Brief Case

Search the Pension Law Library

Limit to:Advanced options
Searches the code/regs in effect on that date.
Words mode supports "quoted phrases", +required and -excluded terms.
Document types:
Go to I.R.C. § 164 (not yet in the library — opens the official source)
88 documents · 0.18sAllIRCERISAPBGCJoint Board
  1. 29 C.F.R. § 2570.4 — Parties.
    ERISARegulationsJan 1, 2017related by meaning
    For prohibited transaction penalty proceedings, this section shall apply in lieu of § 18.10 of this title.
  2. 86 FR 36872 — Requirements Related to Surprise Billing; Part I
    IRCFinal Rules (FR)Jul 13, 2021
    …okings Schaeffer Initiative for Health Policy, September 26, 2019. https://www.brookings.edu/​blog/​usc-brookings-schaeffer-on-health-policy/​2019/​09/​26/​california-saw-reduction-in-out-of-network-care-from-affected-specialties-after-2017-surprise-billing-law/​. Back to Citation 161.  Kliff S. Surprise medical bills,…
  3. T.C. Memo. 2011-105 — Mark E. Warmoth v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsMay 19, 2011related by meaning
    ion 6662(a) and (b) (2). Generally, section 6662(a) and (b) (1) authorizes the Commissioner to impose a 20-percent penalty on the portion of an - 72 - underpayment of income tax attributable to negligence or disregard of rules or regulations. The term "negligence" includes any failure to make.a reasonable attempt to co…
  4. T.C. Memo. 1998-164 — Roland R. & Virginia A. Fox v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsMay 5, 1998
    …lidated for trial, briefing, and opinion by order of this Court dated May 27, 1997. T.C. Memo. 1998-164 UNITED STATES TAX COURT PRINDLE INTERNATIONAL MARKETING, UBO, KEYUS GROUP, TRUSTEE, Petitioner v . COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent ROLAND R. AND VIRGINIA A. FOX, Petitioners v . COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL …
  5. T.C. Memo. 2026-68 — Malibu Valley Land, LLC, Spectrum Development, Inc., Tax Matters Partner v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsAug 17, 2026
    164 T.C. at 151. When applied to vacant land, the approach can be highly sensitive to assumptions, and unsupported projections have undermined income an alyses in many conservation easement cases. See, e.g., Savannah Shoals, T.C. Memo. 2024-35, at *36 (“Income valuation methods are not favored when valuing vacant land…
  6. 167 T.C. No. 4 — Piton Holdings, LLC, David L. Hall, Partnership Representative, Petitioner(s) v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJul 15, 2026
    …he net present value of a hypothetical limestone business conducted on the land. See Ranch Springs, 164 T.C. at 151– 53; Beaverdam Creek , T.C . Memo, 2025- 53, at *36. Even if we were to conclude that the highest and best use of the Property w as as a limestone mine, Mr. Catlett’s before value of $34,540,000 would fai…
  7. T.C. Summary Opinion 2013-96 — Samuel & Lilian Brach v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsDec 2, 2013related by meaning
    or disbarment of any practitioner". 31 C.F.R. sec. 10.4(a)(2007). - 6 - or the Form 1099-R issued by Guardian.5 After preparing the return, Mr. Neuman reviewed it with petitioners, who then timely filed it. In March 2012 respondent issued to petitioners a notice of deficiency for 2010, determining a deficiency of $6,94…
  8. 85 FR 66219 — Effect of Section 67(g) on Trusts and Estates
    IRCFinal Rules (FR)Oct 19, 2020
    …id $25,000 of state income tax, for which the trust is limited to a $10,000 deduction under section 164(b)(6)(B) for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017, and before January 1, 2026. In the commenter's example, the entire amount of the allowable $10,000 deduction was passed through to the beneficiary as an e…
  9. Treas. Reg. § 1.72-5(b)(7) — Expected return.
    IRCRegulationsJul 26, 2016
    …th is 12.6, and the total number of unit payments anticipatable (on an annual basis) is, therefore, 164.4 (2 × 12.6 plus 139.2). Dividing the difference previously found ($328.80) by the total number of unit payments thus determined (164.4) indicates that A will have an additional allocation of the investment in the co…
