Brief Case

Search the Pension Law Library

Limit to:Advanced options
Searches the code/regs in effect on that date.
Words mode supports "quoted phrases", +required and -excluded terms.
Document types:
Go to I.R.C. § 752 (not yet in the library — opens the official source)
79 documents · 0.18sAllIRCERISAPBGCJoint Board
  1. 167 T.C. No. 4 — Piton Holdings, LLC, David L. Hall, Partnership Representative, Petitioner(s) v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJul 15, 2026related by meaning
    e rules regarding other penalties listed in section 6662(b). See § 6662(c), (e)(1), (f)(1), (g)(1), (j)(1), (k) (each beginning with the phrase “[f]or purposes of this section” and explaining the meaning of terms such as “negligence,” “substantial valuation misstatement,” and so on). 11 Section 6664(c) is titled “ Reas…
  2. 127 T.C. No. 1 — Charlotte & Charles T. Gee v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJul 24, 2006related by meaning
    petitioners' Federal income tax for 2002 and determined that petitioners are liable for the accuracy-related penalty under section 6662(a)' for 2002 . There are two issues for decision . The first issue is whether a $977,888 distribution petitioner Charlotte Gee (petitioner) received in 2002 from an individual retireme…
  3. U.S. Tax Court — Charles & Kathy A. Welker v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsDec 15, 2009related by meaning
    series of substantially equal periodic payments . Petitioners allege that Ms . Welker "is a cancer survivor and left her job as a result of the cancer treatment ." Petitioners did not appear at trial, and the case was submitted on the basis of the parties' stipulation of facts . Discussion In general, the Commissioner'…
  4. Rev. Proc. 2025-3 — The revenue procedure updates Rev. Proc. 2024-3, 2024-1 I.R.B.143, to provide a revised list of areas under the jurisdiction of the Associate Chief Counsel (Co…
    IRCRevenue ProceduresDec 30, 2024related by meaning
    ble and Similar Gifts.—Whether a transfer to a pooled income fund described in § 642(c)(5) qualifies for a charitable deduction under § 2522(c)(2)(A). (56) Section 2522.—Charitable and Similar Gifts.—Whether a transfer to a charitable remainder trust described in § 664 that provides for annuity or unitrust payments for…
  5. 75 FR 41726 — Interim Final Rules for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers Relating to Coverage of Preventive Services Under the Patient Protection and Affordable…
    IRCFinal Rules (FR)Jul 19, 2010
    …ursuant to the authority contained in sections 2701 through 2763, 2791, and 2792 of the PHS Act (42 USC 300gg through 300gg-63, 300gg-91, and 300gg-92), as amended.
  6. T.C. Memo. 2015-47 — Balvin Anthony McKnight v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsMar 16, 2015related by meaning
    report the initial retirement distribution of $4,984 from State Street; that his aggregate retirement distribution of $211,499 was includible in gross income; that he was liable under section 72(t) for additional tax equal to 10% of the retirement distribution includible in gross income; and that he was liable for an a…
  7. T.C. Summary Opinion 2011-16 — Paulette A. & Matthew D. Malena v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsFeb 24, 2011related by meaning
    se determinations are erroneous. Rule 142(a); Welch v. Helvering, 290 U.S. 111, 115 (1933). Pursuant to section 7491(a) (1), the burden of proof as to factual matters may shift from the taxpayer to the Commissioner under certain circumstances. Petitioner did not allege that section 7491 applies, nor did she introduce t…
  8. T.C. Memo. 2011-58 — Erin N. Hellweg v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsMar 9, 2011related by meaning
    ds of thousands of dollars in DISC commissions each year from a well-established business, and a 25-percent share in a company receiving such a steady stream of income should have been worth a large amount. -28IV. Section 6662(a) Penalty Section 6662(a) and (b) (1) and (2) imposes an accuracyrelated penalty of 20 perce…
  9. 77 T.C. 1197; 2 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2188 — Shut Out Dee-Fence, Inc. v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsDec 2, 1981
    …receipt of a "notice of determination.” On the same date, petitioner filed petitions in docket Nos. 752-81 and 751-81 contesting the deficiency determinations for the taxable years ending May 31, 1974, and May 31, 1975, respectively. All three petitions were filed as a result of receipt of one statutory notice of defic…
  10. T.C. Memo. 2017-3 — Candace Elaine v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJan 3, 2017related by meaning
    e Commissioner's determinations are erroneous, see Rule 142(a); Welch v. Helvering, 290 U.S. 111, 115 (1933). This burden of production remains on the taxpayer even with respect to the additional tax under section 72(t) because the section 72(t) additional tax is a "tax" and not a "penalty, addition to tax, or addition…
  11. 29 C.F.R. § 4000.21 — What are these rules for determining the filing or issuance date about?
