PBGCRegulationsJan 1, 2017
…r than in the PBGC's own regulations (e.g., requirements under the Internal Revenue Code (Title 26, USC)). In meeting those requirements, you should follow any applicable rules under those requirements for determining the filing and issuance date. (Subpart A tells you what filing methods you may use for filings with us…
88 FR 60018 — Increased Credit or Deduction Amounts for Satisfying Certain Prevailing Wage and Registered Apprenticeship Requirements IRCProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Aug 30, 2023related by meaning
ect to the requirement to submit an additional request after 120 days. The Treasury Department and the IRS request comments on this proposed approach. Consistent with section 45(b)(8)(D)(ii)(I), the proposed regulations would require that the request cannot have been denied because of a refusal of the taxpayer or any c…
PBGCRegulationsJan 1, 2017
…t use a “designated delivery service” under section 7502(f) of the Internal Revenue Code (Title 26, USC). Our Web site, http://www.pbgc.gov, lists those designated delivery services. You should make sure that both the provider and the particular type of delivery (such as two-day delivery) are designated.
PBGCRegulationsJan 22, 2018
…r than in the PBGC's own regulations (e.g., requirements under the Internal Revenue Code (Title 26, USC)). In meeting those requirements, you should follow any applicable computation-of-time rules under those other requirements. (Subpart A tells you what filing methods you may use for filings with us. Subpart B tells y…
ERISACode / StatuteJan 6, 2025related by meaning
(c)(10)(E) (E) Waiver by secretary .—In the case of a failure which is due to reasonable cause and not to willful neglect, the Secretary may waive part or all of the penalty imposed by subparagraph (A) to the extent that the payment of such penalty would be excessive relative to the failure involved.
(c)(10)(F) (F) Def…
Rev. Proc. 2025-3 — The revenue procedure updates Rev. Proc. 2024-3, 2024-1 I.R.B.143, to provide a revised list of areas under the jurisdiction of the Associate Chief Counsel (Co… IRCRevenue ProceduresDec 30, 2024related by meaning
ng in a change in beneficial interests causes the loss of GST exempt status or constitutes a taxable termination or taxable distribution under § 2612. (18) Sections 4966 and 4967.—Taxes on Taxable Distributions; Taxes on Prohibited Benefits.—Issues involving interpretation of §§ 4966 and 4967 regarding distributions fr…
IRCCourt RulingsNov 9, 2020related by meaning
require a signature. Commissioner v. Oswego Falls Corp., 71 F.2d 673 (2d Cir.
1934), 26 B.T.A. 60 (1932); see also Perlmutter v. Commissioner, 44 T.C. 382, 399-400 (1965), aff'd, 373 F.2d 45 (10th Cir. 1967).
Petitioner nonetheless argues that section 6212 requires all statutory notices
of deficiency to be signed by th…
IRCCourt RulingsNov 4, 1998related by meaning
s Opening Brief, Section VIII ARGUMENT, NOTE
11, on pages 78 and 79 at (b)(i)(ii), and “based on
information supplied” (Administrative Record, Exhibit 11-K, para. 1) instead of issuing a “timely” Letter of
Favorable Determination, based upon required
information supplied for determination of the “Entire
Plan As Amended…
IRCPrivate Letter RulingsApr 30, 2010
… April 01, 2010 2:59:47 PM
To: ------------------
Cc:
Subject: RE: ERISA question
The pr ovision 29 USC 1104(b) that you are referring to is section 404(b) of ERISA, that provides that
no fiduciary may maintain the indicia of ownership of any assets of a plan outside the jurisdiction of the
District Courts of the U.S.,…
IRCCourt RulingsSep 9, 1998related by meaning
s and claims against a
debtor's estate. Sec. 507(a)(8) of the Bankruptcy Code provides
a priority for unsecured claims of governmental units for taxes measured by income or gross receipts within the time periods set
forth therein.
by respondent's motion for the reason explained below. However,
because no justiciable is…
78 FR 68240 — Final Rules Under the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008; Technical Amendment to External Review for Multi-… IRCFinal Rules (FR)Nov 13, 2013
…ursuant to the authority contained in sections 2701 through 2763, 2791, and 2792 of the PHS Act (42 USC 300gg through 300gg-63, 300gg-91, and 300gg-92), as amended.