  10. Treas. Reg. § 1.408-2(e)(5)(ii)(D) — Individual retirement accounts.
    IRCRegulationsMay 18, 2016
    …1.408-2(e)(5)(ii)(B) is determined as follows for Trustee X: (1) four percent of $4,100,000 equals $164,000; (2) two percent of $1,400,000 equals $28,000; and (3) $164,000 minus $28,000 equals $136,000. Thus, because $136,000 exceeds $100,000, the minimum net worth necessary for Trustee X to accept new accounts for 199…
  11. T.C. Memo. 2017-67 — Sean M. Murray v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsApr 20, 2017related by meaning
    ish the tax shown on the taxpayer's return for the preceding year or demonstrate that the taxpayer filed no such return. See Wheeler, 127 T.C. at 212; Schlussel v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2013-185. Respondent met his burden of production by including with his summary judgment motion a redacted Form 4340 showing that p…
  12. Treas. Reg. § 54.9802-3T(c)(4) — Additional requirements prohibiting discrimination based on genetic information (temporary).
    IRCRegulationsDec 30, 2016
    …ermination regarding payment. For this purpose, “payment” has the meaning given such term in 45 CFR 164.501 of the privacy regulations issued under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act. Thus, if a plan conditions payment for an item or service based on its medical appropriateness and the medical appr…
  13. 91 FR 46602 — Electronic Disclosure by Group Health Plans Under ERISA
    ERISAProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Jul 23, 2026
    … 31884, 31895. Back to Citation 45.   See 29 CFR 2520.104b-31(k). Back to Citation 46.  45 CFR part 164. Back to Citation 47.  By contrast, if pension benefit information is transmitted via a company email, there is less concern because the employer would already be aware of the employee's deferral amount or their 401(…
  14. T.C. Memo. 2008-288 — Carl Robert Wagenknecht, Jr. v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsDec 22, 2008related by meaning
    foregoing quoted terms are specially defined and used under the "Public Salary Tax Act of 1939" ; 3 . petitioner was not a "person," nor "individual," nor "U .S . person," nor "U .S . individual," nor "taxpayer," nor "non-resident alien," nor any other "legal entity" "made liable for" or "subject to" any "internal reve…
  15. 133 T.C. No. 9 — Taproot Administrative Services, Inc. v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsSep 29, 2009
    …ocess ." Central Bank of Denver, N .A . v . First Interstate 'Bank of Denver, N .A . , .511 U .S . .164, 187 (1994) . And the narrow . focus of Congress's attention should make us even more cautious--"when, as here, Congress has not comprehensively revised a statutory scheme . .but has made .only"isolated amendments, w…
  16. 82 T.C. 843; 82 T.C. No. 65 — Green v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsMay 30, 1984related by meaning
    ents of section 2039(c)(3). Due to concessions and in order to reflect petitioner’s claim for an overpayment, Decision will be entered under Rule 155. Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 as amended and in effect at the date of death, and all references to Rules ar…
  17. T.C. Memo. 2015-164 — Edward N. Tobias & Suzanne M. Koegler v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsAug 18, 2015
    T.C. Memo. 2015-164 UNITED STATES TAX COURT EDWARD N. TOBIAS AND SUZANNE M. KOEGLER, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 21510-13. Filed August 18, 2015. Edward N. Tobias and Suzanne M. Koegler, pro sese. Kristina L. Rico, for respondent. MEMORANDUM FINDINGS OF FACT AND OPINION LAUBER…
  18. T.C. Memo. 2011-104 — Patricia Louise Hyde v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsMay 19, 2011
    …ns attributable to that trade or business. Sec. 1402(a); sec. 1.1402(a)-1, Income Tax Regs. Section 164(f) allows a táxpayer to deduct one-half of the selfemployment tax imposed by section 1401. Petitioner received $92,500 in nonemployee compensation in her capacity as a consultant for Key Apparel and Star. Respondent …
  19. T.C. Summary Opinion 2015-37 — Charles D. Trainito v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJun 23, 2015related by meaning
    d $3,186 of debt that petitioner owed. Petitioner did not report - 5 - receiving any income from the cancellation of debt. Petitioner does not dispute that the debt was discharged but rather argues that the section 108(a)(1)(B) exclusion applies. Discussion I. Burden of Proof In general, the Commiissioner's determinati…
  20. T.C. Summary Opinion 2009-77 — Gary W. & Regina G. Steele v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsMay 14, 2009
    …r .a qualifiedrresidence interest paid deduction in 2002 for the . . alleged"payment . - 18Section= 164 (a) (1) .generally allows . a deduction for the payment of real property taxes for .the taxable year within which paid . It is well established that, in ;general, taxes paid on real property may be deducted .as such …