Brief Case

Search the Pension Law Library

Limit to:Advanced options
Searches the code/regs in effect on that date.
Words mode supports "quoted phrases", +required and -excluded terms.
Document types:
Go to 64 T.C. 564 (not yet in the library — opens the official source)
85 documents · 0.24sAllIRCERISAPBGCJoint Board
  1. T.C. Memo. 2023-140 — Kunjlata J. Jadhav & Jalandar Y. Jadhav v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsNov 21, 2023
    …nd that the weight of the evidence favors petitioners here . See Diaz v. Commissioner, 58 T.C. 560, 564 (1972) (observing that the process of distilling truth from the testimony of witnesses, whose demeanor we
  2. T.C. Memo. 2013-10 — Robert A. & Pearl Fletcher v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJan 14, 2013★ strong match
    Mr. Villasenor was injured on or about May 13, 2000. Although the file is much more extensive than that of Ms. Muriel and it appears that petitioners hired and paid attorneys through 20 3 to handle the appeal of the worker's compensation claim, Ms. Strick's name does not appear on any of the documents, and she did not…
  3. T.C. Memo. 1996-365 — Timothy W. & Suzanne M. Coffield v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsAug 8, 1996related by meaning
    to the Internal Revenue Code by section 302 of the Taxpayer Bill of Rights 2, Pub. L. 104-168, authorizes this Court to review the Secretary's failure to abate interest with respect to requests for abatement after July 30, 1996. Because this case does not involve a request for abatement after July 30, 1996, we lack jur…
  4. 154 T.C. No. 6 — Sandra M. Conard v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsMar 10, 2020related by meaning
    sis test. FIe] , further, as applied to P, I.R.C. sec. 72(t) is valid because the age and disability classifications established by the statute bear a reasonable relationship to a legitimate Government purpose. Sandra M. Conard, pro se. Scott W. Forbord and Mark J. Miller, for respondent. OPINION TORO, Judge: A taxpaye…
  5. U.S. Tax Court — Vincent Marquez v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsMay 20, 2009related by meaning
    flimited by sec . 72(p)(2)(A) to one .- half of his retirement account balance . 1, applies,,in this case . Petitioner is subject to the section 72(t) additional tax . To ; reflect our disposition of the issues , Decision will be entere d it, for respondent . r
  6. 108 T.C. No. 25 — Billy & Ruth Johnson v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJun 17, 1997
    …o. 2546-94 Addition to Tax Penalty Sec. Sec. Year Deficiency 6651(a)(1) 6662(a) 1990 $17,820 --- $3,564 1991 10,263 --- 2,053 Young & Young, Ltd.(Young & Young), docket No. 5754-94 Addition to Tax Penalty Sec. Sec. Year Deficiency 6651(a)(1) 6662(a) 1989 $12,744 $637 $2,549 Howard S. Young & Elaine P. Young (the Youngs…
  7. T.C. Memo. 2005-173 — Transport Labor Contract/Leasing, Inc. & Subsidiaries v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJul 14, 2005related by meaning
    ld a second trial at which petitioner would introduce new evidence in support of that position. With respect to petitioner's tax duplication argument, petitioner asserts: As a result of the Court's Opinion in this case and without a Rule 155 proceeding, respondent will be in a windfall position-it will have collected t…
  8. 66 T.C. 348 — Comprehensive Designers International, Ltd. v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsMay 26, 1976related by meaning
    poses of this case, that the credit which petitioner will obtain is precisely equal to the amount of the creditable foreign taxes in terms of dollars. For the reasons stated, we hold that the foreign tax credit available to petitioner for fiscal 1967 should be adjusted to reflect the dollar cost on the payment date of …
  9. T.C. Memo. 2005-258 — Joyce M. Thomas v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsNov 1, 2005related by meaning
    ficiency for the years in issue. Respondent determined that petitioner was liable for additional taxes of $499 and $5,215 for early distributions from her IRAs for 1999 and 2000, respectively. Respondent also determined that petitioner was liable for additions to tax under sections 6651(a)(1) and 6654(a), as set out ab…
  10. Treas. Reg. § 1.401(a)(9)-6(m)(4)(ii)(A) — Required minimum distributions for defined benefit plans and annuity contracts.
