Brief Case

Search the Pension Law Library

Limit to:Advanced options
Searches the code/regs in effect on that date.
Words mode supports "quoted phrases", +required and -excluded terms.
Document types:
Go to 51 T.C. 352 (not yet in the library — opens the official source)
89 documents · 0.22sAllIRCERISAPBGCJoint Board
  1. T.C. Memo. 2005-298 — Isabelle Bichindaritz v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsDec 29, 2005related by meaning
    d the $1,916 payment as a qualified retirement contribution to an individual retirement account (IRA). She contended in her pretrial memorandum and at trial that she properly deducted that amount as an IRA contribution. In the opening brief, respondent argued that section 219(g)(5) limits IRA deductions for active part…
  2. PLR 200648028 — Definitions and Special Rules
    IRCPrivate Letter RulingsDec 1, 2006
    …em were to be shut down. Law and Analysis : In Estate of Necastro v. Commissioner , T.C. Memo. 1994-352, the court considered the extent to which potential environmental clean up costs for solid waste were to be taken into account in determining the value of the decedent’s property. In applying the “willing buyer-willi…
  3. Treas. Reg. § 1.401(a)(4)-13(c)(6) — Effective dates and fresh-start rules.
    IRCRegulationsMay 18, 2016
    …ars of service after 1994 ((0.75 percent × $32,000 × 1 year) + (1.4 percent × $8,000 × 1 year), or $352); or(2) $3,872, the amended formula applied to Employee M's total years of service ((0.75 percent × $32,000 × 11 years) + (1.4 percent × $8,000 × 11 years)). Example 2.(a) Employer Y maintains a defined benefit plan,…
  4. 154 T.C. No. 6 — Sandra M. Conard v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsMar 10, 2020related by meaning
    sis test. FIe] , further, as applied to P, I.R.C. sec. 72(t) is valid because the age and disability classifications established by the statute bear a reasonable relationship to a legitimate Government purpose. Sandra M. Conard, pro se. Scott W. Forbord and Mark J. Miller, for respondent. OPINION TORO, Judge: A taxpaye…
  5. 101 T.C. 189; 101 T.C. No. 12 — Lee Eng'g Supply Co. v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsAug 30, 1993related by meaning
    inciples, and such a transfer will subject the employer to the excise tax on employer reversions." H. Rept. 100-391, at 143 (1987) (emphasis added). 4 *66 We recognize that Notice 88-58, supra, was released after the year in issue. It is clear, however, from the face of the statute as well as from the legislative histo…
  6. T.C. Memo. 1997-346 — William L. Reese v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJul 29, 1997related by meaning
    rences are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the year in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure. The issues for decision are (1) whether a pension plan distribution to petitioner is taxable pursuant to section 402(a)(1) and whether petitioner is liable for a 10-perc…
  7. T.C. Memo. 2016-10 — Family Chiropractic Sports Injury & Rehab Clinic, Inc. v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJan 19, 2016related by meaning
    ble to a participant or beneficiary. M sec. 1.401(a)-13(c)(1), Income Tax Regs. We clearly described the antialientation procedures under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), Pub. L. No. 93-406, 88 Stat. - 14 - [*14] 829, 29 U.S.C. sec. 1001 (2006), and the Internal Revenue Code in Gallade v. Co…
  8. T.C. Memo. 2012-13 — John K. Goyak & Associates, Inc. v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJan 11, 2012
    …and (5) was an ordinary expense. See Commissioner v. Lincoln Sav. & Loan Association, 403 U.S. 345, 352 (1971); Welch v. Helvering, 290 U.S. 111, 113-115 (1933). Whether an expenditure satisfies each
  9. 91 FR 16088 — Fiduciary Duties in Selecting Designated Investment Alternatives
    ERISAProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Mar 31, 2026
    …nformation.” (emphasis added)). Back to Citation 46.   See, e.g., In re WorldCom, Inc. Sec. Litig., 352 F. Supp. 2d 472, 478 n.3 (S.D.N.Y. 2005) (finding that the FASB is “the designated organization in the private sector for establishing standards of financial accounting and reporting”). Back to Citation 47.
