v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsAug 6, 1991related by meaning
    f the matter is that the payment in question should be taxable to petitioner under section 72(e). Accordingly, we sustain respondent’s determination.6 In order to take into account what appear to be mechanical errors in respondent’s calculations and to afford the parties a further opportunity to resolve the question of…
  9. T.C. Memo. 2008-142 — Michael Cabirac v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsMay 22, 2008related by meaning
    Internal Revenue Code . Accordingly, petitioner is liable for the section 6662 penalty . In 2002, petitioner received distributions from a retiremen t plan . Pursuant to section 72(t), a 10H-percent additional tax is i 6 - imposed upon such distributions unless the distributions meet the requirements of one of the exce…
  10. T.C. Summary Opinion 2005-108 — Magellean Askew, Jr. v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsAug 1, 2005related by meaning
    his annuity policies. As stated earlier, section 72(e)(5) applies to the surrender of an annuity contract. See sec. 72(e)(5)(E). Absent exceptions not applicable in the instant case, the law is well settled that a distribution upon the complete surrender of an annuity contract is includable in gross income to the exten…
  11. T.C. Memo. 2000-250 — Susan Jane Hoyez, C.P.A. v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsAug 10, 2000related by meaning
    6, 682 (1977); Pawlak v. Commissioner , T.C. Memo. 1995-7. Finally, there is no indication - 8 - 2 Petitioner contends that under IRS Publication 560, Retirement Plans for the Self-Employed, contributions can be retroactively applied to the previous year if the contributions are made by the due date of the employer’s r…
  12. 74 T.C. 651 — Judd v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJul 8, 1980related by meaning
    minations should also be within our jurisdiction. Regardless of the logic of petitioners’ position, we are constrained to deny their motion to vacate. The United States Tax Court has limited jurisdiction. See sec. 7442. Under this jurisdictional umbrella fall generally income, estate, gift, and miscellaneous excise tax…
  13. 89 FR 54284 — Statutory Disallowance of Deductions for Certain Qualified Conservation Contributions Made by Partnerships and S Corporations
    IRCFinal Rules (FR)Jun 28, 2024related by meaning
    rior to the qualified conservation contribution, and (3) the complexity of the computations. i. Inclusion of Section 752 Liabilities in Modified Basis Section 170(h)(7)(B)(ii)(II) provides that modified basis is determined without regard to section 752. Section 752(a) provides that any increase in a partner's share of …
  14. 108 T.C. No. 5 — George & Elam Campbell v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsFeb 18, 1997related by meaning
    ioner's retirement distribution's being taxed twice. We think petitioners' contention is meritorious. Here we take note of the long-standing principle that double taxation is to be avoided unless expressly intended by Congress. E.g., Maass v. Higgins , 312 U.S. 443, 449 (1941); United States v. Supplee-Biddle Hardware …
  15. 82 T.C. 843; 82 T.C. No. 65 — Green v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsMay 30, 1984related by meaning
    ents of section 2039(c)(3). Due to concessions and in order to reflect petitioner’s claim for an overpayment, Decision will be entered under Rule 155. Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 as amended and in effect at the date of death, and all references to Rules ar…
  16. T.C. Memo. 1998-336 — Robert A. & Laverne M. Hall v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsSep 22, 1998related by meaning
    nerally presumed correct. Rule 142(a); Welch v. Helvering , 290 U.S. 111, 115 (1933). Furthermore, every item of a person's gross income is subject to Federal income tax unless there is a statute or some rule of law that exempts the person or the item from gross income. HCSC- Laundry v. United States , 450 U.S. 1, 5 (1…
  17. T.C. Memo. 2018-138 — Larry W. Macdonald v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsAug 27, 2018related by meaning
    arguments to justify them. We therefore hold that petitioner - 10 - [*10] is liable for the penalty for an underpayment attributable to a substantial understatement of income tax under section 6662(a) and (b)(2) for each year. V. Section 6673 Sanction Respondent moved that the Court impose sanctions against petitioner…
  18. 77 T.C. 1197; 2 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2188 — Shut Out Dee-Fence, Inc. v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsDec 2, 1981related by meaning
    of Claims, or the district court of the United States for the District of Columbia may make a declaration with respect to such initial qualification.” It is clear that Congress intended that the procedures under secs. 7476 and 7428 be similar. See S. Rept. 94-938 (1976), 1976-3 C.B. (Vol. 3) 624-627); H. Rept. 94-658 (…
  19. T.C. Memo. 2020-1 — Clark J. Gebman & Rebecca Gebman v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJan 2, 2020related by meaning
    er. Mrs. Gebman did not provide any evidence that persuades us that she meets the requirements for relief. Accordingly, Mrs. Gebman is not entitled to relief under section 6015(f), and we will deny her motion for leave to file amendment to petition filed August 28, 2019. VI. Section 6662(a) Penalties Section 6662(a) an…
  20. Rev. Proc. 2014-8 — User fees for employee plans and exempt organizations. Current guidance for complying with the user fee program of the Service as it pertains to requests for l…
    IRCRevenue ProceduresJan 2, 2014
    …03(b) volume submitter plans). SECTION 3. BACKGROUND .01 Legislation authorizing user fees. Section 7528 of the Code directs the Secretary of the Treasury or delegate (the “Secretary”) to establish a program requiring the payment of user fees for requests to the Service for letter rulings, opinion letters, determinatio…