    IRCRegulationsSep 17, 2024
    …000 $400,000 2029 954,545 $408,000 $404,000 $18,957 389,043 2030 909,306 396,824 392,933 19,260 377,564 2031 864,291 385,115 381,339 19,462 365,653 2032 819,740 372,966 369,310 19,765 353,201 2033 775,430 360,265 356,733 19,955 340,310 2034 731,620 347,116 343,713 20,257 326,859 Table 5 to Paragraph (m)(4)(ii)(A) Year …
  11. 73 T.C. 40 — La Fargue v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsOct 10, 1979related by meaning
    Tannenwald, Judge: Respondent determined deficiencies in the Federal income tax of petitioner for 1971, 1972, and 1973 in the respective amounts of $3,576.58, $4,052.04, and $3,912 together with negligence penalties under section 6653(a). The negligence penalties have been conceded by respondent, and capital loss adjus…
  12. Treas. Reg. § 54.9825-3T — Definitions (temporary).
    IRCRegulationsDec 23, 2021
    …rand prescription drug” includes a drug with Emergency Use Authorization issued pursuant to section 564 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 360bbb-3), and that is generally marketed under a proprietary, trademark-protected name. The term “brand prescription drug” includes drugs that the U.S. Food and…
  13. 88 T.C. 548; 88 T.C. No. 28 — Porter v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsMar 5, 1987related by meaning
    tions and are administered in a manner identical to the manner in which the payments to article III judges in regular active service are administered. Accordingly, petitioners are not here receiving the double tax benefit Congress sought to prevent by section 219(b)(2)(A). Having decided that petitioners are entitled t…
  14. T.C. Memo. 1998-399 — Ronny H. & Charlotte A. Schmalzer v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsNov 10, 1998related by meaning
    tstanding rollover involved in this case. Accordingly, the amount of excludable basis in the instant case is computed by multiplying the amount of the distribution $6,100 by a fraction the numerator of which is $1,950 and the denominator of which is $1,374.53 plus $6,100, resulting in an amount excludable of $1,591.40.…
  15. T.C. Memo. 2022-9 — Hoops, LP, Heisley Member, Inc, Tax Matters Partner v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsFeb 23, 2022
    …d compensation liability is taken into account. See JP Morgan Chase & Co. v. Commissioner, 458 F.3d 564, 568 (7th Cir. 2006) , aff’g in part , vacating in part , and remanding Bank One Corp. v. Commissioner, 120 T.C. 174 (2003) . As discussed in the previous section, section 404(a)(5) is the applicable Code provision t…
  16. 74 T.C. 651 — Judd v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJul 8, 1980related by meaning
    minations should also be within our jurisdiction. Regardless of the logic of petitioners’ position, we are constrained to deny their motion to vacate. The United States Tax Court has limited jurisdiction. See sec. 7442. Under this jurisdictional umbrella fall generally income, estate, gift, and miscellaneous excise tax…
  17. 148 T.C. No. 14 — John C. Trimmer & Susan Trimmer v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsApr 20, 2017related by meaning
    5). 28See, e.g., Priv. Ltr. Rul. 201535029 (Aug. 28, 2015) (waiver granted to taxpayer suffering from "mild cognitive impairment and moderate clinical depression", who was "not aware that he did not roll over Amount 1 to another IRA until his tax return for 2013 was being prepared"); Priv. Ltr. Rul. 201323044 (June 7, …
  18. T.C. Memo. 1996-556 — Alfred P. Duffy v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsDec 23, 1996related by meaning
    1 Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the taxable year in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure. T.C. Memo. 1996-556 UNITED STATES TAX COURT ALFRED P. DUFFY, Petitioner v . COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respo…
  19. T.C. Memo. 2012-104 — Jerald W. & Claudia K. White v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsApr 11, 2012
    … 2003, the accumulation value4 of Dr. and Mrs. White's Indianapolis Life policies was $642,220.87 ($564,655.36 for Dr. White's and $77,565.51 for Mrs. White's). The Indianapolis Life annual report indicates that as of September 15, 2003, the policy on Dr. White's life had a guaranteed cash and surrendër value of $127,9…
  20. T.C. Memo. 2007-292 — Hubert Joubert v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsSep 24, 2007related by meaning
    )(2) addition to tax . The sec . 6651(a)(2) addition to tax was listed only in the Form 4549, Income Tax Examination Changes, which was included as an attachment to the notice of deficiency . Suffice it to note that respondent raised the sec . 6651(a)(2) addition to tax in his answer, albeit while misciting that sectio…