Search the Pension Law Library

21. 138 T.C. No. 7 — Research Corporation v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsFeb 29, 2012related by meaning
    statutory notice of deficiency was issued more than 6 years after petitioner filed its Form 5530. The statute of,limitations is an affirmative defense that must be specifically pleaded; Petitioner did not raise the statute of;limitations as an affirmative defense in its pleadings for the taxable year at issue. Accordin…
22. T.C. Memo. 1996-404 — Leonard A. Gross v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsAug 28, 1996related by meaning
    ented are contained in pleadings and other documents in the record, and are not controverted. We must consider whether respondent was entitled to mail petitioner a second notice of deficiency concerning petitioner's 1991 taxable year. If respondent was not entitled to do so, then the August notice would not be valid as…
23. T.C. Memo. 2012-221 — Robert L. Bernard & Diolinda B. Abilheira v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsAug 1, 2012related by meaning
    yer's return information. None of the assertions, even if true, would affect petitioners' deficiency. Petitioners' attacks on the Court in relation to its Rules of Practice and Procedure and the rulings in this and other cases lack merit and will not be addressed in this opinion. Adverse rulings are not grounds - 8 - […
24. 154 T.C. No. 6 — Sandra M. Conard v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsMar 10, 2020related by meaning
    sis test. FIe] , further, as applied to P, I.R.C. sec. 72(t) is valid because the age and disability classifications established by the statute bear a reasonable relationship to a legitimate Government purpose. Sandra M. Conard, pro se. Scott W. Forbord and Mark J. Miller, for respondent. OPINION TORO, Judge: A taxpaye…
25. 148 T.C. No. 14 — John C. Trimmer & Susan Trimmer v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsApr 20, 2017
    …ce in this case, which was pending on December 18, 2015, and tried after that date. ¹'Fed. R. Evid. 702 provides: A witness who is qualified as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education may testify in the form of an opinion or otherwise if: (a) the expert's scientific, technical, or other specia…
26. T.C. Memo. 2002-130 — Ray C. & Bernadette B. Baas v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsMay 29, 2002related by meaning
    is Court. Section 72(t) provides that: (1) * * * If any taxpayer receives any amount from a qualified retirement plan (as defined in section 4974(c)), the taxpayer's tax * * * shall be increased by an amount equal to 10 percent of the portion of such amount which is includible in gross income. Section 72(t)(2) provides…
27. 115 T.C. No. 19 — Flahertys Arden Bowl, Inc. v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsSep 25, 2000related by meaning
    hould apply throughout ERISA including the tax provisions. Because the Department of Labor failed to issue final regulations on this point until 1992, petitioner contends that respondent is not in a position to argue that separate definitions of a fiduciary apply for the two titles. However, the absence of final regula…
28. 84 FR 28888 — Health Reimbursement Arrangements and Other Account-Based Group Health Plans
    IRCFinal Rules (FR)Jun 20, 2019
    …fication of Enrollment in Individual Health Insurance Coverage (26 CFR 54.9802-4(c)(5), 29 CFR 2590.702-2(c)(5) and 45 CFR 146.123(c)(5)); and (2) HRA Notice to Participants (26 CFR 54.9802-4(c)(6), 29 CFR 2590.702-2(c)(6) and 45 CFR 146.123(c)(6)). A third IC is sponsored solely by DOL (29 CFR 2510.3-1): (3) Notice to…
29. T.C. Memo. 2000-384 — Robert W. & Vivian Toan v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsDec 19, 2000related by meaning
    ec. 402(a), 96 Stat. 324, 648, but had to be determined in the Toans’ individual case. Alternatively, petitioners argue, any assessment under the 1980 notice is time barred under section 6501. Petitioners assert that the addition to tax under section 6659 was an affected item - 7 - for 1982 and that the related notice …
30. T.C. Summary Opinion 2007-129 — Jeffrey Lee Golian v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJul 26, 2007related by meaning
    sioner , T .C . Memo . 2001-34 . We recognize that petitioner received his IRA distribution at a time when he was both a single parent and temporarily unemployed and that he used the distribution for a laudable purpose . Unfortunately for petitioner, we are bound by the lis t of statutory exceptions set forth in sectio…