  10. 73 T.C. 758 — Tionesta Sand & Gravel, Inc. v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJan 31, 1980related by meaning
    that in Community Services. Because that case was not decided under section 401(a)(7), its holding has no bearing on our decision of the instant case. Since the trustees are also shareholders, directors, and employees participating in the plan, petitioner contends that the State law principles of fiduciary duty prevent…
  11. IRCCourt RulingsAug 3, 1979related by meaning
    Chabot, Judge: Respondent determined deficiencies in petitioners’ Federal income tax and in excise tax under section 4973(a) for 1975, as follows: Deficiencies in— Docket No. Petitioners Income tax gi 6173-77 John L. Guest .$437.60 9115-77 James Ventresca and Jordy L. Ventresca . 296.00 Jerome Kobos . 286.18 Edward And…
  12. 78 T.C. 979; 78 T.C. No. 69 — Ruggere v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJun 14, 1982related by meaning
    nder the Sixth and Ninth Amendments of the Constitution were not violated by our actions in the instant case. Decision will be entered under Rule 155. By stipulation, respondent concedes that the $1,562 figure is the product of an erroneous computation in the statutory notice of deficiency and that should respondent pr…
  13. 86 T.C. 980; 86 T.C. No. 60 — Estate of Rosenberg v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsMay 19, 1986related by meaning
    4); Estate of English v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1985-549, 50 T.C.M. 1362, 54 P-H Memo T.C. par. 85,549. Decision will he entered for the respondent. While the constitutional issue was the only argument raised in the petition with respect to the dispute over inclusion of the lump-sum payment, we deal also with the two…
  14. T.C. Summary Opinion 2003-83 — Manuel Francisco Palomo & Jane Lyon Potter v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJun 24, 2003related by meaning
    tract unless such amounts are specifically excluded from gross income under other provisions of chapter 1 of the Code. The burden is on petitioners to demonstrate that the payments in question fall into a specific statutory exclusion. See Commissioner v. Glenshaw Glass Co. , 348 U.S. at 429-431. Under section 72(t), a …
  15. 71 T.C. 824; 1 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2016 — Tamko Asphalt Products, Inc. v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsFeb 15, 1979related by meaning
    loyees, which have less generous plans or no plans at all, this would generally constitute an impermissable discrimination. * * * [Emphasis supplied.] We believe that a fair reading of section 414(b) would have alerted petitioner to the fact that such section requires, inter alia, that an affiliated group- comprised of…
  16. T.C. Memo. 2001-55 — Taylor Miller v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsMar 6, 2001related by meaning
    claim to a pension plan contribution deduction on that ground forecloses her claim that she is entitled to an above-the-line Schedule C deduction for legal fees, rather than the itemized deduction subject to the 2percent limitation of section 67 that respondent allowed in the statutory notice. To give effect to all the…
  17. T.C. Memo. 2001-34 — Andrew P. & Roseanne L. Gallagher v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsFeb 13, 2001
    …RA distributions. See Arnold v. Commissioner , supra at 255; Deal v. Commissioner , T.C. Memo. 1999-352; Pulliam v.
  18. 74 T.C. 651 — Judd v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJul 8, 1980related by meaning
    2,300. All statutory references are to the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 as in effect during the year in issue. Sec. 6652(c) states in pertinent part: (c) Failure To Report Tips. — In the case of failure by an employee to report to his employer on the date and in the manner prescribed therefor any amount of tips requir…
  19. T.C. Summary Opinion 2002-66 — Milagros Z. Gueco v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJun 10, 2002related by meaning
    T.C. Summary Opinion 2002-66 UNITED STATES TAX COURT MILAGROS Z. GUECO, Petitioner v . COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 545-01S. Filed June 10, 2002. Milagros Z. Gueco, pro se. James N. Beyer , for respondent. DINAN, Special Trial Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section …
  20. PLR 200931049 — Ten or More Employer Plan Exception
    IRCPrivate Letter RulingsJul 31, 2009
    …nse; and (5) was an ordinary expense. Commissioner v. Lincoln Savings & Loan Assoc. , 403 U.S. 345, 352 (1971); T.J. Enterprises, Inc. v. Commissioner , 101 T.C. 581, 587 (1993). Prior to the effective date of §§ 419 and 419A, an employer which maintained a funded welfare benefit arrangement typically would claim a ded…