Brief Case

Search the Pension Law Library

Limit to:Advanced options
Searches the code/regs in effect on that date.
Words mode supports "quoted phrases", +required and -excluded terms.
Document types:
Go to 1 T.C. 19 (not yet in the library — opens the official source)
47 documents · 0.22sAllIRCERISAPBGCJoint Board
  1. T.C. Memo. 1998-13 — Francisco A. Murillo v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJan 12, 1998related by meaning
    , 3207-22, - 7 - 3 U.S. Const. amend. V provides "nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb". 4 U.S. Const. amend. VIII provides "Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed". we think it clear that allowance of petitioner's claimed deduction …
  2. 89 T.C. 287; 89 T.C. No. 25 — Larotonda v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsAug 13, 1987related by meaning
    alty was designed to cover the situation involved herein. Because of such doubt, we think it judicious to resolve this issue in favor of the taxpayer. Finally, we must decide whether additions to tax pursuant to section 6653(a)(1) and (a)(2) should be imposed. Section 6653(a)(1) provides for an addition to tax of 5 per…
  3. T.C. Memo. 2017-5 — Brian E. Harriss v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJan 5, 2017related by meaning
    n 6662(a) and (b)(1) and (2), a taxpayer may be liable for a penalty of20% 5 Over petitioner's objection respondent introduced a literal transcript of account for petitioner's 2010 tax year. The literal transcript contains no reference to any SFRs. Even if it did, the literal transcript does not establish that the requ…
  4. T.C. Memo. 2005-192 — Arthur F. Millard v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsAug 8, 2005related by meaning
    Commissioner , 83 T.C. 755, 791 n.28 (1984); Kahler v. Commissioner , 18 T.C. 31, 34-35 (1952); Roberts v. Commissioner , T.C. Memo. 2002-281. In the instant case, the record reflects that the original check was not subject to substantial limitations, and petitioner makes no contention otherwise. Consequently, we find…
  5. T.C. Memo. 1999-59 — Robert J. Geiger v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsMar 1, 1999related by meaning
    me-generating activities relating to the items of income, he has satisfied that obligation through the introduction of predicate evidence. Absent some showing by petitioner as to how the distribution in liquidation should have been divided between himself and his spouse, there is no basis for making any apportionment. …
  6. T.C. Memo. 2015-244 — Jeremiah J. O'Connor & Mary K. O'Connor v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsDec 16, 2015related by meaning
    treatment, but that caveat appears to be inapplicable boilerplate as the amount of the penalty, $28,483, is exactly 20% of the notice's determined tax deficiency of $142,416. B. Applicable Law Section 6662(a) and (b)(1)-(3) provides for an accuracy-related penalty (the penalty) in the amount of20% of the portion of any…
  7. 81 T.C. 1; 81 T.C. No. 1 — Anthes v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJul 5, 1983related by meaning
    so determined that petitioners were liable for an addition to tax under sec. 6651(a) in the amount of $28.76. Respondent conceded that issue on brief. The procedures set forth in sec. 7463 apply to cases involving taxes imposed by subtitle A and Chs. 11 and 12 of the Code, subject to monetary limits. As to petitions fi…