Brief Case

Search the Pension Law Library

Limit to:Advanced options
Searches the code/regs in effect on that date.
Words mode supports "quoted phrases", +required and -excluded terms.
Document types:
Go to I.R.C. § 143 (not yet in the library — opens the official source)
76 documents · 0.19sAllIRCERISAPBGCJoint Board
  1. 90 FR 60432 — Transparency in Coverage
    IRCProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Dec 23, 2025
    …uire 10 minutes of work per inquiry from an Attorney III (totaling 300 minutes for 30 inquiries at $143 per hour), 20 minutes per inquiry from a Senior Application Developer (totaling 600 minutes for 30 inquiries at $143 per hour), and 30 minutes per inquiry from a Project Manager/Team Lead (totaling 900 minutes for 30…
  2. ERISARegulationsJan 1, 2017related by meaning
    [Reserved]
  3. 115 T.C. No. 5 — Wan B. & Cecilia Lo v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJul 31, 2000
    …t of $22,916. At the time of conversion, the Cgroup term policy’s conversion credit balance was $13,143.16, and $12,486 of that amount ($13,143.16 x 95%) was transferred to the C-group conversion UL policy for potential earning. Dr. Desai will earn this amount in 120 equal monthly installments, beginning October 1996. …
  4. 76 FR 13932 — Disclosure of Information to State Officials Regarding Tax-Exempt Organizations
    IRCProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Mar 15, 2011related by meaning
    nt participated in their development. List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 301 Employment taxes Estate taxes Excise taxes Gift taxes Income taxes Penalties Reporting and recordkeeping requirements Proposed Amendments to the Regulations Accordingly, 26 CFR part 301 is proposed to be amended as follows: PART 301—PROCEDURE AND…
  5. 143 T.C. No. 5 — Parimal H. Shankar & Malti S. Trivedi v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsAug 26, 2014
    SA- t4dPd erns) 143 T.C. No. 5 UNITED STATES TAX COURT PARIMAL H. SHANKAR AND MALTI S. TRIVEDI, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 24414-12. Filed August 26, 2014. R disallowed Ps' deduction for contributions to their IRAs, which Ps claim are deductible because the limitations on ded…
  6. T.C. Summary Opinion 2011-16 — Paulette A. & Matthew D. Malena v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsFeb 24, 2011
    …as let go from his job, and he defaulted on the loan, at which time the outstanding balance was $29,143. Petitioner and her husband filed a joint Federal income tax return for 2007. On the return, petitioner did not report the defaulted loan of $29,143 from her husband's 401(k). Petitioner attached to her joint return …
  7. T.D. 9744 — This document contains final regulations concerning Public Health Services Act sections which are incorporated into section 9815 of the Internal Revenue Code b…
    IRCTreasury DecisionsDec 7, 2015
    …ion); 2,300 (Internal Revenue Service). Estimated Total Annual Cost Burden (three year average): $1,143,000 (Employee Benefits Security Administration); $1,143,000 (Internal Revenue Service). B. Department of Health and Human Services
  8. ERISARegulationsJan 1, 2017related by meaning
    [Reserved]
  9. T.C. Memo. 2024-16 — Lonnie Wayne Hubbard v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsFeb 6, 2024
    …revenue agent’s report was attached to the SFR. Cabirac, 120 T.C. at 172. In Rader v. Commissioner, 143 T.C. 376, 382 (2014), aff ’ d in part, appeal dismissed in part , 616 F. App ’ x 391 (10th Cir. 2015) , we s ummarized the requirements of a section 6020(b) SFR : “ To constitute a section 6020(b) SFR, ‘the return mu…
  10. 143 T.C. No. 11 — Dennis E. Bohner v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsSep 23, 2014
    143 T.C. No. 11 UNITED STATES TAX COURT DENNIS E. BOHNER, Petitioner y. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 24166-12. September 23, 2014. While P worked for the Federal Government, he participated in the Civil Service Retirement System (CSRS). After P retired, he received a letter explaining that he…
  11. T.C. Memo. 2003-156 — Michael W. Duncan v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsMay 28, 2003related by meaning
