IRCCourt RulingsApr 25, 1972related by meaning
ecision will ~be entered for the petitioners.
unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as amended. This date is at variance with the date shown on the acceptance, Dec. 31, 1963. However, the parties agree by stipulation that the application was accepted on Dec. 31, 19…
IRCCourt RulingsJan 13, 1999related by meaning
tions. Sec. 72(t)(3)(A).
or after the death of the employee; (3) attributable to the
employee's being disabled within the meaning of section 72(m)(7); (4) part of a series of substantially equal periodic payments
(not less frequently than annually) made for the life (or life
expectancy) of the employee or joint lives (…
IRCCourt RulingsJan 17, 2024related by meaning
Title 26 U.S.C. (Code) , in effect at all relevant times, and Rule references are to
the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .
Served 01/17/24
2 [* 2 ] deficiencies under section 4973 in th e aggregate amount of
$8,476,705 . The notices also determined additions to tax under section
6651(a)(1) and (2) and accurac…
IRCCourt RulingsJul 8, 1980related by meaning
minations should also be within our jurisdiction. Regardless of the logic of petitioners’ position, we are constrained to deny their motion to vacate. The United States Tax Court has limited jurisdiction. See sec. 7442. Under this jurisdictional umbrella fall generally income, estate, gift, and miscellaneous excise tax…
IRCCourt RulingsAug 8, 1996related by meaning
to the Internal Revenue
Code by section 302 of the Taxpayer Bill of Rights 2, Pub. L.
104-168, authorizes this Court to review the Secretary's failure to abate interest with respect to requests for abatement after
July 30, 1996. Because this case does not involve a request for
abatement after July 30, 1996, we lack jur…
IRCCourt RulingsOct 16, 2017related by meaning
ord contained no loan documents or other evidence showing that the
distribution was evidenced by a legally enforceable agreement).
III. Additional Tax Section 72(t)(1) imposes a 10% additional tax on early distributions from
qualified retirement plans. Section 72(t)(2), however, sets forth specific
exceptions to the ge…
IRCCourt RulingsOct 9, 2007related by meaning
ers . In response to
our leniency, petitioner once again ignored our Rules and our
order .
-5On account of petitioner 's repeated failure to obey ou r Rules and orders, we considered dismissing this case as a
sanction pursuant to Rule 123(b) . See Stringer v . Commissioner ,
84 T .C . 693, 704-705 (1985), affd . withou…
IRCCourt RulingsNov 13, 1998related by meaning
s in which taxpayers have
sought to avoid the 10-percent additional tax under section
72(t). We repeatedly have ruled that we are bound by the list of statutory exceptions to section 72(t) contained in section
72(t)(2)(A). See, e.g., Clark v. Commissioner
, 101 T.C. 215,
224-225 (1993); Vorwald v. Commissioner
, T.C. M…
IRCCourt RulingsAug 3, 1979related by meaning
155.
Decisions will be entered for the respondent in docket Nos. 6173-77 and 11438-77.
Decision will be entered under Rule 155 inI docket No. 9115-77. Unless indicated otherwise, all section references are to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as in effect for the taxable year in issue.
Respondent concedes …
IRCCourt RulingsOct 11, 1995related by meaning
tion that petitioners
are liable for the 10-percent additional tax imposed by section
72(t).
Section 72(t) provides for a 10-percent additional tax on early distributions from qualified retirement plans. Paragraph
(1), which imposes the tax, provides in relevant part as follows:
(1) Imposition of Additional Tax.--If an…
IRCCourt RulingsOct 1, 2015related by meaning
ioner, 106 T.C. 337, 340 (1996) (citing and discussing the legislative
history underlying section 408(f), the statutory predecessor to section 72(t)); Milner v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2004-111.
Section 72(t)(2)(B) provides an exception to the imposition of additional tax
to the extent that retirement plan distributio…
IRCCourt RulingsMar 15, 2004related by meaning
tutory scheme itself suggests that other liberties should
not be indiscriminately inserted through the judicial process.
Cf. Larotonda v. Commissioner , 89 T.C. 287 (1987) (interpreting
former section 72(m)(5), a penalty provision without the list now
contained in section 72(t)(2), and largely limited to its facts
by o…
IRCCourt RulingsApr 26, 2012related by meaning
ed in section 274(d). Sanford v. Commissioner, 50 T.C. 823, 827 (1968),
aff'd per curiam, 412 F.2d 201 (2d Cir. 1969); Rodriguez v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2009-22 (the strict substantiation requirements of section 274(d) preclude
the Court and taxpayers from approximating certain expenses).
r
- 12 -
Petitioners' tabl…
IRCCourt RulingsNov 22, 2005related by meaning
sioner
,
111 T.C. 250, 255 (1998); Gallagher v. Commissioner
, T.C. Memo.
2001-34; Deal v. Commissioner
, T.C. Memo. 1999-352; Pulliam v.
Commissioner , T.C. Memo. 1996-354. As the legislative history of
section 408(f), the predecessor to section 72(t), explains, the
- 6 -
purpose of the 10-percent additional tax was t…
IRCCourt RulingsSep 15, 2005related by meaning
ion of
penalties. Florida Hospital Trust Fund v.
Commissioner, * * * 103 T.C. 140 (1994).
The issue in the present cases is not whether this Court has jurisdiction over different aspects of petitioners' tax status,
but whether we have jurisdiction over the section 6652(c)(1)
penalty. None of the above-listed instances …
IRCCourt RulingsJan 26, 1984related by meaning
shall not apply to amounts described in clause (ii) of subparagraph (A) of section 72(mX5) to the extent that section 72(mX5) applies to such amounts. (J) Unrealized appreciation op employer securities. — In the case of any distribution including securities of the employer corporation which, without regard to the requi…
IRCCourt RulingsJul 25, 2005related by meaning
settlement
agreement is not a qualified domestic order, and Mr. Ahmad is not
an alternate payee, the exception in section 72(t)(2)(C) is
inapplicable. In light of the foregoing, the Court holds that petitioners
are liable for the 10-percent additional tax imposed under
section 72(t).
Reviewed and adopted as the report …
IRCCourt RulingsApr 22, 2003related by meaning
to section 72(t)(2)(C) for relief.
It does not appear that any of the statutory exceptions to
the application of section 72(t) apply in this case, and petitioner has not suggested otherwise.
- 7 -
The Court concurs in respondent's determination that
petitioner is subject to the 10-percent additional tax on an
early dis…
IRCCourt RulingsMar 5, 1987related by meaning
amended and in effect during the years in issue. Unless otherwise indicated, all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure. Our references to secs. 371 and 372 of the Judicial Code are to those sections as in effect during 1980 and 1981. Sec. 372 of the Judicial Code was amended twice by acts…
IRCCourt RulingsMay 13, 2004related by meaning
ssued to petitioner by USPS.
Petitioner filed a timely 2000 Federal income tax return.
In addition to other items, the distribution is included in the income reported on that return. The Federal income tax reported
on her 2000 return does not include the additional tax imposed by
section 72(t). In the notice of deficie…