List of Subjects
26 CFR Part 54
Excise taxes
Health care
Health insurance
Pensions
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements
29 CFR Part 2590
Continuation c…
88 FR 88494 — Federal Independent Dispute Resolution (IDR) Process Administrative Fee and Certified IDR Entity Fee Ranges IRCFinal Rules (FR)Dec 21, 2023
…the No Surprises Act.
U.S.C.-Brookings Schaeffer on Health Policy.
https://www.brookings.edu/blog/usc-brookings-schaeffer-on-health-policy/2021/03/16/recommendations-for-implementing-the-no-surprises-act/.
IRCCourt RulingsFeb 9, 2023related by meaning
the Treasury Department to
respond appropriately to comments regarding the timin g of the deferral
election is irrelevant to the current case.
VII. C onclusion
As explained above, some of petitioner’s arguments involve a
general challenge to the entire regulation 26 C.F.R. sec. 1.482-1(h)(2)
(2006). This regulation wa…
PBGCPBGC Opinion LettersSep 30, 1994
…( 4)( B)>
421 9 N otice & Co llection o f W ithdraw al Liab ility
422 1 Reso lution of Disputes
>29 USC 1461 n ote >
OP INI ON :
I
wri te i n res ponse t o your reque st for the opini on
of the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation ("PBG C").
Your
fir st r equest c oncerns a par ticu lar
applicat ion of t he princ iples…
75 FR 38700 — Excise Taxes on Prohibited Tax Shelter Transactions and Related Disclosure Requirements; Disclosure Requirements With Respect to Prohibited Tax Shelter Transac… IRCFinal Rules (FR)Jul 6, 2010related by meaning
to the transaction on or before the first date on which the transaction is required to be disclosed by the person under section 6011.
Special Analyses It has been determined that this Treasury decision is not a significant regulatory action as defined in Executive Order 12866. Therefore, a regulatory assessment is not …
75 FR 43330 — Interim Final Rules for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers Relating to Internal Claims and Appeals and External Review Processes Under the Patient… IRCFinal Rules (FR)Jul 23, 2010
…ing Department of Labor claims procedure regulation. That is, the Department of Labor interprets 29 USC 1133 and the DOL claims procedure regulation as already requiring that plans provide claimants with new or additional evidence or rationales upon request and an opportunity to respond in certain circumstances.
See
Br…
75 FR 37188 — Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: Preexisting Condition Exclusions, Lifetime and Annual Limits, Rescissions, and Patient Protections IRCFinal Rules (FR)Jun 28, 2010
… read as follows:
Authority:
2701 through 2763, 2791, and 2792 of the Public Health Service Act (42 USC 300gg through 300gg-63, 300gg-91, and 300gg-92), as amended.
5. Add § 147.108 to read as follows:
§ 147.108
Prohibition of preexisting condition exclusions.
(a)
No preexisting condition exclusions
—(1)
In general.
A …
77 FR 41678 — Amendment Relating to Reasonable Contract or Arrangement Under Section 408(b)(2)-Fee Disclosure/Web Page ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Jul 16, 2012related by meaning
bject to the Congressional Review Act provisions of
( printed page 41680)
the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.) and has been transmitted to Congress and the Comptroller General for review.
5. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
For purposes of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of…
91 FR 33900 — Federal Independent Dispute Resolution Operations IRCFinal Rules (FR)Jun 4, 2026
…the No Surprises Act.
U.S.C.-Brookings Schaeffer on Health Policy.
https://www.brookings.edu/blog/usc-brookings-schaeffer-on-health-policy/2021/03/16/recommendations-for-implementing-the-no-surprises-act/.
Back to Citation
340.
See,
for example, the proposed 2027 HHS notice of benefit and payment parameters (9…
131 T.C. No. 4 — Ralston Purina Company and Subsidiaries v. Commissioner IRCCourt RulingsSep 10, 2008related by meaning
ven such regulations is well
known. See, e.g., Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Res. Def.
Council, Inc., 467 U.S. 837 (1984); Swallows Holdino, Ltd. v. Commissioner, 515 F.3d 162 (3d Cir. 2008), vacating 126 T.C. 96
(2006).
The delegation Congress made to the Secretary in section
404(k)(5) (A), however, is particularly …