    PBGCRegulationsJan 1, 2017
    …r than in the PBGC's own regulations (e.g., requirements under the Internal Revenue Code (Title 26, USC)). In meeting those requirements, you should follow any applicable rules under those requirements for determining the filing and issuance date. (Subpart A tells you what filing methods you may use for filings with us…
  12. 162 T.C. No. 4 — Clair R. Couturier, Jr. v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsFeb 28, 2024related by meaning
    004 made an excess contribution of $25,132,892 to his individual retirement account (IRA). Section 4973(a) 1 imposes an excise tax “in an amount equal to 6 percent of the amount of the excess contributions” that a taxpayer makes to an IRA in any given year. This tax continues to apply for future years, until such time …
  13. 29 C.F.R. § 4000.26(b) — What if I use a commercial delivery service?
    PBGCRegulationsJan 1, 2017
    …t use a “designated delivery service” under section 7502(f) of the Internal Revenue Code (Title 26, USC). Our Web site, http://www.pbgc.gov, lists those designated delivery services. You should make sure that both the provider and the particular type of delivery (such as two-day delivery) are designated.
  14. 29 C.F.R. § 4000.41 — What are these computation-of-time rules about?
    PBGCRegulationsJan 22, 2018
    …r than in the PBGC's own regulations (e.g., requirements under the Internal Revenue Code (Title 26, USC)). In meeting those requirements, you should follow any applicable computation-of-time rules under those other requirements. (Subpart A tells you what filing methods you may use for filings with us. Subpart B tells y…
  15. T.C. Memo. 2017-132 — Jack Howard Taylor v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJul 5, 2017related by meaning
    5, and bore a postmark indicating that it was mailed by FedEx Standard Overnight service on July 6, 2015. Since the petition was mailed timely using a - 6 - [*6] designated private delivery service, see Notice 2015-38, 2015-21 I.R.B. 984, it is treated as filed timely, see sec. 7502(a), (f). Discussion I. Overview Gene…
  16. 95 T.C. 364; 95 T.C. No. 26 — Wood v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsSep 27, 1990related by meaning
    . United States, 872 F.2d 564, 568-570 (3d Cir. 1989). Respondent assumes but does not concede that section 4975(a) imposes a penalty tax. He asserts: the issue in this case would still be whether there is “any expressed or necessarily implied provision or language . . .” (Commissioner v. Acker, 361 U.S. 87, 91 (1959))…
  17. 91 FR 9213 — Requirement To Provide Paper Statements in Certain Cases-Amendments to Electronic Disclosure Safe Harbors
    ERISAProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Feb 25, 2026
    … a result, DB Beneficiaries will not be included in calculations discussing “beneficiaries”. See 29 USC 1025 for more information. 3  Bureau of Labor Statistics, Job Opening and Labor Turnover. Table A, Total Private. February 2025. Most recent release can be found here: https://www.bls.gov/​news.release/​pdf/​jolts.pd…
  18. T.C. Memo. 2014-21 — Alvan L. Bobrow & Elisa S. Bobrow v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJan 28, 2014related by meaning
    her authority that would distinguish the Martin cases from the issue presented before the Court. Accordingly, petitioners have not met their burden of proving that the weight of the authorities supporting the treatment of the IRA - 25 - [*25] distributions is substantial in relation to the weight of the authorities sup…
  19. T.C. Memo. 2017-201 — Joseph E. Bormet v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsOct 16, 2017related by meaning
    ord contained no loan documents or other evidence showing that the distribution was evidenced by a legally enforceable agreement). III. Additional Tax Section 72(t)(1) imposes a 10% additional tax on early distributions from qualified retirement plans. Section 72(t)(2), however, sets forth specific exceptions to the ge…
  20. PLR 200109010 — Sale/Exchange
    IRCPrivate Letter RulingsMar 2, 2001related by meaning
    n believes a court would find section 4975 to be punitive in nature and, therefore, considered a penalty under the Bankruptcy Code. See , e.g. , In re MMR Holding Corp. , 1998 Bankr. LEXIS 1132 (Bankr. M.D. La. 1998) (for purposes of I.R.C. § 6601, section 4975(a) is a penalty because its aim is to punish wrongful cond…