    r the Northern District of Illinois, in which petitioner pleaded guilty to one count of obstructing and impeding the due administration of the Code in violation of section 7212(a). 3 - 6 - 3 (...continued) corruptly or by force or threats of force (including any threatening letter or communication) endeavors to intimid…
  12. T.C. Memo. 2014-143 — Keith Robertson v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJul 21, 2014
    T.C. Memo. 2014-143 UNITED STATES TAX COURT KEITH ROBERTSON, Petitioner y. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 20848-12. Filed July 21, 2014. Keith Robertson, pro se. Bradley C. Plovan, for respondent. MEMORANDUM FINDINGS OF FACT AND OPINION LAUBER, Judge: The Internal Revenue Service (IRS or respon…
  13. 143 T.C. No. 21 — Key Lime Investments, Inc. v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsNov 26, 2014
    143 T.C. No. 21 UNITED STATES TAX COURT RSW ENTERPRISES, INC., Petitioner y. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent KEY LIME INVESTMENTS, INC., Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket Nos. 14820-11R, 14821-11R. Filed November 26, 2014. Ps, domestic corporations, each established a retire…
  14. T.C. Summary Opinion 2002-143 — Robert B. Leppin v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsNov 5, 2002
    T.C. Summary Opinion 2002-143 UNITED STATES TAX COURT ROBERT B. LEPPIN, Petitioner v . COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 941-01S. Filed November 5, 2002. Robert B. Leppin, pro se. Sean R. Gannon , for respondent. DINAN, Special Trial Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of sectio…
  15. 90 FR 39320 — Miscellaneous Corrections, Clarifications, and Improvements
    PBGCFinal Rules (FR)Aug 15, 2025related by meaning
    RT 4065—ANNUAL REPORT 26. The authority citation for part 4065 continues to read as follows: Authority: 29 U.S.C. 1302(b)(3), 1365. § 4065.3 [Amended] 27. Amend § 4065.3 by removing “(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1212-0026)”. PART 4203—EXTENSION OF SPECIAL WITHDRAWAL LIABILITY RU…
  16. T.C. Memo. 2020-38 — Ronald M. Goldberg v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsApr 2, 2020
    …r that RA Knighton performed duplicative work or that RA Knighton's supervisor was not available. - 143 - [*143] Further, Goldberg has not shown that even if RA Knighton's supervisor were unavailable, such unavailability would be relevant to his claim for interest abatement. 3. Analysis and holding We uphold the IRS's …
  17. 79 FR 10296 — Ninety-Day Waiting Period Limitation and Technical Amendments to Certain Health Coverage Requirements Under the Affordable Care Act
    IRCFinal Rules (FR)Feb 24, 2014
    …satisfies this paragraph (g)(1) (and thus does not violate this section). * * * * * 33. Section 146.143 is amended by revising paragraph (c)(2) to read as follows: § 146.143 Preemption; State flexibility; construction. * * * * * (c) * * * (2) Exceptions. Only in relation to health insurance coverage offered by a health…
  18. 78 FR 17313 — Ninety-Day Waiting Period Limitation and Technical Amendments to Certain Health Coverage Requirements Under the Affordable Care Act
    IRCProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Mar 21, 2013
    …satisfies this paragraph (g)(1) (and thus does not violate this section). * * * * * 35. Section 146.143 is amended by revising paragraph (c)(2) to read as follows: § 146.143 Preemption; State flexibility; construction. * * * * * (c) * * * (2) Exceptions. Only in relation to health insurance coverage offered by a health…
  19. 84 FR 213 — Department of Labor Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act Annual Adjustments for 2019
    ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Jan 23, 2019
    ry 23, 2019. § 726.302(c)(2)(i) table $139 $143. § 726.302(c)(2)(i) table 278 285. § 726.302(c)(2)(i) table 417 428. § 726.302(c)(2)(i) table 555 569. § 726.302(c)(4) January 2, 2018 January 23, 2019. § 726.302(c)(4) $139 $143. § 726.302(c)(5) January 2, 2018 January 23, 2019. § 726.302(c)(5) $417 $428. § 726.302(c)(6)…
  20. Joint BoardRegulationsOct 11, 2017related by meaning
    (c)(3)(i) (i) Any monetary penalty imposed on a practitioner under this paragraph (c) may be in addition to or in lieu of any suspension, disbarment or censure and may be in addition to a penalty imposed on an employer, firm or other entity under paragraph (c)(1)(ii) of this section. (c)(3)(ii) (ii) Any monetary penalt…