31. T.C. Memo. 2010-263 — Ernestine Forrest v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsDec 2, 2010related by meaning
    wers v. Commissioner, 24 T.C. 199, 239 (1955), affd. 247 F.2d 233 (2d Cir. 1957), affd. sub nom. Bonney v. Commissioner, 247 F.2d 237 (2d Cir. 1957)); see also sec. 1 165-1(d) (2) (i), Income Tax Regs. This is especially true in a case involving insurance. Section 165(a) prohibits a taxpayer from deducting any amount c…
32. T.C. Summary Opinion 2004-135 — Charlotte Marie Scott v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsSep 30, 2004related by meaning
    etitioner did not “roll over” her distributions pursuant to section 408(d)(3). - 6 - Therefore, in order for petitioner to prevail, she must show that the distributions fall under one of the exceptions under section 72(t)(2). With respect to section 72(t), this Court has repeatedly held that it is bound by the list of …
33. T.C. Memo. 1997-545 — French E. & Janice C. Hickman v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsDec 11, 1997related by meaning
    o be treated as an amount received as a loan on the date of such renegotiation, extension, renewal, or revision. TEFRA, sec. 236(c), 96 Stat. 510-511. In general, a loan fits within the exception in section 72(p)(2) if it (1) is in an amount not exceeding a prescribed ceiling that in no event may be more than $50,000, …
34. T.C. Memo. 2010-149 — Harold X. O'Boyle v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJul 13, 2010related by meaning
    .a distribution of $6,277 from a qualified retirement . plan during~the'2001 tax year and that .she was under the age of 59-l/2 , at "the time of the distribution . . At trial Ms . O'Boyle presented no evidence that she qualified for any of the . exceptions in section 72(t)(2) . Accordingly ; we hold that Ms .-O'Boyle…
35. 160 T.C. No. 3 — 3M Company and Subsidiaries v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsFeb 9, 2023
    …as 6% of net sales. The notice of deficiency calculated that the royalty at the 6% rate was $27,768,702 and that this amount should be reduced by $4,117,370 for 3M Brazil’s unreimbursed expenditures on research and development. Thus, the adjustment to the income of the 3M consolidated group was $23,651,332, equal to $2…
36. T.C. Memo. 1998-203 — Ramon A. & Bertha E. Garcia v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJun 3, 1998related by meaning
    the principal amounts of the loans petitioner received in 1987, 1988, or 1992 as taxable distributions in either of the years at issue. - 8 - OPINION Petitioners do not dispute respondent's treatment of the principal amounts of the 1990 and 1991 loans as deemed distributions in the respective years of receipt. However…
37. 82 T.C. 843; 82 T.C. No. 65 — Green v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsMay 30, 1984related by meaning
    was that it was "clarifying” the "existing” law by rejecting respondent’s position regarding the applicability of sec. 403 to public school employees. Neither party has advanced any argument herein based upon the legislative history of sec. 403(b) and of sec. 2039(c). Nor was this legislative history considered in Esta…
38. T.C. Memo. 2013-245 — Terry L. & Sheila K. Ellis v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsOct 29, 2013related by meaning
    ed CST, an entity owned by his IRA, to enter into a lease agreement with CDJ, an entity owned by both petitioners and their children in tax year 2006. The notice of deficiency also reflected respondent's determination that, for the year in which the prohibited transaction occurred petitioners are liable for the additio…
39. 101 T.C. 189; 101 T.C. No. 12 — Lee Eng'g Supply Co. v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsAug 30, 1993related by meaning
    least 95 percent of the active participants in the terminated plan who remain as employees of the employer after the termination. Sec. 4980(d)(2)(A)↩. 5. See Estate of Young v. Commissioner, 81 T.C. 879↩ (1983) (holding this Court generally lacks jurisdiction over the sec. 6651(a)(2) addition to tax for failure to pay …
40. 88 T.C. 548; 88 T.C. No. 28 — Porter v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsMar 5, 1987related by meaning
    tions and are administered in a manner identical to the manner in which the payments to article III judges in regular active service are administered. Accordingly, petitioners are not here receiving the double tax benefit Congress sought to prevent by section 219(b)(2)(A). Having decided that petitioners are entitled t…